We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balfour Beatty Plc | LSE:BBY | London | Ordinary Share | GB0000961622 | ORD 50P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.20 | -0.06% | 361.20 | 362.00 | 362.20 | 366.40 | 360.60 | 360.60 | 1,230,600 | 16:35:15 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Engineering Services | 9.6B | 197M | 0.3628 | 9.98 | 1.97B |
TIDMBBY
RNS Number : 6301J
Balfour Beatty PLC
03 April 2018
Balfour Beatty plc
LEI: CT4UIJ3TUKGYYHMENQ17
Balfour Beatty plc Annual Report and Accounts 2017, Notice of 2018 Annual General Meeting and Class Meeting of Preference Shareholders, Forms of Proxy and Notice of availability of documents
Copies of the following documents, which are being posted to shareholders today, have been submitted to the UK Listing Authority ("the UKLA"), and will shortly be available for inspection at the UKLA's Document Viewing Facility, via the National Storage Mechanism, which is located at www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/NSM:
-- The Company's Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 December 2017 ("Annual Report 2017");
-- The Notice of 2018 Annual General Meeting ("AGM") and Class Meeting of Preference Shareholders ("Class Meeting");
-- Forms of Proxy for AGM and Class Meeting (versions for shareholders who have elected to continue to receive paper copies of the Company's Annual Report and Accounts, and either request a paper proxy form or have elected to continue to receive one);
-- Forms of Proxy for AGM and Class Meeting (versions for shareholders who have not elected to continue to receive paper copies of the Company's Annual Report and Accounts, and either request a paper proxy form or have elected to continue to receive one); and
-- Notice of availability of the Annual Report 2017 and the Notice of AGM and Class Meeting.
Copies of the Annual Report 2017 and Notice of AGM and Class Meeting will also shortly be available to view on the Company's website, www.balfourbeatty.com.
The Independent Auditor's Report on the financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2017, which comprise the Group Income Statement, Group Statement of Comprehensive Income, Group Statement of Changes in Equity, Company Statement of Changes in Equity, Group and Company Balance Sheets, Group Statement of Cash Flows, and the related Notes 1 to 41, is set out in full on page 88 of the Annual Report 2017.
A condensed set of financial statements were appended to the Company's full year results announcement issued on 14 March 2018, which included an indication of important events that occurred during the year. That information, together with the information set out below regarding a description of the principal risks and uncertainties, related party transactions and a responsibility statement, which is extracted from the Annual Report 2017, constitute regulated information, which is to be communicated to the media in full unedited text through a Regulatory Information Service in accordance with Rule 6.3.5R of the Financial Conduct Authority's Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules.
Page and note references in the text below refer to page numbers in the Annual Report 2017.
This material should be read in conjunction with, and is not a substitute for, the full Annual Report 2017.
Principal risks
Understanding our risk profile
Understanding Balfour Beatty's risk profile and establishing the most effective way to manage, accept or transfer risk is central to the Group's decision-making process. As such, the Board has made a robust assessment of the principal risks which the Group faces, the controls in place to remove or mitigate these risks and also whether these risks represent new, increased or decreased threats.
The Group recognises that its risk profile comprises interlinked and discrete risks. The principal risks as set out below should therefore be considered alongside the viability statement on page 57 and the discussion on financial risk factors and going concern on page 47.
Health and safety Risk: Increased Owner: Safety and Sustainability Committee Build to Last pillar: Safe ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have The Group works on significant, Failure to manage these risks complex and potentially gives the potential for significant hazardous projects which harm to, or even the death of, require continuous monitoring employees, subcontractor staff and management of health or members of the public, as and safety risks. well as the potential for criminal Causes prosecutions, significant fines, Some common themes where debarment and reputational damage. health and safety risks How it is mitigated could arise are recognised Balfour Beatty has detailed and communicated, including: health and safety policies, risk identification/assessment procedures and initiatives to processes that fail minimise such risks. These are to deliver risk elimination reviewed and monitored by management or mitigation and external verification bodies. failure in safety leadership Each business has experienced management of subcontractors health and safety professionals not briefing people in place who provide advice properly before setting and support and undertake regular them to work reviews. failure to follow procedures The Safety and Sustainability ongoing change programme Committee of the Board, as well and performance pressures, as business-level Health and which may have an effect Safety executive leadership on people and their teams, meet regularly throughout ability to remain focused the year to develop a consistent on health and safety approach to health and safety risks. best practice. Training programmes (including behavioural) are in place. Zero Harm action plans continue to be implemented and monitored. Risk movement Lagging performance indicators continue to improve however the upper limits for fines and scope for prosecution have increased. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Work winning Risk: No change Owner: Group Tender and Investment Committee Build to Last pillar: Trusted ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have Failure to identify, Failure to estimate accurately price, and execute the the risks, costs versus scope, right volume and quality time to complete, impact of of bids and investment inflation and exchange rates, opportunities to maintain and failure to understand specification a profitable, sustainable changes and contractual terms order book and deliver and how best to manage them value to stakeholders. could cause financial losses. Causes In the event of disagreement Inaccuracy in: with, failure of, or poor delivery assumptions behind investment performance by a joint venture decisions partner, the Group could face costs versus scope and financial and reputational risks. time calculations If any of the assumptions behind project programme and investment decisions prove incorrect, task duration estimates the profitability of those investments design and specifications could be reduced. not fully developed How it is mitigated or understood Consistent and shared policies assessment of the impact and minimum commercial expectations of inflation and exchange including acceptable margins. rates A wide and ongoing range of contract management training initiatives across negotiation of terms all disciplines within the Group and conditions including Cash is our Compass assessment of customers' and High Value Selling to drive liquidity/creditworthiness increased commercial awareness assessment of joint and an understanding of expectations venture partners or on margins and cost. supply chain. All bids are subject to rigorous estimating and tendering processes as part of the gateway review process. Commercial/contractual reviews are conducted by key commercial and legal staff. Defined delegated authority levels are in place for approving all tenders and infrastructure investments. Reviews are conducted following all tenders to ensure lessons are learnt, captured and applied to future tenders.
Before entering into a joint venture agreement, the Group reviews the relevant skills, experience, resources and values of joint venture partners to understand how they complement its own. Investment appraisals are performed and reviewed by experienced professionals. The Group analyses the risks associated with revenues and costs and, where appropriate, establishes contractual and other risk mitigations. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Project execution Risk: No change Owner: Group management Build to Last pillar: Trusted ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have Failure to deliver projects Failure to manage or deliver at the required specification against contracted customer on time and on budget requirements on time, on budget to meet the expectations and to an appropriate quality of customers and minimise could result in issues such the risk of delay-related as contract disputes, rejected damages and defect liabilities. claims, design issues, liquidated Causes damages, cost overruns, failure Failure to implement, to achieve customer savings maintain and challenge and costs to rectify defective operational and commercial work - which in turn harm Balfour controls (as detailed Beatty's profitability and reputation. within checklists at The Group may also be exposed Gate reviews (4-6)) to long-term obligations including allowing: litigation and costs to rectify unrealistic programming defective or unsafe work. targets Execution failure on a high-profile non-availability of project could result in significant specialist resource reputational damage and costs. unrealistic progress How it is mitigated assessments and cost An increased focus on identifying to complete judgements and reporting risks, including overly-optimistic claim the accuracy of cost and cash recovery assumptions forecasting. incomplete visibility Consistent application of strong and appreciation of commercial management and contract scale of commercial administration processes. judgements Targeted recruitment of key inaccurate and/or incomplete staff within project delivery cost and value data teams and senior management, or failure to analyse together with ongoing and focused and report correctly, training of staff via the Balfour which could arise due Beatty Academy. to poor training, lack Ongoing project resource reviews. of supervision, lack Gateway process embedded within of accountability or each business and held on the fear of reporting bad Business Management System to news increase accuracy and consistency failings in administering within work winning and project the contract terms to delivery. safeguard or protect Site Mobilisation Hub in place future claims, change to facilitate early and effective and extensions of time start-up on site. (EOTs). Use of innovative and cost effective engineering and technical solutions. Planning and programming is undertaken to mitigate unforeseen events and changes. Drive for defect-free delivery is being embedded at all levels. Professional indemnity cover in place to provide further financial safeguards. Balfour Beatty monitors the performance of joint ventures, joint venture partners, subcontractors and suppliers throughout the lifecycle of a project. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Data governance and Risk: Increased cyber security Owner: Group management Build to Last pillar: Trusted ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have Breach of the Data Protection Crystallisation of this risk Act or the General Data has the potential for: Protection Regulation the business facing legal proceedings, (GDPR) and/or key company investigations or disputes resulting data or other confidential in business disruption, losses, information is lost, fines and penalties and reputational stolen or compromised. damage Causes a reduction or loss of competitive Failure to correctly advantage (including loss of assess and prepare for: intellectual property) the new GDPR a negative impact on customer the ongoing threat of relationships, including loss cybercrime of confidence malicious intent and/or exclusion from bidding opportunities. targeted attack How it is mitigated breakdown of key security Data Protection Officers embedded software or management throughout the businesses to system. ensure breaches are reported promptly and risks are appropriately escalated to the Group Data Protection Officer for consideration and assessment. Data protection programme covering policies, procedures and approved access levels in place alongside a comprehensive training plan. The Group's exposure has been reduced via a significant reduction in approved suppliers. All data is stored in secure data centres with strengthened back-up procedures. Regular review and communication of the ever-changing cyber threats and how they manifest themselves in practical guidance that all employees and contractors understand. Use of up-to-date anti-viral software and increased patching of key software. All employees are trained in and must comply with information security management obligations. Risk movement The potential risk exposure has increased as a result of the higher level of fines which will be enforceable under The General Data Protection Regulation. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Uncertainty within our Risk: No change economic environment Owner: The Board Build to Last pillar: Expert ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have The effects of national Any significant changes in the or market trends, political level or timing of customer or regulatory change spending or investment plans (including the UK's could adversely impact the Group's exit from the EU and strategy, business model, revenue the change of administration or profitability in the short in the US), or new developments or medium term. in infrastructure expenditure Restrictions to the availability or procurement may cause of skilled labour and competitively
customers to re--evaluate priced materials will lead to existing or future projects. a loss of competitive advantage Causes and a devaluation of the business. Failure to plan for Financial failure of a customer, any potentially negative including any government or impacts, or to capture public sector body, could result any opportunities that in not collecting amounts owed. may be presented could How it is mitigated lead to: The Group's strategy to focus customers postponing, on the more resilient and stable reducing or changing infrastructure markets and geographies expenditure plans will help mitigate this risk. wider than expected The effect of spending changes fluctuations in inflation in any one market is mitigated increased competition by the Group's broad exposure (eg in the UK from foreign to infrastructure markets and investors acquiring the continued need for infrastructure competitors) spending. Balfour Beatty also increased supply chain mitigates the effects of such risks (eg solvency, market conditions by continuing people and materials) to adapt its business model. reduced revenue or pressure The Group is actively monitoring on margins. the potential impacts of the UK exiting the EU including potential market stimulation by the UK Government, freedom of movement, finance costs, exchange rates and commodity prices. A dedicated Group-wide forum is in place for this purpose and issues a Brexit position paper for external audiences which is updated every second month. The financial solvency and strength of counterparties is always considered before contracts are signed and such assessments are updated and reviewed whenever possible during the project lifecycle. The business also seeks to ensure that it is not over-reliant on any one counterparty. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- People Risk: No change Owner: The Board Build to Last pillar: Expert ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have Inability to attract Failure to recruit and retain and retain required appropriately skilled people levels of skilled and could harm the Group's ability competent staff to meet to win or perform specific contracts, the Group's objectives. grow its business and meet its Causes strategic objectives. Perceived limitations A high level of staff turnover to internal career development or low employee engagement could Lack of recognition result in a drop in confidence and reward in the business within the market, Failure of businesses customer relationships being to promote good news lost and an inability to focus stories on business improvements. Failure to maintain How it is mitigated a culture of pride in The Balfour Beatty Academy has the workplace been established in the UK to Lack of a diverse workforce provide professional development Restrictions in the and knowledge sharing opportunities availability of skilled and to ensure employees feel labour. valued and specialisms are recognised. Regular reviews of remuneration arrangements to ensure they are appropriate to help the Group attract, motivate and retain key employees. Strong employee communication channels are in place celebrating individual, business and Group-level successes. An annual Group-wide employee engagement survey is undertaken to measure engagement and appropriate actions are developed and communicated. Recruitment and retention rates are measured and regularly reviewed across all parts of the business. Affinity networks have been established to create a diverse and inclusive working environment. Emerging talent is supported via a range of graduate, apprenticeship, trainee and industrial placement/internship schemes including The 5% Club (see page 32). Competency frameworks within core job families identify and support the development of key knowledge, skills and expertise. The talent review process focuses on succession and the talent pipeline is supported by various development initiatives across the Group. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Realising the transformation Risk: No change programme Owner: The Board Build to Last pillar: All ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have The momentum gained Failure to capture fully the via the policies, process, benefits of Build to Last could and practices of Build result in the Group's ability to Last is not maintained to deliver sustained profit and potential benefits being jeopardised. are not realised. How it is mitigated Causes Ensuring Build to Last continues To enable the transformation to deliver the Group's standard programme to succeed, operating procedures is a strategic a culture of adhering priority for the Group and is to the Build to Last being led by the Group Chief principles must be continued Executive. and enhanced. Controls include: Failing to grow this continuing to embed the Build culture could result to Last culture within each from: business unit ineffective communication senior leadership communication inadequate resourcing across the businesses is clear (financial, physical and frequent and people) new systems and processes are complacency within core deployed with training plans disciplines and in agreed phases new systems and processes employee surveys form a key being used without appropriate part of the programme controls being in place leaders throughout the business and/or tested. frequently monitor the delivery and impacts of the programme senior leadership is well experienced in delivering business transformation successfully. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Financial strength Risk: No change Owner: The Board Build to Last pillar: Trusted ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have Inability of the Group Failure to deliver effectively to maintain the financial the required financial strength strength required to will mean the Group: operate its business fails to meet financial covenant
and deliver its objectives. tests, as set out in its financing Causes facility agreements, that would Failure to manage financial lead to an event of default risks, including forecasting if not remedied within a specific material exposures, grace period and the financial resources fails to pass the required tests of the Group that underpin that allow it to continue to its ability to: adopt the going concern basis meet ongoing liquidity of preparing the financial statements obligations so that loses the ability to compete it remains a going concern for key long-term contracts meet financial covenants that are critical to the delivery as set out in financing of its long-term objectives facility agreements and viability. maintain the confidence How it is mitigated of customers and key The Group operates with a centralised markets and therefore treasury function that is responsible continue to win long-term for managing key financial risks, contracts. cash resources and the availability of liquidity and credit capacity. The Group maintains significant undrawn term committed bank facilities with a banking group of high credit-quality to underpin the liquidity requirements of the Group. The Group maintains significant bank and surety bonding facilities to deliver trade finance requirements of the Group on an ongoing basis. The Group operates standardised reporting, forecasting and budgeting financial processes. This allows monitoring of the impact of business decisions on financial performance over future time horizons. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Supply chain Risk: Decreased Owner: Group management Build to Last pillar: Lean ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have Supply chain partners Failure of a subcontractor or are not able to meet supplier would result in the the Group's operational Group having to find a replacement expectations and requirements or undertaking the task itself. including availability, This could result in delays, financial stability, additional costs or a reduction technical ability, quality, in quality owing to lack of safety, environmental, expertise. social and ethical. Mistreatment of suppliers, subcontractors Causes and their staff, or poor ethical Supply chain failure standards in the supply chain, risk, exacerbated during, could lead to legal proceedings, and when emerging from, investigations or disputes resulting tough economic conditions in business disruption, losses, Over-reliance on a limited fines and penalties, reputational number of suppliers damage and debarment. Retention of subcontracted How it is mitigated parties in buoyant markets The Group aims to develop long-term Inadequate assessment relationships with key subcontractors, of supply chain partner working closely with them to capabilities and process understand their operations (including safety, ethics, and dependencies. quality, material stewardship, Contingency plans in place to child labour, forced address subcontractor failure labour and modern slavery) including replacement supplier Failure to accurately list. assess project resource Lessons are learnt from supply requirements and key chain performance. deliverables All UK trade suppliers and subcontractors Unethical treatment are assessed using the Constructionline of the supply chain. service that collects, assesses and monitors standard company information through a question set aligned to PAS 91, the industry-standard pre-qualification questionnaire. The risk management framework and the gateway review process allow for early (Gates 1-4) and ongoing (Gate 6) assessment of the appropriateness of resource allocation and dependencies. My Contribution programme generates ideas for more effective procurement and resourcing. The Group obtains project retentions, bonds and/or letters of credit from subcontractors, where appropriate to mitigate the impact of any insolvency. Key supplier audits within projects to ensure they are in a position to deliver consistently against requirements. Group-wide Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct, and related policies and procedures in place. Risk movement Increased rigour in the pre-qualification processes, consolidation of the supply chain and improved monitoring of supplier performance. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Business conduct/compliance Risk: No change Owner: The Board Build to Last pillar: Trusted ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have The Group operates in Failure by the Group, or employees various markets that and third parties acting on present business conduct-related its behalf or in partnership, risks involving fraud, to observe the highest standards bribery or corruption, of integrity and conduct could whether by its own staff result in legal proceedings or via third parties (including prosecution under such as agents, partners the UK Bribery Act), investigations or subcontractors. Those or disputes resulting in business risks are higher in disruption, losses, fines and some countries and sectors. penalties, reputational damage Overall, the construction and debarment. industry has a higher How it is mitigated risk profile than other The Business Integrity function industries. promotes, monitors, assesses Causes awareness of and provides training Corruption on, the Code of Conduct. The Bribery function provides reports to Fraud, deception, false the Audit and Risk Committee claims or false accounting and has the full support of Unfair competition the Board. Human rights abuses, Each business unit, supported such as child and other by the Business Integrity function, labour standards generally, is responsible for embedding illegal workers, human the Code of Conduct. trafficking and modern The Group has a range of risk slavery assessment, due diligence and Unethical treatment procurement controls that are of and by the supply designed to identify and manage chain risks with third parties. Risk of ethics and values Independent third-party whistleblowing being compromised as hotline and dedicated email a result of commercial are in place and actively promoted. pressures All in-scope complaints are Other emerging ethical independently investigated by risks. the Business Integrity function and appropriate action is taken,
where necessary. Balfour Beatty works with a limited number of agents, all of whom undergo a due diligence and approval process. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Legal and regulatory Risk: No change Owner: The Board Build to Last pillar: Trusted ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have The Group does not comply The business could face legal with all legal, tax proceedings, investigations and regulatory requirements. or disputes resulting in business Causes disruption, losses, fines and A failure to recognise penalties, reputational damage or adapt to changes and exclusion from bidding. in applicable laws affecting Such action could also impact the Group's businesses. upon the valuation of assets Such changes may include: within that territory. obligations as a result How it is mitigated of government/regulatory The Group monitors and responds enquiry and enforcement to tax, legal and regulatory actions developments and requirements adverse changes of law, in the territories in which including changes to it operates. tax law Local legal and regulatory frameworks local procurement laws are considered as part of any exclusion from bidding decision to conduct business or blacklisting. in a new country. Appropriate and responsive policies, procedures, training and risk management processes are in place throughout the business. ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Legacy pension liabilities Risk: No change Owner: The Board Build to Last pillar: Lean ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Risk description What impact it might have The Group is exposed Failure to manage these risks to significant defined adequately could lead to the benefit pension risks. Group being exposed to significant Causes additional liabilities due to The Group is unable increased pension deficits. to ensure that the trustees How it is mitigated of the pension funds The Group constructively engages react effectively to with the trustees of the pension or manage: funds to ensure that they are changes in interest taking appropriate advice and rates the funds' assets and liabilities inflation or life expectancy are being managed appropriately. trends The Group's main UK fund has intervention by regulators hedged in excess of 80% of its or legislators exposure to interest rate and investment performance inflation movements. of the funds' assets. ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
More generally and in addition to its principal risks Balfour Beatty faces significant risks and uncertainties that are common to many companies - including financial and treasury, communications and marketing, wider information security, business continuity and crisis management, and hazard risks.
"36 Related party transactions
Joint ventures and associates
The Group has contracted with, provided services to, and received management fees from, certain joint ventures and associates amounting to GBP279m (2016: GBP344m). These transactions occurred in the normal course of business at market rates and terms. In addition, the Group procured equipment and labour on behalf of certain joint ventures and associates which were recharged at cost with no mark-up. The amounts due from or to joint ventures and associates at the reporting date are disclosed in Notes 23 and 24 respectively.
Transactions with non-Group members
The Group also entered into transactions and had amounts outstanding with related parties which are not members of the Group as set out below. These companies were related parties as they are controlled or jointly controlled by a non-executive director of Balfour Beatty plc.
2017 2016 GBPm GBPm ========================= ====== ====== Anglian Water Group Ltd Sale of goods & services 18 13 Amounts owed by related parties 3 - URENCO Ltd Sale of goods & services 72 62 Amounts owed by related parties - 5 ------------------------- ------ ------
All transactions with these related parties were conducted on normal commercial terms, equivalent to those conducted with external parties. The amounts outstanding are unsecured and will be settled in cash. No guarantees have been given or received. No expense has been recognised in the period for bad or doubtful debts in respect of the amounts owed by related parties.
Compensation of key management personnel of the Company
2017 2016 GBPm GBPm ===================== ====== ====== Short-term benefits 2.938 2.384 Share-based payments 2.584 1.612 --------------------- ------ ------ 5.522 3.996 --------------------- ------ ------
Key management personnel comprise the executive Directors who are directly responsible for the Group's activities and the non-executive Directors. The compensation included above is in respect of the period of the year during which the individuals were Directors. Further details of Directors' emoluments, post-employment benefits and interests are set out in the 2017 Remuneration report on pages 76 to 87."
"Statement of Directors' responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Group and Company financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Group and Company financial statements for each financial year. Under that law they are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRSs as adopted by the EU) and applicable law and have elected to prepare the Company financial statements in accordance with UK accounting standards, including FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework.
Under company law, the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and of their profit or loss for that period. In preparing each of the Group and Company financial statements, the Directors are required to:
- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently
- make judgements and estimates that are reasonable, relevant, reliable and prudent
- for the Group financial statements, state whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU
- for the Company financial statements, state whether applicable UK accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Company financial statements
- assess the Group and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern
- use the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that its financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, Directors' Report, Directors' Remuneration Report and Corporate Governance Statement that comply with that law and those regulations.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company's website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
The Directors confirm that to the best of their knowledge:
- the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole
- the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
In light of the work undertaken by the Audit and Risk Committee reported in greater detail on pages 67 to 69 and the internal verification and approval process which has been followed this year, the Directors are able to state that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's position, performance, business model and strategy.
Statements of Directors as to disclosure of information to auditors
Each of the Directors at the date of approval of this report confirms that:
- so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditors are unaware
- the Director has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a Director to make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's auditors are aware of that information.
This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006.
By order of the Board
David Mercer
General Counsel and Company Secretary
13 March 2018
Registered Office:
5 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf
London E14 5HU
Registered in England Number 395826"
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
ACSEAELDEDEPEFF
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 03, 2018 06:36 ET (10:36 GMT)
1 Year Balfour Beatty Chart |
1 Month Balfour Beatty Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions