We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback Plc | FDBK | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 19.50 | 08:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.50 | 19.50 | 19.50 | 19.50 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC & ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 27/1/2025 15:08 by masurenguy Current Institutional ShareholdingsUnicorn Asset Management: 6,928,571. 15.81% Amati Global Investors: 5,000,000. 11.41% Cannacord Genuity Group: 3,750,000. 8.56% Premier Miton Group: 3,054,143. 6.97% Octopus Investments Nominees: 1,953,570. 4.46% Sub Total: 47.21% |
Posted at 07/1/2025 14:50 by ged5 Posted on LSE over the Christmas period by Investor Bill:An earlier RNS from FDBK stated the contract was £495k per year. The contract in the link says Value £495k to end on 28th Dec 2028. Confusion as to whether £495k in total or 495k per year. The flurry of buying might suggest relief to see this contract but perhaps more on the way. Yump thanks for your replies before the holiday. No wonder you are pessimistic with such reading. A couple of your comment helped my education. Hope everyone had a good holiday. Let's hope we have a good year. |
Posted at 03/12/2024 14:37 by yump “ but we are now in the business end and at the revenue inflection point.”Thats rubbish and a cliche. What has actually happened is that the original business model has failed to gain any financially significant traction. So they’ve changed it and are now dressing it up as kings new clothes, with even grander “potentialR I’m sure it will draw in some more naieve pi’s plus more “serious” Plus a few short term chancers. £5000 at 20p is the same amount to be lost as £5000 at £1 a share. The share price is not a measure of cheapness but I’m sure a lot more punters would like it if it was 1p. If it was £1 a share it would just look more credible, but the business would be the same. If I’d got excited about MOU’s and not sales in my businesses, I would have lost my house. TO and FDBK can afford to be excited about MOU’s because they’re living off my and others’ hard-earned. |
Posted at 03/12/2024 12:38 by ged5 Yes, but they seem to have some problems of their own. Perhaps FDBK will come good and change Amati Global Investors' minds about AIM. :) |
Posted at 03/12/2024 03:27 by jamescopperking It is positive that almost all major holders backed the placing with substantially increased subscriptions.Yes, we have many more shares now, but I think the free float remains relatively unchanged. I am very confident that the vast majority of the placing shares are tightly held in the same hands as before the placing. Compared to other AIM shares, the register here is extremely strong, with >50% held by major institutional investors/major holders. As Tom said, at 20p and zero value beyond cash, there has never been a better time to invest. It has been a long road, but we are now in the business end and at the revenue inflection point. |
Posted at 11/10/2024 17:49 by yump Would anyone like to know the total addressable market for my new social media add-on ? I’m afraid I will only be able to divulge information like that to investors putting at least £5000 up.(Small print: There is no guarantee that anyone I try to address will listen to anything) |
Posted at 10/10/2024 15:12 by lr2 Anyone noticed the changes to the Investors page of Feedback Medical? The total addressable markets information is a good reminder. |
Posted at 01/8/2024 17:48 by ducatiman Possibly another placing? They’ll need cash soon to continue their lifestyles. Will be interesting to see how they attempt to con investors this time. |
Posted at 16/5/2024 08:15 by yump Has anyone ever had a reply from the investors contact form. I see it probably goes to walbrook PR. |
Posted at 12/4/2024 10:55 by hamidahamida What has feedback produced continuously since its listing many years ago?-:-MORE SHARES -:-If you look at the companies de-listing from AIM, they have been listed for few years are still high cash burn businesses who will need to raise more money. Their share prices are a fraction of where they were when they listed...Are investors we really going to miss them? Companies who have used AIM to raise money to grow and become profitable will not delist. How long do you give a company before it starts generating money? Surely few years is enough?AIM has a reputation for eroding shareholder value, but this is largely down to companies at the bottom end, that will never produce anything apart from more shares. To improve this perception we need more of the low quality companies to delist so higher quality businesses remain. The types of business that can give investors a positive return on their investment, at least within few years.This will help AIM change its reputation, for the better, and attract more investment & liquidity. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
