We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Sanu Resources Ltd Com Npv | TSXV:SNU | TSX Venture | Common Stock |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0 | - |
Sanu Resources Ltd. ("Sanu" or "the Company") (TSX VENTURE:SNU) is pleased to announce the completion of an independent resource estimate on its Hambok Volcanic-associated Massive Sulphide (VMS) Project located in western Eritrea. The Hambok Project is located approximately 15 kilometers southwest of the Bisha VMS deposit currently being developed by Nevsun Resources and the Eritrean Government. The estimate was prepared in accordance with the guidelines of NI 43-101 and includes an indicated resource at a cut off grade of 0.75% zinc of 10.7 million tonnes grading 2.25% zinc, 0.98% copper, 6.84 g/t silver, 0.2 g/t gold and an additional inferred resource at a cut off grade of 0.75% zinc of 17.0 million tonnes grading 1.74% zinc, 0.85% copper, 5.89 g/t silver and 0.19 g/t gold. At a 2% zinc cut off grade there is a higher grade indicated resource grading 5.1 million tonnes grading 3.24% zinc, 1.12% copper, 7.8 g/t silver, 0.2 g/t gold and an additional inferred resource of 5.1 million tonnes grading 2.8% zinc, 0.96% copper, 6.2 g/t silver and 0.19 g/t gold. The Hambok resource estimate was prepared by G.H. Giroux of Giroux Consultants Ltd., a qualified person pursuant to NI 43-101 and will be included in a new 43-101 report co-authored by Dr. Tucker Barrie which will be released in February, 2009. A copy of the resource estimate and the report will be available on Sedar and on the Company's website www.sanuresources.com. Indicated Resource within the Mineralized Shell -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tonnes Contain- Contain- greater Grade greater ed Contain- ed Cut- than than cutoff Zinc ed Copper off Cutoff Zn Ag Cu Au (million Silver (million Zn % (tonnes) % (g/t) % (g/t) lbs) ounces lbs) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.75 10,700,000 2.25 6.84 0.98 0.2 530.8 2,581,341 231.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.80 10,500,000 2.29 6.92 0.99 0.201 530.1 2,562,718 229.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.85 10,200,000 2.32 6.96 0.99 0.202 521.7 2,503,888 222.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.90 10,000,000 2.36 7 1 0.202 520.3 2,468,900 220.5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.95 9,800,000 2.39 7.07 1.01 0.203 516.4 2,443,717 218.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 9,500,000 2.42 7.14 1.02 0.204 506.8 2,392,364 213.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.10 9,100,000 2.49 7.22 1.04 0.205 499.5 2,317,310 208.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.20 8,500,000 2.58 7.29 1.05 0.206 483.5 2,185,506 196.8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.30 8,200,000 2.64 7.37 1.06 0.207 477.3 2,131,507 191.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.40 7,700,000 2.72 7.43 1.08 0.208 461.7 2,017,832 183.3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.50 7,300,000 2.79 7.5 1.09 0.209 449.0 1,931,033 175.4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.60 6,800,000 2.88 7.49 1.1 0.209 431.8 1,796,372 164.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.70 6,300,000 2.97 7.6 1.11 0.21 412.5 1,688,728 154.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.80 5,900,000 3.05 7.64 1.12 0.21 396.7 1,589,831 145.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.90 5,500,000 3.14 7.73 1.12 0.211 380.7 1,499,504 135.8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.00 5,100,000 3.24 7.81 1.12 0.212 364.3 1,404,839 125.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inferred Resource within the Mineralized Shell -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tonnes Contain- Contain- greater Grade greater ed Contain- ed Cut- than than cutoff Zinc ed Copper off Cutoff Zn Ag Cu Au (million Silver (million Zn % (tonnes) % (g/t) % (g/t) lbs) ounces lbs) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.75 17,000,000 1.74 5.89 0.85 0.19 652.1 3,531,585 318.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.80 16,700,000 1.76 5.93 0.86 0.191 648.0 3,492,823 316.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.85 16,300,000 1.78 5.99 0.87 0.192 639.6 3,443,657 312.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.90 14,600,000 1.89 6.19 0.87 0.193 608.3 3,187,491 280.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.95 13,800,000 1.94 6.24 0.88 0.193 590.2 3,037,170 267.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 13,300,000 1.98 6.25 0.89 0.193 580.6 2,931,819 261.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.10 12,200,000 2.06 6.22 0.9 0.192 554.1 2,676,429 242.1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.20 11,500,000 2.12 6.18 0.9 0.191 537.5 2,506,639 228.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.30 10,700,000 2.18 6.19 0.91 0.19 514.2 2,336,038 214.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.40 9,300,000 2.31 6.16 0.91 0.189 473.6 2,020,548 186.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.50 8,500,000 2.39 6.15 0.92 0.188 447.9 1,843,739 172.4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.60 7,800,000 2.46 6.14 0.94 0.188 423.0 1,689,151 161.6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.70 7,200,000 2.53 6.09 0.95 0.187 401.6 1,546,519 150.8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.80 6,600,000 2.61 6.12 0.97 0.187 379.8 1,424,626 141.1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.90 5,600,000 2.74 6.17 0.95 0.186 338.3 1,218,649 117.3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.00 5,100,000 2.81 6.2 0.96 0.186 315.9 1,115,237 107.9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Hambok resource estimate was based on 57 diamond drill holes completed in 2006 and assayed for copper, zinc, silver, and gold. The drill holes define a massive sulphide body with a simple geometry, consisting of several stacked lenses that dip 60 to 70 degrees to the east and extend approximately 1000m along strike with a depth extent of over 400m. A geologic three dimensional model was developed to outline the massive sulfide lenses. Drill holes were compared to this volume and individual assays were tagged as mineralized or waste if inside or outside this volume respectively. The grade distribution for each variable in each domain was evaluated and capping levels determined. Uniform down hole 2.5m composites were formed that honoured the solid boundaries within the mineralized sulfide. Variography was used to determine the grade continuity along strike and down dip within the massive sulfide solid. Grades were interpolated using ordinary kriging into blocks with dimensions 5m E-W, 20m N-S and 10m vertical. Estimated blocks were then classified as Indicated or Inferred based on grade continuity. The Company is pleased with the results of this resource estimate which confirms that Hambok is a significant base metal deposit and further confirms the Company's view that the emerging VMS belt in western Eritrea is one of the most prospective in the world. The development of the Bisha Mine and processing facilities located only 15 kilometers from Hambok will improve regional infrastructure and enhance the value of the Hambok Deposit and the Company's adjacent exploration ground. The drill programs and sampling were supervised by Dr. Demetrius Pohl, Vice President of Exploration for Sanu who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. Standards and duplicate samples were inserted into the sequence of analyzed samples. The drill samples were prepared at Horn of Africa Labs in Asmara, Eritrea and after multiple acid digestion, analyzed by ICP-OES for base metals and fire assay/atomic absorption for gold at Genalysis Labs in Perth Australia. On Behalf of the Board Wojtek A. Wodzicki, President and CEO
1 Year Sanu Resources Ltd Com Npv Chart |
1 Month Sanu Resources Ltd Com Npv Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions