Green & Smart Share Discussion Threads

[bbr391] 25/10/2018 17:17

As expected great news .
No market reaction .
The future looks as if 10p may be surpassed before Christmas.

Best of All

[ntv] 24/9/2018 09:28

managed to unload my shares into the rise so i will watch from the side lines for a while

[bbr391] 15/9/2018 19:48

Yes 10p may be surpassed soon .
Plenty of value here .
20p seems achievable.
Dependent on news .

Best of All

[ntv] 12/9/2018 12:44

moving up now and almost back to pre suspension price

[ntv] 09/8/2018 16:33

maybe not going to happen now

[ntv] 19/7/2018 07:08

took a small holding here along while ago and now it has technically raised money above my buy in price
shocked it is going to survive considering how the debtors had grown but the business model in principle looked good
now time will tell but this is a large injection of cash so there is hope

[cyfran101] 08/9/2016 00:02

!YOUTUBEVIDEO:DEDyxw-5z0w:
Website:
http://www.greenandsmart.net

Admission Document:
http://217.41.19.60/GreenSmart/CorporateDocuments.asp

Media Coverage:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/12104159/Green-and-Smart-announce-plans-to-float-on-AIM.html

http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/125858/green-smart-rises-to-opening-day-premium-on-aim-125858.html

Business Structure (Admission Document 3.2):
Green & Smart Holdings plc (Jersey)
Green & Smart Ventures Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
100%
Green & Smart Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
100%
Concord Green Energy Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
25%
Megagreen Energy Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
15%
Our Energy Group (M) Sdn Bhd
Malaysia
51%

Correct forum for Green & Smart (GSH) discussion.

[nickcduk] 04/8/2009 08:28

Picked up a few this morning. Should be a decent enough punt over due course. Might even get an offer from the management for a quick turn.

[davidosh] 11/7/2009 19:59

This is absolutely shocking news...

http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=200907080700122969V

[davidosh] 05/5/2009 12:04

No problem. Follow up story in the FT today...

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fd8daec8-390c-11de-8cfe-00144feabdc0.html

[alter ego] 05/5/2009 09:33

Sorry David, I got slightly muddled up about the relationship. It was his son who became a NED -see post 255. I probably subconciously remembered it as his nephew because of post 283 where Simon gordon said his nephew's money was invested in GSH. Post 294 nicely summed up the offputting factors that persuaded me to sell up. Apologies for misleading you.

[davidosh] 01/5/2009 09:01

Who was his nephew ? I remember another Scarr-Hall reseigning from the board last year but is there another family member closely involved.

[alter ego] 01/5/2009 08:37

well David, you know the answer already. ISH treats this company as his private fiefdom and the board allow him to do so. He doesn't want to share profits with irritating shareholders who question his actions and he has the power to outvote the rest so he knows he can get away with murder. I no longer have any holding but once bought in the expectation of ISH reducing his stake. When he appointed his nephew and showed no sign of wanting to let go I sold up. With hindsight, that was one of my better decisions. Anyone still holding is entitled to be furious but ISH holds all the aces.

[davidosh] 01/5/2009 01:06

The interims were out today..

Highlights


Turnover increased to £123.3 million (2008: £88.3 million)

Underlying profit of £4.0 million (£4.6 million before change of accounting policy)* (2008: £4.0 million)

Basic adjusted earnings per share were 13.0 pence (17.1 pence before change of accounting policy)* (2008:12.9 pence)

Cash reserves at the end of the period of £15.2 million (2008: £8.8 million)

Order book at period end of £714 million (2008: £609 million)

The board does not recommend the payment of an interim dividend (2008: 2.9 pence)



Can anyone come up with a good reason for NOT paying a dividend to current shareholders considering that the company is doing so well and has doubled its cash reserves ? They are a reward for investment last year and should be distributed as they have in all previous years.

[davidosh] 19/3/2009 16:44

How many bought not knowing what this man could do to their investment ?

How many sold over the last three days ?

He should pay a fair price and take it off market with the price set by an independent valuation. He should also pay compensation to anyone who he efectively forced to sell on the first news of delisting.

[value viper] 19/3/2009 16:39

how many sold and now this - verging on outrageous stuff

[davidosh] 19/3/2009 16:23

This has only happened because a number of investors and in fairness the directors have stood up to him. However did I invest in this company for it to be taken away from me like this ??

Answer; Definitely not and you have to wonder whether he made the de listing and statement look so disasterous that shareholders would then be thankful for what they are given as an alternative.

[pugg1ey] 19/3/2009 16:18

still disgusted?

[spursmatt99] 18/3/2009 21:28

Get a petition going - 75% to 90%
A bit of pressure cant make things any worse. What a sh1t that man is.

www.number10.gov.uk

[davidosh] 18/3/2009 10:18

Totally stinks and no doubt Schroders will be a forced seller now. An Action Group is needed.