We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ddd Group | LSE:DDD | London | Ordinary Share | GB0031129355 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.30 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
26/2/2016 14:23 | To put any minute changes in DDD's share price into context look at their history. DDD's history is repeating itself. Up on ramping and down on reality! | zipless | |
26/2/2016 13:39 | Posted on LSE: zatcha1980 Posts: 12,440 I believe people (like myself) are buying here because of the ligitation against LG. $25m case and its more likely DDD will win. See statement taken out from RNS: The complaint alleges that the automatic 2D to 3D conversion function performed by LG's range of 3D televisions infringes the claims of DDD's U.S. Patent No. 6,477,267 "Image Conversion and Encoding Techniques", U.S. Patent No. 6,496,598 "Image Processing Method and Apparatus", and U.S. Patent No. 7,489,812 "Conversion and Encoding Techniques". The complaint notes that despite the fact that LG licensed DDD's TriDef 3D solutions for use with their 3D personal computer products and their 3D mobile phones, the engineering team responsible for the development of LG's 3D televisions pursued the development of their 3D TVs in full knowledge of the existence of DDD's patents and technologies. As a result, the complaint alleges that the LG has demonstrated a pattern of blatantly disregarding DDD's intellectual property and by doing so, LG is getting a "free ride" on DDD's decades of research and development, and unfairly competing in the marketplace since first announcing their range of 3D TVs in late 2009. Market Cap of £3.3m and win case worth $25m (assuming it is $25m as they will have to backdate from 2009 till now) is around £17.8m. They have hired Lawyers who have represented big clients in the past: Quinn Emanuel's lawyers have won over $15 billion in judgments and settlements. Quinn Emanuel has successfully represented many leading technology companies including Google, Motorola, Samsung and Sony in a variety of patent related matters. Its a matter of waiting for the outcome which i think will be in few weeks. | market master | |
26/2/2016 13:37 | Who is Greg Hayes? :-) We know he posts under the following names Zipless, Haystack, dddfan & others He locked his linked in page as soon as he was rumbled last night if anyone searches all DDD threads they will see Zipless spent most of Sunday posting on most of them Most DDD threads are created by Greg Hayes under Zipless & haystack names Greg Hayes claims he owns no DDD stock, never has and never will so what's the point posting thousands of deramping posts over so many years??? GREG PLEASE SEEK HELP URGENTLY YOU'RE NOT RIGHT IN THE HEAD!!!!!!! | market master | |
26/2/2016 13:33 | Posted on LSE: zatcha1980 Posts: 12,440 I believe people (like myself) are buying here because of the ligitation against LG. $25m case and its more likely DDD will win. See statement taken out from RNS: The complaint alleges that the automatic 2D to 3D conversion function performed by LG's range of 3D televisions infringes the claims of DDD's U.S. Patent No. 6,477,267 "Image Conversion and Encoding Techniques", U.S. Patent No. 6,496,598 "Image Processing Method and Apparatus", and U.S. Patent No. 7,489,812 "Conversion and Encoding Techniques". The complaint notes that despite the fact that LG licensed DDD's TriDef 3D solutions for use with their 3D personal computer products and their 3D mobile phones, the engineering team responsible for the development of LG's 3D televisions pursued the development of their 3D TVs in full knowledge of the existence of DDD's patents and technologies. As a result, the complaint alleges that the LG has demonstrated a pattern of blatantly disregarding DDD's intellectual property and by doing so, LG is getting a "free ride" on DDD's decades of research and development, and unfairly competing in the marketplace since first announcing their range of 3D TVs in late 2009. Market Cap of £3.3m and win case worth $25m (assuming it is $25m as they will have to backdate from 2009 till now) is around £17.8m. They have hired Lawyers who have represented big clients in the past: Quinn Emanuel's lawyers have won over $15 billion in judgments and settlements. Quinn Emanuel has successfully represented many leading technology companies including Google, Motorola, Samsung and Sony in a variety of patent related matters. Its a matter of waiting for the outcome which i think will be in few weeks. | market master | |
26/2/2016 13:26 | It is quite clear from looking at the trades that it has been the guy from Arisawa but recently and probably today. The smallish trades are most likely average investors and you can see from today that these are mainly sells. This has been the pattern for a long time. Any rise and average holders use it as a chance to get out. | zipless |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions