We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hidefield Gld | HIF | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 1.475 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.475 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 18/12/2009 15:48 by wdurham PGD's COSE target is a long way away from the HIF (or should I now say ex-HIF?) property in Santa Cruz.HOWEVER, the entire Deasado Massif is underexplored and much of it still UN-explored. There's no knowing what will be found. Bonanza shoots like the one intersected at COSE are extreme, but similar structures are found everywhere. |
Posted at 07/12/2009 12:50 by haydock If this works the 2 sites will, on extensive & close study reveal that the patagonia site with the big success last week is far to the east of the massif.Study of the hif map shows the scale of the mining success in the region since 1995. The Patagonia site is only a small part of a big gold region developing. Study of the Last presentation on the hif site, shows the j/v;s & also some royalty deals. Alto down to 14%, so reduced as thought, but no mention of Furum. They must have some warrents or something ? It's a great read for the Mirl investor. |
Posted at 19/11/2009 08:35 by haydock Mirl have made the right move.If the management can take the opportunities offered by the hidden value of HIF, which I think they can then it will be a great growth story. An exciting merger, HIF could not have found a better buyer. Cheap, but beggeres can't be choosers, HIF was out of cash, but asset rich, at the wrong time. Is the Mirl board rated by the shareholders ? |
Posted at 10/11/2009 15:00 by boadicea neudarian - Zedder has explained my point.The HIF share price has generally stood at a discount of between 5 and 10% to the MIRL shares into which it will potentially convert. Today MIRL are quoted online at 74p to buy (i.e. 1p inside the official spread) and trades in HIF are going through at 1.63p. Cost of 42K HIF = £684.60 + expenses Cost of 1K MIRL =£740.00 + expenses Saving = £55.40 which represents a 7.5% discount for the risk of the takeover failing. |
Posted at 06/11/2009 09:49 by haydock Cannot see a better partner coming in for HIF.Firesale price, as expected. They have the cash cow:Corihuarmi Then they also have: Also potentially a basket of real goodies for a song in HIF. Very under visited quiet board. A very tasty morsel? To purchase, apperently unknown to most pi's. Very very low cost gold producer, really hammering out the profits. Ideal combination, producer +HIF + Aquisitive with cash, on tap. |
Posted at 22/10/2009 09:34 by neudarian Fair comments from all, gentlemen.I'm as disapointed/annoyed as the next guy, but I have to say that a few percent more for them now, and perhaps ending up in a company with maybe not as aggressive a management team as Minera, might not be much of a benefit, especially for those of us who intend this as an ongoing investment in gold. Given a simple choice of having my bucks tied up in a Co. with limp management like HIF, or with a go-getting management (who pick up less aggressive targets with potential)..like Minerva - is no contest. And after all, if we all believe that we are being undersold to MIRL and that HIF's assets are really worth much more, the surely that extra value will eventually be reflected in MIRL's shareprice? You win some, you lose some....Let's get onboard with the better management and see where we are in 12 months. If there is value in HIF - then we are surely more likely to benefit via MIRL. neudarian |
Posted at 20/10/2009 17:39 by machupichu Wdurham all the reasons you mentioned "tied up relationships with the state mining organisation as well as having tacit, behind the scenes, backing from Barrick. They also have the involvement of the richest Argentinian investor group in the Miguens-Bemberg family." are the reasons that I would prefer PGD to be invovled with HIF. I doubt it will happen too but at the current offer price would have thought PGD may have some interest in HIF tenements.I wasn't saying why PGD would want HIF just that HIF would want PGD. |
Posted at 20/9/2009 18:19 by daddy warbucks Further to my post above, the 'disposal' of the Golden Zone property makes some sense if it is a toronto listed company after HIF for their columbus gold shares.Should they have bought HIF with the Golden Zone, they may have disposed of Don Nicholas after they had the CGT shares, but the Golden Zone being where it is and with its potential could have been a good acquisition for them. I know all of the above is fanciful, but supposing it is true. ;0) Some of the directors may yet have negotiated to buy back Don Nicholas after HIF is taken out and then who knows, perhaps a JV for the Golden Zone!!!!. On a more serious note, apologies for my conspiracy theories. I am very disappointed that a company which appeared to have so much potential could end up the way it has. I am looking for anything which may improve the share price. I know a lot of it is due to the lack of credit, making it difficult for small firms like HIF to survive, but we do appear to have made some poor calls on the way. IMHO. |
Posted at 18/9/2009 15:21 by machupichu Okay going out on a limb here and providing my tip for the possible offerorPatagonian Gold plc EPIC PGD Why do I think they might be the bidder: 1. Both companies hold mining tenements in the Santa Cruz Province in Argentina 2. PGD already has estimates of USD299 per oz to extract their gold so they have costings already so know it is profitable to mine in Argentina with gold prices over USD1000 and climbing 3. Possible synergies to help keep costs down such as contracts with local suppliers. 4. Makes sense that they would make a share offer with a market cap of £98m they are currently 11 times the size of HIF 5. They know what the grades of gold are coming out of the ground because they already have tenements in the same area. 6. Will be able to commence mining sooner then we currently would be able to with HIF Lomada De Leiva gold project in Argentina's Santa Cruz province progressing towards development with the aim of commencing production in the first half of 2010. The decision follows on evaluation of the positive scoping study for the property, which estimates low pre-production capital of US$8.5 million and production of 21,000 ounces gold per year for a mine life of 7 years, at a cash cost of US$299/oz (so a reserve of 147000 (21000 x 7 years). The Cap-Oeste gold and silver project on which a compliant resource of 304,099 oz. of gold and 6,929,825 oz. of silver has been defined - drilling is currently in progress to upgrade the resource. Total estimated reserves for PDG Santa Cruz Province - Lomada Gold 235000 ounces Santa Cruz Province - Cap Oeeste Gold 304099 ounces gold and 6.9m oz of silver Makes sense to add in HIF reserves of 200700 oz indicated (plus 158,400 inferred) see: PGD also has a third exploration effort in Santa Cruz - La Manchuria gold and silver project where the company completed a second successful drilling campaign frequently intersecting high grade gold and bonanza grade silver, including 1.1 metres at 82.47 grams per ton of gold and 10,485 g/t silver in drill-hole LM-30. following info obtained from proactive website Sept 2009 Lomada de Leiva, containing a resource of approximately 235,000 ounces of gold, is now in the development stage towards a producing gold mine. Initial production is set for late 2009, with full scale production of 20,000 ounces per annum to be reached by the end of 2010. At Cap-Oeste, an NI 43-101 compliant resource upgrade is scheduled for completion in October 2009. Exploration drilling has returned highly encouraging results. Follow up drilling is planned for all of the prospects commencing October 2009. The chief target has been the Main Shoot on the Bonanza fault in the Cap Oeste zone, which hosts an NI 43-101 compliant resource of 304,099 ounces of gold and almost 7 million ounces of silver. March 2009 PDG has strong shareholder support with the capital raising for £9.3m at 7.75p per share netting subscribers over 100% return already. PGD indicated that the placement was oversubscribed so any additional raising needed to fund capez for HIF you would expect would be easily raised. Given the indicated reserves of HIF i would hazard a guess that HIF could be valued between 20-25 million or 4.7 p to 6 p per share. With a share offer shareholders would benefit from any growth in the gold price and results from PGDs own tenements. I have only just got into this share so this is just my own opinion from my research. If they are not the mystery bidder maybe they should take a look IMHO DYOR IF And it is a BIG IF PGD are the bidder then they have kept this very quiet as their own shares have not moved Just an IDEA and trying to stimulate some discussion. GLA |
Posted at 02/9/2009 08:22 by haydock Piedro on APF has had a look at the holdings : Note that HIF claim to still have 31% of ATV on the website:have we sold a large chunk of the holding: have we had an RNS?can confirm from SEDI the following holdings: Colombus Gold - CGT - of 22.2m o/s 20/08/09... HIF... 4,080,134... 18.38% 05/02/09... APF... 3,918,500... 17.65% Alto Ventures - ATV - of 95.6m o/s 29/09/08... APF... 9,804,000... 10.22% ........... HIF... no mention.... although, ATV web site has HIF with 10% and APF with 9% - last updated 28/05/08 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
