ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

CLC Calculus Vct Plc

60.00
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Calculus Vct Plc LSE:CLC London Ordinary Share GB00BYQPF348 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 60.00 50.00 70.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Investment Advice 1.53M 648k 0.0105 57.14 37.04M
Calculus Vct Plc is listed in the Investment Advice sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker CLC. The last closing price for Calculus Vct was 60p. Over the last year, Calculus Vct shares have traded in a share price range of 51.00p to 62.50p.

Calculus Vct currently has 61,733,566 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Calculus Vct is £37.04 million. Calculus Vct has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 57.14.

Calculus Vct Share Discussion Threads

Showing 251 to 273 of 350 messages
Chat Pages: 14  13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
02/5/2006
12:58
Orange 1 . You seem to be the main contributor to the thread. How about a new thread complete with charts,RNS etc? I have been holding for some time at a considerable loss and now it seems as though there is some light at the end of the tunnel.
johnroger
02/5/2006
12:53
Clearly Neil Mendoza knew what he was doing when he bought 250,000 shares at 5p.

As some of the directors recently put more money into CLC, I would suggest that at last CLC is beginning to look interesting. More exciting news to follow soon?

chessman2
28/4/2006
20:09
Mendoza is of course an esteemed and illustrious name. I only hope he knows more of CLC than I do.

In any event the recent buying must be a sign of high expectations so I will remain on the share register until we get taken out. Now, that would be good!!

chessman2
28/4/2006
19:45
I think you mean "entrepreneur" Neil Mendoza who bought 250,000 shares taking his stake to 1.15 mln shares, or 3.65 pct of the company.
orange1
28/4/2006
19:37
Also interesting is that an investor called Elias has recently bought a shedload. I'm with you O1. Fortunately I am 'big' in oil, just as well as I've been waiting some years now since Techinvest first tipped CLC.
chessman2
28/4/2006
17:57
How about this for confidence? The director and one of the two shareholders who have provided the personal guarantee have now bought 1775000 share between them:

Howard Kitchner, Chairman of the Company, has bought 1,000,000
ordinary shares at a price of 5.5 pence. The transaction took place on 27 April 2006, following which Mr.Kitchner had a total shareholding of 2,673,004 Ordinary Shares representing 8.48 per cent. of the Company's issued share capital.

David Altschuler, a connected person with Mr. Kitchner, had bought 775,000 Ordinary Shares at a price of 5.5 pence. The transaction tool place on 27 April 2006, following which Mr.Altschuler had a total shareholding of 2,156,496 Ordinary Shares, representing 6.84 per cent. of the Company's issued shared capital.

orange1
27/4/2006
10:11
Ian
Luckily CLC is not my only share!
It's now my "Dell Boy" share - "one day we will be millionaires".
But just like Dell Boy once made it to millionaire status, it is not beyond the bounds of possibility that the fortunes of CLC could dramatically improve. A few million quids worth of licence fee revenue in one year has been on the cards for many years and still is as far as I am concerned. That would translate to EPS of several pennies.
Granted, the chances of this coming to pass appear to be getting ever smaller
but they do exist. I am prepared to take the gamble in the knowlegde that the gamble of the director and shareholders, with their personal guarantees,is considerably larger than mine.

orange1
27/4/2006
09:56
If I had an army, O1, I'd want you in it; loyal and true to the end! I ducked out some time ago at a significant loss because my broker - who had put me into it and attended all the investment presentations - came to the conclusion he couldn't believe a word he was being told. (Remember all that talk of 'a contract a month for the rest of the year'?). This looks like more of the same and with only £170k in the bank, it looks more like my local Indian corner-shop than a public company (with the significant difference that the corner-shop is profitable!). Even if it survives for much longer, this one is never going to make your fortune, is it? Why not spend the time on more profitable share?!

Best of luck, anyway.

Regards, Ian

jeffian
27/4/2006
07:33
Results out today:

on the down side: disastrous treading performance with no new contracts secured in the last 6 months, ever dwindling cash resources.

on the plus side: strategic review completed and implemented, one director and 2 shareholders give a personal guarantee to extend credit facilities, new contracts expected in the next few months (that one was specially for Ian) and ...

the Times rumour was true(ish) - a purchase order has been received for a renal system to be implemented in an NHS Hospital in the North West of England.

So for die hards, it is more of the same: a healthy stream of maintenance revenue, no new licences, promises of more tomorrow and directors digging deep. Will the tide finally change in 2006?

orange1
29/3/2006
17:20
I am just hanging in as well.

I think one of the biggest problems is the public sector procurement process, which I am well familiar with, which takes forever. In addition there are major IT initiatives going on within the NHS so any system that is bought has to be seen as a strategic fit within the bigger IT picture. That does not mean that CC's products are not strategic, it's just that proving that strategic fit slows the whole procurement process even more.

However the directors should have known all that when they put out their more optimistic forecasts a couple of years ago.

I think it's all down to cash flow when companies get to this stage.

richjp
29/3/2006
17:03
Make it all true, great news
br3adcrump
29/3/2006
17:00
I had P&O and BPB which were both takeover targets and Monsoon, but my biggest win was Deal Group Media which went from 7p to 25p in 5 months (the only time I have ever sold a share exactly at the top!) but it has since fallen back to around 4p and I'm too embarrassed to do anything other than lurk on their thread as there's a lot of pain & anger there and any crowing about gains might reasonably be seen as rubbing salt in the wound! Mind you, I also had CLC and ULG, so I'm as fallible as the next guy! I agree that once they've reached pennies you may as well hang on and see what happens, unless you can use the loss elsewhere. Good luck.

Regards, Ian

jeffian
29/3/2006
14:57
>richjp
You are right: not a new shareholder but a new substantial shareholder in the sense that he has joined the over 3% club.
He didn't even have to spend 15k to get there either: he bought 250k at 4p for an outlay of 10k.
I too see it as an encouraging sign.

>jeffian
Contracts, what contracts? Nothing has been announced. There are just rumours of contracts. I am faithful to the end or foolhardy. It's a question of what is least painful: losing everything or selling at say 2p only to see the next day that you could have sold for twice that. Perversely I find losing everything less painful.
If it goes bust on you, you can just say: oh well, win some lose some. That seems a lot harder to say if you sell only to see them double the next day.

So where have you made your gains apart from Dicom?

orange1
29/3/2006
14:30
Hi Orange1,

Just passing through having noted the unusual excitement at CLC. Blimey, don't tell me they've actually sold something (it was going to be 'a contract a month' when I was around, wasn't it?)!! Nice to see you're faithful to the end. I took my losses - happily to offset against CGT elsewhere. Best of luck with this - you deserve it.

Regards, Ian

jeffian
29/3/2006
13:48
Read the release - he is not a "new" shareholder.

In monetary terms I would think he has spent about £15K only. As he already has a stake in the company over 3% an announcement has to be made about the increase, however small.

Still I supppose it's encouraging that somebody who probably knows what is going on has incresaed his stake.

richjp
29/3/2006
12:30
Dell
Well today's rumour was actually a late night "postbox drop" concerning an acquisition by Clarity Commerce duly RNS-ed today.

Meanwhile, I think this must be the new substantial shareholder:

orange1
29/3/2006
11:44
Orange - Had me confused for a moment there, when I saw that CLC had put out an RNS but I see that its some chap taking a stake and not either of the possible contract news, or "we know of no reason" RNS.

Haven't seen the Times rumour today. What was it?
I did say that they appeared to have a mixture of some good scoops and some complete garbage. I guess that's why they call them "rumours"...

Cheers,
dell

dell314
29/3/2006
07:48
>dell

Today's Times Rumour of the Day was spot on!

orange1
28/3/2006
21:36
Don't worry the hoard will arrive shortly
jr ewing
28/3/2006
19:54
Hope you are correct JR. I bought 40,000 more to average down but am still showing a sizable loss over the longterm. This appears to be another of my long term investments!!
chessman2
28/3/2006
18:36
I bought a few 100k today.

Interesting this, BB is dead, contract will definately be larger than the market cap.

I get the impression nobody has got a wiff of this in the wider market

jr ewing
28/3/2006
11:36
Dell

Were you around in 1999-2000? Things were a lot crazier then!
Are you suggesting any links between me and the P 'n D'ers????? What stocks are you refering to? CLC I have held since flotation. Coolabi I have held for yonks and still think that they could come good. Any others you are refering to?

P.S. Down she dives - do you really think the P 'n D'ers have made any money on this?

orange1
28/3/2006
10:31
Orange - It's interesting if, as you say, these deals have not had any prior mention(haven't looked myself) but one should bear in mind that the Times "rumour of the day" is just that. If it was substantiated story it would be presented as such.
FWIW, I've seen a few Times rumour of the days that turn out to be genuine stories and others that are complete codswallop, so I'll remain cynical until the company makes some kind of statement.

As I said earlier, listing rules require them to publically comment about possible leaks but do not require them to comment about idle speculation.
We'll have to wait and see if there is a clarification RNS.

You appear a bit derisory about the iii p'n'd'ers, although I note you do seem to share a couple of their stocks.
I'd imagine that the ringleaders have made thousands over the last few days, although the followers who make the moves happen are probably just skimmimg a hundred or two, here and there, if they don't get trapped at the highs.

The market seems crazier than I can remember in a long time.....

All IMHO, DYOR etc.

Cheers,
dell

dell314
Chat Pages: 14  13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  4  3  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock