We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helix Exploration Plc | HEX | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 14.90 | 07:46:07 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14.90 | 14.90 | 14.90 | 14.90 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| UNKNOWN |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 01/3/2025 09:45 by lord loads of lolly Xong - agreed. Sometimes the filter button is your friend.The question is why anyone who - by their own admission - has no holding would REPEATEDLY try to sow the same seeds of doubt. Fair enough to make your point once. But not every few hours. Whatever the motive, you can bet your bottom dollar he’s not trying to save investors from themselves. Best option is filter & don’t respond. He’ll soon get bored & move on to the next target. |
Posted at 28/2/2025 07:24 by ohwhatfun Hooded (I ask you as you seem sensible)What do you make of the big numbers. EG $4m per well revenue. Mid range $20m per year Rudyard, post tax, post royalties. Well flow 2,750mcf/per day. Sustainable flow 5 years 2000 mcf/day. Bo in an interview says flows can be but you choke back to maintain pressure. So 1 well 2000 mcf per day 1% Helium is, if 100% recovered 20/mcf per day of Helium. Flat price of $500/mcf used. That’s $10,000 per day, $3.65m per year. 3 wells, $10m per year. That’s what they are saying. The $20m per year post tax/royalties must be something like 60% of the gross ($33m). It’s about 8 wells ($10m cost) Yet with that net return $100m over 5 years they couldn’t get the backing in the US, and have ignored the known play through 4/5 Helium shortages, demonstrating/claimi One backer knowing all these numbers and the story handed over their 10m shares at 10p. It’s a too good to be true type story, I do hope it proves to be true. With such little outlay for such big returns why has it been ignored for so long and needed AIM entry to get it going. Raise low money, drill 3 wells, processing plant and self fund from there making many multiples returns for investors in 12 months is suspicious. BUT it’s a great story to excite Retail investors who are the lifeblood of many an AIM failure. Proceed with caution, trust nothing, challenge everything. The first gauge come April on is how keen the insiders are to keep their 1p and 5p shares. They will be very keen for UK retail to take it to silly levels for an exit before reality of production kicks in. |
Posted at 27/2/2025 07:55 by ohwhatfun Just for the record on why post all this.You have a pump crew jumping on Helium like on HE1 (AIM). Bo is new to the AIM talking honesty and transparency. If it gets pumped up and flies before production is steady and viable, the bear crew will rip this to shreds. It will be propped up by retail investors and therefore easy pickings to create fear and share price crashes, leaving some high and dry. The Rudyard play was looked at 12 years ago, Standiford and Weil resources (Bo)?working together and I believe were set to produce Helium on a JV. So why didn’t it happen and why has information been removed from the web. Add in the lack of transparency over the Standiford link working with Bo 12 years ago. As it’s all now on here, to a small audience it’s now known and of little use to the bears who might otherwise already be stocking it up for a wider media raid shorting it. And it wouldn’t be lies. Hopefully all will go well but the back story has been apparently been deliberately hidden by Helix……& Better that is known now than post some broker pump and dump campaign to serve warrant holding brokers and seed investors. Is Rudyard viable? If so why didn’t Weil (Bo) pursue it 10 years ago. What interest do the Weil Group (Helium producers) still have in it. |
Posted at 26/2/2025 19:37 by ohwhatfun RoundtheworldIf I was employed by the broker it would be to pump it to death to up the price for 3 of them to unload 1.2 million warrants each at 10p. So your theory is nonsense. I’m just warning private investors about the hype when locked in shares trigger in 6 weeks time 20+ million of them. And in m, looking up those parts realised the story so far has not been transparent. A phrase regularly coined by Helix. No I didn’t know Helix had floated I picked up on it saw Bo something about AIM and knew he was a Helium fanatic. Right guy to have on Helium but the back story here has been hidden from investors. A few here have probably drifted in from HE1 nonsense. So better they know the full picture. Rudyard, feasible, will it work out? We’ll just have to wait and see. Seed investors and those gifted shares only have to wait a short time to cash in at good profits. |
Posted at 26/2/2025 18:29 by ohwhatfun HoodedDecent reply, thanks. In that case did you know about the Bo Sears/Weil resources, Adam Standiford connection. Weil 1 well was drilled about 12 years ago 1% Helium in Nitrogen. Weil 1 is literally next to the Helix drill. I raised that as some plonker on here was shouting no Helium, when a little bit of knowledge on the history, would have told anyone a Helium result was guaranteed. I didn’t know this company was on the AIM until recently hence couldn't mention it. Whilst the other play was set up as the IPO, it seems the Hill county asset was already lined up. Standiford who it was acquired from was a consultant for them. It’s obvious no consultancy was needed for that asset, Bo knew about it and Adam drilled the Weil well. So that find ‘an asset’ acquire gets 1.2m shares for consultancy and find an asset looks farcical. It’s clear that was a suspect deal, a farce. A blot on an otherwise decent looking asset. That said the Rudyard play was with Bo as an option 12 years ago via The Weil group. So to talk it up now as amazing after ignoring it for over a decade isn’t the full story. It is being over hyped by the company and all around it, WHY???, if it’s that good and no more funding needed, then let the performance and production do the talking, not constantly pumping it via social media and other routes. So with seed and other shares at 1p and 5p over 23 million of them, it seems the hype now is to offer a handsome exit by virtue of gullible UK private investors. Set that aside, Rudyard could prove to be commercial and profitable but it’s the AIM float that pays off the seed crew handsomely, and bought out assets with float money. It’s just how many multiples they get, some are on 15 times. Open and transparent? I don’t recall seeing any reference to the Weil 1 well results, next to Darwin in any Helix comments, perhaps it is and I missed it. But if that information was out there (which was fully known by Bo and Standiford), then why weren’t investors informed. Darwin was always going to hit Helium. You get my point, anyone close to the company knew 100% Helium at 1% would come up in regulatory news post results of that first well. So this open, transparent point isn’t as it seems. If you knew about Weil 1, Standiford and his family drilling company then you’d know the history. If you didn’t then my posts are news to you and highlight the history. |
Posted at 26/2/2025 16:07 by roundtheworld I’m not sure this is a trading type share. I think most people are investors who are waiting for at the very least production to kick in. |
Posted at 26/2/2025 07:19 by ohwhatfun So the story appears to be……..Bo was in the Hill County area over 10 years ago and discovered Helium at 1% working with Adam Standiford (drill guy), well Weil 1, Bo with Weil resources. Weil decide to produce in Saskatchewan (Canada). Lack of gov support in Canada disrupts expansion. Bo breaks away, set up Hereford resources which is acquired by Helix and goes full circle acquiring land from Standiford, and then drills Darwin about 100 yards from Weil 1, unsurprisingly finding 1% Helium. So AIM funding money being used at no risk to the founders to go after that Helium. The risk to investors is if the play flows well at viable costs. It is the real deal, not fantasy, it’s been over a decade in the making. Will it all work and pay off is another matter, but they are moving at speed, there will be stutters in the timeline, there always is. |
Posted at 25/2/2025 11:46 by lord loads of lolly ohwhatfun - despite your extensive research, you say of Bo "Not his money, risking the money of others".This is just plain wrong: www.helixexploration |
Posted at 21/2/2025 07:05 by john henry Its only when Institutional Investors take a stake will the Share Price not yoyo around as Retail traders take their 5% |
Posted at 25/9/2024 13:17 by lord loads of lolly tidy 2 - I doubt any serious investors believe for one moment that a placing will be needed at this stage. As has been highlighted, it was categorically ruled out in the Q&A (which I've just listened to).What's more likely to put some off since their latest presentation is the mention of risks during re-drill. Of course, serious investors will already have been aware of it & either held off accordingly or discounted the risk. But I suspect the fact Bo & David both mentioned it more than once will have sowed further doubt in some minds. I actually see it as them just being transparent, but it is still something that shouldn't simply be dismissed (as some rampers here - but more notably on LSE - appear to). |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
