Blinkx Share Discussion Threads

[gettysburg2] 25/8/2015 22:31

football 25 Aug'15 - 17:36 - 10034 of 10047

Thanks for the information.

Can you or someone else explain what was said in more detail ? What is the $10M - a day, month ? Is 1R itself seeing 330B views a day ? Can it act on only a tiny fraction of the views ?

I would appreciate the help.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Few interesting things that come out was 1R as something like 330 billion views a day and there are only accessing 1% of it which is at just above breakeven point for 1R and hope to in the coming months to get up to 6 to 7% when asked what that 1% was in real money terms means got told by Ed about $10 million."

[sikhthetech] 25/8/2015 22:23

According to Faultwire, it was PinballCorp website & company which closed, Pinball continues with Leadimpact... so I their answer that it's closed and is still out there is what I thought...
Revenue from it... depends on what Ed means by very small proportion...10% could be a very small proportion... that would equate to $25m..even 5% is $12.5m..
If the revenue is so small, why not close it altogether and remove the potential continuing damage to reputation...





1gw 25 Aug'15 - 15:37 - 10009 of 10053 4 0

blinkx AGM.
<...>

o Pinball has not closed, it's still out there somewhere but not significant (note this is a different answer to the one Matthew got, so don't know who's right)
o Ex-Zango assets were never a significant proportion of the revenue. I told Ed that I had heard him quoted as saying "less than 3%" or "less than 5%". He wouldn't give a figure but did confirm that it had never been more than a very small proportion of the revenue.

<...>

[barkboo] 25/8/2015 22:09

Hi Stocky - yes..............................................woolacombe bay sunrise takes a lot of beating. Then of course the bay of cannes is sensational.

What do you think is up with everyone?

[leluot3] 25/8/2015 22:05

stocky
25 Aug'15 - 21:52 - 10050 of 10050 0 0


Barkboo, any views?




EEEAAAAWWWWW

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 25/8/2015 21:58

Some nice PR for 1R. Emarketer have a decent following. httP://www.emarketer.com/m/Article/How-Big-Influencers-Influence/1012904

[stocky] 25/8/2015 21:52

Barkboo, any views?

[sikhthetech] 25/8/2015 21:44

posting negativity...
That's a big chunk against him... but 80% is a huge majority...
double standards...


langster 25 Aug'15 - 20:26 - 100349 of 100355 0 0

20% voted against BM.

That's quite a big chunk against him.

If he fails to deliver, his position will be all the more precarious.

He's been served notice by 1 in 5 today that it just isn't good enough.

Let's see what happens next.

[langster] 25/8/2015 21:41

STT

Stop trying to twist everything.

20% is naturally a minority but it is quite a sizeable minority nonetheless.

[gowlane] 25/8/2015 21:34

thanks for the update Football, this seems like it could go either way, almost as if they are starting again completely from scratch with R1

what did you think of the new Chairman, there seems to be more effort put into communicating with shareholders - with apologies to Borneobob who asked a perfectly valid question

I mean allegedly back to ebitda breakeven in H2 last year, performing up to expectations in Q1 and now falling off a cliff in Q2, strange business indeed

[geheimnis2] 25/8/2015 21:24

Thanks for the update, footy!

SC just exudes style and panache?

Wow!

[sikhthetech] 25/8/2015 21:19

fb,
isn't 19p what you said that you bought your shares at years ago...
explains why you're desperate, doesn't it..


football - 07 Aug 2014 - 09:02:36 - 80006 of 100357
BARKBOO my avg as gone up in the last few weeks from 19p to 21p ish I've never paid so much for my blinkx shares






edit: included link and post from fb to Barky 7/08/14 on Digi's thread proving fb did say he's average was 19p...

[leluot3] 25/8/2015 21:10

The Geheimnis system for assessing the investment potential of Blinkx:

"what was SC wearing?"

I guess that could make an excellent final sentence in this whole sorry story

[leluot3] 25/8/2015 21:06

Good post sikhy!

what a pathetic defence football puts up for the lies and untruths posted and reposted on these threads. Now the reality is clear - you will be lucky to get 19p for your shares tomorrow and these crooks were calling 240op!!!!!!!

[sikhthetech] 25/8/2015 20:56

what a bitter twisted loser ...
It's because of lying, manipulating idiots like you that deliberately lied, manipulated others that so many have lost money...

You should be ashamed of yourself....


contact the FCA and tell them I'm posting as Leluot..they would love to hear your lies...

[sikhthetech] 25/8/2015 20:53

Langster,

stop the bashing/negativity...
he got 80% majority vote to retain him is what you want to say...



langster 25 Aug'15 - 20:26 - 100349 of 100350 0 0

20% voted against BM.

That's quite a big chunk against him.

If he fails to deliver, his position will be all the more precarious.

He's been served notice by 1 in 5 today that it just isn't good enough.

Let's see what happens next.

[football] 25/8/2015 20:52

good post leluot3 sorry STT is it?






forgot to add about the AGM today the most asked question who do you think STT is and what a nobhead but then again only share holders can go to AGM's

[sikhthetech] 25/8/2015 20:46

I have no sympathy for the deceiving, manipulating, lying gang members and their multiple ids that conned others....
Playing the victim now won't wash...

That's different from those who posted having attachment to their holdings and believing everything must be ok....

The former group should be inside and the key thrown away...

[football] 25/8/2015 20:44

Blinkx chief executive suffers shareholder rebellion

20pc of investors vote against Subhransu Mukherjee's re-election as director


The chief executive of Blinkx has suffered a major shareholder rebellion just a day after the company's shares slumped on a profits warning.
Subhransu Mukherjee's re-election as a director of the British digital advertising firm was opposed by 20pc of investors who voted at Blinkx's AGM on Tuesday.
Other measures at the AGM also faced opposition. More than 10pc voted against a motion to accept the company's financial statements, while 17.4pc were against giving Blinkx the authority to make market purchases of the its own shares.
Mr Mukherjee has been criticised for being awarded a generous share package last month, just days after the company's chairman resigned.
He was granted a 7m share package that quintupled his total voting rights to 2.47pc despite overseeing a slump in the company's fortunes.
On Monday Blinkx warned that it will miss first-half forecasts and record an underlying loss of up to $8m, partly due to weak trading in the second quarter.
Blinkx, which at one point was valued at nearly £1bn, saw its fortunes sour early last year after an academic affiliated with Harvard Business School, published a highly critical analysis of the firm.
The shares, which hit an all-time high of 230p in November 2013, closed at 19.25p on Tuesday, down 12.5pc. That followed a 19pc fall on Monday.

[football] 25/8/2015 20:43

Blinkx chief executive suffers shareholder rebellion
20pc of investors vote against Subhransu Mukherjee's re-election as director

[football] 25/8/2015 20:39

SC looked like a Asian Joe 90 even down to the walk and the way he moved his head