We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polyfuel Regs | LSE:PYF | London | Ordinary Share | COM SHS USD0.001 (REG S) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 3.50 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
RNS Number:1969T PolyFuel Inc. 28 April 2008 28 April 2008 POLYFUEL, INC. YEAR END RESULTS 12 MONTHS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007 PolyFuel, Inc. (AIM: PYF) ("PolyFuel" or the "Company"), a world leader in the development of engineered membranes for portable fuel cell applications, today announces its preliminary results for the year ended 31 December 2007. Highlights Financial * Secured reinstatement of $1.98 Million in funding under the DOE sponsored R&D programme; * Secured $2 Million ATP award from NIST for the development of a new, ultra-low crossover membrane; * Generated revenues of $1.4 Million, the majority of which are from the above mentioned DOE programme, up from $0.2 Million in 2006; * Net loss for the year was $8.5 Million, down from $9.7 Million in 2006; * Reduced overall expenditure levels to significantly lower the Company's cash burn rate; 2008 cash burn rate has averaged approximately $600,000 per month through March and the Company expects its average cash burn rate to be in the $600,000 - $650,000 range going forward; and * Finished 2007 with $13.7 Million in cash and short term investments. Customer * PolyFuel continued to build its direct membrane customer base, increasing the number of direct customers from 18 at the end of 2006 to 24 at the end of 2007; * Shipments of membranes to customers and channel partners increased almost threefold over 2006 on a square meter basis; and * PolyFuel has continued to increase its market share of known prototype portable fuel cell design wins to 44% in 2007 (vs. approximately 30% in 2006). Operational * Successfully completed rigorous vendor qualification audit with Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells ("JMFC"); * Extended the capability of PolyFuel's continuous roll-to-roll hot bondable manufacturing process to include the new, thinner 20-micron membrane material; * A second of the Company's core membrane technology patents was issued in the US in 2007, and 4 new patent applications were filed; * Announced the achievement of the highest power density of any Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) stack; and * Completed the first 3 milestones of PolyFuel's 5 milestone programme to develop a reference design for a fuel cell power supply that can surpass the energy density of lithium-ion battery technology. Developments since 31 December 2007 * Achieved the 4th milestone in the Company's 5-step programme to develop a reference design for a fuel cell power supply that can surpass the energy density of lithium-ion battery technology. * In partnership with the University of North Florida, secured $2 million in funding from the US Army's Communications and Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Command (CERDEC) for the ruggedisation of a prototype fuel cell power supply for a notebook PC. Jim Balcom, Chief Executive Officer, commented: "PolyFuel made significant advances in Direct Methanol Fuel Cell development during 2007, building our direct membrane customer base and increasing our market share of prototype portable fuel cell design wins. "Our focus on engineering support services has enabled us to achieve several critical milestones toward fundamentally solving the water management problem that has been an issue for portable fuel cell developers for nearly a decade. We are now focused on completing the final challenging stage in our five-step development programme to create a reference design for the world's first fuel cell power module for notebook PCs that is designed to outperform Lithium-ion battery packs. "With market demand continuing to grow for longer runtime portable power sources, we believe PolyFuel is positioned to be the leader in providing the industry with the products, tools and designs to commercialise portable fuel cell technology." For further information please contact: PolyFuel, Inc Tel: +1 650 429 4646 Jim Balcom, Chief Executive Officer Hogarth Partnership Tel: +44 (0) 20 7357 9477 Nick Denton mobile: 07770 272 083 Sarah MacLeod mobile: 07747 602 739 Ian Payne mobile: 07956 258 239 Collins Stewart Tel: +44 (0) 20 7523 8350 Mark Connelly About PolyFuel PolyFuel (www.polyfuel.com) is a world leader in engineered membranes that provide significantly improved performance in direct methanol fuel cells ("DMFCs") and hydrogen fuel cells, particularly for portable electronic and automotive applications. The state of the art of fuel cells is essentially that of the membrane, and PolyFuel's best in class, hydrocarbon-based membranes, enable a new generation of fuel cells that for the first time can deliver on the long-awaited promise of clean, long-running, and cost-effective portable power. PolyFuel was spun out of SRI International (formerly the Stanford Research Institute) in 1999, after 14 years of applied membrane research. The company is based in Mountain View, California, and is publicly listed on the AIM stock exchange in London. Chairman and Chief Executive's Review 2007 was a challenging year for the portable fuel cell industry as, contrary to our prior expectations and several fuel cell developers' public statements, no test market activities were conducted by portable fuel cell system developers. During the year, the world's leading fuel cell developers continued in their efforts to reach the commercial benchmark of Lithium-ion ("Li-ion") battery energy density. Their progress so far has been held back by technology challenges, principally an inability to engineer the technology into a consumer-acceptable form which outperforms incumbent battery technology in terms of size, weight and runtime. In the meantime, advances in portable device technology combined with improved wireless network capability continue to drive up the power consumption and usage pattern of consumer portable devices. Consumers continue to demand longer runtimes, driving the so called "runtime gap" even wider. Furthermore, battery safety recalls and newly introduced travel safety limitations are placing additional pressure on conventional battery technology and further restricting the ability of rechargeable battery technology to address the growing market demand for longer, "unplugged" run times. During the year, we continued to advance our strategy of "Building Bridges to Commercialisation", described in last year's annual report. To accomplish this, we are supporting our customers in three principal ways: *Directly through the provision of our expanding line of hydrocarbon membrane products to portable fuel cell system developers; *Indirectly through channel partners, such as Johnson Matthey Fuels Cells Limited (JMFC), that provide value-added fuel cell system components to their customers; and *Through the provision of engineering support services to enable customers to optimise the design and performance of portable fuel cell systems and components. The benefits of this "three bridges" approach include flexibility in meeting the changing needs of our customer base, as well as diversification in terms of potential revenue streams. All three paths are designed to lead to the end goal of positioning PolyFuel as a leading supplier of hydrocarbon membrane materials in volume to the fuel cell industry. We made good progress on the first two bridges during the course of 2007. We continued to build our direct membrane customer base, increasing the number of direct customers from 18 at the end of 2006 to 24 at the end of 2007. We also advanced our relationship with our first channel partner, Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells (JMFC), last year, with the successful completion of a rigorous vendor qualification audit. During 2007 JMFC delivered numerous value-added fuel cell components, incorporating PolyFuel's membranes, to its various fuel cell customers for evaluation testing. Shipments of membranes to customers and channel partners increased almost threefold over 2006 and we have continued to increase PolyFuel's market share of known prototype portable fuel cell design wins to 44% in 2007 (vs. approximately 30% in 2006). Notwithstanding the progress described above, no test market activities were conducted by portable fuel cell system developers in 2007. From our perspective, the primary impediment appears to be that many of the fuel cell system prototypes are still too large to be integrated with the portable electronic devices themselves. This is where our engineering support services have a role, the "third bridge" of our three bridge strategy. Our integrated team of membrane scientists and system engineers are focused specifically on solving this issue. As a result of PolyFuel's progress with building our channel partner relationships (the "second bridge"), we were able to divert resources away from pure research and development of catalyst coated membrane products and focus more on providing engineering support services to optimise the design and performance of portable fuel cell systems and components for customers. One of the key activities undertaken during the year as part of this engineering support services approach was a significant programme to develop a reference design for a fuel cell power module for a notebook PC that could outperform Lithium-ion battery packs. During 2007, we completed the first 3 stages of the 5-milestone programme. The first milestone of the programme was to develop a conceptual design for such a system, and identify the membrane and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) properties that were required to support it. The second milestone was to engineer a revolutionary new membrane that had a high level of water permeability but a low level of methanol diffusivity - usually mutually-exclusive attributes. The third milestone was to design a new MEA that could recycle much of the water that is created in a fuel cell back to and through the newly engineered membrane. In February 2008, we announced the achievement of the fourth milestone, after we had operated several "proof of concept" fuel cells incorporating the newly-engineered membrane and MEA for hundreds of hours in complete water balance using the conceptual system design target operating conditions. This is a significant step toward solving the fundamental problem of water management in a fuel cell for portable electronic devices, and will enable a substantial simplification in fuel cell system design, eliminating certain components and hence achieving a further reduction in system size, weight and cost. The team is now working hard on achieving the fifth challenging milestone, which involves incorporating the advancements described above into a functioning prototype of a fuel cell power module and integrating it with a commercially-available notebook computer. Together, these advances should enable a fuel cell to surpass the performance of the ubiquitous lithium-ion battery in terms of size, weight and runtime. The smaller design is expected to be of particular appeal to notebook computer manufacturers, and their battery suppliers, who wish to provide consumers with continuous, non-stop use of their mobile PCs without resorting to external power connections or unwieldy spare batteries. PolyFuel intends to work with battery and notebook PC OEMs to seek to introduce the fuel cell system into this high growth, 100+ million unit per year market through providing a complete reference design. Research shows that the runtime remains one of the uppermost issues for intensive laptop users. The reference design approach has been successfully used to advance new product introductions in the technology industry for decades, with Intel acting as a pioneer of the concept. We intend to license this reference design technology to our membrane customers as well as to MEA manufacturing partners, such as JMFC. The reference design package will include guidance for fuel cell system manufacturers on how to design a compact, high-efficiency fuel cell stack, various fuel cell system components and the overall system architecture necessary to produce a power supply that can outperform Li-ion batteries. We have no intention of becoming a fuel cell system manufacturer ourselves, but rather will focus on providing system expertise while fulfilling expected demand for both our new and existing families of membrane products. Further evidencing PolyFuel's status as a world-leading fuel cell development company, we successfully secured government funding in the form of the following programmes: * Reinstatement of $1.98 Million in funding from the US Department of Energy (DOE) for a prototype fuel cell power supply for a notebook PC; * $2 Million Advanced Technology Programme (ATP) award from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for the development of a new, ultra-low crossover membrane; and * In concert with the University of North Florida and University of Florida, we secured a $2 Million appropriation from the US Army for the development of a ruggedised fuel cell power supply for military laptop applications. Refocusing our resources away from pure research and development of catalyst coated membrane products and onto providing more engineering support services in July 2007 allowed us to reduce our overall expenditure levels. As a result of these measures, and with the government funding described above, we have significantly lowered our projected cash requirements. During the year we continued to expand our intellectual property portfolio through issuance of 2 US patents, including a composition of matter patent on a core membrane material, and the filing of a number of new patent applications in connection with membrane research and reference design development. The total number of issued and pending patents now stands at 25. We also continued to develop our manufacturing capabilities during the period. In response to growing customer demand for the product, we extended the capability of our continuous roll-to-roll hot bondable manufacturing process to include our new, thinner 20-micron membrane material. In February 2008 we welcomed Thomas Caldwell as our interim Chief Financial Officer, replacing Mark Campion, who resigned to take up a similar position at a non-competing private technology company based in southern California. Tom is very well qualified for the role, having earned an MBA degree from the University of Chicago and a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation, and being a native of Silicon Valley in northern California with extensive experience in both private and public technology companies. Also, in April 2008, Board member Graham Titcombe, whose current term expires in July, informed the Board of his decision not to stand for re-election. Graham has made an outstanding contribution to our Company during the past 3 years since PolyFuel's admission to AIM. We thank him for the leadership and dedication that he has provided. PolyFuel has a strong team of industry-leading fuel cell engineers and scientists, and highly experienced business development and administrative staff. We would like to thank the team for their continued commitment and dedication to making fuel cell technology a commercial reality. With market demand continuing to grow for longer runtime portable power sources, we firmly believe PolyFuel is positioned to be the leader in providing the industry with the products, tools and designs necessary to commercialize portable fuel cell technology. Robert Jecmen Jim Balcom Non-Executive Chairman President and CEO 28 April 2008 28 April 2008 PolyFuel, Inc. (A development stage enterprise) UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Period from 27 January 1999 (Inception) to Year Ended 31 December 31 December -------- -------- -------- --------- 2007 2006 2005 2007 U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Revenues 1,391,247 184,600 1,040,347 3,461,055 -------- -------- -------- --------- Costs and operating expenses Research and development 5,665,354 5,582,924 4,944,800 35,300,000 General and administrative 5,099,380 5,433,608 4,315,669 29,809,607 -------- -------- -------- --------- Total expenses 10,764,734 11,016,532 9,260,469 65,109,607 -------- -------- -------- --------- Loss from operations (9,373,487) (10,831,932) (8,220,122) (61,648,552) Other income (expense), net (4,688) (12,865) 889 (34,115) Interest income 921,176 1,230,979 396,027 3,112,295 Interest expense (635) (59,863) (119,819) (1,591,326) -------- -------- -------- --------- Net loss (8,457,634) (9,673,681) (7,943,025) (60,161,698) ======== ======== ======== ========= Net loss attributable to common stockholders (8,457,634) (9,673,681) (9,054,609) (47,946,585) ======== ======== ======== ========= Net loss per share Basic (0.15) (0.17) (0.41) -------- -------- -------- (0.15) (0.17) (0.41) -------- -------- -------- Weighted average number of shares used in net loss per share calculations Basic 57,368,049 56,154,107 22,305,981 -------- -------- -------- Diluted 57,368,049 56,154,107 22,305,981 -------- -------- -------- PolyFuel, Inc. (A development stage enterprise) UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 31 December --------- -------- -------- 2007 2006 2005 U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 7,126,685 15,177,509 13,378,449 Short-term investments 6,576,170 6,654,886 1,097,931 Accounts receivable 134,511 35,434 30,800 Inventories 114,192 88,806 -- Prepaid expenses and other current assets 330,392 357,435 358,650 --------- -------- -------- Total current assets 14,281,950 22,314,070 14,865,830 Property and equipment, net 337,039 460,405 615,764 Other assets 195,300 195,300 82,599 --------- -------- -------- Total assets 14,814,289 22,969,775 15,564,193 ========= ======== ======== Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses 922,629 1,162,994 845,371 Current portion of finance facility and capital lease obligations -- -- 464,136 Deferred revenue 1,336 115,475 -- --------- -------- -------- Total current liabilities 923,965 1,278,469 1,309,507 Finance facility and capital lease obligations, net of --------- -------- -------- current portion -- -- 36,597 --------- -------- -------- Total liabilities 923,965 1,278,469 1,346,104 --------- -------- -------- Stockholders' equity Common stock: US$0.001 par value; 100,000,000, 100,000,000 and 70,000,000 shares authorised at 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively; 57,436,388, 57,282,839 and 44,550,093 shares issued and outstanding at 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively 57,436 57,283 44,550 Additional paid-in capital 59,272,722 58,616,546 41,483,238 Accumulated other comprehensive income 1,180 857 -- Deficit accumulated during development stage (45,441,014) (36,983,380) (27,309,699) --------- -------- -------- Total stockholders' equity 13,890,324 21,691,306 14,218,089 --------- -------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 14,814,289 22,969,775 15,564,193 ========= ======== ======== PolyFuel, Inc. (A development stage enterprise) UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS'EQUITY (DEFICIT) Deficit Notes Accumulated Accumulated Total Additional Receivable Other During the Stockholders' Paid-in from Comprehensive Development Equity Common Stock Capital Stockholders Income Stage (Deficit) Shares U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Issuance of common stock for cash at US$25 per share in January 1999 4 -- 100 -- -- -- 100 Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (59,926) (59,926) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 1999 4 -- 100 -- -- (59,926) (59,826) Issuance of common stock for in-process research and development and notes payable in October 2000 9,120 9 205,191 -- -- -- 205,200 Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (4,316,346) (4,316,346) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2000 9,124 9 205,291 -- -- (4,376,272) (4,170,972) Issuance of warrants with credit line and lease line in May and July 2001 -- -- 93,986 -- -- -- 93,986 Exercise of common stock options at US$22.50 per share for cash and notes receivable in May and December 2001 5,707 6 128,394 (127,116) -- -- 1,284 Stock based compensation expense -- -- 5,954 -- -- -- 5,954 Interest accrued on notes receivable -- -- -- (4,907) -- -- (4,907) Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (4,839,193) (4,839,193) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2001 14,831 15 433,625 (132,023) -- (9,215,465) (8,913,848) Issuance of warrants with lease line in June 2002 -- -- 45,175 -- -- -- 45,175 Exercise of common stock options at US$22.50 per share for cash 64 -- 1,438 -- -- -- 1,438 Stock based compensation expense -- -- 23,207 -- -- -- 23,207 Cancellation of notes receivable -- -- -- 44,438 -- -- 44,438 Interest accrued on notes receivable -- -- -- (3,131) -- -- (3,131) Repurchase of common stock at US$4.50 per share for notes receivable (2,224) (2) (10,008) 10,010 -- -- -- Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (7,017,090) (7,017,090) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2002 12,671 13 493,437 (80,706) -- (16,232,555) (15,819,811) Issuance of warrants with consulting agreement in August and December 2003 -- -- 44,571 -- -- -- 44,571 Issuance of warrants with finance facility in September 2003 -- -- 44,944 -- -- -- 44,944 Exercise of common stock options at US$22.50 and US$4.50 per share for cash 1,467 1 7,733 -- -- -- 7,734 Cancellation of notes receivable -- -- -- 34,469 -- -- 34,469 Interest accrued on notes receivable -- -- -- (6,384) -- -- (6,384) Repurchase of common stock at US$4.50 per share for notes receivable (1,067) (1) (4,799) 4,800 -- -- -- Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (8,887,814) (8,887,814) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2003 13,071 13 585,886 (47,821) -- (25,120,369) (24,582,291) Conversion of Series A1, A2 and B redeemable convertible preferred stock in common stock and Series AA redeemable convertible preferred stock upon recapitalisation 83,988 84 6,022,301 -- -- 14,720,684 20,743,069 Repurchase of common stock at US$22.50 per share for notes receivable (1,891) (2) (186) 47,821 -- -- 47,633 Issuance of warrants with finance facility in May 2004 -- -- 174,150 -- -- -- 174,150 Issuance of warrants with bridge loans in February and April 2004 -- -- 533,957 -- -- -- 533,957 Exercise of common stock options at US$0.10 per share for cash 2,833 3 280 -- -- -- 283 Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (8,966,989) (8,966,989) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2004 98,001 98 7,316,388 -- -- (19,366,674) (12,050,188) Issuance of warrants with consulting agreement in May 2005 -- -- 69,618 -- -- -- 69,618 Conversion of Series AA and BB redeemable convertible preferred stock into common stock upon admission to AIM 28,655,645 28,656 22,608,911 -- -- -- 22,637,567 Issuance of common stock and Series A Warrants for cash at US$0.90 per unit in connection with initial public offering in July 2005, net of issuance costs of US$2,767,027 15,686,276 15,686 11,217,287 -- -- -- 11,232,973 Issuance of common stock options to financial advisor in connection with AIM Listing -- -- 242,568 -- -- -- 242,568 Stock-based compensation expense -- -- 16,726 -- -- -- 16,726 Exercise of common stock options at US$0.90 and US$0.10 per share for cash 110,171 110 11,740 -- -- -- 11,850 Net loss -- -- -- -- (7,943,025) (7,943,025) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2005 44,550,093 44,550 41,483,238 -- -- (27,309,699) 14,218,089 Issuance of common stock for cash at US$1.4052 per share in connection with follow-on offering in January 2006, net of issuance costs of US$816,653 12,500,000 12,500 16,736,850 -- -- -- 16,749,350 Stock-based compensation expense -- -- 373,417 -- -- -- 373,417 Comprehensive income - change in unrealised gain on available-for- sale investments -- -- -- -- 857 -- 857 Exercise of common stock options at US$0.10 per share for cash 232,746 233 23,041 -- -- -- 23,274 Net loss -- -- -- -- (9,673,681) (9,673,681) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2006 57,282,839 57,283 58,616,546 -- 857 (36,983,380) 21,691,306 Stock-based compensation expense -- -- 640,975 -- -- -- 640,975 Comprehensive income - change in unrealised gain on available-for- sale investments -- -- -- -- 323 -- 323 Exercise of common stock options at US$0.10 per share for cash 153,549 153 15,201 -- -- -- 15,354 Net loss -- -- -- -- (8,457,634) (8,457,634) -------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Balances at 31 December 2007 57,436,388 57,436 59,272,722 - 1,180 (45,441,014) 13,890,324 ==================== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== PolyFuel, Inc. (A development stage enterprise) UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Period from 27 January 1999 (Inception) to Year Ended 31 December 31 December ------- -------- -------- -------- 2007 2006 2005 2007 U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Cash flows from operating activities Net loss (8,457,634) (9,673,681) (7,943,025) (60,161,698) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortisation 221,863 338,217 709,594 3,158,594 Purchased research and development -- -- -- 3,825,984 Stock-based expense - non-employees -- 16,726 45,887 Stock-based employee compensation expense 640,975 373,417 -- 1,014,392 Loss (Gain) on sale of equipment 4,058 -- -- (112,667) Non-cash expense related to notes receivable from stockholders -- -- -- 112,118 Non-cash expense related to issuance of warrants -- -- 69,618 1,006,401 Non-cash interest expense related to bridge loans -- -- -- 34,980 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (99,077) (4,634) 7,128 (134,511) Inventories (25,386) (88,806) (114,192) Prepaid expenses and other current assets 27,043 1,215 18,818 (330,392) Other assets -- (112,701) 40,801 (195,300) Accounts payable and accrued expenses (240,366) 317,623 (32,218) 1,145,659 Deferred revenue (114,139) 115,475 -- 1,336 ------- -------- -------- -------- Net cash used in operating activities (8,042,661) (8,733,875) (7,112,558) (50,703,407) ------- -------- -------- -------- Cash flows from investing activities Purchases of available for sale investments (6,083,465) (8,620,502) (2,373,789) (23,222,673) Maturities and sales of available for sale investments 6,162,503 3,064,404 5,151,591 16,647,682 Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 255 -- - 140,980 Purchase of property and equipment (102,810) (182,858) (42,559) (3,523,946) ------- -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (23,517) (5,738,956) 2,735,243 (9,957,957) ------- -------- -------- -------- Cash flows from financing activities Proceeds from issuance of common stock 15,354 16,772,624 11,487,391 28,286,208 Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock, net -- -- -- 37,097,656 Proceeds from lease line and finance facility -- -- -- 2,545,612 Repayment of lease line and finance facility -- (500,733) (779,034) (2,545,612) Proceeds from issuance of notes payable and bridge loans -- -- -- 2,404,185 ------- -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by financing activities 15,354 16,271,891 10,708,357 67,788,049 ------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash ------- -------- -------- -------- equivalents (8,050,824) 1,799,060 6,331,042 7,126,685 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 15,177,509 13,378,449 7,047,407 -- ------- -------- -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 7,126,685 15,177,509 13,378,449 7,126,685 ======= ======== ======== ======== Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities Issuance of common and redeemable convertible preferred stock for in-process research and development and notes payable -- -- -- 4,153,200 Issuance of warrants in connection with finance facilities and consulting arrangements -- -- 69,618 1,006,901 Repurchase of common stock for notes receivable -- -- -- 62,631 Cancellation of notes receivable -- -- -- 78,907 Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock upon recapitalisation and admission to AIM -- -- 22,637,567 43,380,636 Issuance of common stock options in connection with AIM Listing -- 242,568 242,568 POLYFUEL, INC. (A development stage enterprise) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 - The Company Description of Business PolyFuel, Inc. ("PolyFuel" or the "Company"), was incorporated in Delaware on 27 January 1999. The Company is a spin-off from SRI International, Inc. (formerly the Stanford Research Institute) and was established primarily for the purpose of developing portable fuel cell technology. Since inception, the Company has been deemed to be in the development stage as it has devoted substantially all of its efforts to developing its product, raising capital and recruiting personnel. The Company is headquartered in Mountain View, California and is publicly listed on the London Stock Exchange Alternative Investment Market ("AIM"), also known as the "AIM Market". Principles of Consolidation The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis and, accordingly, reflect the financial position and results of operations of both PolyFuel, Inc. and its wholly owned Canadian subsidiary, PolyFuel, Ltd. All intercompany account balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Basis of Presentation and Continuance of Operations The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company on a going concern basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, the statements anticipate the realisation of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Notwithstanding this fact, the Company has incurred losses and negative cash flow from operations for every fiscal period since its inception. For the year ended 31 December 2007, the Company incurred a net loss of approximately US$8.5 million and negative cash flows from operations of US$8.0 million. In the event the Company is not successful in generating profits and positive cash flow from operations in future periods, it will be dependent upon additional financing to support its continuing operations. While the Company has been successful in completing numerous rounds of public and private equity financing, totaling approximately US$67.8 million (net of issuance costs) through 31 December 2007, no assurances can be given that additional financing will be available, in which case, the Company's ability to achieve its business objectives will be adversely affected. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from such adverse outcomes. NOTE 2 - Significant Accounting Policies Use of Estimates The preparation of financial information in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Revenue Recognition The Company's revenue is derived primarily from government grants and the sale of products to its customers to support testing, evaluation and the development of prototype devices. With respect to product sales, the Company generally recognises revenue upon shipment if (i) a signed arrangement exists, (ii) the fee is fixed and determinable and (iii) collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Revenue from government grants is recorded as earned, generally in the period in which the underlying costs are incurred. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash invested in short-term securities which have remaining maturities of less than 90 days at the time of purchase. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair market value. At 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, cash and cash equivalents included US$7,126,685, US$15,177,509, and US$13,378,449, respectively, of commercial paper, money market funds and U.S. Government Agency Securities Investments The Company has classified all investments as available-for-sale. Such investments are recorded at fair market value and unrealised gains and losses, if material, are recorded as a separate component of stockholders' equity (deficit) until realised. Realised gains and losses on sales of all such securities are reported in the statement of operations. The carrying amount of the Company's available-for-sale investments approximated their estimated fair value at 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, and consisted of the following: 31 December ------------------------------------------ 2007 2006 2005 U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Corporate notes 5,500,700 2,406,053 497,663 U.S. Government Agency Securities 1,075,470 4,248,833 600,268 -------- -------- --------- 6,576,170 6,654,886 1,097,931 ======== ======== ========= The estimated fair value of available-for-sale investments at 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, by contractual maturity, were as follows: 31 December ------------------------------------------ 2007 2006 2005 U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Less than one year 6,075,700 6,155,356 1,097,931 Between one and two years 500,470 499,530 -- -------- -------- --------- 6,576,170 6,654,886 1,097,931 ======== ======== ========= Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency of the Company's Canadian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are remeasured at the period-ending or historical rates, as appropriate, while revenues and expenses are remeasured at average monthly rates. Currency transaction gains and losses are recognised in current operations and have been insignificant for all periods presented. Concentration of Credit Risk and Other Risks and Uncertainties Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. The Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents with three financial institutions. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortisation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the respective assets, generally three to five years, or, in the case of leasehold improvements, the shorter of the useful life of the assets or the lease term. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and the accumulated depreciation and amortisation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of operations in the period realised. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. In the event of impairment, the loss to be recognised would be measured based on the excess carrying value of the asset over the asset's fair value. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Such deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using current tax laws and the enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which these differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realised. Effective 1 January 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN No. 48"). FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing the recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognised in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. See footnote 9 for further details of the impact of adoption. Comprehensive Loss Comprehensive loss consists of net loss and other comprehensive income (loss), which includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net loss. Specifically, unrealised losses on investments are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the stockholder's equity section of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Comprehensive loss for the periods presented consisted of the following: Year ended 31 December -------------------------------------------- 2007 2006 2005 U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Net loss (8,457,634) (9,673,681) (7,943,025) Change in unrealised gain on investments 323 857 -- -------- -------- -------- (8,457,311) (9,672,824) (7,943,025) ======== ======== ======== As of 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, accumulated other comprehensive income represented unrealised gains on investments of US$1,180 US$ 857 and US$ nil, respectively. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Effective 1 January 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123R"), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on the estimated fair market value of the underlying instruments. Accordingly, stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based upon the fair value of the award, and is generally recognised as expense on a straight line basis over the requisite employee service period. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the standard as of 1 January 2006. Accordingly, the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended 31 December 2006 and 2007 reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for prior periods have not been restated. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company accounted for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees ("APB No. 25"), and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, compensation expense was recorded for options issued to employees in fixed amounts and with fixed exercise prices to the extent that such exercise prices were less than the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The Company also followed the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation ("SFAS No. 123"), as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure. The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans. Accordingly, as these equity instruments vest, the Company will be required to remeasure the fair value of the equity instrument at each reporting period prior to vesting and finally at the vesting date of the equity instruments. Loss per Share Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents, including preferred stock, stock options and warrants. For the years ended 31 December 2007, 2006 and 2005, options to purchase 8,891,885, 7,847,516 and 6,292,200 shares of common stock; and warrants to purchase 502,978, 8,350,139 and 8,350,517 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as the effect would be antidilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders per share: Years Ended 31 December ------------------------ 2007 2006 2005 U.S.$ U.S.$ U.S.$ Numerator Net loss (8,457,634) (9,673,681) (7,943,025) Cumulative dividends on preferred stock -- -- (1,111,584) -------- -------- --------- Net loss attributable to common stockholders (8,457,634) (9,673,681) (9,054,609) ======== ======== ========= Denominator Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 57,368,049 56,154,107 22,305,981 ========== ========== ========== Net loss per share Basic (0.15) (0.17) (0.41) ======== ======== ========= Diluted (0.15) (0.17) (0.41) ======== ======== ========= Recent Accounting Pronouncements In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("SFAS No. 157"). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors' requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have any material effect upon its consolidated results of operations and financial condition. In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("SFAS 159") . SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, although earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements. NOTE 3 - Subsequent Events In February, 2008, the Company entered into a new five year lease for its Canadian operations which has total future minimum payments due under noncancellable operating lease facilities of US$32,101, US$48,151, US$49,435, US$51,361 and US$69,337 for the years ending 31 December 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and thereafter, respectively. In March 2008, the Company in concert with the University of North Florida and University of Florida, secured a $2 million appropriation from the US Army for the development of a ruggedized Direct Methanol Fuel Cell power supply for military laptop applications. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange END FR BRGDSXGDGGIR
1 Year Polyfuel Chart |
1 Month Polyfuel Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions