ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

BOO Boohoo Group Plc

34.50
-0.94 (-2.65%)
26 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Boohoo Investors - BOO

Boohoo Investors - BOO

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Boohoo Group Plc BOO London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
-0.94 -2.65% 34.50 16:35:22
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
34.72 34.22 35.42 34.50 35.44
more quote information »
Industry Sector
GENERAL RETAILERS

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 16/7/2024 08:05 by factsandfigures
The only ones shooting themselves in the foot are Boohoo's Directors who are are now facing another massive multi-million pound lawsuit from angry institutional shareholders.





Fox Williams LLP, a leading London law firm, filed a group litigation claim against Boohoo Group plc (“Boohoo”) and its Directors, on 17 May 2024 on behalf of institutional investors who suffered losses as a result of Boohoo’s alleged breaches of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Fox Williams LLP, led by litigation partners Andrew Hill and Matthew Reach, are acting for a group of institutional investors who purchased Boohoo shares in the years leading up to The Sunday Times expose on 5 July 2020 and suffered massive financial losses as a result of the share price drop.
Posted at 08/7/2024 15:54 by ukneonboy
The simple and concise answer to that question is ......... NO !!!

and this is the reason why:





Fox Williams LLP, a leading London law firm, filed a group litigation claim against Boohoo Group plc (“Boohoo”) and its Directors, on 17 May 2024 on behalf of institutional investors who suffered losses as a result of Boohoo’s alleged breaches of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Fox Williams LLP, led by litigation partners Andrew Hill and Matthew Reach, are acting for a group of institutional investors who purchased Boohoo shares in the years leading up to The Sunday Times expose on 5 July 2020 and suffered massive financial losses as a result of the share price drop.
Posted at 02/7/2024 07:39 by sellhighandbuylow
Fox Williams LLP, a leading London law firm, filed a group litigation claim against Boohoo Group plc (“Boohoo”) and its Directors, on 17 May 2024 on behalf of institutional investors who suffered losses as a result of Boohoo’s alleged breaches of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Fox Williams LLP, led by litigation partners Andrew Hill and Matthew Reach, are acting for a group of institutional investors who purchased Boohoo shares in the years leading up to The Sunday Times expose on 5 July 2020 and suffered massive financial losses as a result of the share price drop.
Posted at 23/6/2024 08:29 by ukneonboy
On the subject of costly lawsuits, Kamani and Lyttle definitely can't brush this one, under the carpet.





Fox Williams LLP, a leading London law firm, filed a group litigation claim against Boohoo Group plc (“Boohoo”) on 17 May 2024 on behalf of institutional investors who suffered losses as a result of Boohoo’s alleged breaches of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Fox Williams LLP, led by litigation partners Andrew Hill and Matthew Reach, are acting for a group of institutional investors who purchased Boohoo shares in the years leading up to The Sunday Times expose on 5 July 2020 and suffered massive financial losses as a result of the share price drop.
Posted at 12/6/2024 17:32 by sellhighandbuylow
Fox Williams LLP, a leading London law firm, filed a group litigation claim against Boohoo Group plc (“Boohoo”) on 17 May 2024 on behalf of institutional investors who suffered losses as a result of Boohoo’s alleged breaches of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Fox Williams LLP, led by litigation partners Andrew Hill and Matthew Reach, are acting for a group of institutional investors who purchased Boohoo shares in the years leading up to The Sunday Times expose on 5 July 2020 and suffered massive financial losses as a result of the share price drop.
Posted at 11/6/2024 13:03 by ukneonboy
BOOHOO INVESTORS SEEK £100 MILLION IN DAMAGES AFTER SLAVE LABOUR SCANDAL
========================================================================
A group of investors in Boohoo are seeking more than £100 Million in compensation from the loss making fashion retailer after reports in 2020 alleging its suppliers in Leicester were mistreating workers caused the Boohoo share price to collapse.

Shares in Boohoo dived by more than 40%, wiping more than £1.5 Billion off its market capitalisation, after a 2020 Sunday Times report of labour rights violations at the group’s suppliers’ factories in Leicester indicated some garment workers were paid as little as £3.50 an hour, well below the legal minimum wage.

A damning independent report conducted by lawyer, Alison Levitt QC on behalf of the fast fashion retailer later found that allegations of poor working practices in the company’s supply chain – initially denied – were “substantially true”.

A legal claim on behalf of 49 investors including the California State Teachers’ Retirement System – which has investment assets totalling $332.5bn – led by lawyers at Fox Williams filed against Boohoo Group last month alleges the company made untrue or misleading statements and failed to disclose or delayed the disclosure of material information about the matter to the market, breaching its obligations under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

The group are understood to be seeking £100m in damages plus legal costs and interest that could add millions of pounds more to the potential bill for Boohoo PLC.
Posted at 11/6/2024 06:29 by ukneonboy
BOOHOO INVESTORS SEEK £100 Million IN DAMAGES AFTER SLAVE LABOUR SCANDAL
========================================================================
A group of investors in Boohoo are seeking more than £100 Million in compensation from the loss making fashion retailer after reports in 2020 alleging its suppliers in Leicester were mistreating workers caused the Boohoo share price to collapse.

Shares in Boohoo dived by more than 40%, wiping more than £1.5 Billion off its market capitalisation, after a 2020 Sunday Times report of labour rights violations at the group’s suppliers’ factories in Leicester indicated some garment workers were paid as little as £3.50 an hour, well below the legal minimum wage.

A damning independent report conducted by lawyer, Alison Levitt QC on behalf of the fast fashion retailer later found that allegations of poor working practices in the company’s supply chain – initially denied – were “substantially true”.

A legal claim on behalf of 49 investors including the California State Teachers’ Retirement System – which has investment assets totalling $332.5bn – led by lawyers at Fox Williams filed against Boohoo Group last month alleges the company made untrue or misleading statements and failed to disclose or delayed the disclosure of material information about the matter to the market, breaching its obligations under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

The group are understood to be seeking £100m in damages plus legal costs and interest that could add millions of pounds more to the potential bill for Boohoo PLC.
Posted at 07/6/2024 13:31 by ukneonboy
Boohoo investors seek £100 Million in damages after minimum wage row
=====================================================================

A group of investors in Boohoo are seeking more than £100m in compensation from the online fashion specialist after reports in 2020 alleging its suppliers in Leicester were mistreating workers caused its share price to plummet.

Shares in Boohoo dived more than 40% over several days, wiping more than £1.5bn off its valuation, after a 2020 Sunday Times report of labour rights violations at the group’s suppliers’ factories in Leicester suggested some workers were paid as little as £3.50 an hour, well below the legal minimum wage.

A damning independent report conducted by Alison Levitt QC on behalf of the fast fashion retailer later found that allegations of poor working practices in the company’s supply chain – initially denied – were “substantially true”.

A legal claim on behalf of 49 investors including the California State Teachers’ Retirement System – which has investment assets totalling $332.5bn – led by lawyers at Fox Williams filed against Boohoo Group last month alleges the company made untrue or misleading statements and failed to disclose or delayed the disclosure of material information about the matter to the market, breaching its obligations under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

The group are understood to be seeking £100m in damages as well as legal costs and interest that could add millions of pounds more to the potential bill for Boohoo.
Posted at 07/6/2024 13:28 by ukneonboy
BOOHOO INVESTORS SEEK £100 Million IN DAMAGES AFTER SLAVE LABOUR SCANDAL
========================================================================

A group of investors in Boohoo are seeking more than £100 Million in compensation from the loss making fashion retailer after reports in 2020 alleging its suppliers in Leicester were mistreating workers caused the Boohoo share price to collapse.

Shares in Boohoo dived by more than 40%, wiping more than £1.5 Billion off its market capitalisation, after a 2020 Sunday Times report of labour rights violations at the group’s suppliers’ factories in Leicester indicated some garment workers were paid as little as £3.50 an hour, well below the legal minimum wage.

A damning independent report conducted by lawyer, Alison Levitt QC on behalf of the fast fashion retailer later found that allegations of poor working practices in the company’s supply chain – initially denied – were “substantially true”.

A legal claim on behalf of 49 investors including the California State Teachers’ Retirement System – which has investment assets totalling $332.5bn – led by lawyers at Fox Williams filed against Boohoo Group last month alleges the company made untrue or misleading statements and failed to disclose or delayed the disclosure of material information about the matter to the market, breaching its obligations under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

The group are understood to be seeking £100m in damages plus legal costs and interest that could add millions of pounds more to the potential bill for Boohoo PLC.
Posted at 25/4/2024 14:27 by seedoftongo
A few investors are rattled as they know this is damaging news .
Nobody forced you guys to buy in ….

It’s a huge mistake they have made .
Oh dear .

Some rankled investors keep stating fact then asking questions about the facts they have stated .
😂😂😂😂 8514;😂ԅ14;😂😂;😂😂😂😂28514;
👇🏿👇🏿