We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inland Zdp | INLZ | London | Preference Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 54.10 | 00:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.10 | 54.10 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SERVICES |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 17/8/2024 07:40 by octopus7 Farrugia, theoretically yes as INL claimed they had segregated assets including a large chunk of cash to cover the INLZ Prefs, but in reality the assets were worthless and they spent the cash. |
Posted at 17/8/2024 06:48 by farrugia so inlz bondholders got nothing? I'm curious to know. I don't hold any but i thought this was a safer safer way of playing inland then. |
Posted at 09/1/2024 17:49 by smithie6 Okosling....greedfear wrote "Thus: 3.5 + (34.6 x 109 / 124.5) x (35.5 / 208.7), approximately 8.65 ? 8.65/18.1 something like 47p per INLZ share?" Do you agree/disagree with ~47p/share ? ....or are holders of ord. shares going to get £0 ?? |
Posted at 06/12/2023 09:05 by greedfear Thus: 3.5 + (34.6 x 109 / 124.5) x (35.5 / 208.7), approximately 8.65 ?8.65/18.1 something like 47p per INLZ share? |
Posted at 01/9/2023 12:54 by cc2014 There are two ways to resolve the covenant breach1. Pledge some more assets. Only imho they haven't got any which aren't used as security elsewhere. If they did the RNS would have said so. 2. Buy back ZDP's in the market at a huge discount. Only they haven't got any cash to do so. On top of all this the auditors are requesting yet more provisions in the joint venture accounts which will feed through in part to INL accounts. That's more losses and more destruction to the stated NAV. It doesn't look good for either INL or INLZ shareholders. Still good to know that only a year ago they had so much cash they were buying back shares. |
Posted at 31/8/2023 11:23 by my retirement fund I wouldn't hold your breath, if its a bunch of faceless fund managers, and mixed retail investors then that's highly unlikely. These sorts of situations require an clued up business savvy activist of some description wielding a significant chunk of shares. I'm pretty certain if there was one, you would have heard about it by now.If you want to see what can happen to a rag tag group of debt holders, including retail investors and faceless fund managers, look no further than what has been going on with the EROS bonds where they have been walked all over, have absolutely no control on anything and have not the faintest idea of what is going on and are unlikely to ever do so either. ------------------- I expect a rollover but one where INLZ defines the terms and chances are those terms will be favorable for INLZ. |
Posted at 31/8/2023 10:02 by greedfear I'd like to know who exactly are holders of INLZ because if those are very different from INL holders INL could be in for a nasty surprise.Factually INLZ is in control of INL's future. I expect a rollover but one where INLZ defines the terms and chances are those terms will be favorable for INLZ. I would not be surprised if it will be a partial payment in INL shares (improves equity of INL) and a partial roll over where (high) interest will be paid. What's bad for INL isn't necessarily bad for INLZ. |
Posted at 30/8/2023 14:56 by greedfear I was hoping this news would lead to a sell off of INLZ. Well, maybe tomorrow. |
Posted at 30/8/2023 08:57 by stemis Surprised the INLZ share price hasn't reacted... |
Posted at 19/7/2023 19:33 by cerrito To try to get some information as to who the other shareholders in INLZ are, I went to the Companies House website. There I found the AR of INLZ for y/e September 22 but that had no information of the shareholder base.No other information available.Could find nothing on the LSE site. I note they are quoted on the main market. Does anyone have any info on the shareholder base? Need to see me and arts as well. Ps I see there have been trades every day this week, unusual level of activity. Pps In googling I found that the Labour Peer Lord Goldsmith, I guess the Solicitor General under Blair, sold his holding on May 23 this year. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
