We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cmc Markets Plc | LSE:CMCX | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B14SKR37 | ORD 25P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 254.00 | 255.00 | 256.00 | 259.50 | 254.00 | 254.00 | 298,889 | 16:35:28 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Security Brokers & Dealers | 321.78M | 41.44M | 0.1481 | 17.25 | 714.93M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
27/2/2019 06:57 | A company in transition possibly, but currently their revenues to expenses ratio is totally out of quilter with the current reduction in revenue forecast. Somebody earlier remarked this might even drop into loss, that is possible, and the dividend is set at relative to profit, there may not be one next time! | bookbroker | |
27/2/2019 00:02 | At the current price, providing the dividend is maintained at current levels, then the yield is over 10%. I would think that this would appeal to income seekers in a big way. | knowing | |
26/2/2019 14:22 | Better buy some more countless, this pathetic organisation that pretty much invented the software for trading CFDs and Spreadbetting completely has let others steal its march, how is it, that with all their products you can trade in, let Plus 500 become 4X its size, and revenue to match. Maybe Peter Cruddas just happy to trundle along, we can hope for a takeover now, I see this one’s days numbered. Cruddas took his dough when it IPO’d, clearly little incentive followed, but I still think he carries much respect in the city circles irrespective! | bookbroker | |
25/2/2019 09:52 | my buy is showing as a sell! | countless | |
25/2/2019 08:09 | Cruddas needs to step up and show some leadership, he knows the city well enough, and has seen the transitions, they have this capital buffer which can be put to use, or used to deviate away from core markets. Their technology seems pretty good, but holders are getting a raw deal at the moment, so the gaffer needs to come up with some imaginative ways to restore faith, i’ll Hold for now, but that was a badly timed statement Friday, Cruddas should know better! | bookbroker | |
22/2/2019 21:55 | He’s an Eastender, hard as a rhino’s ass! | bookbroker | |
22/2/2019 21:37 | Definitely will care. This will hurt - good time to think about buying back though. | nigelpm | |
22/2/2019 19:18 | but how they can say that 2020 forecasts are still intact are beyond me. That was the key point - clearly they've seen something which indicates this isn't that serious. | nigelpm | |
22/2/2019 18:55 | Went for a few large lumps between 90 and 95p this afternoon. Shocked by the fall on a pretty nothing statement to my mind - perhaps someone behind the scenes is going for an MBO. | nigelpm | |
22/2/2019 18:30 | Maybe, but their costs do seem high compared to others in this market, very disappointing all the same, but backed up by strong balance sheet. To state at the end of January everything good, and then this, it’s a gobsmacker, the companies in this sector are becoming very erudite at being ignorant of the truth! | bookbroker | |
22/2/2019 16:46 | c. 10% reduction in revenue guidance. probably will make a full year loss I would imagine. | jimbo123elf | |
22/2/2019 16:24 | 20%+ drop for 5% reduction mmmmmmmm | knowing | |
22/2/2019 16:22 | naughty to sneak out Friday afternoon | tsmith2 | |
22/2/2019 14:38 | Been waiting to bein but reluctant to now! | gswredland | |
22/2/2019 14:33 | .....lol....not so respectable after all !!! | gorilla36 | |
15/2/2019 15:47 | This is just being tarred by Plus 500, and the bandits in charge there, but of a shame that respectable companies in a sector are chastened by the action of the ringers! | bookbroker | |
04/2/2019 09:55 | What I would like to see here is a commitment to shareholder value, we’ve heard the patter from Peter Cruddas about how long he has been in this business, they have surplus capital requirements, so what do they propose. PC. has this substantial stake, and a very nice nest egg from the flotation, but what is the point in being a public company with additional smaller shareholders if value creation is unnecessary, they are unlikely to have to raise capital with this structure, more likely to merge or be taken over. It would be nice to see some action, ok so the regulations have made the business harder to quantify but we seem just to be bouncing along the bottom here, maybe with their platform sports betting might be an interesting diversion! | bookbroker |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions