IN House Share Discussion Threads

[cyberpost] 11/7/2008 16:52

yes Jack.. but who bought it ? if we know who has bought it then we know the potential offerer.

[jack1236] 11/7/2008 16:51

I did say earlier that it was Silverhall's 17%.

[cyberpost] 11/7/2008 16:47

tilton

what do you make of all this ?

[tiltonboy] 11/7/2008 16:45

Now that is just plain naughty. If it wasn't bad enough giving away 17% of the company for £50K, we now find there was a 2:1 warrant attached.

[cyberpost] 11/7/2008 16:43

Cohen Arnold & Co
1075 Finchley Road, Golders Green, London, NW11 0PU
Tel: [phone]

[cyberpost] 11/7/2008 16:43

Name & Registered Office:
SHEKEL LIMITED
NEW BURLINGTON HOUSE
1075 FINCHLEY ROAD
LONDON
NW11 0PU
Company No. 05791711


Status: Active
Date of Incorporation: 24/04/2006

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)
Nature of Business (SIC(03)):
9131 - Religious organisations

Accounting Reference Date: 30/04
Last Accounts Made Up To: 30/04/2007 (DORMANT)
Next Accounts Due: 28/02/2009
Last Return Made Up To: 24/04/2008
Next Return Due: 22/05/2009

[cyberpost] 11/7/2008 16:40

exactly RCT.

'shekel' implies a Jewish connection..... Sam Kahn ?

[realcooltrader] 11/7/2008 16:33

So Silverhall to Shekel to whom? And where the hell have all those warrants for Silverhall come from, that wasn't in the 26th June announcement??

[rbonnier] 11/7/2008 15:40

Wonder how Mr Caplan is these days !

[realcooltrader] 11/7/2008 15:36

Yep, also true of some of the biggies the day before: 31.25m, 31.25m, 32.5m and 112m.

[cyberpost] 11/7/2008 15:33

30m trade yesterday (3.8%) and no RNS issued today.

[waynerwayner] 11/7/2008 10:56

Heh, 500k sell to bring it down, 4m buys to put it back to the same point... very balanced...

[realcooltrader] 11/7/2008 10:33

Very calm after the storm today, and back to the normal mark down on a single 500k sell.

[waynerwayner] 11/7/2008 09:53

Cats, I guess that depends if it was reward (or sweetener) for them for their efforts in tracking down deals etc...

[catswhiskas] 10/7/2008 21:36

waynerwayner it cant be making a profit otherwise I doubt Cassidy would have diluted everyone by 17% for £50k

[waynerwayner] 10/7/2008 20:21

I do struggle to see Cassidy giving it away cheaply, especially if it is actually making a profit, he wont come out of In House with nothing, it just depends how he intends to do it and what it means for the rest of us...

[realcooltrader] 10/7/2008 19:38

Good, I'd like to believe you.

[realcooltrader] 10/7/2008 19:35

Is that wishful thinking or ....?

[safman] 10/7/2008 18:33

or a placing at 0.000000000001p..

saffy..

[catswhiskas] 10/7/2008 18:19

Cant see this coming to anything.0.3p would mean someone stumping up over £2 million in cash 0.2p 1.5 million cash.What cash generative assets does this have to support such a valuation in the current market.Indeed the company has just proved it was broke in the form of raising £50k by giving away 17% of the company.So who is going to pay 1.5-2.0million+ for something that wont yield a return for the next 3 years at least but burn a hole in their pockets in the way of working capital.
Then theres Cassidy who wont sell for any less than 0.3p otherwise he will be losing out on vital funds for his hair gel after converting his loan into shares.Cassidy is in for the long term somehow he must have a plan to whether the storm until the company sees a return on the properties it has invested in.

So that leaves the pump and dump theory certainly a possibility or more likely Knifton will try an all paper deal which imho is very bad news for shareholders if there is long term value here with Cassidy.