We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Hang Lung Prop | TG:AOP | Tradegate | Ordinary Share |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.03 | -3.95% | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.775 | 0.775 | 0.73 | 0.775 | 420 | 09:30:04 |
RNS Number:2748T American Opportunity Trust PLC 15 December 2003 American Opportunity Trust plc Preliminary Announcement of Results for the year ended 30 September 2003 Chairman's Statement This Year's Results: Performance: fully diluted NAV 100.0p, +11.0p per share; +12.4% This year's results appear to be the antithesis of last year's. Following last year's decline in net asset value, this year the fully diluted net asset value rose 12.4% from 89.0p to 100.0p per share and, as capital growth is the objective of the Company, that much can be considered satisfactory. Indeed it is important to emphasise that the Board considers attaining absolute returns the prime objective of the Company. In contrast to last year, however, when our net asset value declined but when our performance was much better than that of our peer group and benchmark, this year it lagged behind both. While it is clearly better to make money for shareholders, if at the cost of relative underperformance, than vice versa, we would prefer to make money, and do better than our peer group and our benchmark. For the record, most of our peer group and our benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index (which rose 27.4% expressed in #s), did better than us. There are two reasons for our underperformance, the first of which was that we had too defensive an investment policy during the second half of the year, in which the war in Iraq and the SARS scare came and went and the market staged a strong recovery. During the second half of the year the Russell 2000 Index rose by 27.3% while our net asset value increased by only 7.5%. We were too concerned about the level of the market, which served us well during the first half of the year; instead we should have been focused on finding good investment opportunities. As a consequence our investment policy concentrated too much on our investment in US Treasury Bills and put options. Though they provided a positive return of #1.9 million or 12.1p per share for the year, this was a less than we might have earned had we committed all of our assets to our equity portfolio. The pity of it was that the equity portfolio, while never accounting for much more than 40% of our assets (it was 37% at our year end), performed quite well, adding #1.1 million or 6.9p per share. Furthermore these results were achieved despite a weak American Dollar, declining as it did by 5.3%; it cost our net asset value #0.9 million or 5.5p per share. The rise of 11.0p per share can be accounted for approximately as follows: Pence Per share Equities: 6.9 T-Bills 0.7 Options 11.4 Currency (5.5) Income (2.0) Dilution (0.5) TOTAL 11.0 The second of the two reasons relates to the Russell 2000 Index itself. As a consequence of the substantial decline in so many technology related shares over the past three years, a large number of them were incorporated into the Index, which then became much more heavily weighted in that sector. During 2003 there has been an enormous recovery in the share prices of technology companies but it is a sector we are not exposed to, nor likely to be. The fact that the underlying constituents of all indices, including that of our own benchmark, change so frequently has given the Directors cause to think about the appropriateness of such indices as benchmarks. During the course of the current year we will be considering the whole issue of what benchmark is appropriate for us to judge our performance against and we will report to you later in the year upon the results of our deliberations. As can be seen from the table, the put option portfolio provided the greatest part of our return for the year, in large part because the premia earned were not offset to any significant degree by losses on positions that were assigned to us. Put options in Cassella Waste Systems, Cryptologic, Tyco International and Netbank all earned over #200,000 for us, and only options in Standard Microsystems caused a loss of over #50,000. Of our equity portfolio, Colorado Medtech and Worldport Communications contributed a return of over #200,000 each, while Focus Enhancements lost us over the same sum. Dividend: Our income for the year was not enough to cover our expenses, in large part because of a loss taken in our trading subsidiary, LOT Limited. The portfolio is not managed for the purpose of generating an income return and therefore the income results can and do fluctuate one year from another. We incurred a loss of #318,000 and we are not therefore recommending the payment of a dividend to shareholders. Conversion of Loan Stocks: NASCIT becomes our parent company. The last chance to convert the two classes of loan stock into ordinary shares occurred in August this year and, as a consequence, 4.2 million new ordinary shares were issued upon conversion; as a result there are now 16.2 million ordinary shares outstanding. North Atlantic Smaller Companies Investment Trust plc ("NASCIT"), which hitherto owned 36.5% of our issued shares, converted its loan stock holding and now owns 50.1% of our shares, making it our parent company. Board and Management Matters: Our manager, J O Hambro Capital Management Limited, undertook an internal reorganisation of its business, dividing parts of their fund management business into limited liability partnerships, all of which remain part of the J O Hambro Capital Management Group. The purpose of the change is to provide more focus for each group. The name of the partnership managing our Company (and some of their other investment trust clients) is North Atlantic Value LLP and shareholders will see reference to it throughout the annual report. Christopher Mills, our chief executive, has strengthened our own management by adding Paul Cameron to the team within North Atlantic Value that manages your Company; Paul focuses his work on our portfolio, which has allowed us to uncover some new investment opportunities that are beginning to appear amongst our list of investments. The past year has seen the issuance of the most enormous amount of guides, rules, regulations etc concerning the governance of companies listed on the Stock Exchange - including those from Mr Higgs, Sir Robert Smith and the Association of Investment Trust Companies. The AITC Code of Corporate Governance(c) is the one that is most relevant to investment trust companies and we will use it as our template for our new corporate governance report to shareholders next year. Meanwhile this year's report is based on the old Combined Code. Annual General Meeting: 27 January 2004: The Annual General Meeting will be held on 27 January 2004 at the offices of the J O Hambro Capital Management Group at Ground Floor, Ryder Court, 14 Ryder Street, London SW1Y 6QB at 3.30pm. As I always do, I urge shareholders - individual and institutional alike - to attend your annual meeting. If you have concerns, comments, suggestions or questions we want to hear them; even more to the point it is important that your co-shareholders hear them too, so that they can be made aware of them. This year, for the first time at our AGM, shareholders are to be asked to approve the Directors' Remuneration Report, a new legal requirement for listed companies. There has been no change in the remuneration, which is by way of options. At present the Directors are not otherwise remunerated by the Company and there are no plans to do so. Two of the directors are retiring by rotation and are seeking re-election at the AGM. James Nelson, who has served on the Board since the inception of the Company brings the experience of a career investing in smaller companies, including American ones, of investment trusts and most importantly his experience of the Company's business. His contribution to Board discussions and meetings is invaluable and his colleagues believe that it is very much in shareholders' interests that he continues to serve as a director. In considering his re-election the other directors have considered his "independent " status and have concluded that his behaviour and his contribution at Board Meetings are of a personal and independent nature and therefore that he performs his duties in an independent manner; it is therefore the view of the Board that he is an independent director, notwithstanding his length of service. We therefore recommend to you that you vote in favour of his re-election. John Gildea is also retiring by rotation and offering himself for re-election. John, who is based in the US, is in the business of investing in precisely the same sort of companies and securities as does your Company. He is of considerable help to Christopher and Paul in the process of managing the portfolio and to his boardroom colleagues in evaluating the investment policy and performance. Again the other directors believe that it is in shareholders' interest that he be re-elected and again we recommend that you vote in favour of his re-election. John is not an independent director. I would ask shareholders who have concerns about voting on any of the issues put forward for the AGM or who have questions to ask about them, to contact Christopher or me and we will do our best to address them. Prospects: There is not a lot that can be added to the considerable volume that is written about the prospects for the US economy and stock markets. The government has literally thrown the monetary and fiscal kitchen sink at turning the economy around after the setbacks brought about by the bursting of the technology bubble, the 9/11 terrorist attack and the war in Iraq. It would appear that the stimulus is having its desired affect, given that some really quite encouraging economic statistics are now being reported. Quite whether it all adds up to a live-now-pay-later situation is difficult to assess. There are some remarkably good productivity statistics being reported and of course the US economy benefits from the growth of its population through immigration. That's the plus side of the equation; the minus side is that the US continues to run very large government budget and trade deficits that will have to be paid for one day. There is increasing concern amongst the international foreign exchange trading community about the size of both America's external obligations and the trade deficit. They and an apparent benign neglect by the government are causing concern about the value of the US Dollar and we have seen it decline significantly in recent months. The subject matter is a complex one and of course in turn involves the weaknesses of other economies around the world, particularly those of Japan and Germany - the next largest two. However for the moment it is reasonable to suppose that the Dollar will continue to decline and because of that we had taken out a hedge on 22% of our assets at 30 September 2003; that hedge has now been increased to cover 37% of our assets. The Board has given their approval to allow the manager to take the US dollar hedging to a maximum of 50% of the assets if deemed appropriate. The most important aspect of any assessment of our prospects must depend on ourselves - on how we invest our assets, in which areas and in which companies. We are slowly reducing our US Treasury Bill portfolio as we find new investments that we believe will make capital gains for us. It should continue to be a good investing environment for stock pickers and we should therefore be able to find enough of them to achieve our goal of capital growth. We, the Directors, believe we can and will. R A Hammond Chambers Chairman 15 December 2003 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF TOTAL RETURN (*incorporating the revenue account) for the year ended 30 September 2003 2002 Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total #'000 #'000 #'000 #'000 #'000 #'000 Gains/(losses) on investments - 2,145 2,145 - (714) (714) Exchange gains/(losses) on currency and - 10 10 - (439) (439) capital items Dividends and interest 147 - 147 429 - 429 Other income (145) - (145) (103) - (103) Fee payable to the manager (121) - (121) (163) - (163) Other expenses (175) - (175) (180) - (180) Net (loss)/return before finance costs and taxation (294) 2,155 1,861 (17) (1,153) (1,170) Premium on repurchase of CULS - - - - (7) (7) Interest payable and similar charges (23) - (23) (110) - (110) (Loss)/return on ordinary activities before taxation (317) 2,155 1,838 (127) (1,160) (1,287) Taxation on ordinary activities (1) - (1) (11) - (11) (Loss)/return on ordinary activities after taxation (318) 2,155 1,837 (138) (1,160) (1,298) Proposed dividend to Ordinary shareholders - - - - - - Transfer (from)/to reserves (318) 2,155 1,837 (138) (1,160) (1,298) Return per Ordinary share Basic (pence) (2.6) 17.4 14.8 (1.1) (9.7) (10.8) Fully diluted (pence) + 13.6 11.6 + + + * The revenue column of this statement is the consolidated profit and loss account of the Group. ** The accounts have been prepared using accounting standards and policies adopted at the previous year end. + In order to comply with Financial Reporting Standard No. 14: Earnings per Share, returns per share which are not diluted have not been shown. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET At 30 September 2003 2002 #'000 #'000 Fixed asset investments 16,140 15,232 Current assets Investments held by subsidiary undertaking 60 177 Debtors 35 270 Cash at bank 459 61 554 508 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year Bank overdrafts - (186) Other creditors and accruals (419) (1,137) (419) (1,323) Net current assets/(liabilities) 135 (815) Total assets less current liabilities 16,275 14,417 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year Convertible Loan Stock 2003/2006 - Series 1 - (1,937) - Series 2 - (287) - (2,224) 16,275 12,193 Capital and reserves: Called up share capital 2,025 1,500 Share premium account 7,808 6,088 Capital redemption reserve 535 535 Capital reserve - realised 7,412 10,399 - unrealised (1,165) (6,307) Revenue reserve (340) (22) Equity shareholders' funds 16,275 12,193 Net asset value per ordinary share Basic (pence) 100.5 101.6 Fully diluted (pence) 100.0 89.0 CONSOLIDATED CASHFLOW STATEMENT For the year ended 30 September 2003 2002 #'000 #'000 Operating activities Investment income received 182 481 Interest received 2 20 Administrative services fee paid (144) (121) Other cash payments (151) (467) Net cash outflow from operating activities (111) (87) Servicing of finance Interest paid (2) (135) Net cash outflow from servicing of finance (2) (135) Taxation Corporation tax paid - (58) Tax paid - (58) Financial investments Purchases of investments (47,827) (46,334) Sales of investments (including option premiums) 48,479 54,329 Net cash inflow from investing activities 652 7,995 Equity dividends paid - (132) Net cash inflow before financing 539 7,583 Financing Repurchase of CULS for cancellation - (220) Decrease in fixed-term borrowings - (6,993) Net cash outflow from financing - (7,213) Increase in cash 539 370 Reconciliation of net deficit before finance costs and taxation to net cash outflow from operating activities 2003 2002 #'000 #'000 Net deficit before finance costs and taxation (294) (17) Decrease/(increase) in prepayments and accrued income 4 (6) (Decrease)/increase in other creditors (4) 135 Tax on investment income (1) (22) Decrease/(increase) in stock of investments 184 (177) Net cash outflow from operating activities (111) (87) Notes: 1. The above results for the year to 30 September 2003 are audited. 2. No dividend is proposed for the year ended 30 September 2003 (2002: nil). 3. Consolidated return per share 2003 2002 *Net return Ordinary Per share *Net return Ordinary Per share #'000 shares (pence) #'000 shares (pence) Revenue Basic return per share (318) 12,361,039 (2.6) (138) 12,002,756 (1.1) Option conversion** - - - - Loan stock series 1*** - 3,523,915 - 3,874,184 Loan stock series 2*** - - - - Diluted revenue return per (318) 15,884,954 (2.0)+ (138) 15,876,940 (0.9)+ share Capital Basic return per share 2,155 12,361,039 17.4 (1,160) 12,002,756 (9.7) Option conversion** - - - - Loan stock series 1*** - 3,523,915 - 3,874,184 Loan stock series 2*** - - - - Diluted revenue return per 2,155 15,884,954 13.6 (1,160) 15,876,940 (7.3)+ share *Net return on ordinary activities attributable to Ordinary shareholders. ** Excess of the total number of potential shares on option conversion over the number that could be issued at fair value as calculated in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard No. 14: Earnings per Share ("FRS 14"). *** Loan stock assumed converted unless average share price during the period was less than the conversion price. + In order to comply with FRS 14, returns per share which are not diluted have not been shown on the face of the accounts. 4. Consolidated net asset value 2003 2002 Assets Ordinary Per share Assets Ordinary Per share #'000 shares (pence) #'000 shares (pence) Basic 16,275 16,201,469 100.5 12,193 12,002,756 101.6 Loan stock series 1 - - 1,937 3,874,184 Loan stock series 2* - - - - Option conversion 1,449 1,525,000 - - Fully diluted 17,724 17,726,469 100.0 14,130 15,876,940 89.0 During the year to 30 September 2003 all the outstanding Series 1 and Series 2 Convertible Loan Stock were converted into Ordinary 12.5p Shares, therefore there is no longer a dilutive effect on the net asset value due to loan stock conversion. * The diluted net asset value per Ordinary share as at 30 September 2002 is also based on net assets and has been calculated on the basis that full conversion of the Series 1 Loan Stock units outstanding at the year end had occurred, resulting in a total issued share capital of 15,876,940 Ordinary Shares. The conversion price of the Series 2 Loan Stock and the exercise price of the management options was above the diluted net asset value at 30 September 2002 and so the diluted figure does not include conversion of the Series 2 Loan Stock or the exercise of the management options. 5. The statutory accounts for the year ended 30 September 2003 will be finalised on the basis of the financial information presented by the Directors in this preliminary announcement and will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies following the Company's Annual General Meeting. The Annual General meeting will be held on 27 January 2004 at 3.30 pm in the Board Room, Ground Floor, Ryder Court, 14 Ryder Street, London SW1Y 6QB. The Annual Report will be posted to shareholders and those on the mailing list as soon as practicable after printing and will also be available on request from the Company Secretary, J O Hambro Capital Management Limited at Ground Floor, Ryder Court, 14 Ryder Street, London SW1Y 6QB. The financial information set out above does not constitute the Company's statutory financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2003, but is derived from and has been prepared on the same basis as those financial statements. The above results for the year ended 30 September 2002 are an abridged version of the Company's full accounts which received an audit report that was unqualified and did not contain statements under section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985 and which have been filed with the Registrar of Companies. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange END FR UVANROSRUAAA
1 Year Hang Lung Prop Chart |
1 Month Hang Lung Prop Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions