Antares Announces Initiation of 2010 Work Program at the Rio Grande Cu-Au-Ag Project, Argentina

Antares Minerals Inc. ("Antares") (TSX VENTURE:ANM), together with its joint
venture partner, Pachamama Resources ("Pachamama", PMA.TSX-V), is pleased to
announce the initiation of the 2010 work program at the Rio Grande Project, a
large Cu-Au-Ag system with porphyry affinities located in Salta Province in
northwestern Argentina. The 2010 program at Rio Grande will consist of 1) test
work to characterize the metallurgy over a range of mineralization styles with
varying degrees of oxidation, 2) geochemical sampling and geological mapping at
the NE target, an area with many similarities to the nearby Lindero Au deposit
of Mansfield Minerals, and 3) completion of a deep-imaging Titan IP/Resistivity
survey to acquire a better understanding of the known mineralization to depth.
Antares believes that sufficient drilling has been completed to allow the
calculation of an initial resource for the deposit once the metallurgical test
work has been completed.


A total of 33,015 m in 78 drill holes has been drilled to date at Rio Grande
with encouraging results. Mineralization identified to date occurs in a steeply
inward dipping conical ring zone and consists of a chalcopyrite-magnetite
assemblage that has been partially to completely oxidized to depths of
approximately 300-400 m. Sulphide mineralization remains open to depth.
Additional untested targets remain including 1) the NE zone with geological and
geochemical similarities to the nearby Lindero Au deposit of Mansfield Resources
and 2) a distinct zone containing higher grade molybdenum which is spatially
separate from the Cu-Au zones identified to date. Highlights from previous
drilling are summarized below: 




--  RGA-024: 128 m with 0.47% Cu, 0.71 g/t Au and 4.4 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-026 158 m with 0.46% Cu, 0.51 g/t Au and 4.2 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-034: 189 m with 0.70% Cu, 0.67 g/t Au and 11.1 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-040: 103 m with 0.58% Cu, 0.75 g/t Au and 13.1 g/t Ag 
    --  Includes 25m with 1.37% Cu, 1.89 g/t Au and 18.0 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-043: 151 m with 0.40% Cu, 0.46 g/t Au and 12.4 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-048: 152 m with 0.44% Cu, 0.41 g/t Au and 5.3 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-050: 111 m with 0.42% Cu, 0.41 g/t Au and 8.5 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-056: 135 m with 0.53% Cu, 0.65 g/t Au and 8.9 g/t Ag 
    --   Includes 48m with .82% Cu, 1.28 g/t Au and 8.7 g/ Ag 
--  RGA-064: 114 m with 0.56% Cu, 0.58 g/t Au and 10.6 g/t Ag 
    --  Includes 28 m with 1.10% Cu, 1.22 g/t Au and 20.6 g/t Ag 
--  RGA-065: 146 m with 0.60% Cu, 0.57 g/t Au and 7.2 g/t Ag 
    --  Includes 46 m with 1.16% Cu, 1.18 g/t Au and 10.4 g/t Ag 



John Black, President and CEO of Antares Minerals Inc. commented as follows: 

"We are very pleased to resume work at Rio Grande. The project has always
warranted more work, however over the last two years we have focussed our
financial and human resources on our more advanced Haquira Cu-Mo-Au discovery in
Peru. To date we have found widespread Cu-Au-Ag mineralization at Rio Grande and
the system hosts an impressive total metal budget. We have sufficient drill data
to allow the calculation of an initial resource estimate, but would like to
complete some metallurgical test work first to better define what economic
factors are appropriate for the system (processing methods, recoveries, reagent
consumption, etc.). The system also shows evidence of significant vertical
extent and we plan to complete a deep-imaging Titan IP/resistivity survey to
better delineate drill targets at depth. This type of survey has been very
successful at identifying mineralization in other similar systems."


The 2010 Rio Grande work program

The work program will consist of 1) test work to characterize the metallurgy
over a range of mineralization styles with varying degrees of oxidation, 2)
geochemical sampling and geological mapping at the NE target, an area with many
similarities to the nearby Lindero Au deposit of Mansfield Minerals, and 3)
completion of a Titan IP/Resistivity survey to image better the continuation of
mineralization to depth.


Metallurgical test work is underway and will consist of sequential copper leach,
bottle roll, flotation and flotation/tail leach testing designed to characterize
the metallurgy of the known mineralization. Parameters established by this test
work will provide a context for a resource calculation to be completed later
this year, or in early 2011. Initial results of this metallurgical work should
be available in the next few months with final results by the end of the year.


Geochemical sampling and geological mapping will be completed at the NE target
to see if drilling is warranted to test for mineralization similar in style to
the nearby Lindero Au deposit of Mansfield Minerals. This work will be completed
by the Pachamama staff who discovered the Lindero deposit.


Mineralization at Rio Grande remains open to depth and Antares plans to complete
a deep-imaging Titan IP/Resistivity survey to better characterize the full
system and define additional drill targets. This work is programmed to commence
when the contract survey crew and equipment becomes available in approximately
September.


About the Rio Grande Project, Salta Province, Argentina

The Rio Grande project is very favourably located along the prominent
northwest-trending Archibarca Lineament which also controls the location of the
world-class giant Escondida porphyry copper deposit 150 km to the northwest in
Chile. The Rio Grande project setting shares many similarities with that of
porphyry Cu-Au systems such as the Bajo de Alumbrera porphyry copper-gold
deposit which is located along a similar northwest-trending regional structural
lineament approximately 300 km to the south. However, the system also displays
similarities in alteration and mineralization styles with IOCG (Iron Oxide
Copper Gold) systems like Candelaria in Chile. The IOCG systems often have
higher grades and can present significant vertical extents to mineralization.


Copper-gold mineralization at Rio Grande occurs within a distinct two-km
diameter ring fracture zone defined by IP chargeability as well as copper and
gold soil geochemical anomalies. The mineralization is hosted by a complex
sequence of intermediate sub-volcanic intrusive rocks with variable degrees of
potassic, calcic, and propylitic alteration and local late- to post-mineral
intermediate dikes. The mineralization originally consisted of chalcopyrite and
magnetite as disseminations and fracture fillings. The chalcopyrite has
subsequently been partially to completely oxidized to green and black copper
oxides to depths of 300-400 m or more. Oxidation is typically in situ with
little to no remobilization of copper.


Antares holds a 50% interest in the Rio Grande project pursuant to a joint
venture agreement with Pachamama Resources Ltd. ("Pachamama", PMA.TSX-V).
Antares is the operator of the project.


Additional information about the Rio Grande project is available on our website
at www.antaresminerals.com


This news release has been prepared and approved by John Black, President and
CEO of Antares, and a Qualified Person ("QP") as defined by National Instrument
43-101 (Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects).


About Antares

Antares is a successful mineral exploration company with highly experienced
technical and management teams. The Company is focused on precious- and
base-metal exploration properties in Latin America that can be quickly and
cost-effectively advanced to the discovery and production stage. 


In addition to the Rio Grande project, Antares' flagship project is the Haquira
project located in southern Peru which offers excellent potential for the
development of a large copper mine with production from both near-surface
secondary copper mineralization amenable to SX-EW leaching and from a larger,
underlying body of higher grade primary porphyry copper-molybdenum
mineralization to be processed by a conventional mill/concentrator operation.
Haquira is located contiguous to, and immediately south of, Xstrata Copper's Las
Bambas Cu-Au project and consists of two blocks of property acquired or optioned
under separate agreements as well as additional concessions acquired by Antares
for a total of 20,635 hectares of area. Antares has recently announced an update
Resource Estimate (Feb 2010) and integrated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA
- July 22, 2010) for the project. Highlights from the PEA include: 




--  After-tax NPV of US$ 1.07 billion for base case with US$2.25/lb Cu and
    8% discount rate 
--  After-tax IRR of 16.4% for base case with US$2.25/lb Cu - payback of
    capital in 4.8 yrs 
--  Process rate of 130,000 t/day (30,000 t/day SX-EW leach and 100,000
    t/day mill/flotation) 
--  Twenty year mine life 
--  Initial capital expenditure of US$ 2.06 billion (including working
    capital and a contingency of 20%) 
--  Average production of 425 million lbs Cu/yr (193,000 t Cu/yr) for life
    of mine 
--  Total production of 8.3 billion lbs Cu, 97 million lbs Mo, 522,000 oz
    Au, and 24.3 million oz Ag 
--  Cash cost of US$ 0.89 for first ten years and US$ 1.04 for life of mine
    (C1, includes transport and TCRC charges and is net of by-product
    credits) 
--  Strongly leveraged to price of Cu (based on price range of $2.00-
    3.00/lb) 
    --  After-tax IRR ranges from 12.4% to 26.3% 
    --  After-tax NPV(8%) ranges from $516 million to $2,730 million 



Cautionary and Forward-looking Statement Information

Certain disclosure in this release, including management's assessment of
Antares' plans and projects, constitutes forward-looking statements that are
subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to Antares'
operation as a mineral exploration company that may cause future results to
differ materially from those expressed or implied. Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.


All diamond drilling at Rio Grande has been performed using HQ and NQ diameter
core with recoveries averaging greater than 95%. Core is logged and cut with a
diamond saw on site under the supervision of Antares geologists. Sampling is
done on intervals varying from 1-3 metres. Reverse-circulation drilling at
Haquira typically has recoveries averaging greater than 90% with some exceptions
in areas of difficult drilling conditions. All samples are transported by
Antares vehicles or contract transport, accompanied by Antares staff, to Salta,
Argentina for direct shipping to ALS Chemex Laboratories in Mendoza, Argentina.
The QC/QA program includes the insertion of control samples (known standards,
blanks, and duplicates) comprising a minimum of 10% of each sample batch.


All of Antares' exploration programs and pertinent disclosure of a technical or
scientific nature are prepared by or prepared under the direct supervision of
John Black, Antares' President and CEO, who serves as the qualified person (QP)
under the definitions of National Instrument 43-101. Antares' security, chain of
custody and quality control is described on their website under the section on
best practices - sampling methodologies.


Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability and future in-fill
drilling and scoping, pre-feasibility and feasibility studies will determine
what percentage of the inferred resource can be placed into the mineable
category. Antares is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, marketing or other issue which may materially affect
this estimate of mineral resources.


All information contained in this press release relating to the contents of the
preliminary economic assessment (PEA) for the Haquira project, including but not
limited to statements of the project's potential and information under the
headings " Key highlights from the study " and "Summary of key financial
parameters for the Haquira project PEA" are "forward looking statements" within
the definition of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Generally, these
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected",
"budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or
"does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or
state that certain actions, events or results "may", "can", "could", "would",
"might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". 


The PEA was prepared to broadly quantify the project's capital and operating
cost parameters and to provide guidance on the type and scale of future project
engineering and development work that will be needed to ultimately define the
project's likelihood of feasibility and optimal production rate. It was not
prepared to be used as a valuation of the project nor should it be considered to
be a pre-feasibility study. The capital and operating cost estimates which were
used have been developed only to an approximate order of magnitude based on
generally understood capital cost to production level relationships and they are
not based on any systematic engineering studies, so the ultimate costs may vary
widely from the amounts set out in the Study. This could materially and
adversely impact the projected economics of the project. As is normal at this
stage of a project, data are incomplete and estimates were developed based
solely on the expertise of the individuals involved. At this level of
engineering, the criteria, methods and estimates are very preliminary and result
in a high level of subjective judgment being employed.


The following are the principal risk factors and uncertainties which, in
management's opinion, are likely to most directly affect the conclusions of the
PEA and the ultimate feasibility of the project. The mineralized material at the
project is currently classified as resources and it is not reserves. The
mineralized material in the PEA is based only on the resource model developed by
the mineral resource and mining division of Tetra Tech, Inc. ("Tetra Tech"), a
professional mining engineering firm in Golden, Colorado in February, 2010.
Considerable additional work, including in-fill drilling, additional process
tests, and other engineering and geologic work will be required to determine if
the mineralized material is an economically exploitable reserve. There can be no
assurance that this mineralized material can become a reserve or that the amount
may be converted to a reserve or the grade thereof. Final feasibility work has
not been done to confirm the mine design, mining methods, and processing methods
assumed in the PEA. Final feasibility could determine that the assumed mine
design, mining methods, and processing methods are not correct. Construction and
operation of the mine and processing facilities depends on securing
environmental and other permits on a timely basis. No construction or operation
permits have been applied for and there can be no assurance that required
permits can be secured or secured on a timely basis. Data are incomplete and
cost estimates have been developed in part based on the expertise of the
individuals participating in the preparation of the PEA and on costs at projects
believed to be comparable, and not based on firm price quotes. Costs, including
design, procurement, construction, and on-going operating costs and metal
recoveries could be materially different from those contained in the PEA. There
can be no assurance that mining can be conducted at the rates and grades assumed
in the PEA. The PEA assumes specified, long-term price levels for copper. The
price for copper is historically volatile, and Antares has no control of or
influence on the price, which is determined in international markets. There can
be no assurance that the price of copper will continue at current levels or that
it will not decline below the prices assumed in the PEA. The price of copper has
been below the price range assumed in the PEA at times during the past ten
years, and for extended periods of time. The project will require major
financing, probably a combination of debt and equity financing. Interest rates
are at historically low levels. 

There can be no assurance that debt and/or equity financing will be available on
acceptable terms. A significant increase in costs of capital could materially
and adversely affect the value and feasibility of constructing the project.
Other general risks include those ordinary to large construction projects
including the general uncertainties inherent in engineering and construction
cost, the need to comply with generally increasing environmental obligations,
and accommodation of local and community concerns.