We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iafyds | IAF | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.0075 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0075 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 20/8/2015 08:42 by timbo003 This one is due to rise like a phoenix from the ashes tomorrow.The epic will be 365 Initial price 75p/share (following a 1 for 10,000 share consolidation) |
Posted at 03/8/2015 07:30 by timbo003 IOT and social housing combined, sounds like a good place to be at the mo'It's oversubscribed which is good The people involved should give shareholders encouragement (check out Castleton: CTP) I would not be surprised to see these open at a premium I have been fortunate enough to have to procured a few shares in the placing. It's EIS qualifying too, so HMRC will refund 30% of the cost of the shares. Time for a new thread? |
Posted at 28/1/2015 07:39 by aries2000 Iaf day is here watch this baby rise |
Posted at 28/1/2015 06:58 by aries2000 iaf something brewing |
Posted at 22/4/2009 13:43 by clocktower Shareholders went without a whisper it seems as IAF floundered. |
Posted at 01/12/2008 03:30 by mryesyes Thank you and be grateful you only had a small holding when the share had to go this way, and thank you for putting your money into IAF, as an associate I always know who to thank and when. Goodbye |
Posted at 30/11/2008 22:23 by mryesyes Yes I can point to Sunderland FC which bravely delisted its shares announcing that the PLC (with a low share price) was not viable i.e. holding a rights issue or an offer to others would sell a whole chunk including overall controlfor less than could be realised by putting the PLC into mothballs and massively increasing the equity on offer that could be sold to a completely new organisation OK I accept that we used this as a device after the FA started pointb deduction for going into administration and looking for backers Can you accept that in your position as a shareholder in a delisted PLC OK, but as a potential technical director that I can now poach from a competitor and offer eqwuity to and an overseas millionaire I can now sell a non listed stake even a 50% stake in IAF to it is a good thing in the round? Please do not talk about dumping the shareholders and reselling their assets as that is not constructive. There are laws which do not prohibit IAF's strategy and a lot of beneficiaries and I do not only think about myself |
Posted at 30/11/2008 17:27 by 2trying mryesyes - thank you for your post / point of view .I have no intention of falling out / arguing with you , however - I have experience of involvement in a de-listed company , the share price of which dropped like a stone , and has remained so . Liquidity / transactions in same , varies between nil and zero . Surely the same will apply to IAF ? So we have to wait for dividends to see a ROCE ( our own , of course )? Not good , surely ? If this were good news , why then , are we the biggest faller on the market ? Now - I ( obviously ) hold shares in IAF - which I purchased in May this year , along with warrants . The warrents I assume are now worthless . Nice . You state "After we have delisted we can raise new funds, develope(sic) and incentivise new staff and facilities" - I am somewhat puzzled - What / where is the improved situation of raising new funds after delisting ? What / where is the same on facilities ? Likewise regarding staff motivation ? I'd have thought share options were an excellent way of same - now no longer an option . You state "freed from the contrictions of a listing we found that with that scenario new investors were willing to back us"....as you speak in the past tense , I presume you have experience of a similar situation . Would you be so kind as to expand ? Now - on a positive note - I also buy and sell shares via JPJ and have found their people ( whom I have chatted to , both on the phone and email sometimes even at eight o'clock at night ) to be incredibly helpful - and twice , they have bought me shares in companies X and Y below bid !!! Again , let me emphasize - I am not arguing , we're on the same side , I wish everyone the best in their investments . John |
Posted at 28/11/2008 08:11 by dell314 Sept 01 2008:During the current year the Board expects, despite market conditions, to make substantial progress towards our goal of a broadly based profitable group. The key issue for that Company is that the regulatory capital requirement of IAF Securities is met and the business has sufficient working capital for the future. At the year end the consolidated cash and cash equivalent balances were £0.9m (2007 - £0.7m). The Company is confident that current resources, are sufficient to meet its requirements. The year has made an encouraging start. Trading in the year to date has exceeded budget, with turnover for the first two months of this year ahead of the equivalent period for 2007/2008 and it is expected this trend will accelerate. 28 Nov 2008: As the Company approaches its half year, it is already likely that results for the full year to 30 June 2009 will be below expectations. The lack of an institutional shareholder base has limited the Company's ability to raise capital from the stock market to grow the business organically and to effect acquisitions........ The Directors have concluded that it is no longer in the best interests of the Company and its Shareholders to maintain admission to AIM of the Ordinary Shares. I think they mean, "thanks for your support. We'll have our company back now!" Just another AIM atrocity. Rgds dell All IMHO, DYOR etc. |
Posted at 13/11/2008 10:17 by clocktower Whatever it is you can bet that it will not benifit small investors and minority holders.. It seems IAF provide as little information to them as the majority of the companies that J P Jenkins offers a matched trading facility for - if you can call it that. IMO they act as market makers - taking a fee from all sides.All they do really imo is to provide a smoke screen for companies that were listed on AIM to do as they please. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
