We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Futura Medical Plc | LSE:FUM | London | Ordinary Share | GB0033278473 | ORD 0.2P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.10 | 0.26% | 38.35 | 38.25 | 38.35 | 38.35 | 38.35 | 38.35 | 114,425 | 16:35:18 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 3.1M | -6.51M | -0.0217 | -17.67 | 115.32M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/3/2024 12:28 | Company website...anyone who spouts on and on without reference to the below is acting in the capacity of a real placebo i.e. makes no difference and waste of time :) Why are there no placebo controlled studies? Eroxon, was the “placebo” Why hasn't a double blind study been conducted? FM57 was a double-blind study. It was not possible to double-blind FM71 as the two treatment arms were not matched; a topical gel and a tablet. US FDA accepted the “open-label | takeiteasy | |
01/3/2024 11:18 | Haleon on the importance of ‘scientific substantiation&rsquo | mdi | |
01/3/2024 11:10 | I wonder if we can raise this with the firm itself and they raise the matter with the relevant authorities - can but try. This can be plan B if your plan does not work.... | takeiteasy | |
01/3/2024 10:18 | I wondering to do the same now...the bears have thrown the kitchen sink at us and come up woefully short. We are down to the same old you tube videos relying on amazon scores as primary research - then you know it is a busted flush... | takeiteasy | |
01/3/2024 10:11 | Not sure but have topped up all the same. Given the product, this can only rise, lol | wheeze | |
01/3/2024 10:11 | With the introduction of EROXON, many wonder if this ED cream is the answer to their prayers. However, a closer look reveals limited clinical evidence of its effectiveness. | mdi | |
01/3/2024 10:06 | Question: is the most recent price action looking like a flag - wdik of course. dyor and no advice... | takeiteasy | |
01/3/2024 09:34 | Eroxon was ‘clinically proven’ to be less effective then the lowest dose of Tadalafil. ‘tadalafil showed a greater improvement in erectile function than MED3000’ And now it can be claimed ‘Aerobic activity may work as well as medication for helping erectile dysfunction’ So based on the fact that the placebo Eroxon gel was proven less effective then Tadalafil medication. Therefore free ‘aerobic activity’ is a much more cost effective solution for men with ED then just using an expensive placebo Eroxon gel. ‘If you are concerned about the potential side effects of erectile dysfunction (ED) drugs and you're looking for an alternative treatment, try doing more aerobic exercise’ Dr. Roach: Eroxon cream is safe for ED, but is a placebo Two trials have been completed, but only one was published. In the published trial, the results showed that the results for the active drug were only marginally better than a placebo, with about 37% of placebo recipients being satisfied with their experience versus 48% in those who received the active drug. This means that about one man out of nine who used the active drug found it more helpful than a placebo. It also means that most people who were satisfied with the results were having a placebo response The company then decided to market the placebo compound itself as Eroxon, which does not contain nitroglycerine or any compound that is expected to have a pharmacologic effect, although the company suggests that the “evaporative effect” of the cream may stimulate nerve endings, without any data to support this. When I looked online to see how much it cost, I was surprised to see that a 1.75-ounce tube costs $99 — and it was temporarily out of stock. I know that many men are willing to do almost anything to treat erectile dysfunction. I am also supportive of the placebo response when it is used ethically. However, I have a hard time recommending paying $100 for a compound that was designed and tested as a placebo, even if 37% of men will find some benefit from it. | mdi | |
29/2/2024 09:07 | Why do you keep encouraging him to post by aiming your comments at him haroldthegreat? Please start a MIDI thread and leave this one to FUM. | 2 solaris | |
29/2/2024 08:55 | Does ATD 'meet criteria for same intended use'. Yes as proven in Libigel studies. Has 'slightly different technology but produces similar end results'. Yes made of similar solvents and also causes evaporative cooling. And is 'safe and effective'. Yes. Its already on the market in gels delivering drugshTtps://www.pal | mdi | |
29/2/2024 08:22 | There is no evidence from any direct blind study that the non medicated ‘Dermasys&rsqu Men were first treated with tadalafil 10 mg once a day (OAD) for 4 weeks; if not successful, they were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design to receive placebo or a 1% hydroalcoholic T gel (50 mg/5 g gel) Erectile function progressively improved over a period of at least 12 weeks in both the placebo and T treatment groups | mdi | |
29/2/2024 07:59 | Here is a link to the Haleon results: | broomrigg | |
29/2/2024 07:58 | Posted on the LSE board this morning........ "Great results from Haleon this morning. Read them and realise the significance of signing with such a partner." | broomrigg | |
28/2/2024 16:55 | MDI if "However, I have a hard time recommending paying $100 for a compound " you could make a fortune and never have to buy a tube to achieve the desired response that everyone else has to pay for . | haroldthegreat | |
28/2/2024 15:29 | Does it work? MED3000 was recently granted a CE mark as an approved medical device in the EU. Does this mean it works? No. Unlike drugs, medical devices don't need to be proven efficacious to be sold; they only need to show conformity with safety regulations, which the CE mark indicates. ‘gels, sold as medical devices in the European Union (EU), aren’t regulated to the same safety standards as those applied to medicines’ ‘As a result, these products, which look like medicines, can be marketed with very limited clinical data’ ‘MedDevs for use in Europe are regulated by a business arm of the EU called GROW, rather than the European Medicines Agency, and require only certification with a ‘CE’ (quality) kitemark before the product can be marketed’ ‘This process doesn’t require evidence of efficacy or safety from high quality clinical trials, as is the case for medicines’ | mdi |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions