Boohoo Share Discussion Threads

[hotaimstocks] 21/10/2021 14:24

MORE BAD NEWS EXPECTED..
WE AWAIT NEWS on this 100m claim ... UKNEONBOY worrying times

[hotaimstocks] 21/10/2021 14:21

70% returns with free postage could cause a profits warning ..RED FLAG 125p.

[slinkyj] 21/10/2021 14:21

Here come the rest of the whacko aliases lol come on boys copy paste your millions of other posts about 100p 150p 80p ha ha Go short please!

[chickbait] 21/10/2021 14:20

I think we need more gifs on this thread I will be happy to share how this is done.

[transhoneyqueens] 21/10/2021 14:19

MAHMUD KAMANI NEEDS TO SEP DOWN before we see 150p

[transhoneyqueens] 21/10/2021 14:17

whats going on with this boohoo " faked sales lead by the founder " ????? its going put a massive hole in the cash pile with this 100m LAWSSUIT US claim against boohoo

[ammu12] 21/10/2021 14:17

Sp is about to blow Good luck shorters

[factsandfigures] 21/10/2021 14:15

Also keep a close eye on the Bank of England and the MPC.

The smart City money is betting on a rise in UK interest rates by Xmas 2021




(You clowns can have that one, as FREEBIE on me)

[ammu12] 21/10/2021 14:07

300p by dec

[millennialinvestor] 21/10/2021 14:07

FACTS AND FIGURES ALIAS REQUIRED URGENTLY

[newstead40] 21/10/2021 14:04

People that buy clothes from boo don't own houses, there young and living at home with no gas bill or inflation worries

[dissentingvoices] 21/10/2021 13:57

UK Households are now spending more money on paying their inflated Gas and Electricity bills, putting food on the table and keeping the roof over their heads.

Buying clothes is NOT a high priority and it is reflected in the ABNORMALLY HIGH levels of Boohoo returns going through Boohoo's Burnley distribution centre

[slinkyj] 21/10/2021 13:55

We agree on this one then Sb ?

[sbb1x] 21/10/2021 13:52

Easy 300+ target with Xmas and boohoo busiest period coming up.People are spending money on everything like its going out of fashion

[sparsam] 21/10/2021 13:52

The beast awakens. Looking forward toSmelly burnt shorts aka Mel and Ds b2s and the other losers

[dissentingvoices] 21/10/2021 13:52

Hmmmm.... the truth is out there and YOU dont like it

[sbb1x] 21/10/2021 13:52

Ammu, slinky the derampers on this boo bored are aboulure nightmare spamming nonstop

[ammu12] 21/10/2021 13:47

300p target by dec

[dissentingvoices] 21/10/2021 13:45

NEVER overlook the fact that the Kamani family have extracted hundreds of millions of pounds of SHAREHOLDER MONEY out of Boohoo PLC.

Paying way over the odds to acquire the trading name and the branding of PrettyLittleThing, (previously owned by Kamani's own two sons).

Maybe compare the prices paid for PLT against the prices paid for Debenhams, Oasis, Coast, Karen Millen, etc and then draw your own conclusions.

Then Kamani installed his 3rd son to run BoohooMan and how many more Kamanis are actually on the Boohoo payroll...... check for yourselves !!!

It is no wonder former Boohoo Chairman, Peter Williams was on Kamani's back about "feathering the nest" and non compliance with the City's rules

[ammu12] 21/10/2021 13:45

There is she blows

[millennialinvestor] 21/10/2021 13:39

DON'T LISTEN TO THE DE-RAMPERS SPOUTING SLURRY

The defendants argue that despite claiming that they “fell victim to the deception” of the retailers’ various sale events, they do not allege any tangible harm. Khan, for instance, claims that he was duped by Boohoo’s “50% Off Everything” advertising, but “does not allege that he is out-of-pocket anything, e.g., that his $6 t- shirts were worth less than the rock-bottom price he paid for them.” With that in mind, Boohoo and co. argue that the plaintiffs lack standing to bring their suits since “they do not plausibly allege that they suffered any damages, i.e., that the price they paid was more than the value received.”
Beyond the plaintiffs’ failure to establish that they were harmed by the defendants’ “false advertising,” the defendants claim that the court should strike down the sweeping class allegations for products that Kahn, Hilton, and Lee never actually purchased. “For example, although she only bought one $24-pair of shoes on the Nasty Gal website, Lee seeks to serve as a class representative for claims covering every product sold on the Nasty Gal website to every customer in the U.S. over the past four years,” the defendants assert. The same for Hilton, who only “bought seven items,” and Khan, who bought twelve items, seven of which were “the same $6 t-shirt.” As such, they “do not have standing to assert claims related to products they never purchased and online advertising they never saw or relied upon,” according to counsel for Boohoo, PrettyLittleThing and Nasty Gal.
Still yet, the retailer defendants claim that the plaintiffs have filed to “satisfy [the] ‘heightened217; pleading standard that must ‘state with particularity the circumstances surrounding fraud.’” Citing an earlier decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California (Rael v. New York & Company), which refused to side with a plaintiff that alleged price fraud on the basis that it is not enough to merely allege that a product was sold was “not sold at the [original, pre-sale] price in the three months before [the plaintiff’s] purchase,” the defendants argue that the “same theory – and the same allegations – [are] advanced by the plaintiffs here” and should similarly be dismissed by the court.
With the foregoing in mind, and given that plaintiffs alleged failure to adequately plead their unjust enrichment claim (“When a plaintiff fails ‘to sufficiently plead an actionable misrepresentation or omission, his [or her] restitution claim must be dismissed.’221;), the defendants ask the court to grant their motion to dismiss and strike

credit slinkyj

[factsandfigures] 21/10/2021 13:20

Realistically, those THREE U.S. Class Action lawsuits in California are NOT going to end well for Boohoo and for PrettyLittleThing and for NastyGal



Consumer Protection is much stronger in the U.S.A than in the U.K. and eventually just watch the flood gates open across the rest of North America in all other 49 U.S. states.

Kamani can try to delay proceedings but if Kamani has nothing to hide, WHY HAS HE NOT FACED HIS ACCUSERS ALREADY ???

Those hotshot Californian Lawyers are STILL coming after Boohoo PLC for U.S. $100 Million

[slinkyj] 21/10/2021 13:20

Ooooooh we'llSee ?