We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minerva | LSE:MNR | London | Ordinary Share | GB0005953681 | ORD 25P |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | O | 0 | 124.00 | GBX |
Minerva (MNR) Share Charts1 Year Minerva Chart |
|
1 Month Minerva Chart |
Intraday Minerva Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
08/1/2014 | 10:25 | Minerva Recovery 2009 | 8,455 |
08/9/2010 | 15:40 | Minerva for Sensible Posters - Moderated | 25 |
01/8/2010 | 08:59 | Minerva - Northacre Partnership | 54 |
19/7/2010 | 12:50 | ***** Minerva ***** | 2,262 |
15/4/2009 | 12:56 | The Minerva Tower: a big opportunity for profits | 432 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 06/7/2011 14:26 by dovegang Why would the share price sit 1p above the bid price, is there still a better offer in the shadows? |
Posted at 30/6/2011 10:44 by fireplace22 If you transfer the shares to anyone other than your spouse it will be deemed as a disposal you will realise your gains and they are due for CGT. Your relatives can buy them at the price you wish to sell at and they will not incur CGT on any future gains if put in an ISA. Any gain in share price up to the disposal/transfer date is yours and you will have to pay CGT. If you transfer them to your spouse, I think she is assumed to have bought them at the same price you originally paid. If she goes on to sell them then she is liable for the full CGT and not you. |
Posted at 29/6/2011 07:49 by n0rbie Share price above offer price. Buyers speculating that there might be a counterbid? |
Posted at 15/6/2011 08:59 by sami69 HBK Master fund keep on adding everyday to their CFD... must be confident of share price increase? |
Posted at 03/6/2011 08:07 by fireplace22 Agreed, MNR have done well but only because of the price inflation in prime London. I was just trying to higlight what I see as a failing of the MNR management who still appear not to be acting in the best interests of it's shareholders. |
Posted at 02/6/2011 18:20 by quepassa you may wish to find someone else to discuss the historic share register with. my focus is on the current situation, the bid and the share price i have nothing further to add to this dialogue which - for me at least- has now run its full course. good luck to you. QP |
Posted at 20/5/2011 08:29 by smurfy2001 fireplace, indeed, that was my point (badly put though), i.e., offer price is looking likely not to be much higher.Held these since 15p and all i'm getting back is potentially 110p, less than the peak share price :-( |
Posted at 12/5/2011 07:18 by fireplace22 Can't see this going for £1, the current share price has nothing to do with the eventual take out price but the uncertainty over whether a bid will eventually come at all. I think news on letting alone would take this back above £1. Doubts must also remain on refinancing particularly if lettings are not forthcoming. Banks are in control and with that, risk for shareholders. Thats why the price is where it's at nothing to do with the eventual TO price. IMO. |
Posted at 09/2/2011 16:29 by dr knowledge Smurfy - volume doesn't correspond to news leak, even so, struggling to see the downside here....if a bid comes in it will have to be at a premium to share price last 21 days. To me MNR would only seriously entertain a bid around the 1.10 mark if they were in doubt over rental potential/bank covenants near term, ergo, even if no bid comes to light, must surely underpin MNR's confidence in both these key areas. If the share price had shot up to the 1.30-40 mark on the rumour I'd be worried but not at c12% premium to where we were prior to any bid rumour! Not sure, time will tell. ;-) |
Posted at 06/2/2011 12:00 by fireplace22 It's odd then that the company thinks the recent rise in share price is due to the TO approach and that the two events share price hike/approach were coincidental.I'd have thought that refinancing would be an integral part of any TO negotiations. Don't forget it was the banks refusing Limitless a waiver on part of their agreements with MNR that caused that TO to be aborted. 'The Board of Minerva plc ("the Company") notes the recent movement in the Company's share price and confirms that it is in preliminary discussions which may or may not lead to an offer for the Company in whole or in part.' |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions