Feedback Share Discussion Threads

[ged5] 19/7/2021 10:16

About twice as many shares bought than sold on Friday even after allowing for wrong reporting because of the algorithm. A trickle of buys again this morning yet still .75p bid.

A lot going on according to the last interview but just the one agreement so far. If there is a lot going on in the background perhaps Tom Oakley can't buy shares. Surely there must be ways around this problem. An announcement about buying shares on a monthly/quarterly basis perhaps. I think him not having any shares (just the unconverted options), a decent salary of £130k plus an unexplained 40k bonus is causing a drag on the share price

[ducatiman] 18/7/2021 14:39

And at 03:30. Quite sad really. Something must be keeping him awake 🤔
Look forward to hearing what TO has to say tomorrow.

[lr2] 18/7/2021 11:13

7 words & a link to post something factual.

102 words of conjecture and opinion in response.

Grow up.

[ydderf] 18/7/2021 03:28

LR2 and others, TO/Feedback can say nothing market sensitive or not already in the public domain in the proliferating interviews, and you are trailing it presumably because you think it will provide a much needed tonic for the anaemic share price. I suggest that what is needed is the announcement of a material contract with the promise of sufficient revenue to avoid further dilutive placings if the share price is to recover. Paradoxically there may be a short term spike in the share price offering some an opportunity to exit as part of the possible fund raising prep should there be one.

[lr2] 18/7/2021 02:37

Confirmed. Interview Monday. Says so at 1:37.

[ducatiman] 17/7/2021 14:29

Disappointing market reaction to what I think is excellent news.
It was trialled, it impressed, it has been bought. Ok, only 20 practices but that I feel sure will increase. No figures given but at this stage that is not important.
I do believe we will get further contract news in the near future.
Of course, the question is wether revenue can build to a sufficient level to negate the need for further dilution. So if anyone from Fdbk reads this thread it would be a good idea to clarify the situation ASAP.

[lr2] 16/7/2021 18:53

Been playing this video a lot today.



Even better video being released Monday.

[hedgehog 100] 16/7/2021 18:36

LR2 16 Jul '21 - 16:21 - 8259 of 8261
"Ah! There's the bully that was always lurking under the surface."


So anyone objecting to a libel is a bully, are they?

Surely the bully is the one posting the libel.

[hedgehog 100] 16/7/2021 17:50

PeteKand 16 Jul '21 - 16:29 - 8260 of 8260
"I will not be taking down anything but I have edited praise to promote.
Now, jog along you old fruitcake."


Oh the irony of a conspiracy theorist nutter calling someone else a fruitcake ...

Pete, you have blood on your hands:

"Covid in Namibia: 'Fifteen of my relatives have died'
By Samantha Granville
Windhoek, Namibia

Published 1 day ago

... Namibia was unprepared for the third wave, due to a perfect storm of government complacency, misinformation regarding vaccines and a deep case of fatigue with measures to control the spread of the virus.

Social media has been flooded with fake posts criticising the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. ..."

[petekand] 16/7/2021 16:29

I will not be taking down anything but I have edited praise to promote.
Now, jog along you old fruitcake.

[lr2] 16/7/2021 16:21

Ah! There's the bully that was always lurking under the surface.

[ydderf] 16/7/2021 16:14

PeteKind, you have confirmed you have seen my request for you to take down your libellous statement and you have not done so. It is really a simple thing to do and I am asking you again to do so please

[petekand] 16/7/2021 15:34

The shareholders of IQAI must be well impressed that their head man spends his days behaving like a typical ADVFN troll on this thread and posting contradictory nonsense.
I’m glad Fdbk told you to get lost and FWIW I would not invest a single penny into a company where you may be involved.

[petekand] 16/7/2021 15:30

Libel? Sue me.
Medic mentioned one possible contract with a vet surgery and didn’t mention again.
Here, we have signed a contract, after a trial period, with 20 surgeries.
A huge difference eh.

[ydderf] 16/7/2021 15:23

PeteKand, show me where I praise a competitor or withdraw that libel please

[davydoo] 16/7/2021 15:00

Love the picture LR2. Is the horse self diagnosing?

[petekand] 16/7/2021 14:50

So the ex is now promoting a ‘competitor217; when he is on record suggesting all this mobile images business is a load of nonsense and not needed according to the clinicians he has spoken with. IT departments can knock together their own products without requiring this to be outsourced.
Is the ex now tripping over his own tripe?

[ged5] 16/7/2021 14:33

Orange1,you posted this:-

"Medic Bleep, a rival of Bleepa,"

No it's not. I'm sure it was discussed a long time ago on this thread.

"Bleepa is the only compliant communication platform that enables you to share and annotate clinical-grade images on mobile devices, giving you networked care at your fingertips.
Bleepa supports clinical referrals and treatment decisions within and between hospitals, community diagnostic hubs and other care settings, helping to speed up referral times for your patients wherever they need to go."

Back out in the shade this time.

[ydderf] 16/7/2021 13:44

Orange1, thanks for this, I am truly amazed nobody here mentioned it

"Medic Bleep has been developed as a simple and secure solution to the communication challenges that healthcare professionals and wider team in the NHS face while going about their everyday work. This means that if you work in the NHS, Medic Bleep can make your life easier by cutting down on wasted communication time."

and

"Medic Bleep is a simple, secure and innovative patient focused solution to the communication challenges that healthcare professionals and the wider team in the NHS face while going about their everyday work"

and finally this:

"Can you share patient data? Yes, that is precisely what Medic Bleep has been created for! Clinical teams have the freedom to share various types of patient data including handover sheets (no more losses), photos (X-rays), names, NHS numbers and clinical information without the cumbersome act of masking confidential data."

Could someone paste this on the LSE site perhaps, it seems unfair that we should have all the market intelligence to ourselves?

[digger2779] 16/7/2021 12:50

davy - I have had good news right across my portfolio this week and the week before and all of them have been mullered! It's not as if they were rising for the sell on news brigade either. Think it's the whole of AIM suffering whereas the FTSE isn't doing too badly.

[davydoo] 16/7/2021 12:06

Down 9% on a news day! Think I preferred the no news days