We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boohoo Group Plc | LSE:BOO | London | Ordinary Share | JE00BG6L7297 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.98 | 3.31% | 30.60 | 30.76 | 31.08 | 31.60 | 29.66 | 29.70 | 6,335,915 | 16:35:27 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Womens Hosiery, Except Socks | 1.46B | -137.8M | -0.1086 | -2.85 | 375.9M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
23/8/2021 08:58 | Compare the text!!! OMG!! It’s HIM! | guruofcanada | |
23/8/2021 08:57 | Did you see how he changed the text? Hahahaha more evidence! | guruofcanada | |
23/8/2021 08:56 | BOOHOO SUBSIDIARY PRETTYLITTLETHING SPARKS ANGRY BACKLASH WITH "INAPPROPRIATE" ILLUSTRATION OF JET BLACK HAND !!! Pretty Little Thing sparked an angry backlash after sharing an illustration that shows a white hand holding a black hand in a shade completely unrealistic to human skin tones. However, when the illustration first appeared, social media exploded pointing out the issues with the “jet black hand colour” and accused the retailer of “huge misrepresentation “I know y’all shoulda had a shade of brown for that hand,” one person tweeted. Another said: “Erm you do know black people aren’t actually THAT shade of black? And our nails are not naturally black as well.” Others called the illustration “inappropriate “Delete this sh*t and put up another hand shade please". someone tweeted. While another person wrote: “Who approved this? Delete and try again.” | dissentingvoices | |
23/8/2021 08:53 | Just read it guru, disgusting behaviour from those users, and they have been reported to the authorities. | millenniallnvestor | |
23/8/2021 08:49 | Did you read the PM millennial? | guruofcanada | |
23/8/2021 08:47 | boo days this week. | millenniallnvestor | |
23/8/2021 08:41 | Melegramfortongo. You said that VOR would stand up and not let this issue drop? Did you suddenly forget whom you was fighting against? Buy2sell? Didn’t you say something? | guruofcanada | |
23/8/2021 08:30 | Tongo, surely you wouldn’t be so vocal if you hadn’t even read by whom or what was actually said??? | guruofcanada | |
23/8/2021 08:24 | Melegramfortongo. Since you was such a strong vocal supporter against that horrible stuff maybe you could help with the name of that user? | guruofcanada | |
23/8/2021 06:47 | Have they removed it ? It’s disgraceful that JET BLACK hand . Sack the BOZO who authorised that to go to print …. Maybe el gordo did it over a weekend ? Maybe staff told him it might not be suitable … maybe he just said “ do you know who I am “ and carried on regardless … oaflike ,bumbling and blundering on …. | melegramfortongo | |
23/8/2021 06:36 | Dont forget to add your own BEST Boohoo own goals. | dissentingvoices | |
20/8/2021 09:40 | VOR in overdrive | millenniallnvestor | |
20/8/2021 06:59 | LANCASHIRE TELEGRAPH REPORTS KAMANI BLOCKING TRADE UNION REPRESENTATION AT BOOHOO WAREHOUSE Workers at Boohoo PLC in Burnley have urged the company to show it is "serious about becoming an ethical trader." U.S.D.A.W, which represents employees at Boohoo's distribution hub in Burnley, says that despite the firm's recently stated commitment to sign up to a more ethical standards regime, its continued refusal to recognise their trade union leaves workers without a real voice. Boohoo supposedly signed up to union recognition in the wake of a report last year which revealed that some in the company's supply chain were paid below the National Minimum Wage and had to endure 'sweatshop' conditions. U.S.D.A.W regional secretary for the North West Mike Aylward said: "We totally understand why shareholders have deep concerns about Boohoo’s reputation, after fast-fashion links with garment manufacturers who exploit workers and reportedly paid as little as £3.50 per hour were exposed. "Sorting the supply chain is important and the company also promised MPs they would engage with U.S.D.A.W, but that is yet to happen." In the wake of last year's low pay revelations, Boohoo PLC commissioned an independent review (LEVITT REPORT) which found that there were “very serious issues” in the firm's supply chain. The report also found that chief executive John Lyttle and other senior staff were sent an email in December 2019 describing one factory as having “the worst working conditions that I have seen in the UK." | buy2sell1 | |
20/8/2021 06:49 | John oooo arrrrrrrrrr aka guru aka click ….. Obvious that click aka guru has made that alias up . Silly sausage Tut tut Byeeeeeee | melegramfortongo | |
20/8/2021 06:23 | All of this U.S. litigation should have been noted in Boohoo's latest Financial Accounts as a CONTINGENT LIABILITY. Accounting for SIGNIFICANT CONTINGENT LIABILITIES ==================== Any legal cases brought against Boohoo PLC have to be defended and in accordance with both IFRS and GAAP accounting rules, any liability SHOULD be noted and recorded when there is a probability that these cases will result in a future economic outflow of shareholder funds and that outflow can be reliably quantified. The $100 Million damages currently being sought in the THREE Californian U.S. $100 Million Class Action Lawsuits, does not appear to have been recorded in Boohoo's latest Financial Accounts. The key point being: "likely future economic outflow of shareholder funds" | factsandfigures | |
20/8/2021 06:06 | $100 MILLION U.S. CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS ==================== Farid Khan v. Boohoo.com USA, Inc Haya Hilton v. PrettyLittleThing.co Olivia Lee v. NastyGal.com USA, Inc U.S. Lawyers, Yasin Almadini and Ahmed Ibrahim representing the named Plaintiffs (and thousands of other dissatisfied U.S. customers that are also members of these Class Action lawsuits) allege that Boohoo PLC and its U.S. subsidiaries have engaged in deceptive marketing practices in violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Profs. Code § 17200, False Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. & Profs. Code § 17500, Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 and fraud, fraudulent concealment and unjust enrichment, to the detriment of U.S. consumers. In the latest Court Order dated 28th July 2021, the Honourable JOHN E. MCDERMOTT, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, ordered Boohoo PLC Chairman, Mahmud Kamani to provide deposition evidence (under Oath) on or before 15th August 2021 by videoconference (due to COVID-19 concerns). Kamani's deposition was intended to to be limited to just four hours and to matters relating specifically to class certification, including Mahmud Kamani’s personal knowledge and involvement in Boohoo’s reference pricing, fake discounts and markdown practices at the three Boohoo Group US websites. Will the Federal Judge be impressed with Mr Kamani's ego and flippant remarks ??? WATCH THIS SPACE...... | ukneonboy | |
20/8/2021 00:30 | I think we could now see a rally in Boo going into autumn. It's consolidated after the 2019-2020 rises, it's clearly stronger as a business. Ready for a big rise I feel. Management are clearly confident. Would not be surprised to see more director buys. Massively undervalued in my opinion. When you think about all they went through in 2020, and still they come out guns blazing. It's a buy all day long. | breakconvention |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions