Nasstar Share Discussion Threads

[arty] 14/7/2011 20:59

Aagghh yes of course, forgoten about that. Thnx Skidaddle.

[skidaddle] 14/7/2011 20:55

Share placings. Without those kind of RNS's they would have nothing to announce.

Nothing to see here.

[arty] 14/7/2011 20:46

Sol, any rumblings from your sources? - or is that just your stomach 8o)

They certainly appear to be substantive organisations.

[arty] 14/7/2011 19:50

significance of just published holdings rns's, I don't recall seeing any large transactions going through ??? It certainly hasn't impacted the sp

[arty] 06/7/2011 09:10

He's not the only one. :o)

[solarno lopez] 06/7/2011 09:05

the FD must be feeling a bit sore at the price

[skidaddle] 23/6/2011 17:04

Historically it's been a pipeline to a money black hole.

[6kenny] 23/6/2011 08:37

Might be a pipe dream as opposed to a pipeline....

[skidaddle] 22/6/2011 16:42

Nasstar have a pipeline. Don't know where it leads to though cause nothing ever seems to come of it!

[6kenny] 22/6/2011 10:59

The client I consult for just signed a £24k order yesterday and have a few similiar ones in the pipeline, you can't beat direct sales.

[skidaddle] 20/6/2011 09:00

I'd like to think that Nasstar's partners actually start producing large volumes of sales with good margins.

It would be a first though!

[6kenny] 19/6/2011 22:04

in the next 12 months I expect NASA to either go bust or be bought out. IMHO, it's just jobs for the boys with Lord Daresbury propping it up financially.

[skidaddle] 19/6/2011 11:28

The size of the cash raising looks like the last throw of the dice. The money should last until 2013 when cloud computing should be a £100bn plus industry as predicted by Charles Black many moons ago. He also stated over a couple of years ago ""I wanted to be the only AIM company that specialised in hosted desk top applications. If you are the only one in a growing market you get traction,". Nasstar's 'traction' is rather like my friends dog on a tiled kitchen floor and just as unpredictable.

Perhaps the company needs traction boots like this:

[jazza] 16/6/2011 23:30

Agreed.

They shouldn't be getting salary increases until they turn a profit, issuing paper left, right and centre while turnover is flat, is not acceptable.

[jazza] 16/6/2011 23:30

Agreed.

They shouldn't be getting salary increases until they turn a profit, issuing paper left, right and centre while turnover is flat, is not acceptable.

[daniel] 16/6/2011 22:34

Obviously the actions of the directors are utterly disgraceful. They must realise that we can't just keep issuing shares at ever reducing prices and be happy clippie about it. Please wake-up, smell the cofee and deliver some value for your shareholders. You have just given away 1/3 of the company for peanuts; a price less than 10% of floatation prices. Enough is enough on share issues, it's time to deliver results.

[skidaddle] 16/6/2011 09:35

Well they have delivered next to nothing up to now.

There always seems to be a massive amount of hope built into the Nasstar business model, very little of which has been converted into any kind of reality so far.

[6kenny] 16/6/2011 08:58

Easy to quote big numbers but another thing delivering!

[skidaddle] 16/6/2011 08:43

INTY have a target with Nasstar of 10,000 in 3 years which is almost 2 now as it commenced last year.

[6kenny] 16/6/2011 08:31

if you sign up partners to a white label programme then you need to ensure they have targets to hit otherwise it is an utter waste of time!

the targets need to be reviewed on a quartely basis. Another way of doing it is to charge the partner X amount a month for the white label service, that soon gets them selling.

Also, visit the top 10 partners on a monthly basis and help them with marketing the cloud and attend end user meetings to help close down the sales meetings....sales 101 really!

[skidaddle] 16/6/2011 08:25

The way things are going we are going to need as many partners as there are clients to make things profitable. Obviously there was very little quality control with regard to partner selection. Even now the management can hardly be described as very positive about future growth (except in the partnership category) they come across as rather defensive.

[6kenny] 16/6/2011 08:11

one of the companies I consult for started about 10 months after NASA. Debt free and privately owned and bringing on clients at a rate of knots, why can't NASA do the same?

[solarno lopez] 16/6/2011 07:46

Thanks for the accolade TREBLEWIDE and keep up the good work