We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Mktg | MMG | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 3.75 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.75 | 3.75 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 16/7/2013 19:47 by tenapen Thanks or the link, Hastings, When my friend and I was talking about MMG it had felt like we had remembered everything with such clarity. But when you read tha facts ! we were selective in our memory LOL. We had Also forgot about MMgs no1 fan M Walters D'ho. |
Posted at 11/7/2013 18:26 by tenapen Thanks for posting the link, Legend01.I was on a long drive yesterday with a friend who had also bought MMG. After not thinking about this company for all of these years it was a good chat reliving what had happened ... with the share price And today the link, crazy how it works. I lost a fair ammount also failedQS, but no where near that sum. |
Posted at 03/2/2011 21:56 by renew Ive been told by the Revenue that loss on MMG arose in 2009/2010 tax year.This surprises me as although they went into admin in Dec 09 I understood the revenue await confirmation from the administrators that shares are negligable value which cant have been before the 10/11 tax year (ie this year!) Anyone else been talking to revenue about this. |
Posted at 09/11/2010 16:45 by barkjon23 i think you can only offset the MMG loss against income if you purchased as a new issue - mine were all bought in the secondary market |
Posted at 26/10/2010 08:32 by johnny felopez An interesting point raised on Meldex board re. possibility of offsetting a loss against income:then link to this 'Deducting losses from your income', towards bottom of page. Anyone have any thoughts as to the possibility of doing this with MMG? TIA |
Posted at 22/2/2010 19:11 by tenapen They both made millions from MMG and now your telling me they are taking the company to an employment tribunal because they got ousted from the board on full pay. My already low opinion of them as sunk to a new low :-/You did ask Benny, My last word, "Africa's GDP growth could reach 7% in 2011, says AfDB Monday, 22 Feb 2010 Africa's real gross domestic product growth could reach about 7 percent in 2011 from a forecast of about 5.5 percent growth for 2010, the president of the African Development Bank Cont.... |
Posted at 21/2/2010 15:10 by tenapen Before you go please tell us what claims the Bests have outstanding ? and how do you know about them ?.Why do i think you have a connection with them ? because if you had money invested in MMG it is now gone because of the Bests IMO. It is very unusual for a poster in this situation to support the culprits (how i see them). |
Posted at 21/2/2010 09:51 by tenapen I did not go to any Presentations so if you are not his Pal but another investor that was 'smooth talked' into beleaving that MMG had the answer, i am sorry for saying so. Do not feel bad for being taken in, as the then great Mr Mike Walters also beleaved all that the Bests said and became a cheif cheerleader.As for the DNA trials, they were about two years late when the company failed so my guess is that the results they were getting were not ..... the right results so they tried again !. Keep beleaving that the administrators are going to do more than liquidate the assets and sell the technologys to the highest bidder and after deducting their bill share the money raised to share holders. This will meen the smalll holders get Jack sh*t. Jura1, the next time you see 'them' please ask why they would not deal with the new board to raise new money and change the name of the company (as MMG was surely tarnished) and in not doing we all lost money, even the Bests !. |
Posted at 20/2/2010 19:14 by jura1 You've got it so wrong. How many MMG meetings and presentations have you attended over the years? What is the the full story then between DB and the board because I certainly do not know.I only posted to help explain about the role of an administrator. The company is insolvent, i.e. it cannot pay its immediate debts, but it does not necessarily mean it needs to be wound up. Companies have re-risen as solvent entities from administration. This is why the administrators should be aware of the DNA trial results as this would have finished about the same time (Sept 09) as MMG went into administration. This was the information all investors were waiting for but I see no mention of it at all |
Posted at 19/2/2010 10:02 by jura1 shamster, perhaps I am clutching at straws. I still think that the main priority of an administrator is to rescue a company as a going concern - this involves interaction with creditors etc. Of course MMG may eventually be wound up if there is no solution. To this end, it is the administrators duty to explore all avenues including ongoing settlement of DB claims and obtaining the trial data if possible to leverage any value. I have no information so this might be irrelevant now. Really disappointed with losses on this stock - still hoping something can be settled with DB as, personally, have always found him reasonable. Or maybe not - we await the administrator's report. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
