We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asset Man Inv | LSE:AMN | London | Ordinary Share | GB0000580653 | ORD 25P |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | O | 0 | 70.00 | GBX |
Asset Management Investment (AMN) Share Charts1 Year Asset Management Investment Chart |
|
1 Month Asset Management Investment Chart |
Intraday Asset Management Investment Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
07/1/2011 | 19:02 | ASSET MANAGEMENT- UNDERVALUED | 496 |
06/5/2004 | 20:05 | aurum mining - RUSSIAN MINERALS - TRADING TUESDAY | 5 |
09/5/2003 | 07:33 | Cheap Warrants? Below NAV! | 9 |
15/1/2002 | 11:55 | iRegent approaches a turnaround | 3 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 07/1/2011 19:02 by ianbrewster Net asset value (cum current year income) per ordinary share is 83.41 pence, so 92% would give 76.72p less termination costs, fees etc.I think I'll wait for the money rather than sell for 67.5p |
Posted at 24/12/2010 09:16 by tel5 will there be a dividend payable or will the offer be on the price of dividend included less 8% on current prices that would mean about 74p a share |
Posted at 01/11/2010 11:15 by asmodeus Grateful if somebody would please explain the implications of the "Form 8.5" just announced. Does it mean somebody has bought more shares in AMN than have been sold? Sorry to be so ignorant. |
Posted at 28/10/2010 12:04 by tiltonboy Share alternative now worth nearer 74p. |
Posted at 28/10/2010 07:34 by asmodeus Tilton if opting for cash them, do you think the amount offered will defintely be higher than that available if selling for the current bid price ? (Silly question, I suppose). |
Posted at 27/10/2010 10:43 by jimbo3352 tiltonboyAgreed. I'm happy for the discount to nav to be reduced and for potential pressure to sell IFDC at any price to be delayed. I hadn't realised Geoff Miller had been with AMN for 5 years. Presumably, he has detailed knowledge of IFDC. I always found IFDC a bit hard to follow: Japanese asset manager publishes unconsolidated accounts in euros out of Lichtenstein with a UK sub used as a cash shell only for the investment in AMN's accounts to be reported in US$? Are you going to remain invested in GLIF when this all goes through? |
Posted at 27/10/2010 09:33 by tiltonboy jimbo,The issue is whether IFDC has the inclination to take out the AMIC shareholding, and what price it might offer. To me this offers an ideal opportunity to exit the investment, as post the IFX repayment, I wouldn't want my major shareholding to be an unquoted asset manager where I was one of only three shareholders. The shares would stand at a sizeable discount if that were to be the case. |
Posted at 27/10/2010 09:25 by jimbo3352 I can't see the logic of this offer from GLIF's point of view. AMN currently is in run off and has just 3 main investments, shares in CLIG having been sold off:IFDC SA The book value of AMN's 17.25% equity stake slashed to £3.3m in 2009 in anticipation of reduced dividends. IFDC has more than adequate cash to buy out the AMN stake. see my AMN posting in April International Foreign Exchange Concepts, IFX has already bought out AMN's equity stake and the conversion rights of a 10% 2011 loan note valued at £4.1 which also carries a revenue sharing top up. Lombardia Capital Partners AMN has a 8% convertible note 2010 and small equity stake currently written down to £0.8m. Less than 1% of GLIF's investments are equity based. Fair enough if the loan notes had some years to run: IFX had resources to buy out AMN's equity interest and every incentive to repay an onerous but short dated note, which just leaves Lombardia. Am I missing something? |
Posted at 26/10/2010 09:59 by asmodeus Have checked with my Broker, who confirms that if my shares, held in my ISA, are taken over by an AIM company, the GLIF shares would have to be withdrawn from the ISA, which I wouldn't want to do, so will be obliged to sell AMN before that point. |
Posted at 26/10/2010 08:28 by oniabsta Thought about offloading a few but decided against it. Although may have to because half of my holding is in an ISA. I realise GLIF is to move to the main mkt but not sure of the timing and if I'll be able to keep them.Glif currently paying 4p divi equating to 14% at the price quotedEdit Oop's just re read and now I realise they are staying on Aim but also listing in the chan Isles |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions