Randgold Ads Discussion Threads

[pvb] 18/4/2024 13:59

John Nada 18 Apr '24 - 12:52 - 283283 of 283290



Article Published by: Richard Moody Jr , Permission to reproduce the article in the same form has been taken from the Publisher on 22 April 2016.

Einstein plagiarised the work of several notable scientists in his 1905 papers on special relativity and E=mc2, yet the physics community has never bothered to set the record straight.

....

When the scandal breaks, the physics community, Einstein’s supporters and the media will attempt to downplay the negative news and put a positive spin on it. However, their efforts will be shown up when Einstein’s paper, “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, is seen for what it is: the consummate act of plagiarism in the 20th century........

-----------

It goes on...

Yeah...

They usually do. ;-)

[pvb] 18/4/2024 13:53

John Nada 18 Apr '24 - 13:22 - 283287 of 283289

I'm not playing your jewish games Barnestein.

Oh, go on! Goy hopscotch is so boring!

[pvb] 18/4/2024 13:49

John Nada 17 Apr '24 - 23:01 - 283248 of 283287

'The Jesuits want to see Europe and Rome destroyed.'

Winning huh.

I mean it would be laughable if it wasn't so tragically moronic.

That's what I think, Nada. Every time I see one of your posts. ;-)

[john nada] 18/4/2024 13:22

I'm not playing your jewish games Barnestein.

[peterbarnes35] 18/4/2024 13:10

The advancement of Knowlegde comes back to one individual building on the thoughts of a predicessor. Einstein it could be said bulit and advanced, the ideas of Issac Newton. And there are people who are building on Eienstein, in Quantum mechanics, something that Ritchard Feynman advanced. They did,nt pinch ideas they merely advanced them. It how we extend our understanding of the world, and hopefully will continue to do. There are differing views in science, and people who had diffenent views than Einstein, and are yet to be proven. But this in no way means Einstein stole any particular view, it simply means as yet they are not proven?.

PS Such as: spooky action at a distance. Nada whats your belief on this?.Einstein had doubts about it. What is your view?.

[alligator2023] 18/4/2024 12:55

i agree but you dont need to venture to far now if you are in the UK

peterbarnes35
18 Apr '24 - 12:02 - 283275

[alligator2023] 18/4/2024 12:54

There are many great Jews, this guy does some of the best shows on the web at present, the weekly with Robert Barnes is a must watch....

[john nada] 18/4/2024 12:52

Article Published by: Richard Moody Jr , Permission to reproduce the article in the same form has been taken from the Publisher on 22 April 2016.

Einstein plagiarised the work of several notable scientists in his 1905 papers on special relativity and E=mc2, yet the physics community has never bothered to set the record straight.

Abstract
Proponents of Einstein have acted in a way that appears to corrupt the historical record. Albert Einstein (1879-1955), Time magazine’s “Person of the Century”, wrote a long treatise on special relativity theory (it was actually called “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, 1905a), without listing any references. Many of the key ideas it presented were known to Lorentz (for example, the Lorentz transformation) and Poincaré before Einstein wrote the famous 1905 paper.

As was typical of Einstein, he did not discover theories; he merely commandeered them. He took an existing body of knowledge, picked and chose the ideas he liked, then wove them into a tale about his contribution to special relativity. This was done with the full knowledge and consent of many of his peers, such as the editors at Annalen der Physik.

The most recognisable equation of all time is E=mc2. It is attributed by convention to be the sole province of Albert Einstein (1905). However, the conversion of matter into energy and energy into matter was known to Sir Isaac Newton (“Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another…”, 1704). The equation can be attributed to S. Tolver Preston (1875), to Jules Henri Poincaré (1900; according to Brown, 1967) and to Olinto De Pretto (1904) before Einstein. Since Einstein never correctly derived E=mc2 (Ives, 1952), there appears nothing to connect the equation with anything original by Einstein.

albert-einstein1Arthur Eddington’s selective presentation of data from the 1919 eclipse so that it supposedly supported “Einstein’s” general relativity theory is surely one of the biggest scientific hoaxes of the 20th century. His lavish support of Einstein corrupted the course of history. Eddington was less interested in testing a theory than he was in crowning Einstein the king of science.

The physics community, unwittingly perhaps, has engaged in a kind of fraud and silent conspiracy; this is the byproduct of simply being bystanders as the hyperinflation of Einstein’s record and reputation took place. This silence benefited anyone supporting Einstein.

Introduction
Science, by its very nature, is insular. In general, chemists read and write about chemistry, biologists read and write about biology, and physicists read and write about physics. But they may all be competing for the same research dollar (in its broadest sense). Thus, if scientists wanted more money for themselves, they might decide to compete unfairly. The way they can do this is convince the funding agencies that they are more important than any other branch of science. If the funding agencies agree, it could spell difficulty for the remaining sciences. One way to get more money is to create a superhero-a superhero like Einstein.

Einstein’s standing is the product of the physics community, his followers and the media. Each group benefits enormously by elevating Einstein to icon status. The physics community receives billions in research grants, Einstein’s supporters are handsomely rewarded, and media corporations like Timemagazine get to sell millions of magazines by placing Einstein on the cover as “Person of the Century”.

When the scandal breaks, the physics community, Einstein’s supporters and the media will attempt to downplay the negative news and put a positive spin on it. However, their efforts will be shown up when Einstein’s paper, “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, is seen for what it is: the consummate act of plagiarism in the 20th century........

-----------

It goes on...

[john nada] 18/4/2024 12:48

Einstein is a manufactured media invention. An incestial deviant who plagiarised and frankly stole other people's work.

[peterbarnes35] 18/4/2024 12:47

My favourit Jew.



I also believe in the scientific method as proposed by Feynman.

[alligator2023] 18/4/2024 12:03

283271 if true, he would be a Maruna ie "blending in" with the Kafirs

[alligator2023] 18/4/2024 12:01

pete agreed, and it is happening against across the west. this explains it well.

[pineapple1] 18/4/2024 11:59

Thankyou Mr Elbee.

Pete ....I can certainly empathize with other groups . Its you thats unable to do so as is so clear from your postings.
Everything is so certain and irrefutable in your world. Its ironic considering many of the economic theories you have surrounded yourself with which have one by one been discredited There is never any overlap or grey areas for you.
I'm uncertain about most things today as thats what they are designed to do for those who do not take their views from central govt and MSM .
You on the other hand are convinced you have it right on just about everything never entertaining the possibility you may be mistaken. Talk about arrogance.
imho

[peterbarnes35] 18/4/2024 11:57

I was born in 1940, and have an empiracal knowledge of what fascism is, and how it takes hold of a society. And sets out to destroy any democratic resistance to it,s doctrines. And i see this happening today, in the UK. So moron or not i will oppose it, knowing the death and destruction it always causes, and always has done.

[john nada] 18/4/2024 11:53

Pineapple what did Barnestein say? I can't see his comment because he has me on permo filter.

[mr.elbee] 18/4/2024 11:48

very good comment pineapple