Cloudtag Share Discussion Threads

[andy] 26/5/2017 09:48

smc,

Not a dead product, it seems to work, but the issue is can they commercialise it given the current financial limitations?

They need cash soon at some point, and they need to market the product they do have, so the next step will be interesting.

[smcmahon993993] 25/5/2017 23:21

Get a grip, CTAG has to be a dead product by now right?

[amitwillburnshorts] 25/5/2017 13:51

Time for Onitor to step into the B2C market.



hxxp://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/05/24/529839681/fitness-trackers-good-at-measuring-heart-rate-not-so-good-at-measuring-calories

[nod] 25/5/2017 13:03

A little bug in the advfn app.
The thread "CTAG Per ardua ad astra" appears to have been removed. However, when you click on a poster their posts are revealed.

e.g. click on headinthesands above.
The post filtered by Andy has now gone. The post under the other thread is still visible.

[nod] 25/5/2017 12:51

headinthesands
Member since: 25 May 2017

[headinthesand] 25/5/2017 12:33

I don't have an S at the end...

Yes I do seem to have upset some, don't I?

C'est la vie...

[andy] 25/5/2017 12:33

Funk,

Done.

Reason was use of personal information.

[funkmasterp12] 25/5/2017 12:23

Yes, I would suggest post 844 be moderated.

[henchard] 25/5/2017 12:21

nod,

CTAG Per ardua ad astra - Post 21 CTAG Cloudtag
HeadInTheSands 25 May 2017 09:49
@wshak is imo part of a scam gang working on AIM at the moment.

The poster is headinthesands not HeadInTheSands who posts on LSE and here occasionally.

This bogus headinthesands has just started posting today and seems to have a grudge against HeadInTheSands. Not sure, but it may have been HeadInTheSands who outed Brokerman1/goldbullion. Perhaps the appearance of this new headinthesands is just coincidence.

[nod] 25/5/2017 11:59

Log, it should work as CTAG claimed last week it had taken delivery of Onitors and are, on that day, shipping them to UK and US distributors (indicating a sizeable shipment was received).

19 May 2017:
"CloudTag is pleased to announce that it has received delivery of Onitor Track devices from its Manufacturing facility in Malaysia. These products are being delivered to its UK distributors and the US distributor with whom the Company is currently engaged and will be circulated.

The Company will continue to provide updates to shareholders via the website with regards to Cloudtag’s product, operations and working capital."


The update to shareholders via its website will not mention "sales".

[nod] 25/5/2017 11:45

CTAG Per ardua ad astra - Post 21 CTAG Cloudtag
HeadInTheSands 25 May 2017 09:49
@wshak is imo part of a scam gang working on AIM at the moment.

[headinthesands] 25/5/2017 10:49

@wshak is imo part of a scam gang working on AIM at the moment.

[andy] 25/5/2017 07:55

log,

I agree, what is required for people to lose weight is to eat the proper food in the right proportions, reduce or eliminate alcohol consumption, and do some physical exercise on a regular basis.

Discipline and motivation are what's required, not wristbands.

I wonder how people lost weight before fitness trackers were thought of?

[loglorry1] 25/5/2017 07:46

I think the point the bulls are making with the Aberdeen Uni trial is that the Onitor must function otherwise it couldn't be used in a trial.

So what I say.

[nod] 25/5/2017 00:05

"ConclusionThis trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of a wearable technology weight loss intervention (fitness tracker) with standard weight loss strategies to see which would result in greater weight loss at the end of 24 months.It found the addition of a wearable technology device did not aid weight loss, and participants in the standard behavioural intervention group lost more weight when compared to the technology group."

[nod] 25/5/2017 00:03

This was a much bigger study completed in 2016. 470 overweight people on a 24 month evaluation.Aberdeen Uni project is 20 people over 1 month. Fitness trackers 'don't help you lose weight'Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:33:00 EST"Fitness trackers may not help weight loss," reports Sky News on a new trial which investigated whether using wearable technology helped people lose more weight compared to standard weight-loss programmes.Researchers tracked 470 overweight or obese people aged 18 to 35, for 24 months. Everyone in the study was put on a low-calorie diet, given an exercise plan and invited to regular group counselling sessions.After six months, half the group was given a wearable device to track activity and feed it into a computer programme that also allows people to record their diet.The other half were simply told to continue the weight loss programme and monitor their exercise and diet by themselves.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/behindtheheadlines/news/2016-09-23-fitness-trackers-dont-help-you-lose-weight/21 SEPTEMBER 2016Fitness trackers designed to help people keep in shape offer no useful weight-loss benefit, a study has suggested.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/21/fitness-trackers-offer-no-weight-loss-benefit-and-can-actually-m/

[nod] 24/5/2017 23:43

The Aberdeen study is not measuring the accuracy of Onitor, it is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of wearables on weight loss. It refers to past conflicting studies. Some have said yes wearables improve results and some have said no they don't.From Aberdeen Uni:"A new pilot study by the University of Aberdeen will recruit 20 overweight women, aged 25-54 from Aberdeen, to explore whether using a wearable activity tracker can help. Researchers are interested in how the features might assist goal setting and weight loss, and what factors make them most effective."

[funkmasterp12] 24/5/2017 22:17

Oh, our rumbled friend may be scuttling off. From LSE:

"I will no longer be posting on here or any other bulletin board."

Why do I doubt that will be the case.

EDIT: He broke that pledge after 8 minutes.