Reflec Share Discussion Threads

[upthepool] 12/12/2010 21:06

think you might just have missed the irony in my last post phil

[philmac56] 11/12/2010 11:43

up the pool
you always on a downer???
or have you a brighter side to life????

[philmac56] 11/12/2010 09:37

4 screws
i could not access on 11th dec, ok today 12th

Poss they been changing web site/page???

[4screws] 10/12/2010 18:34

why cant I access any of the jpjenkins websites?????????????

[philmac56] 05/12/2010 10:38

no news coming out here at all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[philmac56] 02/12/2010 09:53

normteaux

LOOK AT THE DATE, IT'S 10 YRS OLD!!!!

You been alseep!!!!

[normteaux] 01/12/2010 12:14

I've heard nothing on this she-ra

[4screws] 22/11/2010 17:07

picturehappy what are you on about...

[picturehappy] 22/11/2010 14:56

P.P.

3700, 3701, 3300.6, (All broken).

R.B.

[clocktower] 19/11/2010 15:46

The likelyhood of directors commenting here must be zero I guess philmac56. They seem to have trouble even talking to potential customers and stakeholders, it would appear.

[4screws] 18/11/2010 21:46

philmac56 - 18 Nov'10 - 09:47 - 561 of 569

I also had an email reply. Not too happy with comments on board!!!


What do you mean by the board, are you talking here or on reflec.co.uk

Any way just watched apprentice on i player, pity the reflec name could not have been seen, but the exposure to the product should encourage sales in the future.

[upthepool] 18/11/2010 13:44

no balls......you growing some........wow :-)

[upthepool] 18/11/2010 12:13

Why would you want to? You not got enough going on in your life?

[gogoneko] 18/11/2010 11:06

UpThePoodle,

I've been following REF's activities closely for almost a decade, how about you? I've been a shareholder too (briefly!) and I believe that EVERYONE has a right to express an opinion on REF or any other stock as it's not some unique privilege exclusive those who own shares. Do you disagree? I very much expect that you do. However historically I've anticipated this slovenly lots' actions well enough to know what they're planning and provided an honest opinion (as a non-shareholder) long before an official RNS arrives to confirm what I believed and what shareholders had denied.

[gogoneko] 18/11/2010 11:06

[duplicate]

[philmac56] 18/11/2010 09:47

4Screws
I also had an email reply. Not too happy with comments on board!!!

[upthepool] 18/11/2010 08:23

hey no balls;

and if they are not shareholders why do they bother wasting their time commenting on something they have no financial interest in....

.....and by the very nature of not being shareholders they have limited information about? - but that doesn't them sprouting on as if they know everything.....

.....and that my dear no balls, makes you and your ilk very sad indeed.....

[philmiboots] 17/11/2010 23:57

For those who missed it.......