ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

EPY E-Pay Asia

0.75
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
E-Pay Asia LSE:EPY London Ordinary Share AU000000EPY3 ORD NPV
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.75 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

E-Pay Asia Share Discussion Threads

Showing 4426 to 4444 of 5000 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  188  187  186  185  184  183  182  181  180  179  178  177  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
31/8/2011
15:34
Like I said .... shareholders should tell the BOD to accept the Euronet offer of $11.5m
buywell2
30/8/2011
05:34
Half year results released last week....highlights

0.4% increase in consolidated incomes
36% decrease in net profit after tax
Malaysia business impacted by higher costs and margin pressure

monkey puzzle
16/8/2011
09:43
Buywell,

I must be missing something as I looked at Hot Copper and only found 1 recent post from a shareholder expressing any concerns.....hardly encouraging if no one over there can be bothered to do anything. Most of us here are small fry holders who got diluted to hell years ago hence I never received any communications from Euronet re their bid and I know I am on the shreholder list as I get various stuff from Epay.

If the BoD accepts $10m then that's the deal I'm afraid but let's see what this so called independent review highlights, I can't say I am optimistic btw.

monkey puzzle
13/8/2011
10:15
The BOD will accept the $10m then
buywell2
12/8/2011
17:37
Nope.
Let the bidding continue.
This is worth a lot more than 11.5m. 30m is in the right ball park.

freddie ferret
12/8/2011
10:15
The EPY BOD are trying to make out that they are acting in the interest of shareholders.

To avoid prosecution

What I suggest shareholders do is urge the EPY BOD to write to Euronet saying that ASD 11.5m will be accepted

As many shareholders on hotcopper etc to agree with this course of action and to post likewise

buywell2
12/8/2011
03:03
I agree and this has a feel of not being handled at all well by epay...I mean look at the bidder, do they look like untrustworthy cowboys out for a bit of competitor info....No of course not...I cannot understand why epay thought they could get away with dismissing the bid like this...does look like they are not acting in shareholders interests to get the best offer on the table from Euronet who are a $780m NASDAQ listed company.

ALL IMHO OF COURSE

Welcome to Euronet Worldwide, Inc.

We are a global provider of electronic payment and transaction processing solutions for financial institutions, retailers, service providers and individual consumers. Our three primary business segments - EFT, Prepaid and Money Transfer - are supported by 3,400 employees in 31 countries. In 2010, we processed approximately 1.7 billion transactions and posted annual revenues of more than $1 billion.

monkey puzzle
11/8/2011
14:51
You mean this guy?

euronet letter to shareholders (craigelachie)
Forum: ASX - By Stock (Back)
Code: EPY - E-PAY ASIA LIMITED ( 19c | Price Chart | $8.54M | Announcements | Google EPY)
Post: 7035255 (Start of thread) Views: 23
Posted: 08/08/11 14:48 Stock Price (at time of posting): 17.5c Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Stock Held From: 220.236.xxx.xxx

New Post Post Reply Thread View (0)
Back >
I have received a circular letter from Euronet to EPY shareholders dated 02 August 2011.

Euronet indicate in this letter the apparent reluctance of EPY (Lo?) to treat with Euronet even though it is obviously, imho, in we shareholders best interests.

Euronets letter states that EPY did not seek a competitive bid from Euronet after receiving Simon Lo's "Tabriki" offer, even though Euronet is a leading global electronic payments provider. This omission to act by the EPY board causes me real concern.

Euronet's letter also indicates that EPY (Lo?)is playing hardball on Euronet's due diligence enquiries.

Euronet suggests we shareholders encourage the "independent" directors (ie. those other than Simon Lo) to treat with Euronet in a meaningful way.

Euronet indicate they are serious about their offer of $11.5m and intend to proceed with it if they can get sufficient co-operation from EPY in the conduct of due diligence and the findings are satisfactory.

This indicates to me that the announcements on the ASX by EPY concerning these matters are potentially misleading to the point of deceit because they do not mention these issues.

I hope ASIC has a good look at the situation to see that the price paid is not just "fair and reasonable" but that the "independent" directors of EPY take reasonable steps to ensure it is the BEST PRICE AVAILABLE IN THE MARKETPLACE so that the best interests of shareholders is realized, not just the best interests of Simon Lo.

Thankfully, Euronet has already forced Tabiriki's offer up c.15%, no doubt to the chagrin of Lo.

monkey puzzle
11/8/2011
14:30
MP.
There is a bloke on hotcopper who is pushing for something to be done about this. Loh did not change his non execs for nothing. If the Euronet offer is accepted as valid and the company allows due dilligence to occur we will be into a bidding war.
The question is according to Austrialian company law and ASX listing rules what is the position. In Britian the board would not be able to refuse to consider a bid as is basically the situation here.
We are more or less dealing with a disguised attempt at fraud. The fixing of the board is pivotal. I hope this is not libel, all IMHO.

freddie ferret
11/8/2011
13:47
So we may or we may not get $11.5m subject to the independent expert's view of whetehr or not the original $10m offer is fair and reasonable...

IMO FWI, it all seems a bit pointless when the board have already said that it views the $10m offer as fair and reasonable and that it views Euronet's actions not being genuine but a blatant attempt to get access to inside company information as a competitor...

In Asia acting in bad faith would be seen as very poor form indeed so I can't see the expert as doing anything but agreeing with the board's view and confirming the $10m offer is acceptable.

Looks like a window dressing exercise to me and nothing more and fully expect Euronet bid to fail.

monkey puzzle
11/8/2011
13:36
and here is alot more of interest to us to read as well.....the company letter to us...............

10 August 2011

Dear e-pay Asia Limited shareholder

E-PAY ASIA LIMITED (EPY) – SALE OF OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES

Background:

The directors of e-pay Asia Limited (E-pay) or (the Company) have decided to put on record a historical chronology for the sale of its operating subsidiaries, given the interest shown at the Company's AGM last Friday and the letter sent to shareholders by Euronet.

E-pay is currently undertaking the sale of its operating subsidiaries and main assets, E-Pay Asia Holdings and Mobiepay SDN BHD, after receiving an unsolicited offer of $8,550,000 from Tobikiri Capital Limited, a company controlled by Mr Simon Loh, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of E-pay.

Heads of Agreement

To this end, the Company entered into a Heads of Agreement with Tobikiri Capital Limited and advised the market on 13 April 2011. That Heads of Agreement was formalised in a Share Sale Agreement announced on 4 May 2011.
The Tobikiri contract was and is unconditional, except for conditions for the benefit of the Company.

Shareholder Protection Mechanism

In those Heads of Agreement as outlined in the Company's 13 April announcement and subsequently, in the formal agreement with Tobikiri as outlined in the Company's 4 May 2011 announcement, there was clear provision for a mechanism whereby any competing proposal for the Company's operating subsidiaries could be matched by Tobikiri, thus maximising the return to shareholders. This mechanism effectively opened the door to expressions of interest and provided a safeguard so that the Company's subsidiaries could be sold at the best available terms, for the benefit of shareholders.

No expressions of Interest

Between 13 April 2011, when the Company's announced its intention to sell the subsidiaries (and the price matching mechanism) and 27 June 2011, when the Company first became aware of the Euronet offer, no expressions of interest were received for the Company's subsidiaries and in particular, there was no communication from Euronet. By this time, in the absence of expressions of interest, the Company had commissioned an independent expert to express an opinion on the fairness and reasonableness of Tobikiri's $8,550,000 offer. That opinion in draft form, expressed the view that the Tobikiri offer was fair and reasonable.

Ground Rules to Protect Shareholders

When the Company received Euronet's conditional competing proposal for $10 million, the independent directors resolved on implementing a set of ground rules for managing competing proposals, to:

1.put a reasonable timeline on the process;
2.prevent a situation where neither proposal would proceed; and
3.ensure that speculative bidders or bidders without genuine intent or ability to complete, were filtered out.

To this end, the independent directors asked both Tobikiri and Euronet to pay a 30% deposit on their offered purchase price, to pre-pay the balance of the purchase price before the planned EGM and in the case of Euronet, to formalise its offer in a binding agreement by close of business on 29 July 2011.

The Company also asked Euronet to put its best offer on the table.

These conditions were put to Euronet's lawyers on 8 July 2011 and given that Euronet's offer expressly stated that it was to be on the same terms and conditions as the Tobikiri contract except as expressly otherwise stated, the independent directors considered this a more than reasonable time frame.
Tobikiri agreed to the ground rules, matched the $10 million offer from Euronet, amended its contract accordingly and paid the deposit.

Euronet's Actions

While Euronet did pay the initial deposit, it failed to pay the top-up deposit on its increased conditional offer of $11.5 million; it failed to enter into a confidentiality deed relating to Euronet's proposed due diligence on E-pay and it failed to formalise its offer into a binding contract, when requested by E-pay.

Euronet is a competitor of E-pay

Shareholders will be aware that Euronet and the Company, through one of its subsidiaries, have a joint venture in Malaysia. As a result, Euronet has access to the information it could assess for its offer, without formal due diligence, in relation to E-pay Asia Holdings.

However, in relation to Mobiepay, Euronet is a competitor and in order to protect the Company and shareholders from the obvious detriment of making sensitive, confidential commercial information available to a competitor, the Company insisted that such sensitive information would not be made available to Euronet. Instead, the Company suggested appropriate warranties to Euronet, which suggestion did not elicit any meaningful response.

Euronet refused to give an indemnity for misuse of the Company's confidential information

Despite the Company's efforts, Euronet insisted on full access to sensitive commercial confidential information, but refused to give the Company an indemnity for any misuse of that confidential information, when requested by E-pay.

Euronet refused to enter into an agreement

Euronet declined to comment on, propose amendments to, negotiate concerning or execute the agreement given to it by the Company based on Euronet's offer to enter into an agreement on substantially the same terms as the Tobikiri agreement.

Status of Euronet offer

The current status of the Euronet offer is:

1.The offer is conditional and is not binding on Euronet;

2.The Euronet conditional offer is subject to entering into a contract, while
Euronet has shown what the independent directors believe is a lack of genuine commitment to proceed to a formal contract;

3.The offer is conditional on due diligence by Euronet, which condition allows Euronet to withdraw from its offer at its sole discretion and in particular, to withdraw after it has gained access to the Company's sensitive commercial confidential information;

4.Euronet expects the Company to give it access to sensitive commercial confidential information in circumstances where it refuses to give the Company an indemnity for disclosure or misuse of that information; this could place the Company at a disadvantage, going forward;

5.Euronet did not pay a top-up deposit on its conditional offer above $10 million, despite request;

6.Euronet, despite its supposed interest in the Company's subsidiaries, has requested a refund of its deposit and the Company has therefore repaid it; and

7.Euronet refused to abide by the Company's reasonable timeframe to enter into a formal agreement.

Euronet Letter

The independent directors consider Euronet's letter to shareholders dated 2 August 2011 as imbalanced and self-serving, in that it fails to reflect the efforts to which the Company has gone, to accommodate Euronet.

The independent directors consider it important that shareholders have a proper understanding of the Company's response to Euronet's conditional offer and to this end, the independent directors have dealt below with assertions in Euronet's letter to shareholders:

1.Euronet stated that E-pay's directors failed to "accept" Euronet's conditional $11.5 million offer. The correct position is that Euronet failed to formalise that offer, despite a request by E-pay and being provided with a draft contract. At no time did the Company reject Euronet's conditional offer.

2.Euronet's letter created the impression that it had paid a deposit on its conditional $11.5 million offer. The correct position is that this money was never made available to the Company's lawyers to hold on trust, as requested and hence was never paid to the Company.

3.Euronet's letter asserted that the Company had maintained "unreasonable negotiation positions".

a.The independent directors are under an obligation to protect the Company's sensitive commercial confidential information from competitors, especially in circumstances where Euronet is not under any obligation to complete an agreement with the Company and Euronet refused to give the Company an indemnity for misuse of that confidential information. The independent directors are of the view that protecting the valuable intellectual property of the Company is not an "unreasonable negotiating position".

b.The independent directors consider it reasonable that a timeframe be put in formalising Euronet's non-binding, conditional offer, so as to avoid a situation where the Tobikiri offer does not proceed and Euronet simply withdraws. The independent directors consider that ensuring that Euronet's non-binding, conditional offer be formalised in a binding contract is not an "unreasonable negotiating position".

Euronet as a Genuine Bidder?

The independent directors believe that Euronet, in refusing to enter into an agreement with the Company to formalise its offer, refusing to enter into a Confidentiality Deed to protect the Company's confidential information and by ignoring reasonable timeframes proposed to manage the bidding process, has not demonstrated a genuine commitment to purchase the Company's operating subsidiaries. Euronet's withdrawal of the deposit for its $10 million bid, instead of topping it up for its $11.5 million second bid, further supports this view.

Moving Forward to Protect Shareholders

The Company's independent directors now intend to again engage an independent expert to determine whether Tobikiri's current unconditional offer for the purchase of the Company's operating subsidiaries for $10 million is fair and reasonable, which determination will take into account Euronet's uncontracted, conditional offer for $11.5 million.

The independent directors intend to call an EGM in due course allowing shareholders to vote on the sale of the subsidiaries with that opinion attached, so that shareholders can make a fully informed decision.

Yours Faithfully,

CY Chin
Independent Director, e-pay Asia Limited

monkey puzzle
11/8/2011
13:31
11 August 2011

E-PAY ASIA LIMITED (EPY) UPDATE ON SALE OF BUSINESS

The Company refers to recent announcements concerning competing bids for its operating subsidiaries by Euronet Worldwide Inc. and Tobikiri Capital Limited.

The directors have become aware that Euronet has written directly to the Company's shareholders concerning Euronet's offer for the Company's subsidiaries.

The Company's independent directors also have decided to send a letter to the Company's shareholders to ensure they have the correct facts and are apprised of the status of the respective offers.

A copy of that letter will shortly be posted on the Company's website.

At present, the directors are seeking independent advice in relation to the conditional offer by Euronet and the unconditional offer by Tobikiri.
By order of the Board.
__________________
Robert Lees
Company Secretary
(02) 9299 9580

monkey puzzle
11/8/2011
13:25
As I said.

freddie ferret - 2 Aug'11 - 16:29 - 196 of 207 edit


Still in play IMHO.

freddie ferret - 4 Aug'11 - 15:21 - 197 of 207 edit


There is a new announcement out, basically it attempts to clarify matters and suggests we will only get 10m for the business not 11.5m. Let's just wait and see.

freddie ferret
11/8/2011
07:36
The game aint over yet........
monkey puzzle
11/8/2011
02:48
+27% in Ozz to 19c, no news updates as at time of posting.
monkey puzzle
09/8/2011
09:57
The sooner we get the cash now the better , I have other fish to fry at these prices
buywell2
08/8/2011
17:52
I would say we have been stuffed and Loh gets the prize
buywell2
06/8/2011
14:26
email and phone robert lees.....I never received any letters btw.
monkey puzzle
06/8/2011
12:31
i received a letter from euronet this morning saying they are still
interested in buying epay assets and asking shareholders to encourage
our ''independant'' directors to engage in a meaningfull way with euronet

they also say that they deposited the extra 350k on top of their origonal
3000k deposit as required with epay's solicitors

something seems not to add up here

any views and advice on how to badger the directors

manonph
Chat Pages: Latest  188  187  186  185  184  183  182  181  180  179  178  177  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock