![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gsk Plc | LSE:GSK | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BN7SWP63 | ORD 31 1/4P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29.50 | 1.94% | 1,553.00 | 1,555.00 | 1,555.50 | 1,557.50 | 1,521.50 | 1,525.00 | 5,189,535 | 16:35:08 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 30.33B | 4.93B | 1.1970 | 12.99 | 62.72B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
11/7/2024 13:35 | Around 5% loss, bought in at 1600ish, can't see this moving anytime soon. | ![]() chc15 | |
11/7/2024 13:08 | What % did you lose? | tradermichael | |
11/7/2024 12:05 | Dumped out of this, bought more 3i. Sell your losers, put them in your winners I say. | ![]() chc15 | |
09/7/2024 11:25 | Usually true but this one is a combination of downgraded vaccine market penetration and Zantac. Win the appeal and half that downgrade is then not pertinent | ![]() rikky72 | |
09/7/2024 11:13 | "UBS cuts target price to 1580p from 2040p, neutral" - a 460p cut is cannot be said to be neutral - negative at best. These banks and brokers don't seem to have a clue. | tradermichael | |
09/7/2024 10:02 | UBS cuts target price to 1580p from 2040p, neutral | ![]() dplewis1 | |
09/7/2024 09:35 | A mess of a company-one crises after another..... A 4% dividend does not make up for it. | ![]() cumnor | |
09/7/2024 09:12 | That will probably be a successful appeal. Anyone have any idea when it's being heard? | ![]() rikky72 | |
09/7/2024 08:58 | Deluded? Time will be the ultimate arbiter of that, rather than a rush to judgement within the first few days | ![]() rikky72 | |
09/7/2024 07:08 | Whether labour or conservative it doesn't matter a great deal . What we need is something to really kickstart this share price and soon | ![]() alibizzle | |
09/7/2024 06:02 | Rikky72 "But they do seem to have a plan and appear competent" hahahahaha Deluded. One thing this lot wont be is competent. And the plan is to open the floodgates even more(if that was possible) and concrete over England's green and pleasant land to house them all(but not homeless Brits) | ![]() geckotheglorious | |
08/7/2024 20:42 | It is funny to read these comments after the worst government in living memory was finally kicked out. We will see what happens. But they do seem to have a plan and appear competent... | ![]() rikky72 | |
08/7/2024 08:19 | Dig deep Brits. Got to pay for the 20,000 odd on France's beaches waiting to cross the English Channel now Starmer's pro unfettered Immigration lot have got into power. | ![]() geckotheglorious | |
08/7/2024 08:10 | Labour will wreck UK business and wait for tax hikes | ![]() ny boy | |
05/7/2024 20:08 | It has been a turbulent few months for GSK (GSK) and its investors. The group hiked earnings guidance in May after a strong first quarter, only to see its shares tumble a few weeks later following an inauspicious ruling in the litigation cases relating to heartburn drug Zantac. Now it appears a revised recommendation from US health regulators will hurt sales of one of the company's key vaccines, Arexvy.The jab is designed to protect adults against RSV, a common respiratory virus that can cause serious illness in vulnerable individuals. Both Pfizer (US:PFE) and Moderna (US:MRNA) have produced competitor vaccines, although Arexvy was the first on the market. Last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advised everyone over 60 to get immunised against RSV which was seemingly good news for market leader GSK.However, after reviewing the data, a CDC committee said vaccines should be restricted to the 75-plus cohort, with exceptions for 60-74 years olds with pre-existing conditions. "This move was characterised by one speaker as protecting 'the worried well' from any risks," said UBS analyst Jo Walton. "And if it turns out that re-boosting is not possible, [the decision] keeps the vaccine for use only when a patient is most likely to get a benefit."GSK had also hoped US health authorities would endorse Arexvy for 50-59-year-olds after a recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this group. But no such support materialised. According to UBS, this means interested patients would probably have to self-fund their vaccinations at a list price of $300 (£236). Jabs that receive the CDC's seal of approval tend to receive some level of insurance coverage, meaning patients can access them at reduced rates.At present, there isn't enough data on Arexvy's durability for regulators to endorse booster doses and this is crucial for predicting future earnings. Once the results of ongoing trials are published, it's possible that the CDC could expand its recommendations to include vulnerable people in additional age brackets. Brokers are seemingly divided over the longer-term impact of last week's decision, with one Citi analyst stating peak sales of the jab would now "fall materially".Meanwhil | ![]() xtrmntr | |
05/7/2024 09:07 | Will take 1700 nevermind 1900 at this stage ! | ![]() alibizzle | |
05/7/2024 08:22 | Citigroup cuts target price to 1900p from 2120p | ![]() dplewis1 | |
05/7/2024 06:51 | Good news GSK buy curevac hopefully boost confidence | ![]() alibizzle | |
02/7/2024 18:28 | Wait ,let the court cases finish first, catching the falling knife is not going to help. | abdullla | |
02/7/2024 17:00 | Good time to buy | ![]() alibizzle | |
02/7/2024 16:21 | I said two pounds down, sadly now share price has lost one pound down to £15 | abdullla | |
30/6/2024 14:10 | Possibly, but unlikely. A few cases like this build up a confidence gap as many individuals wouldn't know how to build a case with doubtful scientific evidence. Class actions (consisting of mutiple claimants) are also failing. | tradermichael | |
29/6/2024 08:27 | 28 June 2024: GSK plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK) reached a confidential settlement with Martin Gross resolving the case he filed in Illinois state court. GSK does not admit any liability in this settlement. The case will now be dismissed as to GSK. | tradermichael |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions