Jaywing Dividends JWNG

Dividends

No Dividend Data for JWNG

Top Dividend Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 04/8/2020 19:08 by nash81 i think our TR1 is still buying more. yes, profit takers have moved on, but i think JWNG is about to rise up again. maybe another TR1 again soon Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 02/10/2019 08:20 by buywell3 The power of have a name on board JWNG Flying today after burners lit Praps he should be made up to CEO Could maybe do 10p plus then all imo dyor Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 16/9/2019 09:10 by buywell3 is jwng coming back to land ? Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 01/9/2019 17:06 by buywell3 IMO JWNG are going to raise cash from the latest RNS From this bombed out share price level IMO it would be reasonable to think that 2.5p would be a decent price with a chart like JWNG now has 2.5M pounds at least IMO needed with such a BIG workforce = another 100M shares need to be issued unless they go down the loan note road. There are 93.4M shares currently in issue IMO JWNG needs major surgery at every level How any sane investor could have put psitive spin on this at any time in the last 3 years beats me , purely based upon : Net Tangible Asset Values Per Share which have been NEGATIVE since 2015 dyor Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 01/9/2019 09:04 by buywell3 This buywell avitar seems to be getting a lot of his calls right just lately JWNG was the TOP FTSE advfn Loser on Friday buywell3 - 26 May 2019 - 09:16:15 - 212 of 254 Jaywing - Digital Marketing Specialists - JWNG EBITDA is a meaningless term profit after tax is ALL. Beware the BOD's that push the EBITDA story IMO. JWNG paid the BOD close to 1.2M last year and for what ? They made a Loss and debt increased. But many still got a bonus payment. IMO this company needs a check up from the neck up ... it has lost its way regarding the fundamental reason it exists as a listed company. What would worry me most when viewed V some of its peers , is that it employs far too many people. It brags that 1 in 10 is a data scientist , ok , but if debts are increasing and your making a loss ... so what? JWNG employs far too many people V peers it needs to cut staff numbers by 50% The BOD need to take a pay freeze until profits are hit 2 years running and NO bonus payments till then Peer analysis Key Information NOTE by buywell ALL of these are loss making = this area of the Sector not performing IMO Company Revenue (TTM) Net income (TTM) Market cap ...........Employees Space and People Plc 7.94m -674.00k .......2.54m ........ 92.00 Be Heard Group PLC 49.72m -9.83m ........9.89m........... 12.00 Jaywing PLC ....... 46.06m -1.43m ........11.95m........ 639.00 Reach4 Ent't Ent's PLC 77.73m -39.00k ........13.40m.......211.00 Trader Media East Ltd 2.56m -3.40m ........37.76m.......... 163.00 JWNG employ 3 TIMES as many people as Reach4 Entertainment Enterprises , a company that has a bigger market cap and a much bigger turnover (+60% plus) than JWNG. Get that number down to 320 for starters Also keeping buying companies does not equate to profits. But it does mean further cash raises. Australia is a country in economic difficulty. House prices crashing and banks now wobbling. China their biggest trading partner also in trouble. JWNG need to CONSOLODATE to key profit areas of generation and DITCH the rest ASAP dyor Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 26/5/2019 09:53 by buywell3 Maybe not but it answered some I had about JWNG To any advfn newbes re EBITDA and its pushers ... read this Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 26/5/2019 09:16 by buywell3 EBITDA is a meaningless term profit after tax is ALL. Beware the BOD's that push the EBITDA story IMO. JWNG paid the BOD close to 1.2M last year and for what ? They made a Loss and debt increased. But many still got a bonus payment. IMO this company needs a check up from the neck up ... it has lost its way regarding the fundamental reason it exists as a listed company. What would worry me most when viewed V some of its peers , is that it employs far too many people. It brags that 1 in 10 is a data scientist , ok , but if debts are increasing and your making a loss ... so what? JWNG employs far too many people V peers it needs to cut staff numbers by 50% The BOD need to take a pay freeze until profits are hit 2 years running and NO bonus payments till then Peer analysis Key Information NOTE by buywell ALL of these are loss making = this area of the Sector not performing IMO Company Revenue (TTM) Net income (TTM) Market cap ...........Employees Space and People Plc 7.94m -674.00k .......2.54m ........ 92.00 Be Heard Group PLC 49.72m -9.83m ........9.89m........... 12.00 Jaywing PLC ....... 46.06m -1.43m ........11.95m........ 639.00 Reach4 Ent't Ent's PLC 77.73m -39.00k ........13.40m.......211.00 Trader Media East Ltd 2.56m -3.40m ........37.76m.......... 163.00 JWNG employ 3 TIMES as many people as Reach4 Entertainment Enterprises , a company that has a bigger market cap and a much bigger turnover (+60% plus) than JWNG. Get that number down to 320 for starters Also keeping buying companies does not equate to profits. But it does mean further cash raises. Australia is a country in economic difficulty. House prices crashing and banks now wobbling. China their biggest trading partner also in trouble. JWNG need to CONSOLODATE to key profit areas of generation and DITCH the rest ASAP dyor Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 02/11/2018 13:41 by p1nkfish Major investors are toothless and JWNG, with all their capabilities, are not exhibiting signs of being able to push the business upwards. More like circling a drain until proven otherwise. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 29/9/2018 19:06 by p1nkfish "S4 Capital plans further acquisitions in content, data analytics, media planning and digital media buying." Sorrells new vehicle, S4 Capital, would do us all a favour if it looked this way. JWNG is probably too small. They have bought MediaMonks and looking for other targets. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 05/3/2018 21:30 by arthur_lame_stocks I also take it that the dividend is now off the cards for the time being at least. Read Full Thread Reply