We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Springer Nature AG and Co | TG:SPG | Tradegate | Ordinary Share |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.26 | 1.07% | 24.50 | 24.35 | 24.65 | 24.52 | 24.17 | 24.36 | 600 | 22:50:05 |
RNS Number:5826P Springboard PLC 10 September 2003 SPRINGBOARD PLC 10 September 2003 SPRINGBOARD PLC UNAUDITED PRELIMINARY RESULTS FINANCIAL YEAR HIGHLIGHTS NAV reduced by 16.4% since 31 December 2002 to 140 pence per share, a 24.4% fall over the year. After the initial early losers within the portfolio, clear evidence of the successful companies is emerging, with core portfolio generating sales of #34 million in the last year and 11 companies now profitable or intermittently profitable. Reduced investment in start-up companies and development of investment strategy to focus on producing earlier returns. Cash reserves of #7.37million (2002: #9.94m) sufficient to support the existing portfolio and anticipated investment rates. Proposals intended to lead to the creation of distributable reserves and to obtain authority to buy-back shares to be set out in the Report and Accounts and put to shareholders at the AGM. CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE'S STATEMENT Results and Overview In the year ended 30 June 2003 the group incurred a loss of #4.78 million compared with a loss of #3.44 million in the previous year. Income, which includes interest receivable and other operating income totalled #0.98 million (2002: #1.56m) and costs were #1.55 million (2002: #1.82m). The value of our investments was reduced by a net #5.38 million of which #4.21million is reflected in the profit and loss account and the balance charged to the revaluation reserve. The net asset value ('NAV') is reduced from 185p per share a year ago to 140p per share at 30 June 2003. This is a reduction of 24.4% over the year and 16.4% over the second half. We are disappointed with this performance since, at the start of the financial year, we felt that our portfolio was well positioned to perform strongly. With the benefit of hindsight we were over optimistic about the momentum that some businesses had established and a few businesses were not sufficiently developed to withstand the inevitable shocks that a faltering economy can deliver. In the initial stages of a start-up company there is a very fine line between success and failure. During the period we saw the failure of 4 businesses that we had not anticipated, resulting in a write off of #1.68 million. In addition provisions of #3.56 million have been made against the core holdings to reflect the status of the portfolio based on the results in the year under review, the largest being #1.56 million against the value of Businesshealth, which we referred to at the time of our interim results and was as a result of its capital reconstruction. Last year we produced a full report on our portfolio companies and many of our shareholders met some of our portfolio CEOs at the AGM in December and there was genuine enthusiasm about the prospects for these companies. It is worth pointing out that the prospects for the majority of these companies, including those where we have provided against part of the investment, remain undiminished. The 'losses' have not been crystallised and the majority of our portfolio CEOs have no intention of seeking a sale for their businesses until they have achieved their potential. As clearer evidence of performance and profitability becomes available these provisions may be written back and eventually the companies will be valued on the basis of maintainable earnings. A full review of the performance of the portfolio is set out in the Chief Investment Officer's Review and I would encourage you to read it in full. Despite our firm belief in the potential of our investee companies and that they will produce attractive value for our shareholders over the long term, we recognise that our shareholders may not wish to see continued losses in getting there. We have therefore slowed our investment in new ventures until we can demonstrate more clearly that the returns make the short term and inevitable diminution in value worth suffering. We have therefore concentrated over the past 12 months on increasing our shareholdings in those of our companies that are already successful and will expand this investment strategy to acquiring shares in other companies that have the same characteristics of being well managed, high growth and with low capital requirements. This year has been one of incredibly hard work for all of the CEOs of our portfolio companies. As a group they were already successful business people and are used to hard work. For many of them living on the knife-edge between success and failure for extended periods of time without the resources of a large corporate owner is a new and not always pleasant experience. Our consolation is to know that most start-up businesses have to go through this period and that the majority will prosper. In the meantime we thank them for their hard work and commitment. We expect to see many of the directors of our investee companies and their partners at our AGM again this year when the shareholders will have the opportunity to meet them. Details of the timing of and arrangements for the AGM will be set out in the forthcoming Report and Accounts. Corporate Structure During the year we confirmed our commitment to develop the business towards investment trust status, when it is clear that this structure is more attractive for our shareholders than the present AIM company status. For those shareholders who are unaware of the implications of Investment Trust status they are set out below. An investment trust does not pay tax on its capital gains but cannot distribute them to shareholders. It can only make distributions from the excess of income over costs. There are a number of well established Investment Trusts investing in venture capital and these should be not confused with Venture Capital Trusts ('VCTs') which have similar corporate tax advantages as Investment Trusts (and also confer tax benefits on individual holders), but are severely restricted in their investment polices. Our present status allows capital gains to be distributed and we are in the position where we will not pay tax on these gains for some time due to the accumulated tax losses, primarily resulting from earlier failures. In due course it would be attractive for Springboard to convert to an Investment Trust to shelter gains, but there are no immediate advantages due to the unutilised losses, Comparison with established Investment Trusts in the meantime is not inappropriate. In the light of the recent movement in the Company's share price it is worth describing how we believe Investment Trusts are valued. Generally investments trusts are valued at a discount to their NAV, the size of which can discount can be 50% or more but can sometimes be very low or even negative (i.e. when an investment company's shares trade at a premium to the underlying NAV). The level of the discount (or premium) is a function of a number of factors: * the liquidity in the trust's underlying assets; * the future expectations of the growth in the underlying assets which is in itself related to the stage of the economic cycle; * the long term performance of the fund manager; * the dividend yield on the shares; * the existence of a share buyback program or the likelihood of a new share issue; and finally * the size of the trust and the liquidity in its own shares. These combination of factors tend to emerge over time and the underlying performance of an Investment Trust's shares should therefore be more gradual than those in trading companies where so much of the valuation is dependent on the current year's earnings. We would not generally expect shares in an investment companies to have the volatility that can sometimes be suggested by financial web sites and feel more comfortable with shareholders buying shares on the basis of the above factors rather than the expectations of short term performance. One other factor that heavily penalises those buying and selling our shares on a short-term view is the market makers 'bid offer' spread, over which we have no control, which can be around 10%. The accumulated losses that we have incurred, have wiped out the reserves from which any distributions can be made, although we have cash in our balance sheet. We therefore intend to propose a restructuring of the balance sheet which, if approved and put into effect, should bring forward the Company's ability to make distributions to shareholders. In addition we are also proposing to seek shareholders' authority for the Company to be able to buy back its own shares. Further details of these proposals are set out in the Financial Review and full details will be provided in the Report and Accounts. Board Changes As part of our strategic development we have made some board changes. At the close of the AGM, Brian North will retire as Chairman and hand over to Stephen Ross and we have taken the unusual step of producing a joint Chairman's and Chief Executive's Report. As the business becomes more clearly an investment business, Simon Smith's role of Chief Investment Officer has become more important and we are delighted that Simon has agreed to take over the role of CEO. Simon and Stephen will continue to work in close partnership with Gerard Downes and we do not believe any change in style or strategy will be evident to our portfolio companies. Reporting and Disclosure This year we have changed the format of the Report and Accounts and chosen to focus on the earnings of the portfolio companies by introducing the concept of 'look through earnings'. We have looked at the earnings or losses for each company in our portfolio and calculated that portion which is attributable to our shareholding. As this report is publicly available, we believe it is commercially sensitive to present each company's results, as one might see in a limited partnership fund, and we have therefore reported earnings by sector. We have again shown details of every core investment, which represent 99% of the continuing portfolio by value, unlike some venture capital investment trusts which report only the top 10 out of many (sometimes hundreds) of investments. This policy, combined with an invitation to meet our CEOs at the AGM gives our shareholders the opportunity to understand the businesses themselves and make their own judgements on future value. On the subject of disclosure it is worth explaining why our share price is no longer in the FT. We took the view that paying for this service was not an effective use of shareholders funds when share prices are now widely available more cheaply and on a timelier basis. You can view Springboard's share price in many places on the internet. Two of the easiest sites to find the price and other company related information are: www.londonstockexchange.com and www.hemscott.net or you can link to the Stock Exchange site though our own web site www.springboardplc.com. You can also obtain the share price by calling the FT Cityline on 0906 843 1535, which is a premium rate service. It is worth pointing out that we have less than 300 shareholders and often weeks can go by with no trade in the shares. This move does not affect the share liquidity in any way and is not a reflection of the level of corporate governance or openness in this business. On a personal note the board would like to thank Brian North for his support and guidance over the first five years of the Company's life and are confident that he leaves the Company well positioned to realise the potential value of the portfolio. Brain North Chairman Stephen Ross Chief Executive CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER'S REVIEW In spite of the disappointing decline in net asset value over the period, the year under review has been a year of progress for many of our core holdings, against what has continued to be a difficult economic background. In any early stage venture capital portfolio it takes a while before the successful companies emerge and in the last year we have developed a much clearer picture of which those businesses are. It should be remembered that Springboard itself was a start-up in 1998, and that our investments have mainly occurred since the fund raising in 2000. As a result, Springboard had an immature portfolio of start-up investments at a time when economic conditions were deteriorating, hence our decision to slow new investment and allow the existing portfolio time to mature and become cash generative. We believe the current financial year will see further significant progress and we aim to have most of the core portfolio profitable and self-funding by the end of this period. The first quarter of 2003 was adversely affected by global events and this made signing new contracts particularly difficult for our investee companies. However as we entered the second quarter there was evidence of an improved trading climate, which has continued throughout the year. Although our net asset value has declined, it reflects the results for the last year, rather than the potential of the portfolio. During this period we have reduced the carrying value of 17 of our investments by #5.64 million and uplifted the value of 3 investments by #0.26 million. #3.56 million of the downward adjustment has been made against businesses that remain in the portfolio which have developed at a slower rate than was originally anticipated and where we believe that their medium term potential remains unchanged. We now have ten core businesses and one non-core business that are profitable or intermittently profitable, six of which reported a pre-tax profit for the last six months. Overall the funding requirement of the portfolio is relatively modest and in a number of cases we have brought in investors alongside us. However we continue to seek opportunities to increase shareholdings in businesses where we believe our shareholder value can be enhanced. For reporting purposes only, we have allocated our investments into five groups. Support Services, Media, Software Services, Other Groups and Non-core, and have provided shareholders with 'look through earnings,' taken from the unaudited management accounts of each company at our year-end. This we believe will give a much clearer view of the portfolio's development without compromising the underlying investments. These figures show that core businesses (which have largely been formed by Springboard over the last three years) have generated sales of #34 million in the last year and have made a pre-tax loss of #5.9 million. This loss was struck after #2.2 million of start-up expenses at the recent investments Tree Top Media, Codima and MeetingZone; and #3.1 million of exceptional charges or losses, subsequently largely eradicated, at Tenzen, Businesshealth and The Funding Corporation. If Springboard were to account for this loss pro-rata our shareholdings, the contribution would have been sales of over #5.5 million and a loss of #1.4 million. We would expect a significant improvement in this position in the current year. In addition to our equity holdings we have outstanding loans to the portfolio companies valued at #5.3 million. Support Services Year end Springboard's 30 June 2003 look through earnings #'000 #'000 Turnover 13,098 2,461 Pre tax profit (loss) (1,693) (335) MeetingZone, a telephone conferencing business, has made excellent progress. During its first financial year monthly revenue growth was 50%, and in the early part of its second years trading, monthly revenues have continued to grow at around 30%. The company has attracted over 3000 end users of its services including a number of FTSE 100 customers. We anticipate profitability in the early part of 2004, well within the funding timetable set at its launch. Businesshealth, a preventative healthcare company, has continued to make steady progress and following new contract wins and a capital reorganisation the business expects to be profitable from October. At the Employee Benefits Awards 2003 Businesshealth won three awards for its services including the overall Grand Prix award for the most effective healthcare strategy. Specialist Hire Group, a plant hire company in the fork lift truck and crane hire markets, was created to acquire the businesses of Rushlift Mechanical Handling and A. Jardine & Sons. Using bank funding and a small amount of share capital it has established a profitable business and the company continues to look for acquisitions. Following our year-end it has acquired Rushlift (Doncaster), which has been held outside the group by similar shareholders and Reflexsource the original acquisition vehicle set up by management and Springboard. Directorbank, the UK's largest database of immediately available executives, grew its revenues by 50% in the year although additional costs, that should show benefits in the current year, reduced the growth in profits. In addition to its existing contacts in the venture capital market, it has started to establish itself as a provider of both executive and non-executive directors to public companies. Office Canopy Group is a technology business focussed on driving the cost out of procuring commodity goods particularly in the office products sector. In 2003 OCG launched the Netstationers franchise operation to develop its trade in this market. In the first 5 months since launch 19 UK franchises were sold and the franchise channel is expected to deliver significant scale in the coming year. Unfortunately Build Assured was unable to recover from the failure of its major customer Miller Fisher and was unable to address its liabilities in respect of its acquisition of Morrison Repairline from Anglian Water and was placed into administration. We recovered #308,000 after our year-end, and expect to recover a further #34,000, but had to make a write off of #748,000 against our carried cost. We continue to review the circumstances leading to the failure of the business with a view to making a further recovery. Caribiner failed to develop as anticipated and was placed into receivership and Rescue IT has so far failed to establish a scaleable business model and has been moved to non-core and our investment written off. Media Year end Look through 30 June 2003 earnings #'000 #'000 Turnover 4,730 1,625 Pre tax profit (loss) (1,537) (689) Tree Top Media, a children's magazine company, has launched a number of titles including DK Find Out under licence from Dorling Kindersley; Engie Bengy, one of the up and coming children's character properties in the pre-school section; Little Girl based on the Bang on the Door characters; Milkshake, based on the Channel 5 TV programme, Strand, and I Love Pop. After a difficult initial trading period the business achieved its first month of profitability after our year-end. Spark Learning is an educational publisher with hard copy and e-learning revenues. Spark is a beneficiary of the Governments Curriculum Online initiative where #100m per annum of funding is being channelled into educational software from approved suppliers. Spark has signed partnership agreements with Harper Collins, RM and the BBC. The company is intermittently profitable. Redeye, a web intelligence monitoring company, monitors activity on web sites for businesses such as William Hill and the AA. This information is then used to develop marketing strategies and improve the success rates of Internet sites. The company is intermittently profitable. ICP Europe Publishing, a online business provider which manages a portfolio of online titles for organisations such as the British Chamber of Commerce, Business Links, banks and professional bodies. In addition ICP publishes a business titles under its own brands in Biotechnology, Venture Capital and the enterprise and growing business sectors. The company made a small profit in its year-ended June 2003. Jobs Financial advertises accountancy vacancies online for many of the UK's leading recruitment businesses. The company is intermittently profitable. Software Services Year end Look through 30 June 2003 earnings #'000 #'000 Turnover 1,130 345 Pre tax profit (loss) (2,124) (434) Codima Technology was our only new investment in the current year, completed in December 2002. Codima has made good progress in its first few months and has acquired software assets to create a network solutions management company. During its first few months it has established global distribution partners and has established initial sales in Europe, Scandinavia and North America. Codima is incurring the early start-up losses and after our year-end we broadened the shareholder base and raised #650,000 of further funding of which we contributed #250,000. Accede Solutions is a supply chain collaboration services company. Initially Accede offered a hosted solution, however customers preferred to host the software on their own systems. Following a change in strategy, Accede secured three significant contracts, with a major global OEM, a global contract manufacturer and a UK component distributor, three of its initial target markets. While good progress is being made, it is still early stages for the company and further funding will be required to scale the opportunity. Wax Digital is an e-business solutions provider, delivering managed integration solutions for large corporate clients. Key clients include Hagemeyer where they are facilitating the exchange of electronic orders, invoices and other messages between one of Britain's largest distribution groups and nearly 800 suppliers; and Xerox who are integrating transactional exchange with customers in 15 European countries using a Wax solution. Wax has been intermittently profitable and is expected to trade profitably in the current year. Both Accede and Wax have been able to demonstrate very significant returns on investment for customers. Knowledge Process Software plc, an OFEX listed company, supplies software to assist energy savings in process control environments, such as power stations, oilfields and paper mills. After the year-end we completed a further investment that increased our shareholding in the company. Unfortunately we have been unable to establish a successful business model for either Treasurydealer, where in spite of a proven and significant return on investment, the banks seem cautious about buying the solution from a start-up software company. We are now seeking a partner for the business where we have written off our carried value; or Purple Voice, which had struggled to scale its business, and we disposed of our investment to IPC Holdings inc following our year-end at a discount to our carried cost. Other Groups Year end Look through 30 June 2003 earnings #'000 #'000 Turnover 15,021 1,128 Pre-tax profit (loss) (560) 60 The Funding Corporation is believed to be the fastest growing finance company in the UK, with over 350 employees being based at its Chester offices and a nationwide sales team. The company has been trading profitably in the six months ending June 2003 and has raised over #180 million of funding since we established the company with its management in late 2000. Latina Brands, an ethnic food company specialising in the cuisines of Latin America, is progressing albeit slower than we would have initially anticipated. Over the summer months the company expanded into the food service market, which complements its retail sales. New Latin bread, sauce and rice products have been introduced since the company's initial launch and their products are sold in around 1,000 retail outlets in the UK. Tenzen Group, an Automatic Identification and Data Capture company, has through its subsidiary Zipher developed world-class packaging overprinting equipment, and through its Claricom subsidiary, developed software to enable food factories to eliminate date and traceability coding errors. The Tenzen Group had an outstanding year, achieving profits substantially ahead of budget on sales up by over 350% on the previous year, and establishing its products on a global stage. Its success was achieved during a period when it was involved in a significant court case relating to Zipher's intellectual property. The court ruled largely in favour of Zipher after our year-end. Our investment in the acquisition search vehicle Parallel Brand, which failed to find a suitable acquisition, was written off. Non-Core (results below based on the continuing businesses) Year end Look through 30 June 2003 earnings #'000 #'000 Turnover 11,019 382 Pre tax profit (loss) (4,851) (132) The businesses grouped in this area have either failed to develop as we anticipated and valuation adjustments have been established against the holdings, or we have do not have the level of controls that we normally seek. The carried value of these non-core investments is #0.12 million. There is no commitment to fund any of these businesses although some show reasonable promise. The investments include: - J4B plc which provides funding information from over 150 public sector bodies and is listed on OFEX. The company traded profitably in the first six months of 2003 and has sales of around #4 million per annum. Strand Technology plc a software business selling to the IT healthcare market. Strand was adversely affected by a contract in 2001 and made a creditors voluntary arrangement, at the time we wrote off our entire investment. The company's latest accounts show that it is making progress in recovering its position. Altrix Healthcare, a company providing drug testing in the workplace and has contracts with companies such as Railtrack. Zero Waste, a landfill company in which we have a small equity position, it operates two landfill sites in the North of England. Simon Smith Chief Investment Officer FINANCIAL REVIEW We are disappointed to report a loss for the year and a decline in net asset value, which principally result from adjustments to the value of the portfolio, as we have reported. Although we are required to report as a trading company, emphasising the profit and loss account, in assessing our performance and future prospects I believe shareholders should have a good understanding of our balance sheet. Balance Sheet Overall we had net assets of #18.44 million at 30 June 2003, equivalent to 140.1 pence per share (2002: 185.3p per share). The carrying value our portfolio of investments was #10.46 million (79.5 p per share) including 3 companies valued at #1.40 million held for resale. We have invested #2.50 million in the year, received loan repayments of #0.14 million and made changes to valuations including provisions for impairment of #5.38 million. We have illustrated the changes to the portfolio during the year by individual investment in the table that follows my report and discussed their performance and prospects in the Chief Investment Officer's Review. I shall return later in my report to the principles we have applied when valuing them. Our second largest asset is cash, which at 30 June 2003 stood at #7.37 million, equivalent to 56 pence per share. Against this, we have undrawn commitments of #3.27 million, which are not shown on the face of the balance sheet. This year we have included in commitments, not just the undrawn loan facilities committed to the portfolio, but further amounts allocated to them where investment is agreed in principle or foreseen with some likelihood, and a further #1.55 million in respect of the rental due on our properties until their break clauses. Our uncommitted cash was therefore #4.1 million, adequate to pursue our investment rate and strategy, and we remain ungeared. Debtors of #0.77 million include cash rental deposits of #0.38 million, and included in accruals is a provision for VAT as explained below. Capital Reorganisation In due course we would intend crystallising value in our portfolio through realisations. To date, however, we have suffered from the early failures and disappointments of a start-up portfolio and, including our own trading losses, the deficit on the Company's profit and loss account at stands at #13.47 million. In order to bring forward the Company's ability to pay dividends, we intend to propose a restructuring of the Company's balance sheet to create distributable reserves, by reducing or cancelling the share premium account, amounting to #28.6 million at 30 June 2003, and crediting some or all of it to the profit and loss account. The actual amount that the Company may be able to distribute in future, is of course dependent on the free cash flow which the Company generates as well as the precise amount of distributable reserves available at the relevant time and is also subject to the recommendations of the Board. Full details of this process, which will require both shareholder approval and subsequent confirmation by the High Court, will be set out in the 2003 Report and Accounts, and a special resolution is intended to be put at the AGM. We shall also be seeking authority at the AGM for the Company to buy back its own shares. The effect of the Company buying its shares at a discount to NAV would be to increase the NAV per remaining share that would of course be beneficial to shareholders. Profit and Loss Account During the year we received from the portfolio companies investment interest income of #0.3 million (2002: #0.31 million) and fees of #0.13 million (#0.34 million) for advisory and non-executive work. Interest receivable from bank deposits amounted to #0.31 million (2002: #0.56 million) reflecting both lower cash balances and interest rates. Rental income for the year was #0.25 million, slightly ahead of last year, as we continue to seek to maximise the utilisation and income from our London and Wilmslow offices. We continue to review the options for the London office, which has a break clause in October 2010, and on which we incur an average monthly cost of some #10,000 net of rental income from our portfolio companies. Our subtenant currently covers the costs of the Wilmslow office in full. The total costs for the year amount to #1.55 million (2002: #1.81 million), including a provision for VAT. Over the last few months we have been discussing the appropriate VAT treatment of our income streams with HM Customs & Excise. We are not alone in this debate, and in particular the treatment of non-executive fees is being discussed on an industry-wide basis between the BVCA and Customs. Whilst we have not yet reached agreement and no assessment has been made, we have felt it prudent to provide for the potential cost of any historic over-recovery. The business is run with the same close attention to costs that we expect of our portfolio companies. We have reduced our trading overhead year on year and the will reduce it further following the proposed board changes. Valuation The BVCA published in July a new guideline to assist venture capital funds in valuing their portfolios and to help investors in these funds make better decisions about the funds. Whilst the new guidelines are effective from 1 August 2003, we have sought to apply their principles in our year-end valuation and accounts. Although I shall attempt to summarise the key points here, I would recommend that shareholders review the full text, which is available from the BVCA's website www.bvca.com, or we would be happy to email a pdf version to shareholders if they would prefer. Shareholders can contact Antoinette McShane at a.mcshane@springboardplc.com to request a copy. The fundamental principle in the Guidelines is that investments should be valued at 'Fair Value' which means the amount for which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction. To establish fair value, the Guidelines require fund managers (the valuers) to make reasonable assumptions and estimates for all the significant factors that arms length parties to a transaction would be expected to consider, including those which impact upon the expected cash flows and the expected risk of those cash flows. There is no assumption that the underlying businesses or the investments held are saleable at the reporting date or that there is an intention to sell. The Guidelines prescribes that where Fair Value cannot be reliably measured, the investment should be reported at the carrying value at the previous reporting date, unless there is evidence of impairment since that time, in which case the carrying value should be reduced. This may be particularly appropriate for an early stage technology business, where the inability to estimate future earnings or cash flows and the difficulty of estimating the probability, and financial impact of success may lead the fund manager to conclude that Fair Value can not be reliably measured. The Guidelines are much less prescriptive than those they supersede in that they do not require that a particular method of valuation be used in specific circumstances. Instead the Guidelines require that the methodologies used are appropriate to the investment and consistently used from period to period and go on to set out primary or secondary methodologies. The primary ones are earnings multiple, price of a recent investment or net assets, though this is not an exhaustive list and others may be used depending on the circumstances. The valuation methodologies, which we have applied at the year-end, are set out for each of our core investments in the Investment Portfolio Review in the Report and Accounts. For the majority of investments we have been able to assess Fair Value. Where this is not the case, the investment is carried at the previous carrying value less an appropriate impairment provision. Whilst the BVCA has introduced the new Guidelines and we have been mindful of these, it would be wrong for shareholders to have the impression that this year's basis of valuation is in some way incomparable with last as we also endeavoured to produce a fair value for each investment then. Whilst we have updated our valuation policy to reflect the new Guidelines, other than specific impairment provisions, the basis of valuation has only changed for two companies in the portfolio year on year where the specific circumstances warranted that change. Gerard Downes Finance Director INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO: Movements in the financial year Net Book Value at Net Cash Valuation Net Book Value at 30 June 2002 Invested (Repaid) Adjustments 30 June 2003 #'000 #'000 #'000 #'000 SUPPORT SERVICES Build Assured 1,138 (48) (748) 342 Businesshealth 2,564 102 (1,561) 1,105 Caribiner 294 63 (357) - Directorbank 1,250 (50) (380) 820 Meetingzone 750 368 - 1,118 Office Canopy 263 100 - 363 Group Rescue IT 134 6 (140) - Specialist Hire 95 76 201 372 Group __________ __________ __________ __________ 6,488 617 (2,985) 4,120 __________ __________ __________ __________ MEDIA ICP Europe 470 - - 470 Publishing Jobs Financial 426 - (213) 213 Redeye 1,116 - (191) 925 Spark Learning 1,005 - - 1,005 Tree Top Media 352 768 (560) 560 __________ __________ __________ __________ 3,369 768 (964) 3,173 __________ __________ __________ __________ SOFTWARE SERVICES Accede 788 139 (464) 463 Solutions Codima - 350 - 350 Technologies Knowledge 136 - (89) 47 Process Purple Voice 125 139 (214) 50 Treasurydealer 457 18 (475) - Wax Digital 807 40 33 880 __________ __________ __________ __________ 2,313 686 (1,209) 1,790 __________ __________ __________ __________ OTHER GROUPS Funding 12 - - 12 Corporation Latina Brands 194 225 (94) 325 Parallel Brand 37 60 (97) - Tenzen 887 - 887 __________ __________ __________ __________ 1,130 285 (191) 1,224 __________ __________ __________ __________ NON CORE 176 - (26) 150 __________ __________ __________ __________ TOTAL 13,476 2356 (5,375) 10,457 PORTFOLIO __________ __________ __________ __________ CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003 2003 2002 #'000 #'000 Income __________ __________ - Investment management fee income 125 342 - Rental income 245 224 - Interest income 302 307 __________ __________ 672 873 Other operating income - 128 Staff costs (542) (862) Goodwill written off - (92) Administrative expenses (1,010) (952) Impairment of investments (4,212) (3,062) __________ __________ Operating loss (5,092) (3,967) Interest receivable 312 558 Loss on realisation of investments - (35) __________ __________ Loss on ordinary activities before taxation (4,780) (3,444) Tax - - __________ __________ Loss on ordinary activities after taxation (4,780) (3,444) Minority interests - 3 __________ __________ Loss for the financial year (4,780) (3,441) __________ __________ Loss per share (36.3p) (26.2p) All activity has arisen from continuing operations. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS AND LOSSES FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003 2003 2002 #'000 #'000 Loss for the financial year (4,780) (3,441) Unrealised (deficit) surplus on revaluation of (1,163) 3,329 investments _________ _________ Total gains and losses recognised since last annual (5,943) (112) report and accounts _________ _________ CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 30 JUNE 2003 2003 2002 #'000 #'000 Fixed assets Tangible assets 148 237 Investments 9,060 13,476 __________ __________ 9,208 13,713 __________ __________ Current assets Assets held for resale 1,397 - Debtors 775 954 Cash at bank and on deposit 7,371 9,938 __________ __________ 9,543 10,892 Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year (314) (225) __________ __________ Net current assets 9,229 10,667 __________ __________ Net assets 18,437 24,380 __________ __________ Capital and reserves Called-up share capital 1,316 1,316 Share premium account 28,623 28,623 Profit and loss account (13,668) (8,888) Revaluation reserve 2,166 3,329 __________ __________ Total capital employed 18,437 24,380 __________ __________ Net asset value per share 140.1p 185.3p __________ __________ The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated balance sheet. CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003 2003 2002 #'000 #'000 Net cash outflow from (510) (1,082) operating activities __________ __________ Returns on investments and servicing of finance Interest received 312 562 __________ __________ Capital expenditure and financial investment Purchase of equity investments and (2,495) (5,160) loans to investments Disposal of investments - - Loans repaid 139 150 Purchase of tangible fixed (13) (6) assets Receipts on sale of - 3 tangible fixed assets __________ __________ Net cash outflow from capital (2,567) (5,013) expenditure and financial investment __________ __________ Acquisitions Purchase of subsidiary - (11) undertaking __________ __________ Net cash outflow from acquisitions - (11) __________ __________ Cash outflow before management of (2,567) (5,544) liquid resources __________ __________ Management of liquid resources Cash taken from short term 9,789 5,277 deposits __________ __________ Net cash inflow from management of 9,789 5,277 liquid resources __________ __________ Increase (decrease) in 7,222 (267) cash in the year __________ __________ NOTES Preparation of Preliminary Statement The foregoing financial information has been prepared on the basis of the accounting policies set out in Springboard plc's accounts for the year ended 2002 having regard for the Reporting and Valuation Guidelines published by the BVCA in July 2003. The financial information set out in this announcement does not constitute the Company's statutory accounts for the years ended 30 June 2003 or 2002. The financial information for the year ended 30 June 2002 is derived from the statutory accounts for that year which have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The auditors reported on those accounts; their report was unqualified and did not contain a statement under s237(2) or (3) Companies Act 1985. The statutory accounts for the year ended 30 June 2003 will be finalised on the basis of the financial information presented by the directors in this preliminary announcement and will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies following the Company's annual general meeting. Annual Report and Accounts Copies of this preliminary announcement will be sent to shareholders, as will copies of the Report and Accounts in due course. Loss Per Share The loss per share of 36.3p (2002: 26.2p) is calculated by reference to the loss for the financial year of #4,780,000 (2002: #3,441,000) and to the weighted average of 13,156,000 ordinary shares in issue during both years. Cash Flow: Analysis of Funds 30 June 2002 Cash flow 30 June 2003 #'000 #'000 #'000 Cash at bank and in hand 149 7,222 7,371 Short term bank deposits 9,789 (9,789) - __________ __________ __________ 9,938 (2,567) 7,371 __________ __________ __________ This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange END FR UUUCPBUPWGMB
1 Year Springer Nature Chart |
1 Month Springer Nature Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions