ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

CHL Cloudified Holdings Limited

2.25
0.00 (0.00%)
19 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Cloudified Holdings Limited LSE:CHL London Ordinary Share VGG3338A1158 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 2.25 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Business Services, Nec 3.79M -2.55M -0.4844 -0.05 118.45k
Cloudified Holdings Limited is listed in the Business Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker CHL. The last closing price for Cloudified was 2.25p. Over the last year, Cloudified shares have traded in a share price range of 2.00p to 12.50p.

Cloudified currently has 5,264,212 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Cloudified is £118,445 . Cloudified has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -0.05.

Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

Showing 47851 to 47874 of 70725 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1917  1916  1915  1914  1913  1912  1911  1910  1909  1908  1907  1906  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/8/2016
14:14
I'm out of here mate, you have an agenda and i will not take part...
neo26
27/8/2016
14:12
I agree investors should do their research, read the past rns, read Quinlivans podcast and presentations.

Some posters seem to come when news is around corner and totally deflect from the points and talk some other waffle. Quite clearly they have an interest otherwise they wont be here. All that is happening is that they want to get in a couple of points cheaper.

Well sept is approaching, we shall see what transpires..

neo26
27/8/2016
14:06
You can not copy and paste? I wonder is this bizarre claim is going to give way to folks drawing the conclusion that you're the one in the fantasy world fabricating stories about Police clearing logging in an national park?


OK i am sure someone else can copy and paste where the police clear Churchill of illegal logging from your link!

Neo?

evil_doctor_facilier
27/8/2016
14:03
Sorry you can't copy and paste - it's all there if you can be bothered. Cutting down some trees is acceptable if access is required - this is not logging.
No more from me - life is too short to get pulled in to a fantasy world you have created.
WG

weegeordie
27/8/2016
13:56
weegorden if you could copy and post onto this site the part in that link that states

"The allegation of illegal logging was looked into by the local police at the time and was dismissed. What they said was that, yes, some trees had been removed to improve access to the local villages at the request of the locals."

It would be appreciated.( the link is not working for me)

You do know that any logging whatsoever in the national park would be enough to revoke the licensee don't you?

evil_doctor_facilier
27/8/2016
13:55
Police investigated the forgery claim.
weegeordie
27/8/2016
13:52
Neo i need you expert insight into something. What do you think of Tambang Mineral?
evil_doctor_facilier
27/8/2016
13:51
edit
No police in logging but locals saying no logging.

weegeordie
27/8/2016
13:50
Well actually am not disagreeing with you weegorden on corruption.
i simply asked you to back up your claim that police investigated and subsequently cleared this logging!.

Save that happening, i am minded to form the opinion, shall we say, you're mistaken!

evil_doctor_facilier
27/8/2016
13:46
what facts have you stated?
neo26
27/8/2016
13:42
edf - I can do better than one sentence - corruption.
weegeordie
27/8/2016
13:40
Andy

this is his thread Bad Robots, you treat someone how they treat you.

The verdict we are getting shortly in Sept 2016 is for the authenticity of the licenses, nothing else...

neo26
27/8/2016
13:38
Andy it is just a smoother tactic neo (Debs) is using to try and hide my factual posts on the arbitration .
It will not work, i have a rule i post far more often when anti free speech CHL jihadist morons try and silence me!

evil_doctor_facilier
27/8/2016
13:35
Neo what do you think about Tambang Mineral?
evil_doctor_facilier
27/8/2016
13:34
neo,

It's getting a bit wearing now, I think you've made your point.

andy
27/8/2016
13:32
Same laywers who recommended to Roi to default on their payment and have hissy fit. :)
neo26
27/8/2016
13:17
We are trying to pass a resistance so there will be stock waiting on the books at every step untill we are through.
It was like this as we tried to pass 24 and 26.
Personally Im not worried as I think we will cross .

Just do DYOR and make your own minds up

debbiegee
27/8/2016
13:12
keeptoyourown, you post without even reading what other people post or the thread header,so we cant be bothered to read yours.
debbiegee
27/8/2016
13:05
Neo maybe to highlight a choice word or sentence or RNS , but not in demented infantile ridiculous manner posting vacuous idiotic rants like you do !

There we have it folks, no need to worry! The whole defense of the ROI of alleged illegal logging has been totally blown out of the water by weegeordie.
Why hire arbitration lawyers at £500 per hour when you can get 'experts' on advfn for free to win your case In one sentence?


If he could be so kind to show reference to the Indonesian police report he mentions above, i am sure this will help clarify his point!

Just one question weegordie. Considering that alleged illegal logging is the reason the license was revoked- and you're saying it was investigated at the time and cleared by police . Why are we at the arbitration now?
Why did they not get the license back when found to have done nothing wrong?
Moreover, if as you say. Police gave the all clear (very unlikely the police would go against Noor) Are you then seriously suggesting the ROI could defend a case brought against them when their own police proved the case without merit?

Or are we not supposed to notice that flaw in your assertion above?

evil_doctor_facilier
27/8/2016
13:00
WEEGEORGIE

Correct, EDF is here to mislead.

neo26
27/8/2016
12:57
IT WAS YOU WHO STARTED THESE RED CAPS, IF PEEPS READ YOUR PREVIOUS POSTS. TWO CAN PLAY THE GAMES MATE!!!
neo26
27/8/2016
12:56
The allegation of illegal logging was looked into by the local police at the time and was dismissed. What they said was that, yes, some trees had been removed to improve access to the local villages at the request of the locals. This can hardly be construed as logging! I remain confident.
weegeordie
27/8/2016
12:54
like you claim the illegal logging is ROI main defense, icsid are impartial ROI would have walked through this and all negative sentiments with regards to foreign investments to Indonesia would have disappeared.

But we know whats going on here, roi are crooked just like you.

CHL have been fully funded internally for last 5 years. Once the forgery results are out which should hopefully be positive the share price will explode and that $1.3b claim will be ALOT CLOSER!!

neo26
27/8/2016
12:49
Reading the clearly aggravated Neo's posts above. I wonder what kind of shock it will come to him when he finally grasps the end game (final hearing result) is still probably 3 years away?

red caps lock beware!!!!

evil_doctor_facilier
Chat Pages: Latest  1917  1916  1915  1914  1913  1912  1911  1910  1909  1908  1907  1906  Older