We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mwtops � | TOPS | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 980.50 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 980.50 | 980.50 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 18/5/2014 22:23 by hedgehog 100 From "TOP Traders Thread !!!! (CR)":TOPINFO 18 May'14 - 18:16 - 404717 of 404724 2 0 "classic that Viv. Make sure you treasure that comment for many years to come ....coz you know he would if he had got his de-ramp right. Lol has he ever got one right. What a prize tw@t he is. Lmao" Guess who TOPS is laughing at! |
Posted at 18/5/2014 22:12 by hedgehog 100 TGL closed for the weekend at 0.7p, rising stongly on big volume: it ended April at 0.3p, so is up 133% on the month to date.And the company has made five announcements in under a month: 06/05/2014 07:03 UKREG Touchstone Gold Limited Admission of Shares & Holdings in Company 30/04/2014 07:01 UKREG Touchstone Gold Limited Investment Policy, Circular & Notice of AGM 25/04/2014 10:41 UKREG Touchstone Gold Limited Holding(s) in Company 23/04/2014 13:02 UKREG Touchstone Gold Limited Holding(s) in Company 22/04/2014 07:02 UKREG Touchstone Gold Limited Placing, director change, strategy & TSX delisting TOPS posted this on the thread "TOUCHSTONE GOLD - BASHER FREE THREAD (TGL)" when the share price was 0.3p: TOPINFO 20 Apr'14 - 04:01 - 564 of 727 3 0 "Just catching up with a few bits and Just seen that news TGL Thursday that they are de-listing from TSX market only, in order to reduce costs and with lack of volume etc on TSX it certainly makes sense and is a very positive move. This coupled with the injection of capital last month from new investor, this looks to me like a deal is coming very soon and new bod are having a very positive clearout and preparing this baby for interesting times ahead. If it was curtains here like some have tried to make out then they would have just de-listed the whole listing both TSX and UK and the fact they have not is the most positive news I have seen as TGL for some time. They look like they have an agenda and a plan and Im sure they will divulge what it is shortly but in the meantime I think by the past 3 or 4 Rnses you can be sure this is far from game over and more like get ready for a new revised TGL. Big things about to happen here! All IMO but something very good is happening behind the scenes in my opinion." |
Posted at 07/1/2005 13:11 by makingheaps I'm a little surprised by the speed of the recent rise and in parrticular todays. It may be that we are up with events for now but on the other hand I wouldn't be surprised if there was a bid in the offing.The Merril numbers above show why this remains a strong hold on fundamental grounds. Their target price for 2005 represents a 25% discount to NAV but this could narrow to 15% in 2006 when the REIT legislation finally arrives implying a share price rise of about £1 from todays levels in 12 months time. A 25% gain plus dividend income should easily outstrip the index. |
Posted at 23/12/2004 17:43 by mw8156 Cheapest access to tops is tpy? |
Posted at 22/12/2004 21:20 by diogenesj OK, the reason appears to be that Merrill Lynch have upgraded from neutral to Buy, based on upgraded net asset value estimates:"22.12.04 :+13.5, (390) upgraded to 'buy' from 'neutral' on valuation by Merrill Lynch, dealers said. In a note to clients, the US broker argued that although Tops did not produce a full interim revaluation, two of its key centres, at Stafford & Liverpool, were revalued for financing purposes and showed strong uplifts of 17% and 11% respectively. Merrill noted that as a result, its NAV forecasts have been raised to 556 pence from 514 for 2005, to 602 from 557 pence for 2006 and to 636 pence from 588 for 2007. The broker said its target price is 415 pence, based on a 12 month discount to NAV." - from InvestorEase. |
Posted at 22/12/2004 12:14 by diogenesj Lol, Z, quite right. I was looking for the Tops Estates thread, and chanced on this one. :-) |
Posted at 30/11/2004 15:46 by makingheaps I agree and the discount is even bigger if you look at the NAV including the two premises revalued and ignore deferred tax. Over 40% !! I'm looking for £4 fair value and hopefully higher next year with yet again improved results and higher dividend plus news on REITS to narrow the discount.The problem seems to be lack of coverage but their record is really very impressive. |
Posted at 10/3/2004 23:38 by energyi Niggle,You are welcome to do better. Your comments are idiotic, since all of those tops were tops, though of a short term nature. And i made HUGE money in 2003, so I have no complaints. Howd you do, h5lf-w1t? |
Posted at 19/10/2003 21:37 by jdeltablues Just catching up..."People equate rises with greed and falls with fear, and yes greed on a new rising market should be slow because investors are likely to be slow because they fear a risk of losing, but speed up when the greed is motivated by fear of missing out, so shouldn't tops be rapid as in late 1999?" Yes, this is how spike tops are formed; this kind of fear-driven greed is usually only seen near the top of major bull markets, which is why this kind of top is fairly rare. Much more common is the kind of top where the greed of the buyers is matched by the fear of losing profits from those who got long earlier, and the market goes sideways until the second group dominate (assuming they do dominate, but then it won't be a top if they don't!). "The past 6 months have been marked by the speed of the rise- so what has been the dominant emotion over the past 6 months? Has it been professional speculative greed of the few as their cash returns. I can't believe that mass greed has returned." I'd say it was initially driven by short covering, and some of the funds who've been religiously buying every dip of the bear market and finally got lucky, and then the kind of trader that jhurbanek used to be - no offence intended to anyone! (Obviously there were other types of traders and investors active as well, but IMHO those were the ones who were dominant). I would agree that the people who don't watch the market much are still out; in fact I'd guess that most of them haven't even noticed the rally, if the rest of my family is anything to go by. "A fall is thought to be swift because it is motivated by fear, but fear paralyses investors and so shldn't a fall be slow until the final capitualtion when holders can take no more and sell." Yes, this has been typical of the falls in the bear market; if you look at them, they often start by wobbling, trying to recover, then wobbling a bit more, starting to fall and accelerating until they're almost going down vertically, then bouncing back so sharply that it's impossible to catch. Falls in a bull market tend to be seen as buying opportunities, and the "wobble" usually results in a steady recovery, quickly followed by new highs for the move. "Actually, I don't know and think I tend to see tops as less obvious." Yep, calling tops is even harder than picking bottoms. |
Posted at 15/10/2003 23:35 by jdeltablues I think I agree with most of what Mr Gartley says - it's quite common for markets to bottom out with a very sharp reversal, as the longs who've been holding all the way down finally lose confidence and throw in the towel, and the large shorters see this and take advantage of the liquidity to cover their positions. We've seen several examples of this over the last few years. (Another variety is the rounded saucer bottom, where the selling very gradually dries up and buyers eventually start dipping their toes in - these are often very good trades).The dynamics of tops are different, as many buyers only get drawn in after the market has already gone up a long way, so there's often heavy trade in both directions as large longs who've held since the bottom sell their shares to new participants hoping to make a killing. Market tops often see very high volume, but with the market failing to make further progress North, until eventually the selling overcomes the buying and the market starts going down. Spike tops are more common in individual stocks and commodities, as stock markets that are making a top often rotate from stocks that looks "expensive" to others that look "cheap". Having a market make a spike top which is not retested, like the Nasdaq in 2000 is very unusual (the S&P did retest its spike top later in the year, and the Dow made a more normal extended top which lasted a couple of years). |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
