We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Cohen and Steers TaxAdv Pfd Securities and Income Fund | NYSE:PTA | NYSE | Common Stock |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 19.27 | 0 | 10:50:20 |
Six Months Ended October 31, 2023 |
Year Ended October 31, 2023 |
|||||||
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund at Net Asset Value (a ) |
1.20 |
% |
0.15 |
% | ||||
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund at Market Value (a) |
2.77 |
% |
4.40 |
% | ||||
ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index (b) |
–4.76 |
% |
–1.40 |
% | ||||
Blended Benchmark—50% ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index/35% ICE BofA U.S. IG Institutional Capital Securities Index/15% Bloomberg Developed Market USD Contingent Capital Index (b) |
–2.11 |
% |
1.29 |
% | ||||
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (b) |
–6.13 |
% |
0.36 |
% |
(a ) |
As a closed-end investment company, the price of the Fund’s exchange-traded shares will be set by market forces and can deviate from the net asset value (NAV) per share of the Fund. |
(b ) |
For benchmark descriptions, see page 6. |
W ILLIAM F. SCAPELL Portfolio Manager |
E LAINE ZAHARIS -NIKAS Portfolio Manager | |
J ERRY DOROST Portfolio Manager |
1 Year |
5 Years |
10 Years |
Since Inception (b) |
|||||||||||||
Fund at NAV |
0.15 |
% |
— |
— |
– |
2.66 |
% | |||||||||
Fund at Market Value |
4.40 |
% |
— |
— |
– |
5.53 |
% |
(a) |
ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index contains all securities in the ICE BofA Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index that are DRD (dividends received deduction) eligible, but caps issuer exposure at 7%. The ICE BofA U.S. IG Institutional Capital Securities Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar denominated investment grade hybrid capital corporate and preferred securities publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market. The Bloomberg Developed Market USD Contingent Capital Index includes hybrid capital securities in developed markets with explicit equity conversion or write down loss absorption mechanisms that are based on an issuer’s regulatory capital ratio or other explicit solvency-based triggers. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-market measure of the U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade fixed-rate taxable bond market. The index includes Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. |
(b) |
Commencement of investment operations was October 28, 2020. |
Leverage (as a % of managed assets) |
37% | |
% Variable Rate Financing |
3% | |
Variable Rate |
6.1% | |
% Fixed Rate Financing (c ) |
97% | |
Weighted Average Rate on Fixed Financing |
1.3% | |
Weighted Average Term on Fixed Financing |
2.5 years |
(a) |
Data as of October 31, 2023. Information is subject to change. |
(b) |
See Note 7 in Notes to Financial Statements. |
(c) |
Represents fixed payer interest rate swap contracts on variable rate borrowing. |
Security |
Value |
% of Managed Assets |
||||||
Charles Schwab Corp., 5.375%, Series G |
$ |
41,170,091 |
2.5 |
|||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6.75%, Series S |
40,372,585 |
2.5 |
||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.625% |
36,895,561 |
2.3 |
||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.10%, Series AA |
31,416,898 |
1.9 |
||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 3.90%, Series BB |
28,257,191 |
1.7 |
||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.25%, Series X |
24,948,599 |
1.5 |
||||||
WESCO International, Inc., 10.625%, Series A |
24,798,119 |
1.5 |
||||||
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., 9.312%, Series O |
22,347,000 |
1.4 |
||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.25%, Series T |
22,097,039 |
1.4 |
||||||
BNP Paribas SA, 7.75% (France) |
21,382,486 |
1.3 |
(a) |
Top ten holdings (excluding short-term investments and derivative instruments) are determined on the basis of the value of individual securities held. The Fund may also hold positions in other securities issued by the companies listed above. See the Schedule of Investments for additional details on such other positions. |
(b) |
Excludes derivative instruments. |
Shares |
Value |
|||||||||||
P REFERRED SECURITIES —EXCHANGE -TRADED |
29.4% |
|||||||||||
B ANKING |
7.8% |
|||||||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.875% to 11/15/23, Series K (a)(b)(c) |
217,434 |
$ |
5,516,301 |
|||||||||
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp., 4.875%, Series G (c) |
410,836 |
7,277,960 |
||||||||||
First Horizon Corp., 6.50% (b)(c) |
264,378 |
4,869,843 |
||||||||||
Morgan Stanley, 4.25%, Series O (b)(c) |
104,002 |
1,706,673 |
||||||||||
Morgan Stanley, 5.85% to 4/15/27, Series K (b)(c)(d) |
116,651 |
2,549,991 |
||||||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6.375% to 10/15/24, Series I (b)(c)(d) |
289,449 |
6,807,840 |
||||||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6.50%, Series P (b)(c) |
193,478 |
4,771,167 |
||||||||||
Morgan Stanley, 6.875% to 1/15/24, Series F (b)(c)(d) |
700,397 |
17,124,707 |
||||||||||
Morgan Stanley, 7.125% to 1/15/24, Series E (b)(c)(d) |
300,000 |
7,530,000 |
||||||||||
Regions Financial Corp., 5.70% to 5/15/29, Series C (a)(b)(c) |
144,909 |
2,586,626 |
||||||||||
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., 5.75%, Series B (b)(c) |
150,425 |
2,438,389 |
||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 4.375%, Series CC (b)(c) |
117,864 |
1,908,218 |
||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 4.70%, Series AA (b)(c) |
335,000 |
5,919,450 |
||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 4.75%, Series Z (b)(c) |
268,039 |
4,771,094 |
||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 6.625% to 3/15/24, Series R (b)(c)(d) |
120,000 |
3,022,800 |
||||||||||
78,801,059 |
||||||||||||
C ONSUMER STAPLE PRODUCTS |
0.7% |
|||||||||||
CHS, Inc., 7.50%, Series 4 (c) |
299,435 |
7,545,762 |
||||||||||
F INANCIAL SERVICES |
2.4% |
|||||||||||
Apollo Global Management, Inc., 7.625%, due 9/15/53 (a)(b) |
286,800 |
7,502,688 |
||||||||||
Oaktree Capital Group LLC, 6.55%, Series B (b)(c) |
641,880 |
12,118,694 |
||||||||||
Oaktree Capital Group LLC, 6.625%, Series A (b)(c) |
244,527 |
4,697,364 |
||||||||||
24,318,746 |
||||||||||||
I NDUSTRIAL SERVICES |
2.4% |
|||||||||||
WESCO International, Inc., 10.625% to 6/22/25, Series A (a)(c) |
930,162 |
24,798,119 |
||||||||||
I NSURANCE |
7.3% |
|||||||||||
Allstate Corp., 7.375%, Series J (b)(c) |
234,600 |
6,045,642 |
||||||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd., 4.55%, Series G (b)(c) |
100,000 |
1,730,000 |
||||||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd., 5.45%, Series F (b)(c) |
127,738 |
2,607,133 |
||||||||||
Assurant, Inc., 5.25%, due 1/15/61 (b) |
75,306 |
1,409,728 |
||||||||||
Athene Holding Ltd., 4.875%, Series D (b)(c) |
243,569 |
3,940,946 |
||||||||||
Athene Holding Ltd., 6.35% to 6/30/29, Series A (a)(b)(c) |
393,502 |
8,314,697 |
Shares |
Value |
|||||||||||
Athene Holding Ltd., 6.375% to 6/30/25, Series C (a)(b)(c) |
378,171 |
$ |
9,178,210 |
|||||||||
Athene Holding Ltd., 7.75% to 12/30/27, Series E (a)(b)(c) |
337,144 |
8,394,886 |
||||||||||
Brighthouse Financial, Inc., 5.375%, Series C (b)(c) |
190,619 |
2,962,219 |
||||||||||
Enstar Group Ltd., 7.00% to 9/1/28, Series D (a)(b)(c) |
332,363 |
7,906,916 |
||||||||||
Equitable Holdings, Inc., 5.25%, Series A (b)(c) |
205,223 |
3,700,171 |
||||||||||
Lincoln National Corp., 9.00%, Series D (b)(c) |
226,466 |
6,001,349 |
||||||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 5.95%, due 9/1/62 (b) |
91,652 |
2,209,730 |
||||||||||
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc., 7.125% to 10/15/27, due 10/15/52 (a)(b) |
363,200 |
9,261,600 |
||||||||||
73,663,227 |
||||||||||||
P IPELINES |
2.9% |
|||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 2.983% to 9/1/25, Series 15 (Canada) (a)(b)(c) |
300,000 |
3,007,031 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 4.449% to 3/1/24, Series 7 (Canada) (a)(b)(c) |
55,500 |
667,161 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 6.704% to 6/1/28, Series 1 (Canada) (a)(b)(c) |
100,000 |
1,858,000 |
||||||||||
Energy Transfer LP, 7.60% to 5/15/24, Series E (a)(b)(c) |
739,908 |
18,290,526 |
||||||||||
Energy Transfer LP, 10.364% to 11/15/23, Series D (a)(b)(c) |
159,171 |
3,988,825 |
||||||||||
TC Energy Corp., 3.762% to 10/30/24, Series 9 (Canada) (a)(b)(c) |
200,000 |
2,098,431 |
||||||||||
29,909,974 |
||||||||||||
R EAL ESTATE |
1.3% |
|||||||||||
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., 6.375%, Series D (c) |
83,997 |
1,348,152 |
||||||||||
Brookfield Property Preferred LP, 6.25%, due 7/26/81 (b) |
152,272 |
1,827,264 |
||||||||||
Chatham Lodging Trust, 6.625%, Series A (c) |
85,000 |
1,692,350 |
||||||||||
DigitalBridge Group, Inc., 7.125%, Series J (c) |
167,076 |
3,485,205 |
||||||||||
DigitalBridge Group, Inc., 7.125%, Series H (c) |
206,801 |
4,446,222 |
||||||||||
12,799,193 |
||||||||||||
T ELECOMMUNICATIONS |
0.5% |
|||||||||||
Telephone & Data Systems, Inc., 6.00%, Series VV (b)(c) |
81,437 |
1,046,465 |
||||||||||
U.S. Cellular Corp., 5.50%, due 3/1/70 (b) |
182,910 |
2,718,043 |
||||||||||
U.S. Cellular Corp., 5.50%, due 6/1/70 (b) |
95,662 |
1,398,578 |
||||||||||
5,163,086 |
||||||||||||
Shares |
Value |
|||||||||||
U TILITIES |
4.1% |
|||||||||||
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., 6.20% to 7/1/24, due 7/1/79, Series 19-A (Canada)(a)(b) |
140,000 |
$ |
3,442,600 |
|||||||||
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., 9.341%, due 10/17/78 (Canada) (a)(b) |
23,930 |
600,164 |
||||||||||
BIP Bermuda Holdings I Ltd., 5.125% (Canada) (b)(c) |
47,070 |
720,171 |
||||||||||
Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada, Inc., 4.625% (Canada) (b)(c) |
208,034 |
2,843,825 |
||||||||||
Brookfield BRP Holdings Canada, Inc., 4.875% (Canada) (b)(c) |
168,056 |
2,399,840 |
||||||||||
Brookfield Infrastructure Finance ULC, 5.00%, due 5/24/81 (Canada) (b) |
214,600 |
3,281,234 |
||||||||||
CMS Energy Corp., 5.875%, due 10/15/78 (b) |
80,000 |
1,764,000 |
||||||||||
NiSource, Inc., 6.50% to 3/15/24, Series B (a)(b)(c) |
387,503 |
9,687,575 |
||||||||||
SCE Trust V, 5.45% to 3/15/26, Series K (TruPS) (a)(b)(c) |
462,414 |
10,196,229 |
||||||||||
SCE Trust VI, 5.00%, (TruPS) (b)(c) |
383,601 |
6,720,689 |
||||||||||
41,656,327 |
||||||||||||
T OTAL PREFERRED SECURITIES —EXCHANGE -TRADED (Identified cost—$353,949,311) |
298,655,493 |
|||||||||||
Principal Amount |
||||||||||||
P REFERRED SECURITIES —OVER - THE -C OUNTER |
121.3% |
|||||||||||
B ANKING |
78.4% |
|||||||||||
Abanca Corp. Bancaria SA, 6.00% to 1/20/26 (Spain) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
$ |
4,000,000 |
3,803,595 |
|||||||||
Banco de Sabadell SA, 5.75% to 3/15/26 (Spain) (a)(b)(c)(f)(g) |
1,000,000 |
926,864 |
||||||||||
Banco de Sabadell SA, 9.375% to 7/18/28 (Spain) (a)(b)(c)(f)(g) |
4,000,000 |
4,163,024 |
||||||||||
Banco Mercantil del Norte SA/Grand Cayman, 6.625% to 1/24/32 (Mexico) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
1,000,000 |
752,974 |
||||||||||
Bank of America Corp., 5.875% to 3/15/28, Series FF (a)(b)(c) |
12,042,000 |
10,383,214 |
||||||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.10% to 3/17/25, Series AA (a)(b)(c) |
32,500,000 |
31,416,898 |
||||||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.125% to 4/27/27, Series TT (a)(b)(c) |
1,700,000 |
1,602,624 |
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.25% to 9/5/24, Series X (a)(b)(c) |
$ |
25,320,000 |
$ |
24,948,599 |
||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.30% to 3/10/26, Series DD (a)(b)(c) |
3,318,000 |
3,245,053 |
||||||||
Bank of America Corp., 6.50% to 10/23/24, Series Z (a)(b)(c) |
8,567,000 |
8,476,040 |
||||||||
Bank of Ireland Group PLC, 7.50% to 5/19/25 (Ireland) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
8,675,000 |
9,066,247 |
||||||||
Bank of Nova Scotia, 8.625% to 10/27/27, due 10/27/82 (Canada) (a)(b) |
10,250,000 |
10,052,637 |
||||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, 6.278% to 12/15/34, Series 1 (United Kingdom) (a)(c) |
6,720,000 |
6,279,282 |
||||||||
Barclays PLC, 6.125% to 12/15/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
2,000,000 |
1,788,940 |
||||||||
Barclays PLC, 7.125% to 6/15/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
800,000 |
907,980 |
||||||||
Barclays PLC, 8.00% to 6/15/24 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
8,000,000 |
7,844,354 |
||||||||
Barclays PLC, 8.00% to 3/15/29 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
12,000,000 |
10,644,000 |
||||||||
Barclays PLC, 8.875% to 9/15/27 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
5,200,000 |
5,865,007 |
||||||||
BNP Paribas SA, 7.00% to 8/16/28 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
2,000,000 |
1,789,154 |
||||||||
BNP Paribas SA, 7.375% to 8/19/25 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
4,400,000 |
4,297,424 |
||||||||
BNP Paribas SA, 7.375% to 6/11/30 (France) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
2,000,000 |
2,050,196 |
||||||||
BNP Paribas SA, 7.75% to 8/16/29 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
23,000,000 |
21,382,486 |
||||||||
BNP Paribas SA, 8.50% to 8/14/28 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
8,600,000 |
8,261,923 |
||||||||
BNP Paribas SA, 9.25% to 11/17/27 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
8,800,000 |
8,967,103 |
||||||||
CaixaBank SA, 8.25% to 3/13/29 (Spain) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
6,800,000 |
7,023,911 |
||||||||
Charles Schwab Corp., 4.00% to 6/1/26, Series I (a)(c) |
26,699,000 |
21,223,596 |
||||||||
Charles Schwab Corp., 4.00% to 12/1/30, Series H (a)(c) |
10,317,000 |
7,053,402 |
||||||||
Charles Schwab Corp., 5.375% to 6/1/25, Series G (a)(b)(c) |
43,130,000 |
41,170,091 |
||||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 3.875% to 2/18/26, Series X (a)(c) |
4,370,000 |
3,674,800 |
||||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 4.00% to 12/10/25, Series W (a)(c) |
2,919,000 |
2,513,502 |
||||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 5.95% to 5/15/25, Series P (a)(c) |
22,150,000 |
21,086,816 |
||||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 6.25% to 8/15/26, Series T (a)(c) |
23,476,000 |
22,097,039 |
||||||||
Citigroup, Inc., 7.625% to 11/15/28, Series AA (a)(c) |
12,361,000 |
11,933,843 |
||||||||
Citizens Financial Group, Inc., 5.65% to 10/6/25, Series F (a)(c) |
10,202,000 |
8,848,992 |
||||||||
CoBank ACB, 6.45% to 10/1/27, Series K (a)(b)(c) |
6,590,000 |
6,138,178 |
||||||||
Commerzbank AG, 7.00% to 4/9/25 (Germany) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
5,000,000 |
4,525,375 |
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||
Credit Agricole SA, 4.75% to 3/23/29 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
$ |
1,000,000 |
$ |
742,707 |
||||||
Credit Agricole SA, 6.875% to 9/23/24 (France) (a)(b)(c)(f)(h) |
4,600,000 |
4,475,477 |
||||||||
Credit Agricole SA, 7.25% to 9/23/28, Series EMTN (France) (a)(b)(c)(f)(g) |
4,100,000 |
4,291,207 |
||||||||
Credit Agricole SA, 7.875% to 1/23/24 (France) (a)(b)(c)(f)(h) |
2,800,000 |
2,793,000 |
||||||||
Credit Agricole SA, 8.125% to 12/23/25 (France) (a)(b)(c)(f)(h) |
4,460,000 |
4,418,188 |
||||||||
Credit Suisse Group AG, 6.375% to 8/21/26, Claim (Switzerland) (a)(c)(e)(f)(h)(i) |
2,200,000 |
231,000 |
||||||||
Credit Suisse Group AG, 7.25% to 9/12/25, Claim (Switzerland) (a)(c)(e)(f)(h)(i) |
5,200,000 |
546,000 |
||||||||
Credit Suisse Group AG, 7.50%, Claim (Switzerland) (a)(c)(e)(f)(h)(i) |
12,400,000 |
1,302,000 |
||||||||
Danske Bank AS, 7.00% to 6/26/25 (Denmark) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
4,000,000 |
3,827,860 |
||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG/New York, 6.00% to 10/30/25, Series 2020 (Germany) (a)(c)(f) |
5,200,000 |
4,212,811 |
||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG/New York, 7.079% to 11/10/32, due 2/10/34 (Germany) (a) |
4,600,000 |
4,053,880 |
||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG/New York, 7.50% to 4/30/25 (Germany) (a)(c)(f) |
9,400,000 |
8,352,450 |
||||||||
Deutsche Bank AG/New York, 10.00% to 12/1/27 (Germany) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
7,000,000 |
7,413,205 |
||||||||
Farm Credit Bank of Texas, 9.681% to 12/15/23 (c)(d)(h) |
7,000 |
† |
699,125 |
|||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 3.65% to 8/10/26, Series U (a)(c) |
3,284,000 |
2,553,150 |
||||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.50% to 8/10/24, Series Q (a)(b)(c) |
5,597,000 |
5,478,748 |
||||||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.50% to 2/10/29, Series W (a)(b)(c) |
20,357,000 |
20,016,078 |
||||||||
HSBC Capital Funding Dollar 1 LP, 10.176% to 6/30/30, Series 2 (United Kingdom) (a)(b)(c)(h) |
12,910,000 |
15,645,126 |
||||||||
HSBC Holdings PLC, 6.00% to 5/22/27 (United Kingdom) (a)(b)(c)(f) |
2,000,000 |
1,746,930 |
||||||||
HSBC Holdings PLC, 6.375% to 3/30/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(b)(c)(f) |
4,200,000 |
3,965,062 |
||||||||
HSBC Holdings PLC, 8.00% to 3/7/28 (United Kingdom) (a)(b)(c)(f) |
7,400,000 |
7,279,750 |
||||||||
Huntington Bancshares, Inc., 5.625% to 7/15/30, Series F (a)(c) |
7,141,000 |
5,588,918 |
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||
ING Groep NV, 4.875% to 5/16/29 (Netherlands) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
$ |
1,200,000 |
$ |
876,000 |
||||||
ING Groep NV, 5.75% to 11/16/26 (Netherlands) (a)(b)(c)(f) |
2,200,000 |
1,936,836 |
||||||||
ING Groep NV, 7.50% to 5/16/28 (Netherlands) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
7,000,000 |
6,290,662 |
||||||||
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, 7.70% to 9/17/25 (Italy) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
8,800,000 |
8,240,047 |
||||||||
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, 9.125% (Italy) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
4,600,000 |
4,905,956 |
||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 3.65% to 6/1/26, Series KK (a)(b)(c) |
3,676,000 |
3,198,024 |
||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6.10% to 10/1/24, Series X (a)(b)(c) |
6,200,000 |
6,119,399 |
||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6.125% to 4/30/24, Series U (a)(b)(c) |
14,592,000 |
14,508,865 |
||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6.75% to 2/1/24, Series S (a)(b)(c) |
40,378,000 |
40,372,585 |
||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 8.939% (3 Month USD Term SOFR + 3.562%), Series R (b)(c)(d) |
2,331,000 |
2,340,058 |
||||||||
Julius Baer Group Ltd., 6.875% to 6/9/27 (Switzerland) (a)(b)(c)(f)(g) |
2,400,000 |
2,081,088 |
||||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC, 7.50% to 6/27/24 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
7,600,000 |
7,413,356 |
||||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC, 7.50% to 9/27/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
5,800,000 |
5,395,740 |
||||||||
Lloyds Banking Group PLC, 8.00% to 9/27/29 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
4,500,000 |
3,962,732 |
||||||||
NatWest Group PLC, 6.00% to 12/29/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
2,000,000 |
1,837,217 |
||||||||
NatWest Group PLC, 8.00% to 8/10/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f) |
11,200,000 |
10,885,056 |
||||||||
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., 6.00% to 5/15/27, Series U (a)(b)(c) |
2,502,000 |
2,103,582 |
||||||||
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., 6.20% to 9/15/27, Series V (a)(b)(c) |
8,976,000 |
8,008,256 |
||||||||
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., 6.25% to 3/15/30, Series W (a)(b)(c) |
9,155,000 |
7,557,460 |
||||||||
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., 9.312% (3 Month USD Term SOFR + 3.940%), Series O (b)(c)(d) |
22,347,000 |
22,347,000 |
||||||||
Regions Financial Corp., 5.75% to 6/15/25, Series D (a)(c) |
10,429,000 |
9,592,557 |
||||||||
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, 6.875% to 6/30/27 (Sweden) (a)(b)(c)(f)(g) |
1,600,000 |
1,501,203 |
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||||
Societe Generale SA, 5.375% to 11/18/30 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
$ |
1,200,000 |
$ |
863,647 |
||||||||
Societe Generale SA, 6.75% to 4/6/28 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
6,800,000 |
5,485,074 |
||||||||||
Societe Generale SA, 7.875% to 1/18/29, Series EMTN (France) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
1,100,000 |
1,098,528 |
||||||||||
Societe Generale SA, 8.00% to 9/29/25 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
11,600,000 |
11,369,224 |
||||||||||
Societe Generale SA, 9.375% to 11/22/27 (France) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
6,200,000 |
6,000,816 |
||||||||||
Stichting AK Rabobank Certificaten, 6.50% (Netherlands) (c)(g) |
10,000,000 |
9,543,165 |
||||||||||
Swedbank AB, 7.625% to 3/17/28 (Sweden) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
1,800,000 |
1,675,571 |
||||||||||
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 8.125% to 10/31/27, due 10/31/82 (Canada) (a)(b) |
14,975,000 |
14,728,842 |
||||||||||
Truist Financial Corp., 4.80% to 9/1/24, Series N (a)(b)(c) |
1,894,000 |
1,556,891 |
||||||||||
Truist Financial Corp., 4.95% to 9/1/25, Series P (a)(b)(c) |
9,735,000 |
8,853,391 |
||||||||||
Truist Financial Corp., 5.10% to 3/1/30, Series Q (a)(b)(c) |
9,869,000 |
7,953,246 |
||||||||||
Truist Financial Corp., 5.125% to 12/15/27, Series M (a)(c) |
2,239,000 |
1,562,933 |
||||||||||
U.S. Bancorp, 3.70% to 1/15/27, Series N (a)(c) |
6,495,000 |
4,575,955 |
||||||||||
U.S. Bancorp, 5.30% to 4/15/27, Series J (a)(c) |
6,162,000 |
4,850,397 |
||||||||||
UBS Group AG, 4.875% to 2/12/27 (Switzerland) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
981,000 |
809,200 |
||||||||||
UBS Group AG, 6.875% to 8/7/25 (Switzerland) (a)(b)(c)(f)(g) |
10,100,000 |
9,548,388 |
||||||||||
UBS Group AG, 7.00% to 1/31/24 (Switzerland) (a)(c)(f)(h) |
1,600,000 |
1,590,536 |
||||||||||
UBS Group AG, 7.00% to 2/19/25 (Switzerland) (a)(b)(c)(f)(g) |
5,400,000 |
5,251,500 |
||||||||||
UniCredit SpA, 8.00% to 6/3/24 (Italy) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
6,970,000 |
6,883,921 |
||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 3.90% to 3/15/26, Series BB (a)(c) |
32,600,000 |
28,257,191 |
||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 5.90% to 6/15/24, Series S (a)(c)(d) |
16,000 |
15,773 |
||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.625% to 9/15/28 (a)(c) |
36,756,000 |
36,895,561 |
||||||||||
796,681,264 |
||||||||||||
C ONSUMER DISCRETIONARY PRODUCTS |
0.2% |
|||||||||||
Volkswagen International Finance NV, 7.50% to 9/6/28, Series PNC5 (Germany) (a)(b)(c)(g) |
1,900,000 |
2,038,033 |
||||||||||
E NERGY |
2.4% |
|||||||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 3.625% to 3/22/29 (United Kingdom) (a)(b)(c)(g) |
8,000,000 |
7,455,629 |
||||||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.375% to 6/22/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(b)(c) |
7,000,000 |
6,663,224 |
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||||
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.875% to 3/22/30 (United Kingdom) (a)(b)(c) |
$ |
11,895,000 |
$ |
10,392,007 |
||||||||
24,510,860 |
||||||||||||
F INANCIAL SERVICES |
3.1% |
|||||||||||
Aircastle Ltd., 5.25% to 6/15/26, Series A (a)(c)(h) |
2,920,000 |
2,304,310 |
||||||||||
American Express Co., 3.55% to 9/15/26, Series D (a)(c) |
3,381,000 |
2,662,538 |
||||||||||
Ares Finance Co. III LLC, 4.125% to 6/30/26, due 6/30/51 (a)(h) |
3,950,000 |
2,961,438 |
||||||||||
Charles Schwab Corp., 5.00% to 6/1/27, Series K (a)(c) |
1,769,000 |
1,401,560 |
||||||||||
Discover Financial Services, 5.50% to 10/30/27, Series C (a)(c) |
8,776,000 |
5,885,582 |
||||||||||
Discover Financial Services, 6.125% to 6/23/25, Series D (a)(b)(c) |
13,394,000 |
12,401,685 |
||||||||||
ILFC E-Capital Trust II, 7.459% (3 Month USD Term SOFR + 2.062%), due 12/21/65(TruPS)(d)(h) |
5,352,000 |
4,006,493 |
||||||||||
31,623,606 |
||||||||||||
H EALTH CARE |
0.1% |
|||||||||||
Bayer AG, 7.00% (Germany) (a)(g) |
1,300,000 |
1,369,395 |
||||||||||
I NSURANCE |
15.8% |
|||||||||||
Allianz SE, 6.35%, due 9/6/53 (Germany) (a)(b)(h) |
4,400,000 |
4,207,228 |
||||||||||
Argentum Netherlands BV for Swiss Re Ltd., 5.625% to 8/15/27, due 8/15/52 (Switzerland) (a)(b)(g) |
10,900,000 |
10,211,719 |
||||||||||
Athora Netherlands NV, 7.00% to 6/19/25 (Netherlands) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
5,030,000 |
4,999,983 |
||||||||||
CNP Assurances, 5.25% to 1/18/33, due 7/18/53, Series EMTN (France) (a)(b)(g) |
5,500,000 |
5,498,336 |
||||||||||
Corebridge Financial, Inc., 6.875% to 9/15/27, due 12/15/52 (a)(b) |
10,695,000 |
9,893,452 |
||||||||||
Dai-ichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd., 5.10% to 10/28/24 (Japan)(a)(b)(c)(h) |
2,000,000 |
1,957,117 |
||||||||||
Enstar Finance LLC, 5.50% to 1/15/27, due 1/15/42 (a)(b) |
5,970,000 |
4,768,872 |
||||||||||
Enstar Finance LLC, 5.75% to 9/1/25, due 9/1/40 (a)(b) |
6,300,000 |
5,569,179 |
||||||||||
Global Atlantic Fin Co., 4.70% to 7/15/26, due 10/15/51 (a)(h) |
7,910,000 |
5,517,680 |
||||||||||
La Mondiale SAM, 5.05% to 12/17/25 (France) (a)(b)(c)(g) |
2,000,000 |
2,090,785 |
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||||
Lancashire Holdings Ltd., 5.625% to 3/18/31, due 9/18/41 (United Kingdom) (a)(g) |
$ |
5,900,000 |
$ |
4,752,780 |
||||||||
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.125% to 9/15/26, due 12/15/51 (a)(h) |
2,023,000 |
1,609,600 |
||||||||||
Lincoln National Corp., 9.25% to 12/1/27, Series C (a)(c) |
3,247,000 |
3,276,213 |
||||||||||
Markel Group, Inc., 6.00% to 6/1/25 (a)(c) |
8,007,000 |
7,751,249 |
||||||||||
MetLife Capital Trust IV, 7.875%, due 12/15/37 (TruPS) (b)(h) |
4,800,000 |
4,899,658 |
||||||||||
MetLife, Inc., 9.25%, due 4/8/38 (b)(h) |
5,500,000 |
5,964,887 |
||||||||||
Nippon Life Insurance Co., 5.10% to 10/16/24, due 10/16/44 (Japan) (a)(b)(h) |
6,100,000 |
5,990,833 |
||||||||||
Phoenix Group Holdings PLC, 5.625% to 1/29/25 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
3,000,000 |
2,747,745 |
||||||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 5.125% to 11/28/31, due 3/1/52 (a)(b) |
4,500,000 |
3,834,570 |
||||||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 5.20% to 3/15/24, due 3/15/44 (a)(b) |
2,533,000 |
2,500,542 |
||||||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 6.00% to 6/1/32, due 9/1/52 (a)(b) |
10,284,000 |
9,219,850 |
||||||||||
Prudential Financial, Inc., 6.75% to 12/1/32, due 3/1/53 (a)(b) |
4,010,000 |
3,783,800 |
||||||||||
QBE Insurance Group Ltd., 5.875% to 6/17/26, due 6/17/46, Series EMTN (Australia) (a)(b)(g) |
2,000,000 |
1,897,419 |
||||||||||
QBE Insurance Group Ltd., 5.875% to 5/12/25 (Australia) (a)(b)(c)(h) |
8,365,000 |
8,015,515 |
||||||||||
Rothesay Life PLC, 4.875% to 4/13/27, Series NC6 (United Kingdom) (a)(c)(f)(g) |
5,200,000 |
3,770,000 |
||||||||||
SBL Holdings, Inc., 6.50% to 11/13/26 (a)(c)(h) |
8,120,000 |
4,600,368 |
||||||||||
SBL Holdings, Inc., 7.00% to 5/13/25 (a)(c)(h) |
7,813,000 |
4,786,395 |
||||||||||
Swiss Re Finance Luxembourg SA, 5.00% to 4/2/29, due 4/2/49 (Switzerland) (a)(b)(h) |
800,000 |
751,000 |
||||||||||
UnipolSai Assicurazioni SpA, 5.75% to 6/18/24, Series EMTN (Italy) (a)(c)(g) |
5,869,000 |
6,141,085 |
||||||||||
Voya Financial, Inc., 7.748% to 9/15/28, Series A (a)(c) |
9,575,000 |
9,424,528 |
||||||||||
Zurich Finance Ireland Designated Activity Co., 3.00% to 1/19/31, due 4/19/51, Series EMTN (Switzerland) (a)(g) |
13,600,000 |
10,167,768 |
||||||||||
160,600,156 |
||||||||||||
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||||
P IPELINES |
7.8% |
|||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 5.50% to 7/15/27, due 7/15/77, Series 2017-A (Canada)(a)(b) |
$ |
1,900,000 |
$ |
1,619,837 |
||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 5.75% to 4/15/30, due 7/15/80, Series 20-A (Canada)(a)(b) |
10,772,000 |
8,992,029 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 6.00% to 1/15/27, due 1/15/77, Series 16-A (Canada)(a)(b) |
2,421,000 |
2,110,949 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 6.25% to 3/1/28, due 3/1/78 (Canada) (a)(b) |
8,605,000 |
7,551,661 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 7.375% to 10/15/27, due 1/15/83 (Canada) (a)(b) |
3,512,000 |
3,257,746 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 7.625% to 10/15/32, due 1/15/83 (Canada) (a)(b) |
10,208,000 |
9,155,975 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 8.25%, due 1/15/84, Series NC5 (Canada) (a)(b) |
10,860,000 |
10,413,987 |
||||||||||
Enbridge, Inc., 8.50%, due 1/15/84 (Canada) (a)(b) |
10,710,000 |
10,265,246 |
||||||||||
Energy Transfer LP, 6.50% to 11/15/26, Series H (a)(c) |
5,355,000 |
4,863,303 |
||||||||||
Energy Transfer LP, 7.125% to 5/15/30, Series G (a)(b)(c) |
8,146,000 |
6,785,030 |
||||||||||
Transcanada Trust, 5.50% to 9/15/29, due 9/15/79 (Canada) (a) |
7,810,000 |
6,217,183 |
||||||||||
Transcanada Trust, 5.60% to 12/7/31, due 3/7/82 (Canada) (a) |
10,885,000 |
8,414,890 |
||||||||||
79,647,836 |
||||||||||||
R EAL ESTATE |
1.0% |
|||||||||||
Scentre Group Trust 2, 5.125% to 6/24/30, due 9/24/80 (Australia) (a)(b)(h) |
11,600,000 |
9,578,684 |
||||||||||
R ETAIL & WHOLESALE —STAPLES |
0.4% |
|||||||||||
Land O’ Lakes, Inc., 7.00% (c)(h) |
3,600,000 |
2,646,000 |
||||||||||
Land O’ Lakes, Inc., 7.25% (c)(h) |
1,600,000 |
1,256,000 |
||||||||||
3,902,000 |
||||||||||||
T ELECOMMUNICATIONS |
1.1% |
|||||||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 4.125% to 3/4/31, due 6/4/81 (United Kingdom) (a) |
5,280,000 |
4,001,220 |
||||||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 7.00% to 1/4/29, due 4/4/79 (United Kingdom) (a) |
2,875,000 |
2,782,431 |
Principal Amount |
Value |
|||||||||||
Vodafone Group PLC, 8.00% to 5/30/31, due 8/30/86, Series EMTN (United Kingdom) (a)(g) |
$ |
3,500,000 |
$ |
4,231,645 |
||||||||
11,015,296 |
||||||||||||
U TILITIES |
11.0% |
|||||||||||
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., 4.75% to 1/18/27, due 1/18/82 (Canada) (a) |
10,622,000 |
8,396,744 |
||||||||||
Dominion Energy, Inc., 4.35% to 1/15/27, Series C (a)(b)(c) |
17,640,000 |
14,440,994 |
||||||||||
Edison International, 5.00% to 12/15/26, Series B (a)(c) |
5,197,000 |
4,638,124 |
||||||||||
Electricite de France SA, 5.375% to 1/29/25, Series EMTN (France) (a)(b)(c)(g) |
6,000,000 |
6,221,757 |
||||||||||
Electricite de France SA, 6.00% to 1/29/26, Series EMTN (France) (a)(b)(c)(g) |
13,400,000 |
15,101,424 |
||||||||||
Electricite de France SA, 7.50% to 9/6/28, Series EMTN (France) (a)(b)(c)(g) |
5,200,000 |
5,575,300 |
||||||||||
Electricite de France SA, 9.125% to 3/15/33 (France) (a)(b)(c)(h) |
4,600,000 |
4,732,797 |
||||||||||
Emera, Inc., 6.75% to 6/15/26, due 6/15/76, Series 16-A (Canada)(a) |
18,819,000 |
17,768,657 |
||||||||||
Enel SpA, 6.625% to 4/16/31, Series EMTN (Italy) (a)(b)(c)(g) |
4,600,000 |
4,824,186 |
||||||||||
NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc., 3.80% to 3/15/27, due 3/15/82 (a)(b) |
1,250,000 |
1,006,238 |
||||||||||
Sempra, 4.125% to 1/1/27, due 4/1/52 (a) |
10,750,000 |
8,293,468 |
||||||||||
Sempra, 4.875% to 10/15/25 (a)(c) |
9,555,000 |
8,946,979 |
||||||||||
Southern California Edison Co., 9.838% (3 Month USD Term SOFR + 4.461%), Series E (c)(d) |
12,175,000 |
12,157,935 |
||||||||||
112,104,603 |
||||||||||||
T OTAL PREFERRED SECURITIES —OVER - THE -C OUNTER (Identified cost—$1,376,934,100) |
1,233,071,733 |
|||||||||||
C ORPORATE BONDS |
0.0% |
|||||||||||
I NSURANCE |
0.0% |
|||||||||||
SBL Holdings, Inc., 5.00%, due 2/18/31 (h) |
720,000 |
544,691 |
||||||||||
T OTAL CORPORATE BONDS (Identified cost—$607,354) |
544,691 |
|||||||||||
Number of Shares |
Value |
|||||||||||
S HORT -TERM INVESTMENTS |
5.7% |
|||||||||||
M ONEY MARKET FUNDS |
||||||||||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund, Premier Class, 5.30% (j) |
23,842,000 |
$ |
23,842,000 |
|||||||||
State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund, Premier Class, 5.30% (j) |
34,386,864 |
34,386,864 |
||||||||||
T OTAL SHORT -TERM INVESTMENTS (Identified cost—$58,228,864) |
58,228,864 |
|||||||||||
T OTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (Identified cost—$1,789,719,629) |
156.4% |
1,590,500,781 |
||||||||||
L IABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS |
(56.4) |
(573,823,085 |
) | |||||||||
N ET ASSETS (Equivalent to $18.39 per share based on 55,273,457 shares of common stock outstanding) |
100.0% |
$ |
1,016,677,696 |
|||||||||
Notional Amount |
Fixed Rate Payable |
Fixed Payment Frequency |
Floating Rate Receivable (resets monthly) |
Floating Payment Frequency |
Maturity Date |
Value |
Upfront Receipts (Payments) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ |
125,000,000 |
0.270% |
Monthly |
5.424% (k) |
Monthly |
12/20/24 |
$ |
7,248,586 |
$ |
17,932 |
$ |
7,266,518 |
||||||||||||||||||||
35,000,000 |
0.249% |
Monthly |
5.424% (k) |
Monthly |
12/20/24 |
2,037,907 |
4,658 |
2,042,565 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
125,000,000 |
0.360% |
Monthly |
5.424% (k) |
Monthly |
12/20/25 |
11,874,031 |
24,387 |
11,898,418 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
35,000,000 |
0.349% |
Monthly |
5.424% (k) |
Monthly |
12/20/25 |
3,332,635 |
5,654 |
3,338,289 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
160,000,000 |
0.464% |
Monthly |
5.424% (k) |
Monthly |
12/20/26 |
20,156,890 |
33,723 |
20,190,613 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
70,000,000 |
0.930% |
Monthly |
5.424% (k) |
Monthly |
9/15/27 |
9,397,683 |
14,755 |
9,412,438 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
GBP |
28,000,000 |
0.900% |
Monthly |
5.187% (l) |
Monthly |
9/15/27 |
4,418,958 |
— |
4,418,958 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
$ |
58,466,690 |
$ |
101,109 |
$ |
58,567,799 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Counterparty |
Notional Amount |
Fixed Payable Rate |
Fixed Payment Frequency |
Underlying Reference Entity |
Position |
Maturity Date |
Value |
Upfront Receipts (Payments) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BNP Paribas |
$ |
13,986,826 |
0.25% |
Monthly |
BNPXCHY5 Index (m) |
Short |
5/15/24 |
$ |
97,826 |
$ |
— |
$ |
97,826 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
BNP Paribas |
EUR |
12,909,711 |
0.30% |
Monthly |
BNPXCEX5 Index (n) |
Short |
5/15/24 |
8,032 |
— |
8,032 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ |
105,858 |
$ |
— |
$ |
105,858 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Counterparty |
Contracts to Deliver |
In Exchange For |
Settlement Date |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
||||||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
CAD |
7,851,305 |
USD |
5,801,386 |
11/2/23 |
$ |
139,655 |
|||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
EUR |
102,181,825 |
USD |
108,281,058 |
11/2/23 |
162,440 |
||||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
GBP |
7,460,939 |
USD |
9,052,581 |
11/2/23 |
(15,812 |
) | |||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
USD |
9,115,007 |
GBP |
7,460,939 |
11/2/23 |
(46,613 |
) | |||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
USD |
5,654,971 |
CAD |
7,851,305 |
11/2/23 |
6,759 |
||||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
USD |
108,017,429 |
EUR |
102,181,825 |
11/2/23 |
101,189 |
||||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
CAD |
7,909,750 |
USD |
5,699,078 |
12/4/23 |
(7,438 |
) | |||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
EUR |
99,717,613 |
USD |
105,539,127 |
12/4/23 |
(107,225 |
) | |||||||||||||
Brown Brothers Harriman |
USD |
9,212,325 |
GBP |
7,591,783 |
12/4/23 |
16,818 |
||||||||||||||
$ |
249,773 |
|||||||||||||||||||
CAD |
Canadian Dollar | |
EMTN |
Euro Medium Term Note | |
EUR |
Euro Currency | |
GBP |
British Pound | |
OIS |
Overnight Indexed Swap | |
SOFR |
Secured Overnight Financing Rate | |
TruPS |
Trust Preferred Securities | |
USD |
United States Dollar |
† |
Represents shares. |
(a) |
Security converts to floating rate after the indicated fixed–rate coupon period. |
(b) |
All or a portion of the security is pledged as collateral in connection with the Fund’s revolving credit agreement. $866,956,414 in aggregate has been pledged as collateral. |
(c) |
Perpetual security. Perpetual securities have no stated maturity date, but they may be called/redeemed by the issuer. |
(d) |
Variable rate. Rate shown is in effect at October 31, 2023. |
(e) |
Non–income producing security. |
(f) |
Contingent Capital security (CoCo). CoCos are debt or preferred securities with loss absorption characteristics built into the terms of the security for the benefit of the issuer. Aggregate holdings amounted to $277,078,229 which represents 27.3% of the net assets of the Fund (17.1% of the managed assets of the Fund). |
(g) |
Securities exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities are subject to resale restrictions. Aggregate holdings amounted to $201,707,462 which represents 19.8% of the net assets of the Fund, of which 0.2% are illiquid. |
(h) |
Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may only be resold to qualified institutional buyers. Aggregate holdings amounted to $186,992,926 which represents 18.4% of the net assets of the Fund, of which 0.6% are illiquid. |
(i) |
Security is in default. |
(j) |
Rate quoted represents the annualized seven–day yield. |
(k) |
Based on USD-SOFR-OIS. |
(l) |
Based on 1–Month GBP SONIA. Represents rates in effect at October 31, 2023. |
(m) |
The index intends to track the performance of the CDX.NA HY. The two constituent investments held within the index at October 31, 2023 were as follows: |
Index Constituents |
Receive |
Frequency |
Payment |
Frequency |
Maturity Date |
Total Weight |
Price |
Value |
||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Default Swap (CDS) — Markit CDX.NA.HY.40 Index |
5.00% per annum |
Quarterly |
Performance of CDS |
Semiannually |
12/20/28 |
101.23 |
% |
$ |
99.35 |
$ |
14,058,163 |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
(1.23 |
)% |
— |
(170,815 |
) |
(n) |
The index intends to track the performance of the iTraxx Crossover CDS. The two constituent investments held within the index at October 31, 2023 were as follows: |
Index Constituents |
Receive |
Frequency |
Payment |
Frequency |
Maturity Date |
Total Weight |
Price |
Value |
||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Default Swap (CDS) — MARKIT ITRX EUR XOVER Index. |
5.00% per annum |
Quarterly |
Performance of CDS |
Semiannually |
12/20/28 |
101.50 |
% |
EUR 450.245 |
$ |
13,854,549 |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
(1.50 |
)% |
— |
(204,747 |
) |
Country Summary |
% of Managed Assets |
|||
United States |
57.2 |
|||
Canada |
8.7 |
|||
United Kingdom |
8.6 |
|||
France |
7.9 |
|||
Switzerland |
2.6 |
|||
Germany |
2.2 |
|||
Italy |
1.9 |
|||
Netherlands |
1.5 |
|||
Australia |
1.2 |
|||
Spain |
1.0 |
|||
Ireland |
0.6 |
|||
Bermuda |
0.5 |
|||
Japan |
0.5 |
|||
Other (includes short-term investments) |
5.6 |
|||
100.0 |
||||
ASSETS: |
||||
Investments in securities, at value (Identified cost—$1,789,719,629) |
$ |
1,590,500,781 |
||
Cash collateral pledged for interest rate swap contracts |
9,725,458 |
|||
Foreign currency, at value (Identified cost—$1,350,677) |
1,331,226 |
|||
Receivable for: |
||||
Dividends and interest |
19,359,397 |
|||
Investment securities sold |
3,890,749 |
|||
Variation margin on interest rate swap contracts |
252,433 |
|||
Total return swap contracts, at value |
105,858 |
|||
Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
426,861 |
|||
Other assets |
70,131 |
|||
Total Assets |
1,625,662,894 |
|||
LIABILITIES: |
||||
Cash collateral received for total return swap contracts |
270,000 |
|||
Unrealized depreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
177,088 |
|||
Payable for: |
||||
Credit agreement (See Note 7) |
600,109,828 |
|||
Interest expense |
3,154,106 |
|||
Investment securities purchased |
2,538,450 |
|||
Investment management fees |
1,378,052 |
|||
Dividends and distributions declared |
1,023,412 |
|||
Administration fees |
82,683 |
|||
Trustees’ fees |
3,957 |
|||
Other liabilities |
247,622 |
|||
Total Liabilities |
608,985,198 |
|||
NET ASSETS |
$ |
1,016,677,696 |
||
NET ASSETS consist of: |
||||
Paid-in capital |
$ |
1,358,462,941 |
||
Total distributable earnings/(accumulated loss) |
(341,785,245 |
) | ||
$ |
1,016,677,696 |
|||
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE: |
||||
($1,016,677,696 ÷ 55,273,457 shares outstanding) |
$ |
18.39 |
||
MARKET PRICE PER SHARE |
$ |
16.81 |
||
MARKET PRICE PREMIUM (DISCOUNT) TO NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE |
(8.59 |
)% | ||
Investment Income: |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
70,837,532 |
||
Dividend income (net of $75,897 of foreign withholding tax) |
26,781,380 |
|||
Total Investment Income |
97,618,912 |
|||
Expenses: |
||||
Interest expense |
35,282,685 |
|||
Investment management fees |
17,164,012 |
|||
Administration fees |
1,170,763 |
|||
Professional fees |
115,045 |
|||
Shareholder reporting expenses |
89,101 |
|||
Trustees’ fees and expenses |
47,470 |
|||
Custodian fees and expenses |
37,031 |
|||
Transfer agent fees and expenses |
19,328 |
|||
Miscellaneous |
147,600 |
|||
Total Expenses |
54,073,035 |
|||
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
43,545,877 |
|||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss): |
||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
||||
Investments in securities |
(113,962,410 |
) | ||
Interest rate swap contracts |
25,311,718 |
|||
Total return swap contracts |
(457,035 |
) | ||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
(3,148,165 |
) | ||
Foreign currency transactions |
(161,999 |
) | ||
Net realized gain (loss) |
(92,417,891 |
) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
||||
Investments in securities |
58,533,583 |
|||
Interest rate swap contracts |
(12,317,034 |
) | ||
Total return swap contracts |
105,858 |
|||
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
1,143,995 |
|||
Foreign currency translations |
(2,204,060 |
) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
45,262,342 |
|||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
(47,155,549 |
) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
$ |
(3,609,672 |
) | |
For the Year Ended October 31, 2023 |
For the Year Ended October 31, 2022 |
|||||||
Change in Net Assets: |
||||||||
From Operations: |
||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ |
43,545,877 |
$ |
57,271,832 |
||||
Net realized gain (loss) |
(92,417,891 |
) |
(40,378,416 |
) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
45,262,342 |
(247,280,096 |
) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
(3,609,672 |
) |
(230,386,680 |
) | ||||
Distributions to shareholders |
(81,766,289 |
) |
(89,607,854 |
) | ||||
Tax return of capital to shareholders |
(6,671,242 |
) |
(4,743,937 |
) | ||||
Total distributions |
(88,437,531 |
) |
(94,351,791 |
) | ||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
(92,047,203 |
) |
(324,738,471 |
) | ||||
Net Assets: |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
1,108,724,899 |
1,433,463,370 |
||||||
End of year |
$ |
1,016,677,696 |
$ |
1,108,724,899 |
||||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash: |
||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
$ |
(3,609,672 |
) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||
Purchases of long-term investments |
(589,705,230 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of long-term investments |
690,260,298 |
|||
Net purchases, sales and maturities of short-term investments |
(355,346 |
) | ||
Net amortization of premium on investments in securities |
15,355,384 |
|||
Net decrease in dividends and interest receivable and other assets |
1,921,909 |
|||
Net increase in payable for collateral received for over-the-counter option contracts and total return swap contracts |
10,000 |
|||
Net increase in interest expense payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
439,311 |
|||
Net decrease in receivable for variation margin on interest rate swap contracts |
848,691 |
|||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments in securities |
(58,533,583 |
) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on total return swap contracts |
(105,858 |
) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
(1,143,995 |
) | ||
Net realized loss on investments in securities |
113,962,410 |
|||
Cash provided by operating activities |
169,344,319 |
|||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||
Repayments of credit agreement* |
(82,734,556 |
) | ||
Dividends and distributions paid |
(88,422,200 |
) | ||
Cash used for financing activities |
(171,156,756 |
) | ||
Increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash |
(1,812,437 |
) | ||
Cash and restricted cash at beginning of year (including foreign currency) |
12,869,121 |
|||
Cash and restricted cash at end of year (including foreign currency) |
$ |
11,056,684 |
||
Restricted cash |
$ |
9,725,458 |
||
Foreign currency |
1,331,226 |
|||
Total cash and restricted cash shown on the Statement of Cash Flows |
$ |
11,056,684 |
||
* |
Amount includes $2,265,444 of mark-to-market increase on GBP portion of the credit agreement. Amount repaid was $85 million. |
For the Year Ended October 31, |
For the Period October 28, 2020 (a) through October 31, 2020 |
|||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Data: |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
|||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period |
$20.06 |
$25.93 |
$24.99 |
$25.00 |
||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) (b) |
0.79 |
1.04 |
1.02 |
(0.01 |
) | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(0.86 |
) |
(5.20 |
) |
1.35 |
(0.00 |
) (c) | |||||||||
Total from investment operations |
(0.07 |
) |
(4.16 |
) |
2.37 |
(0.01 |
) | |||||||||
Less dividends and distributions to shareholders from: |
||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
(1.48 |
) |
(1.51 |
) |
(1.42 |
) |
— |
|||||||||
Net realized gain |
— |
(0.11 |
) |
(0.01 |
) |
— |
||||||||||
Tax return of capital |
(0.12 |
) |
(0.09 |
) |
— |
— |
||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions to shareholders |
(1.60 |
) |
(1.71 |
) |
(1.43 |
) |
— |
|||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value |
(1.67 |
) |
(5.87 |
) |
0.94 |
(0.01 |
) | |||||||||
Net asset value, end of period |
$18.39 |
$20.06 |
$25.93 |
$24.99 |
||||||||||||
Market value, end of period |
$16.81 |
$17.59 |
$24.97 |
$25.00 |
||||||||||||
Total net asset value return (d) |
0.15 |
% |
-16.09 |
% |
9.77 |
% |
-0.04 |
% (e) | ||||||||
Total market value return (d) |
4.40 |
% |
-23.59 |
% |
5.66 |
% |
-0.00 |
% (e) | ||||||||
For the Year Ended October 31, |
For the Period October 28, 2020 (a) through October 31, 2020 |
|||||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
|||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in millions) |
$1,016.7 |
$1,108.7 |
$1,433.5 |
$1,249.6 |
||||||||||||
Ratios to average daily net assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
4.99 |
% |
2.71 |
% |
2.01 |
% |
1.24 |
% (f) | ||||||||
Expenses (excluding interest expense) |
1.73 |
% |
1.67 |
% |
1.61 |
% |
1.24 |
% (f) | ||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
4.02 |
% |
4.52 |
% |
3.97 |
% |
(1.22 |
)% (f) | ||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average daily managed assets (g) |
3.15 |
% |
1.75 |
% |
1.40 |
% |
1.24 |
% (f) | ||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
35 |
% |
41 |
% |
47 |
% |
0 |
% (e) | ||||||||
Revolving Credit Agreement |
||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage ratio for revolving credit agreement |
269 |
% |
262 |
% |
308 |
% |
NA |
|||||||||
Asset coverage per $1,000 for revolving credit agreement |
$2,694 |
$2,624 |
$3,077 |
NA |
||||||||||||
Amount of loan outstanding (in millions) |
$600.1 |
$682.8 |
$690.2 |
NA |
||||||||||||
(a) |
Commencement of investment operations. |
(b) |
Calculation based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) |
Amount is less than $0.005. |
(d) |
Total net asset value return measures the change in net asset value per share over the period indicated. Total market value return is computed based upon the Fund’s market price per share and excludes the effects of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of these calculations, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. |
(e) |
Not annualized. |
(f) |
Ratios for periods less than one year are annualized. Certain professional, shareholder reporting and non–recurring expenses incurred by the Fund are not annualized for periods less than one year. |
(g) |
Average daily managed assets represent net assets plus the outstanding balance of the credit agreement. |
• |
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
• |
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, credit risk, etc.) |
• |
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Investments (Level 1) |
Other Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total |
|||||||||||||
Preferred Securities—Exchange-Traded |
$ |
298,655,493 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
298,655,493 |
||||||||
Preferred Securities—Over-the-Counter |
— |
1,233,071,733 |
— |
1,233,071,733 |
||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds |
— |
544,691 |
— |
544,691 |
||||||||||||
Short-Term Investments |
— |
58,228,864 |
— |
58,228,864 |
||||||||||||
Total Investments in Securities (a) |
$ |
298,655,493 |
$ |
1,291,845,288 |
$ |
— |
$ |
1,590,500,781 |
||||||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
$ |
— |
$ |
426,861 |
$ |
— |
$ |
426,861 |
||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Contracts |
— |
58,567,799 |
— |
58,567,799 |
||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter Total Return Swap Contracts |
— |
105,858 |
— |
105,858 |
||||||||||||
Total Derivative Assets (a) |
$ |
— |
$ |
59,100,518 |
$ |
— |
$ |
59,100,518 |
||||||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
$ |
— |
$ |
(177,088 |
) |
$ |
— |
$ |
(177,088 |
) | ||||||
Total Derivative Liabilities (a) |
$ |
— |
$ |
(177,088 |
) |
$ |
— |
$ |
(177,088 |
) | ||||||
(a) |
Portfolio holdings are disclosed individually on the Schedule of Investments. |
Ex-Date |
Record Date |
Payable Date |
Amount | |||
11/14/23 |
11/15/23 |
11/30/23 |
$0.134 | |||
12/12/23 |
12/13/23 |
12/29/23 |
$0.134 | |||
1/16/24 |
1/17/24 |
1/13/24 |
$0.134 | |||
2/13/24 |
2/14/24 |
2/29/24 |
$0.134 | |||
3/12/24 |
3/13/24 |
3/28/24 |
$0.134 |
Assets |
Liabilities |
|||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
Location |
Fair Value |
Location |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Credit Risk: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Return Swap Contracts—Over-the-Counter |
Total return swap contracts, at value |
$ |
105,858 |
— |
$ |
— |
||||||||||
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk: |
||||||||||||||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts (a) |
Unrealized appreciation |
426,861 |
Unrealized depreciation |
177,088 |
||||||||||||
Interest Rate Risk: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Contracts (b) |
Receivable for variation margin on interest rate swap contracts |
58,567,799 |
(c) |
— |
— |
(a) |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts executed with Brown Brothers Harriman are not subject to a master netting agreement or another similar arrangement. |
(b) |
Not subject to a master netting agreement or another similar arrangement. |
(c) |
Amount represents the cumulative appreciation on interest rate swap contracts as reported on the Schedule of Investments. The Statement of Assets and Liabilities only reflects the current day variation margin receivable from broker. |
Derivatives |
Location |
Realized Gain (Loss) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|||||||
Credit Risk: |
||||||||||
Total Return Swap Contracts |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
$ |
(457,035 |
) |
$ |
105,858 |
||||
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk: |
||||||||||
Purchased Option Contracts(a) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
(313,760 |
) |
(55,872 |
) | |||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
(3,148,165 |
) |
1,143,995 |
||||||
Interest Rate Risk: |
||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Contracts |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
25,311,718 |
(12,317,034 |
) | ||||||
Purchased Option Contracts(a) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
(428,588 |
) |
— |
(a) |
Purchased option contracts are included in net realized gain (loss) and change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in securities. |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
Assets |
Liabilities |
||||||
Credit Risk: |
||||||||
Total Return Swap Contracts |
$ |
105,858 |
$ |
— |
Counterparty |
Gross Amount of Assets Presented in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
Financial Instruments and Derivatives Available for Offset |
Collateral Received (a) |
Net Amount of Derivative Asset (b) |
||||||||||||
BNP Paribas |
$ |
105,858 |
$ |
— |
$ |
(105,858 |
) |
$ |
— |
(a) |
Collateral received or pledged is limited to the net derivative asset or net derivative liability amounts. Actual collateral amounts received or pledged may be higher than amounts above. |
(b) |
Net amount represents the net receivable from the counterparty or net payable due to the counterparty in the event of default. |
Purchased Option Contracts (a) (b) |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts |
Total Return Swap Contracts (b) |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|||||||||||||
Average Notional Amount |
$ |
1,297,000 |
$ |
584,432,884 |
$ |
23,874,291 |
$ |
101,187,361 |
(a) |
Notional amount for binary option contracts represents the nominal payout amount. |
(b) |
Average notional amounts represent the average for the period in which the Fund had option contracts and total return swap contracts outstanding. For purchased option contracts, this represents one month and for total return swap contracts, this represents seven months. |
For the Year Ended October 31, |
||||||||
2023 |
2022 |
|||||||
Ordinary income |
$ |
81,766,289 |
$ |
87,878,955 |
||||
Long-term capital gain |
— |
1,728,899 |
||||||
Tax return of capital |
6,671,242 |
4,743,937 |
||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
$ |
88,437,531 |
$ |
94,351,791 |
||||
Cost of investments in securities for federal income tax purposes |
$ |
1,811,421,340 |
||
Gross unrealized appreciation on investments |
$ |
3,405,692 |
||
Gross unrealized depreciation on investments |
(161,909,015 |
) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
$ |
(158,503,323 |
) | |
Assumed Portfolio Total Return |
-10 |
% |
-5 |
% |
0 |
% |
5 |
% |
10 |
% | ||||||||||
Common Share Total Return |
( |
)% |
( |
)% |
( |
)% |
% |
% |
• |
Deferral and Omission Risk . Preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, at its discretion, to defer or omit distributions for a stated period without any adverse consequences to the issuer. In certain cases, deferring or omitting distributions may be mandatory. If the Fund owns a preferred security that is deferring its distributions, the Fund may be required to report income for tax purposes although it has not yet received such income. In addition, recent changes in bank regulations may increase the likelihood for issuers to defer or omit distributions. |
• |
Credit and Subordination Risk . Credit risk is the risk that a preferred security in the Fund’s portfolio will decline in price or the issuer of the security will fail to make dividend, interest or principal payments when due because the issuer experiences a decline in its financial status. Preferred securities are generally subordinated to bonds and other debt instruments in a company’s capital structure in terms of having priority to corporate income, claims to corporate assets and liquidation payments, and therefore will be subject to greater credit risk than more senior debt instruments. |
• |
Interest Rate Risk . Interest rate risk is the risk that preferred securities will decline in value because of changes in market interest rates. When market interest rates rise, the market value of such securities generally will fall, and therefore the Fund may underperform during periods of rising interest rates. The Fund may be subject to a greater risk of rising interest rates than would normally be the case due to the current period of historically low rates and the effect of government monetary policy initiatives and resulting market reaction to those initiatives. Preferred securities without maturities or with longer periods before maturity may be more sensitive to interest rate changes. |
• |
Prepayment and Extension Risk . Prepayment risk is the risk that changes in interest rates, credit spreads or other factors will result in the call (repayment) of a preferred security more quickly |
than expected, such that the Fund may have to invest the proceeds in lower yielding securities, or that expectations of such early call will negatively impact the market price of the security. Extension risk is the risk that changes in the interest rates or credit spreads may result in diminishing call expectations, which can cause prices to fall. |
• |
Floating-Rate and . The market value of floating-rate securities is a reflection of discounted expected cash flows based on expectations for future interest rate resets. The market value of such securities may fall in a declining interest rate environment and may also fall in a rising interest rate environment if there is a lag between the rise in interest rates and the reset. This risk may also be present with respect to Fixed-to-Floating-Rate fixed-to-floating-rate fixed-to-floating-rate |
• |
Call, Reinvestment and Income Risk . During periods of declining interest rates, an issuer may be able to exercise an option to redeem its issue at par earlier than scheduled which is generally known as call risk. Recent regulatory changes may increase call risk with respect to certain types of preferred securities. If this occurs, the Fund may be forced to reinvest in lower yielding securities. This is known as reinvestment risk. Preferred securities frequently have call features that allow the issuer to repurchase the security prior to its stated maturity. An issuer may redeem preferred securities if the issuer can refinance the preferred securities at a lower cost due to declining interest rates or an improvement in the credit standing of the issuer, or in the event of regulatory changes affecting the capital treatment of a security. Another risk associated with a declining interest rate environment is that the income from the Fund’s portfolio may decline over time when the Fund invests the proceeds from new share sales at market rates that are below the portfolio’s current earnings rate. |
• |
Liquidity Risk . Certain preferred securities may be substantially less liquid than many other securities, such as common stocks or U.S. government securities. Illiquid securities involve the risk that the securities will not be able to be sold at the time desired by the Fund or at prices approximating the value at which the Fund is carrying the securities on its books. |
• |
Limited Voting Rights Risk . Generally, traditional preferred securities offer no voting rights with respect to the issuer unless preferred dividends have been in arrears for a specified number of periods, at which time the preferred security holders may elect a number of directors to the issuer’s board of directors. Generally, once all the arrearages have been paid, the preferred security holders no longer have voting rights. Hybrid-preferred security holders generally have no voting rights. |
• |
Special Redemption Rights . In certain varying circumstances, an issuer of preferred securities may redeem the securities prior to a specified date. For instance, for certain types of preferred securities, a redemption may be triggered by a change in U.S. federal income tax or securities laws. As with call provisions, a redemption by the issuer may have a negative impact on the return of the security held by the Fund. See “Call, Reinvestment and Income Risk” above and “Regulatory Risk” below. |
• |
New Types of Securities . From time to time, preferred securities, including hybrid-preferred securities and contingent capital securities, have been, and may in the future be, offered having |
features other than those described herein. The Fund reserves the right to invest in these securities if the investment manager believes that doing so would be consistent with the Fund’s investment objectives and policies. Since the market for these instruments would be new, the Fund may have difficulty disposing of them at a suitable price and time. In addition to limited liquidity, these instruments may present other risks, such as high price volatility. |
Name, Address and Year of Birth (1) |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office (2) |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served (3) | |||||||
Interested Trustees (4) |
||||||||||||
Joseph M. Harvey 1963 |
Trustee, Chairman |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
Chief Executive Officer since 2022 and President since 2003 of Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (“CSCM”), and Chief Executive Officer since 2022 and President since 2004 of Cohen & Steers, Inc. (“CNS”). Chief Investment Officer of CSCM from 2003 to 2019. Prior to that, Senior Vice President and Director of Investment Research of CSCM. |
21 |
Since 2014 | |||||||
Adam M. Derechin 6 1964 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
Chief Operating Officer of CSCM since 2003 and CNS since 2004. President and Chief Executive Officer of the Funds from 2005 to 2021. |
21 |
Since 2021 | |||||||
Independent Trustees |
||||||||||||
Michael G. Clark 1965 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
CFA; From 2006 to 2011, President and Chief Executive Officer of DWS Funds and Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management. |
21 |
Since 2011 |
Name, Address and Year of Birth (1) |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office (2) |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served (3) | |||||
George Grossman 1953 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
Attorney-at-law. |
21 |
Since 1993 | |||||
Dean A. Junkans 1959 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
CFA; Advisor to SigFig (a registered investment advisor) from July 2018 to July 2022; Chief Investment Officer at Wells Fargo Private Bank from 2004 to 2014 and Chief Investment Officer of the Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement group at Wells Fargo & Company from 2011 to 2014; former Member and Chair, Claritas Advisory Committee at the CFA Institute from 2013 to 2015; former Adjunct Professor and Executive-In-Residence, Bethel University, 2015 to 2022; former Board Member and Investment Committee Member, Bethel University Foundation, 2010 to 2022; former Corporate Executive Board Member of the National Chief Investment Officers Circle, 2010 to 2015; former Member of the Board of Governors of the University of Wisconsin Foundation, River Falls, 1996 to 2004; U.S. Army Veteran, Gulf War. |
21 |
Since 2015 |
Name, Address and Year of Birth (1) |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office (2) |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served (3) | |||||
Gerald J. Maginnis 1955 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
Philadelphia Office Managing Partner, KPMG LLP from 2006 to 2015; Partner in Charge, KPMG Pennsylvania Audit Practice from 2002 to 2008; President, Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA) from 2014 to 2015; Member, PICPA Board of Directors from 2012 to 2016; Member, Council of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) from 2013 to 2017; Member, Board of Trustees of AICPA Foundation from 2015 to 2020; Board Member and Audit Committee Chairman of inTEST Corporation since 2020; Chairman of the Advisory Board of Centri Consulting LLC since 2022. |
21 |
Since 2015 | |||||
Jane F. Magpiong 1960 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
President, Untap Potential since 2013; Senior Managing Director, TIAA-CREF, from 2011 to 2013; National Head of Wealth Management, TIAA- CREF, from 2008 to 2011; President, Bank of America Private Bank from 2005 to 2008; Executive Vice President, Fleet Private Clients Group, from 2003 to 2004. |
21 |
Since 2015 |
Name, Address and Year of Birth (1) |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office (2) |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served (3) | |||||
Daphne L. Richards 1966 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
President and CIO of Ledge Harbor Management since 2016; Investment Committee Member of the Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation since 2015; Member of the Advisory Board of Northeast Dutchess Fund since 2016; former Independent Director of Cartica Management, LLC, 2015 to 2022; formerly worked at Bessemer Trust Company from 1999 to 2014; Frank Russell Company from 1996 to 1999; Union Bank of Switzerland from 1993 to 1996; Credit Suisse from 1990 to 1993; and Hambros International Venture Capital Fund from 1988 to 1989. |
21 |
Since 2017 |
Name, Address and Year of Birth (1) |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office (2) |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served (3) | |||||
Ramona Rogers-Windsor 1960 |
Trustee |
Until Next Election of Trustees |
CFA; Member, Capital Southwest Board of Directors since 2021; Member, Thomas Jefferson University Board of Trustees since 2020 and its insurance subsidiary board, Partners Insurance Company, Inc., since 2023; Managing Director, Public Investments Department, Northwestern Mutual Investment Management Company, LLC from 2012 to 2019; former Member, Milwaukee Film, LLC Board of Directors from 2016 to 2019. |
21 |
Since 2021 |
(1) |
The address for each Trustee is 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 30 th Floor, New York, NY 10036. |
(2) |
On March 12, 2008, the Board of Trustees adopted a mandatory retirement policy stating a Trustee must retire from the Board on December 31 st of the year in which he or she turns 75 years of age. |
(3) |
The length of time served represents the year in which the Trustee was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Cohen & Steers Fund Complex. |
(4) |
“Interested persons,” as defined in the 1940 Act, on the basis of their affiliation with the Advisor (“Interested Trustees”). |
Name, Address and Year of Birth (1) |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Principal Occupation During At Least the Past 5 Years |
Length of Time Served (2) | |||
James Giallanza 1966 |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2014. Prior to that, Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2006. |
Since 2006 | |||
Albert Laskaj 1977 |
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2019. Prior to that, Vice President of CSCM since 2015. |
Since 2015 | |||
Dana A. DeVivo 1981 |
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2019. Prior to that, Vice President of CSCM since 2013. |
Since 2015 | |||
Stephen Murphy 1966 |
Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President |
Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2019. Prior to that, Managing Director at Mirae Asset Securities (USA) Inc. since 2017. |
Since 2019 | |||
William F. Scapell 1967 |
Vice President |
Executive Vice President of CSCM since 2014. Prior to that, Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2003. |
Since 2003 | |||
Elaine Zaharis-Nikas 1973 |
Vice President |
Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2014. Prior to that, Vice President of CSCM since 2005. |
Since 2015 |
(1) |
The address of each officer is 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 30 th Floor, New York, NY 10036. |
(2) |
Officers serve one-year terms. The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected as an officer of any fund in the Cohen & Steers fund complex. All of the officers listed above are officers of one or more of the other funds in the complex. |
Facts |
What Does Cohen & Steers Do With Your Personal Information? | |
Why? |
Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. | |
What? |
The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include: • Social Security number and account balances • Transaction history and account transactions • Purchase history and wire transfer instructions | |
How? |
All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons Cohen & Steers chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
Reasons we can share your personal information |
Does Cohen & Steers share? |
Can you limit this sharing? | ||
For our everyday business purposes— such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or reports to credit bureaus |
Yes |
No | ||
For our marketing purposes— to offer our products and services to you |
Yes |
No | ||
For joint marketing with other financial companies— |
No |
We don’t share | ||
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes— information about your transactions and experiences |
No |
We don’t share | ||
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes— information about your creditworthiness |
No |
We don’t share | ||
For our affiliates to market to you— |
No |
We don’t share | ||
For non-affiliates to market to you— |
No |
We don’t share | ||
Questions? Call 800.330.7348 |
Who we are |
||
Who is providing this notice? |
Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., Cohen & Steers Asia Limited, Cohen & Steers Japan Limited, Cohen & Steers UK Limited, Cohen & Steers Ireland Limited, Cohen & Steers Singapore Private Limited, Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC, Cohen & Steers Private Funds and Cohen & Steers Open and Closed-End Funds (collectively, Cohen & Steers). | |
What we do |
||
How does Cohen & Steers protect my personal information? |
To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. We restrict access to your information to those employees who need it to perform their jobs, and also require companies that provide services on our behalf to protect your information. | |
How does Cohen & Steers collect my personal information? |
We collect your personal information, for example, when you: • Open an account or buy securities from us • Provide account information or give us your contact information • Make deposits or withdrawals from your account We also collect your personal information from other companies. | |
Why can’t I limit all sharing? |
Federal law gives you the right to limit only: • sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes—information about your creditworthiness • affiliates from using your information to market to you • sharing for non-affiliates to market to you State law and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. | |
Definitions |
||
Affiliates |
Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. • Cohen & Steers does not share with affiliates. | |
Non-affiliates |
Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. • Cohen & Steers does not share with non-affiliates. | |
Joint marketing |
A formal agreement between non-affiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. • Cohen & Steers does not jointly market. |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities |
• |
Symbols: CSJAX, CSJCX, CSJIX, CSRSX, CSJRX, CSJZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities |
• |
Symbols: CSEIX, CSCIX, CREFX, CSDIX, CIRRX, CSZIX |
• |
Designed for institutional investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities |
• |
Symbol: CSRIX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global real estate equity securities |
• |
Symbols: CSFAX, CSFCX, CSSPX, GRSRX, CSFZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in international (non-U.S.) real estate securities |
• |
Symbols: IRFAX, IRFCX, IRFIX, IRFRX, IRFZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return and the maximization of real returns during inflationary environments by investing primarily in real assets |
• |
Symbols: RAPAX, RAPCX, RAPIX, RAPRX, RAPZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return (high current income and capital appreciation), investing primarily in preferred and debt securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies |
• |
Symbols: CPXAX, CPXCX, CPXFX, CPXIX, CPRRX, CPXZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking high current income and capital preservation by investing in low-duration preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies |
• |
Symbols: LPXAX, LPXCX, LPXFX, LPXIX, LPXRX, LPXZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in midstream energy master limited partnership (MLP) units and related stocks |
• |
Symbols: MLOAX, MLOCX, MLOIX, MLORX, MLOZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global infrastructure securities |
• |
Symbols: CSUAX, CSUCX, CSUIX, CSURX, CSUZX |
• |
Designed for investors seeking high current income and capital appreciation, investing in equity, preferred and debt securities, focused on real assets and alternative income strategies |
• |
Symbols: DVFAX, DVFCX, DVFIX, DVFRX, DVFZX |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (the “Code of Ethics”). The Code of Ethics was in effect during the reporting period. The registrant has not amended the Code of Ethics as described in Form N-CSR during the reporting period. The registrant has not granted any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics as described in Form N-CSR during the reporting period. A current copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the registrant’s website at https://assets.cohenandsteers.com/assets/content/uploads/Code_of_Ethics_for_Principal_Executive_and_Principal_Financial_Officers_of_the_Funds.pdf. Upon request, a copy of the Code of Ethics can be obtained free of charge by calling 800-330-7348 or writing to the Secretary of the Registrant, 1166 Avenue of the Americas, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10036.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Registrant’s board has determined that Gerald J. Maginnis qualifies as an audit committee financial expert based on his years of experience in the public accounting profession. The registrant’s board has determined that Michael G. Clark qualifies as an audit committee financial expert based on his years of experience in the public accounting profession and the investment management and financial services industry. The registrant’s board has determined that Ramona Rogers-Windsor qualifies as an audit committee financial expert based on her years of experience in the investment management and financial services industry. Each of Messrs. Maginnis and Clark and Ms. Rogers-Windsor is a member of the board’s audit committee, and each is independent as such term is defined in Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2023 and October 31, 2022 for professional services rendered by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:
2023 | 2022 | |||
Audit Fees |
$47,179 | $46,028 | ||
Audit-Related Fees |
$0 | $0 | ||
Tax Fees |
$6,459 | $6,301 | ||
All Other Fees |
$0 | $0 |
Tax fees were billed in connection with tax compliance services, including the preparation and review of federal and state tax returns and the computation of corporate and franchise tax amounts.
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed for the registrant by the principal accountant. The audit committee also is required to pre-approve non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant’s investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrant’s investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant, if the engagement for services relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.
The audit committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members who are independent members of the board of directors of the registrant. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting. The audit committee may not delegate its responsibility to pre-approve services to be performed by the registrant’s principal accountant to the investment advisor.
(e)(2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2023 and October 31, 2022, the aggregate fees billed by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant and for non-audit services rendered to the registrant’s investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrant’s investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant were:
2023 | 2022 | |||
Registrant |
$6,459 | $6,301 | ||
Investment Advisor |
$0 | $0 |
(h) The registrant’s audit committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrant’s investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X was compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
(i) Not applicable.
(j) Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the committee are Gerald J. Maginnis (chair), Michael G. Clark, George Grossman and Ramona Rogers-Windsor.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
Included in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
The registrant has delegated voting of proxies in respect of portfolio holdings to Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (“C&S”), in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth below.
COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING THE VOTING OF SECURITIES
This statement sets forth the policies and procedures that Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. and its affiliated advisors (“Cohen & Steers”, “we” or “us”) follow in exercising voting rights with respect to securities held in its client portfolios. All proxy-voting rights that are exercised by Cohen & Steers shall be subject to this Statement of Policy and Procedures.
General Proxy Voting Guidelines
Objectives
Voting rights are an important component of corporate governance. Cohen & Steers has three overall objectives in exercising voting rights:
• | Responsibility. Cohen & Steers shall seek to ensure that there is an effective means in place to hold companies accountable for their actions. While management must be accountable to its board, the board must be accountable to a company’s shareholders. Although accountability can be promoted in a variety of ways, protecting shareholder voting rights may be among our most important tools. |
• | Rationalizing Management and Shareholder Concerns. Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that the interests of a company’s management and board are aligned with those of the company’s shareholders. In this respect, compensation must be structured to reward the creation of shareholder value. |
• | Shareholder Communication. Since companies are owned by their shareholders, Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that management effectively communicates with its owners about the company’s business operations and financial performance. It is only with effective communication that shareholders will be able to assess the performance of management and to make informed decisions on when to buy, sell or hold a company’s securities. |
General Principles
In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in accordance with the general principles set forth below.
• | The ability to exercise a voting right with respect to a security is a valuable right and, therefore, must be viewed as part of the asset itself. |
• | In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall engage in a careful evaluation of issues that may materially affect the rights of shareholders and the value of the security. |
• | Consistent with general fiduciary duties, the exercise of voting rights shall always be conducted with reasonable care, prudence and diligence. |
• | In exercising voting rights on behalf of clients, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in the same manner as if Cohen & Steers were the beneficial owner of the securities. |
• | To the extent reasonably possible, Cohen & Steers shall participate in each shareholder voting opportunity. |
• | Voting rights shall not automatically be exercised in favor of management-supported proposals. |
• | Cohen & Steers, and its officers and employees, shall never accept any item of value in consideration of a favorable proxy vote. |
General Guidelines
Set forth below are general guidelines that Cohen & Steers shall follow in exercising proxy voting rights:
• | Prudence. In making a proxy voting decision, Cohen & Steers shall give appropriate consideration to all relevant facts and circumstances, including the value of the securities to be voted and the likely effect any vote may have on that value. Since voting rights must be exercised on the basis of an informed judgment, investigation shall be a critical initial step. |
• | Third Party Views. While Cohen & Steers may consider the views of third parties, Cohen & Steers shall never base a proxy voting decision solely on the opinion of a third party. Rather, decisions shall be based on a reasonable and good faith determination as to how best to maximize shareholder value. |
• | Shareholder Value. Just as the decision whether to purchase or sell a security is a matter of judgment, determining whether a specific proxy resolution will increase the market value of a security is a matter of judgment as to which informed parties may differ. In determining how a proxy vote may affect the economic value of a security, Cohen & Steers shall consider both short-term and long-term views about a company’s business and prospects, especially in light of our projected holding period on the stock (e.g., Cohen & Steers may discount long-term views on a short-term holding). |
Specific Guidelines
Board and Director Proposals
Election of Directors
Voting for Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections
Votes on director nominees are made on a case-by-case basis using a “mosaic” approach, where all factors are considered and no single factor is determinative. In evaluating director nominees, Cohen & Steers considers the following factors:
• | Whether the nominee attended less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings without a valid excuse for the absences; |
• | Whether the nominee is an inside or affiliated outside director and sits on the audit, compensation, or nominating committees and/or the full board serves as the audit, compensation, or nominating committees or the company does not have one of these committees; |
• | Whether the board ignored a significant shareholder proposal that was approved by a majority of the votes cast in the previous year; |
• | Whether the board, without shareholder approval, instituted a new poison pill plan, extended an existing plan, or adopted a new plan upon the expiration of an existing plan during the past year; |
• | Whether the nominee is the chairman or CEO of a publicly-traded company who serves on more than two (2) public company boards; |
• | In the case of nominees other than the chairman or CEO, whether the nominee serves on more than four (4) public company boards; |
• | If the nominee is an incumbent director, the length of tenure taking into account tenure limits recommended by local corporate governance codes1; |
• | Whether the nominee has a material related party transaction or a material conflict of interest with the company; |
• | Whether the nominee (or the entire board) has a record of making poor corporate or strategic decisions or has demonstrated an overall lack of good business judgment; |
• | Material failures of governance, stewardship, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company; |
• | Material failures of risk oversight including, but not limited to: |
• | Bribery; |
• | Large or serial fines from regulatory bodies; |
• | Demonstrably poor risk oversight of environmental and social issues, including climate change; |
• | Significant adverse legal judgments or settlements; |
• | Hedging of company stock by employees or directors of a company; or |
• | Significant pledging of company stock in the aggregate by officers or directors of a company; |
• | Whether the board has oversight of material climate-related risks and opportunities including, but not limited to: |
• | The transition and physical risks the company faces related to climate change on its operations and investment in terms of the impact on its business and financial condition, including the company’s related disclosures; |
• | How the board identifies, measures and manages such risks; and |
• | The board’s oversight of climate-related risk as a part of governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets; |
• | Actions related to a nominee’s service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about such nominee’s ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company; and |
• | In the case of a nominee that is the chair of the nominating committee (or other directors on a case-by-case basis), whether the company’s board lacks diversity including, but not limited to, diversity of gender, ethnicity, race and background. |
Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections
Votes in a contested election of directors are evaluated on a case-by-case basis considering the long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry management’s track record, the qualifications of the nominees and other relevant factors.
1 | For example, in the UK, independent directors of publicly traded companies with tenure exceeding nine (9) years are reclassified as non-independent unless the company can explain why they remain independent. |
Board Composition and Gender Diversity
We encourage companies to continue to evolve diversity and inclusion practices. We generally vote against the chair of the nominating committee (or other directors on a case-by-case basis) at companies where the post-election board contains no female directors if the board has not included a female director during the last 12 months and the company has not articulated a plan to include a qualified female nominee.
Non-Disclosure of Board Nominees
Cohen & Steers generally votes against the election of director nominees if the names of the nominees are not disclosed prior to the meeting. However, Cohen & Steers recognizes that companies in certain emerging markets may have legitimate reasons for not disclosing nominee names. In such cases, if a company discloses a legitimate reason why such nominee names have not been disclosed, Cohen & Steers may vote for the nominees even if nominee names are not disclosed.
Majority Vote Requirement for Directors (SP)2
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals asking the board to amend the company’s governance documents (charter or bylaws) to provide that director nominees will be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast.
Separation of Chairman and CEO (SP)
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to separate the CEO and chairman positions. However, Cohen & Steers does recognize that under certain circumstances, it may be in the company’s best interest for the CEO and chairman positions to be held by one person.
Independent Chairman (SP)
Cohen & Steers reviews on a case-by-case basis proposals requiring the chairman’s position to be filled by an independent director taking into account the company’s current board leadership and governance structure, company performance, and any other factors that may be relevant.
Lead Independent Director (SP)
In cases where the CEO and chairman roles are combined or the chairman is not independent, Cohen & Steers votes for the appointment of a lead independent director.
Board Independence (SP)
Cohen & Steers believes that boards should have a majority of independent directors. Therefore, Cohen & Steers vote for proposals that require the board to be comprised of a majority of independent directors.
In general, Cohen & Steers considers a director independent if the director satisfies the independence definition set forth in local corporate governance codes and/or the applicable listing standards of the exchange on which the company’s stock is listed.
In addition, Cohen & Steers generally considers a director independent if the director has no significant financial, familial or other ties with the company that may pose a conflict and has not been employed by the company in an executive capacity.
Board Size (SP)
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to limit the size of the board to 15 members or less.
2 | “SP” refers to a shareholder proposal. |
Classified Boards (SP)
Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of proposals to declassify boards of directors. In voting on proposals to declassify a board of directors, Cohen & Steers evaluates all facts and circumstances, including whether: (i) the current management and board have a history of making good corporate and strategic decisions and (ii) the proposal is in the best interests of shareholders.
Tiered Boards (non-U.S.)
Cohen & Steers votes in favor of unitary boards as opposed to tiered board structures. Cohen & Steers believes that unitary boards offer flexibility while, with a tiered structure, there is a risk of upper tier directors becoming remote from the business, while lower tier directors become deprived of contact with outsiders of wider experience. No director should be excluded from the requirement to submit him/herself for re-election on a regular basis.
Independent Committees (SP)
Cohen & Steers votes for proposals requesting that a board’s audit, compensation and nominating committees consist only of independent directors.
Adoption of a Board with Audit Committee Structure (JAPAN)
Cohen & Steers votes for article amendments to adopt a board with an audit committee structure unless the structure obstructs shareholders’ ability to submit proposals on income allocation related issues or the company already has a 3-committee (U.S. style) structure.
Non-Disclosure of Board Compensation
Cohen & Steers generally votes against the election of director nominees at companies if the compensation paid to such directors is not disclosed prior to the meeting. However, Cohen & Steers recognizes that companies in certain emerging markets may have legitimate reasons for not disclosing such compensation. In such cases, if a company discloses a legitimate reason why such compensation should not be disclosed, Cohen & Steers may vote for the nominees even if compensation is not disclosed.
Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection
Cohen & Steers votes in favor of proposals providing indemnification for directors and officers for acts conducted in the normal course of business that is consistent with the laws of the jurisdiction of formation. Cohen & Steers also vote in favor of proposals that expand coverage for directors and officers where, despite an unsuccessful legal defense, the director or officer acted in good faith and in the best interests of the company. Cohen & Steers votes against proposals that would expand indemnification beyond coverage of legal expenses to coverage of acts, such as gross negligence, that are violations of fiduciary obligations.
Directors’ Liability (non-U.S.)
These proposals ask shareholders to give discharge from responsibility for all decisions made during the previous financial year. Depending on the country, this resolution may or may not be legally binding, may not release the board from its legal responsibility, and does not necessarily eliminate the possibility of future shareholder action (although it does make such action more difficult to pursue).
Cohen & Steers will generally vote for the discharge of directors, including members of the management board and/or supervisory board, unless the board is not fulfilling its fiduciary duties as evidenced by:
• | A lack of oversight or actions by board members that amount to malfeasance or poor supervision, such as operating in private or company interest rather than in shareholder interest; |
• | Any legal issues (e.g., civil/criminal) aimed to hold the board liable for past or current actions that constitute a breach of trust, such as price fixing, insider trading, bribery, fraud, or other illegal actions; or |
• | Other egregious governance issues where shareholders are likely to bring legal action against the company or its directors. |
Directors’ Contracts (non-U.S.)
Best market practice about the appropriate length of directors’ service contracts varies by jurisdiction. As such, Cohen & Steers votes these proposals on a case-by-case basis taking into account the best interests of the company and its shareholders and local market practice.
Compensation Proposals
Votes on Executive Compensation. “Say-on-Pay” votes are determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account the reasonableness of the company’s compensation structure and the adequacy of the disclosure.
Cohen & Steers generally votes against in circumstances where there are an unacceptable number of problematic pay practices including:
• | Poor linkage between executive pay and company performance and profitability; |
• | The presence of objectionable structural features in the compensation plan, such as excessive perquisites, golden parachutes, tax-gross up provisions, and automatic benchmarking of pay in the top half of the peer group; and |
• | A lack of proportionality in the plan relative to the company’s size and peer group. |
Additional Disclosure of Executive and Director Pay (SP). Cohen & Steers generally votes for shareholder proposals that seek additional disclosure of executive and director pay information.
Frequency of Shareholder Votes on Executive Compensation. Cohen & Steers generally votes for annual shareholder advisory votes to approve executive compensation.
Golden Parachutes. In general, Cohen & Steers votes against golden parachutes because they impede potential takeovers that shareholders should be free to consider. Cohen & Steers opposes the use of employment agreements that result in excessive cash payments and generally withhold our vote at the next shareholder meeting for directors who approved golden parachutes.
In the context of an acquisition, merger, consolidation, or proposed sale, Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals to approve golden parachute payments. Factors that may result in a vote against include:
• | Potentially excessive severance payments; |
• | Agreements that include excessive excise tax gross-up provisions; |
• | Single-trigger payments upon a change in control (“CIC”), including cash payments and the acceleration of performance-based equity despite the failure to achieve performance measures; |
• | Single-trigger vesting of equity based on a definition of change in control that requires only shareholder approval of the transaction (rather than consummation); |
• | Recent amendments or other changes that may make packages so attractive as to encourage transactions that may not be in the best interests of shareholders; or |
• | The company’s assertion that a proposed transaction is conditioned on shareholder approval of the golden parachute advisory vote. |
Non-Executive Director Remuneration (non-U.S.). Cohen & Steers evaluates these proposals on a case-by-case basis taking into account the remuneration mix and the adequacy of the disclosure. Cohen & Steers believes that non-executive directors should be compensated with a mix of cash and equity to align their interests with the interests of shareholders. The details of such remuneration should be fully disclosed and provided with sufficient time for us to consider our vote.
Approval of Annual Bonuses for Directors and Statutory Auditors (JAPAN). Cohen & Steers generally supports the payment of annual bonuses to directors and statutory auditors except in cases of scandals or extreme underperformance.
Equity Compensation Plans. Votes on proposals related to compensation plans are determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account plan features and equity grant practices, where positive factors may counterbalance negative factors (and vice versa), as evaluated based on three pillars:
• | Plan Cost: the total estimated cost of the company’s equity plans relative to industry/market cap peers measured by the company’s estimated shareholder value transfer (SVT) in relation to peers, considering: |
• | SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants; and |
• | SVT based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants. |
• | Plan Features: |
• | Automatic single-trigger award vesting upon a CIC; |
• | Discretionary vesting authority; |
• | Liberal share recycling on various award types; and |
• | Minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan. |
• | Grant Practices: |
• | The company’s three year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers; |
• | Vesting requirements for most recent CEO equity grants (3-year look-back); |
• | The estimated duration of the plan based on the sum of shares remaining available and the new shares requested divided by the average annual shares granted in the prior three years; |
• | The proportion of the CEO’s most recent equity grants/awards subject to performance conditions; |
• | Whether the company maintains a claw-back policy; and |
• | Whether the company has established post exercise/vesting shareholding requirements. |
Cohen & Steers generally votes against compensation plan proposals if the combination of factors indicates that the plan, overall is not, in the interests of shareholders, or if any of the following apply:
• | Awards may vest in connection with a liberal CIC; |
• | The plan would permit re-pricing or cash buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval; |
• | The plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a pay-for-performance disconnect; or |
• | Any other plan features that are determined to have a significant negative impact on shareholder interests. |
Equity Compensation Plans (non-U.S.). Cohen & Steers evaluates these proposals on a case-by-case basis. Share option plans should be clearly explained and fully disclosed to both shareholders and participants and put to shareholders for approval. Each director’s share options should be detailed, including exercise prices, expiration dates and the market price of the shares at the date of exercise. They should take into account appropriate levels of dilution. Options should vest in reference to challenging performance criteria, which are disclosed in advance. Share options should be fully expensed so that shareholders can assess their true cost to the company. The assumptions and methodology behind the expensing calculation should also be disclosed to shareholders.
Long-Term Incentive Plans (non-U.S.). A long-term incentive plan refers to any arrangement, other than deferred bonuses and retirement benefit plans, which require one or more conditions in respect of service and/or performance to be satisfied over more than one financial year.
Cohen & Steers evaluates these proposals on a case-by-case basis. Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of plans with robust incentives and challenging performance criteria that are fully disclosed to shareholders in advance and vote against plans that are excessive or contain easily achievable performance metrics or where there is excessive discretion delegated to remuneration committees. Cohen & Steers would expect remuneration committees to explain why criteria are considered to be challenging and how they align the interests of shareholders with the interests of the plan participants. Cohen & Steers will also vote against proposals that lack sufficient disclosure.
Transferable Stock Options. Cohen & Steers evaluates on a case-by-case basis proposals to grant transferable stock options or otherwise permit the transfer of outstanding stock options, including the cost of the proposal and alignment with shareholder interests.
Approval of Cash or Cash-and-Stock Bonus Plans. Cohen & Steers votes to approve cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans that seek to exempt executive compensation from limits on deductibility imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans. Cohen & Steers votes for the approval of employee stock purchase plans, although Cohen & Steers generally believes the discounted purchase price should not exceed 15% of the current market price.
401(k) Employee Benefit Plans. Cohen & Steers votes for proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.
Pension Arrangements (non-U.S.). Cohen & Steers evaluates these proposals on a case-by-case basis. Pension arrangements should be transparent and cost-neutral to shareholders. Cohen & Steers believes it is inappropriate for executives to participate in pension arrangements that are materially different than those offered to other employees (such as continuing to participate in a final salary arrangement when employees have been transferred to a money purchase plan). One-off payments into individual director’s pension plans, changes to pension entitlements, and waivers concerning early retirement provisions must be fully disclosed and justified to shareholders.
Stock Ownership Requirements (SP). Cohen & Steers supports proposals requiring senior executives and directors to hold a minimum amount of stock in a company (often expressed as a percentage of annual compensation), which may include restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Stock Holding Periods (SP). Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals requiring executives to hold stock received upon option exercise for a specific period of time.
Recovery of Incentive Compensation (SP). Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to recover incentive bonuses or other incentive payments made to senior executives if it is later determined that fraud, misconduct, or negligence significantly contributed to a restatement of financial results that led to the award of incentive compensation.
Capital Structure Changes and Anti-Takeover Proposals
Increase to Authorized Shares. Cohen & Steers generally votes for increases in authorized shares, provided that the increase is not greater than three times the number of shares outstanding and reserved for issuance (including shares reserved for stock-related plans and securities convertible into common stock, but not shares reserved for any poison pill plan).
Blank Check Preferred Stock. Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals authorizing the creation of new classes of preferred stock without specific voting, conversion, distribution and other rights, and proposals to increase the number of authorized blank check preferred shares. Cohen & Steers may vote in favor of these proposals if Cohen & Steers receives reasonable assurances that (i) the preferred stock was
authorized by the board for legitimate capital formation purposes and not for anti-takeover purposes, and (ii) no preferred stock will be issued with voting power that is disproportionate to the economic interests of the preferred stock. These representations should be made either in the proxy statement or in a separate letter from the company to us.
Pre-Emptive Rights. Cohen & Steers generally votes against the issuance of equity shares with pre-emptive rights. However, Cohen & Steers may vote for shareholder pre-emptive rights where such pre-emptive rights are necessary taking into account the best interests of the company’s shareholders. In addition, we acknowledge that international local practices may call for shareholder pre-emptive rights when a company seeks authority to issue shares (e.g., UK authority for the issuance of only up to 5% of outstanding shares without pre-emptive rights). While Cohen & Steers prefers that companies be permitted to issue shares without pre-emptive rights, in deference to international local practices, Cohen & Steers will approve issuance requests with pre-emptive rights.
Dual Class Capitalizations. Because classes of common stock with unequal voting rights limit the rights of certain shareholders, Cohen & Steers votes against the adoption of a dual or multiple class capitalization structure. Cohen & Steers supports the one-share, one-vote principle for voting.
Restructurings/Recapitalizations. Cohen & Steers reviews proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to issue shares as part of a debt restructuring plan on a case-by-case basis. In voting, Cohen & Steers considers the following:
• | Dilution: how much will the ownership interest of existing shareholders be reduced, and how extreme will dilution to any future earnings be? |
• | Change in control: will the transaction result in a change in control of the company? |
• | Bankruptcy: generally approve proposals that facilitate debt restructurings unless there are clear signs of self-dealing or other abuses. |
Share Repurchase Programs. Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of such programs where the repurchase would be in the long-term best interests of shareholders and where we believe that this is a good use of the company’s cash.
Cohen & Steers will vote against such programs when shareholders’ interests could be better served by deployment of the cash for alternative uses, or where the repurchase is a defensive maneuver or an attempt to entrench management.
Targeted Share Placements (SP). Cohen & Steers votes these proposals on a case-by-case basis. These proposals ask companies to seek shareholder approval before placing 10% or more of their voting stock with a single investor. The proposals are typically in reaction to the placement of a large block of voting stock in an employee stock option plan, parent capital fund or with a single friendly investor, with the aim of protecting the company against a hostile tender offer.
Shareholder Rights Plans. Cohen & Steers reviews proposals to ratify shareholder rights plans on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the length of the plan.
Shareholder Rights Plans (JAPAN). Cohen & Steers reviews proposals on a case-by-case basis examining not only the features of the plan itself but also factors including share price movements, shareholder composition, board composition, and the company’s announced plans to improve shareholder value.
Reincorporation Proposals. Proposals to change a company’s jurisdiction of incorporation are examined on a case-by-case basis. When evaluating such proposals, Cohen & Steers reviews management’s rationale for the proposal, changes to the charter/bylaws, and differences in the applicable laws governing the companies.
Voting on State Takeover Statutes (SP). Cohen & Steers reviews on a case-by-case basis proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including control share acquisition statutes, control share cash-out statutes, freeze-out provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions and disgorgement provisions). In voting on these proposals, Cohen & Steers takes into account whether the proposal is in the long-term best interests of the company and whether it would be in the best interests of the company to thwart a shareholder’s attempt to control the board of directors.
Mergers and Corporate Restructurings
Mergers and Acquisitions. Votes on mergers and acquisitions are considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the anticipated financial and operating benefits, offer price (cost vs. premium), prospects of the combined companies, how the deal was negotiated and changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights.
Cohen & Steers votes against proposals that require a super-majority of shareholders to approve a merger or other significant business combination.
Nonfinancial Effects of a Merger or Acquisition. Some companies have proposed charter provisions that specify that the board of directors may examine the nonfinancial effects of a merger or acquisition on the company. This provision would allow the board to evaluate the impact a proposed change in control would have on employees, host communities, suppliers and/or others. Cohen & Steers generally vote against proposals to adopt such charter provisions. Directors should base their decisions solely on the financial interests of the shareholders.
Spin-offs. Cohen & Steers evaluates spin-offs on a case-by-case basis taking into account the tax and regulatory advantages, planned use of sale proceeds, market focus, and managerial incentives.
Asset Sales. Cohen & Steers evaluates asset sales on a case-by-case basis taking into account the impact on the balance sheet/working capital, value received for the assets, and potential elimination of diseconomies.
Liquidations. Cohen & Steers evaluates liquidations on a case-by-case basis taking into account management’s efforts to pursue other alternatives, appraisal value of the assets, and the compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.
Issuance of Debt (non-U.S.). Cohen & Steers evaluates these proposals on a case-by-case basis. Reasons for increased bank borrowing powers are numerous and varied, including allowing for normal growth of the company, the financing of acquisitions, and allowing increased financial leverage. Management may also attempt to borrow as part of a takeover defense. Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of proposals that will enhance a company’s long-term prospects. Cohen & Steers votes against any uncapped or poorly-defined increase in bank borrowing powers or borrowing limits, issuances that would result in the company reaching an unacceptable level of financial leverage or a material reduction in shareholder value, or where such borrowing is expressly intended as part of a takeover defense.
Ratification of Auditors
Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals to ratify auditors, auditor remuneration and/or proposals authorizing the board to fix audit fees, unless:
• | an auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is therefore not independent; |
• | there is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion that is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position; |
• | the name of the proposed auditor and/or fees paid to the audit firm are not disclosed by the company prior to the meeting; |
• | the auditors are being changed without explanation; or |
• | fees paid for non-audit related services are excessive and/or exceed fees paid for audit services or limits set by local best practice recommendations or law. |
Where fees for non-audit services include fees related to significant one-time capital structure events, initial public offerings, bankruptcy emergence, and spinoffs, and the company makes public disclosure of the amount and nature of those fees, then such fees may be excluded from the non-audit fees considered in determining whether non-audit related fees are excessive.
Auditor Rotation
Cohen & Steers evaluates auditor rotation proposals on a case-by-case basis taking into account the following factors: the tenure of the audit firm; establishment and disclosure of a review process whereby the auditor is regularly evaluated for both audit quality and competitive pricing; length of the rotation period advocated in the proposal; and any significant audit related issues.
Auditor Indemnification
Cohen & Steers generally votes against auditor indemnification and limitation of liability. However, Cohen & Steers recognizes there may be situations where indemnification and limitations on liability may be appropriate.
Annual Accounts and Reports (non-U.S.)
Annual reports and accounts should be detailed and transparent and should be submitted to shareholders for approval in a timely manner as prescribed by law. They should meet accepted reporting standards such as those prescribed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Cohen & Steers generally approves proposals relating to the adoption of annual accounts provided that:
• | The report has been examined by an independent external accountant and the accuracy of material items in the report is not in doubt; |
• | The report complies with legal and regulatory requirements and best practice provisions in local markets; |
• | the company discloses which portion of the remuneration paid to the external accountant relates to auditing activities and which portion relates to non-auditing advisory assignments; |
• | A report on the implementation of risk management and internal control measures is incorporated, including an in-control statement from company management; |
• | A report should include a statement of compliance with relevant codes of best practice for markets where they exist (e.g. for UK companies a statement of compliance with the Corporate Governance Code should be made, together with detailed explanations about any area(s) of non-compliance); |
• | A conclusive response is given to all queries from shareholders; and |
• | Other concerns about corporate governance have not been identified. |
Appointment of Internal Statutory Auditor (JAPAN)
Cohen & Steers evaluates these proposals on a case-by-case basis taking into account the work history of each nominee. If the nominee is designated as independent but has worked the majority of his or her career for one of the company’s major shareholders, lenders, or business partners, Cohen & Steers considers the nominee affiliated and will withhold support.
Shareholder Access and Voting Proposals
Proxy Access. Cohen & Steers reviews proxy access proposals on a case-by-case basis taking into account the parameters of proxy access use in light of a company’s specific circumstances. Cohen & Steers generally supports proposals that provide shareholders with a reasonable opportunity to use the right without stipulating overly restrictive or onerous parameters for use and also provide assurances that the mechanism will not be subject to abuse by short-term investors, investors without a substantial investment in the company or investors seeking to take control of the board.
Bylaw Amendments. Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals requesting companies grant shareholders the ability to amend bylaws. Similar to proxy access, Cohen & Steers generally supports proposals that provide assurances that this right will not be subject to abuse by short-term investors or investors without a substantial investment in a company.
Reimbursement of Proxy Solicitation Expenses (SP). In the absence of compelling reasons, Cohen & Steers will generally not support such proposals.
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings (SP). Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals requesting companies amend their governance documents (bylaws and/or charter) in order to allow shareholders to call special meetings.
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent (SP). Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals to allow or facilitate shareholder action by written consent to provide reasonable protection of minority shareholder rights.
Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board. Cohen & Steers generally votes for proposals that seek to fix the size of the board and vote against proposals that give the board the ability to alter the size of the board without shareholder approval. While Cohen & Steers recognizes the importance of such proposals, these proposals may be set forth in order to promote the agenda(s) of certain special interest groups and could be disruptive to management of the company.
Cumulative Voting (SP). Having the ability to cumulate votes for the election of directors (i.e., to cast more than one vote for a director) generally increases shareholders’ rights to effect change in the management of a company. However, Cohen & Steers acknowledges that cumulative voting promotes special candidates who may not represent the interests of all, or even a majority, of shareholders. Therefore, when voting on proposals to institute cumulative voting, Cohen & Steers evaluates all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal and generally vote against cumulative voting where the company has good corporate governance practices in place, including majority voting for director elections and a de-classified board.
Supermajority Vote Requirements (SP). Cohen & Steers generally supports proposals that seek to lower supermajority voting requirements.
Confidential Voting. Cohen & Steers votes for proposals requesting that companies adopt confidential voting, use independent tabulators, and use independent inspectors of election as long as such proposals permit management to request that dissident groups honor its confidential voting policy in the case of proxy contests.
Date/Location of Meeting (SP). Cohen & Steers votes against shareholder proposals to change the date or location of the shareholders’ meeting.
Adjourn Meeting if Votes Are Insufficient. Cohen & Steers generally votes against open-end requests for adjournment of a shareholder meeting. However, where management specifically states the reason for requesting an adjournment and the requested adjournment is necessary to permit a proposal that would otherwise be supported under this policy to be carried out, the adjournment request will be supported.
Disclosure of Shareholder Proponents (SP). Cohen & Steers votes for shareholder proposals requesting that companies disclose the names of shareholder proponents. Shareholders may wish to contact the proponents of a shareholder proposal for additional information.
Environmental and Social Proposals
Cohen & Steers believes that well-managed companies should be identifying, evaluating and assessing environmental and social issues and, where material to its business, managing exposure to environmental and social risks related to these issues. When considering management or shareholder proposals relating to these issues, because of the diverse nature of environmental and social proposals, Cohen & Steers evaluates these proposals on a case-by-case basis. The principles guiding our evaluation of these proposals include, but are not limited to:
• | The current level of publicly available disclosure from the company or other publicly available sources, including if the company already discloses similar information through existing reports or policies; |
• | Whether implementation of a proposal is likely to enhance or protect shareholder value; |
• | Whether a proposal can be implemented at a reasonable cost; |
• | Whether the information requested concerns business issues that relate to a meaningful percentage of the company’s business; |
• | The degree to which the company’s stated position on the issues raised in the proposal could affect its reputation or sales; |
• | Whether the company has already responded in some appropriate manner to the request embodied in the proposal; |
• | What other companies in the relevant industry have done in response to the issue addressed in the proposal; and |
• | Whether implementation would reveal proprietary or confidential information that could place the company at a competitive disadvantage. |
Environmental Proposals (SP). Cohen & Steers acknowledges that environmental considerations can pose significant investment risks and opportunities. Therefore, Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of proposals requesting a company disclose information that will aid in the determination of material environmental issues impacting the company and, where material to its business, how the company is managing exposure to environmental risks related to these issues, taking into consideration the following factors:
• | The general factors listed above; and |
• | Whether the issues presented have already been effectively dealt with through governmental regulation or legislation. |
In particular in relation to climate-related risk and opportunities material to its business, we expect companies to help their investors understand how they may be impacted by such risk and opportunities, and how these factors are considered within strategy in a manner consistent with the company’s business model and sector. The principles guiding our evaluation of these proposals are:
• | The general factors listed above; |
• | The transition and physical risks the company faces related to climate change on its operations and investment in terms of the impact on its business and financial condition, including the company’s related disclosures; |
• | How the company identifies, measures and manages such risks; and |
• | The company’s approach to climate-related risk as part of governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets. |
Social Proposals (SP). Cohen & Steers acknowledges that social considerations can pose significant risks and opportunities. There, Cohen & Steers general votes in favor of proposals requesting a company disclose information that will aid in the determination of material social issues impacting the company and, where material to its business, how the company is managing exposure to social risks related to these issues.
Cohen & Steers believes board and workforce diversity are beneficial to the decision-making process and can enhance long-term profitability. Therefore, Cohen & Steers generally votes in favor of proposals that seek to increase board and workforce diversity including, but not limited to, diversity of gender, ethnicity, race and background. Cohen & Steers votes all other social proposals on a case-by-case basis, including, but not limited to, proposals related to political and charitable contributions, lobbying, and gender equality and the gender pay gap.
Miscellaneous Proposals
Bundled Proposals. Cohen & Steers reviews on a case-by-case basis bundled or “conditioned” proposals. For items that are conditioned upon each other, Cohen & Steers examines the benefits and costs of the bundled items. In instances where the combined effect of the conditioned items is not in shareholders’ best interests, Cohen & Steers votes against such proposals. If the combined effect is positive, Cohen & Steers supports such proposals. In the case of bundled director proposals, Cohen & Steers will vote for the entire slate only if Cohen & Steers would have otherwise voted for each director on an individual basis.
Other Business. Cohen & Steers generally votes against proposals to approve other business where Cohen & Steers cannot determine the exact nature of the proposal(s) to be voted on.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies.
Information pertaining to the portfolio managers of the registrant, as of October 31, 2023, is set forth below.
William F. Scapell
• Vice President
• Portfolio manager since inception |
Executive Vice President of C&S since 2014. Prior to that, Senior Vice President of C&S since 2003. | |
Elaine Zaharis-Nikas
• Vice President
• Portfolio manager since inception |
Senior Vice President of C&S since 2014. Prior to that, Vice President of C&S since 2005. | |
Jerry Dorost
• Vice President
• Portfolio manager since inception |
Senior Vice President of C&S since 2019. Prior to that, Vice President of C&S since 2010. |
C&S utilizes a team-based approach in managing the Fund. Messrs. Scapell and Dorost and Ms. Zaharis-Nikas direct and supervise the execution of the Fund’s investment strategy, and lead and guide the other members of the investment team. All of the Fund’s portfolio managers collaborate with respect to the process for allocating the Fund’s assets among the various sectors and industries.
Each portfolio manager listed above manages other investment companies and/or investment vehicles and accounts in addition to the registrant. The following tables show, as of October 31, 2023, the number of other accounts each portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets in the other accounts managed within each category.
William F. Scapell | Number of accounts | Total assets | ||||
• Registered investment companies |
13 | $ | 17,144,676,578 | |||
• Other pooled investment vehicles |
17 | $ | 2,856,010,948 | |||
• Other accounts |
23 | $ | 2,818,935,852 | |||
Elaine Zaharis-Nikas | Number of accounts | Total assets | ||||
• Registered investment companies |
11 | $ | 14,753,564,315 | |||
• Other pooled investment vehicles |
15 | $ | 2,834,485,673 | |||
• Other accounts |
20 | $ | 2,364,901,207 | |||
Jerry Dorost | Number of accounts | Total assets | ||||
• Registered investment companies |
9 | $ | 11,823,245,633 | |||
• Other pooled investment vehicles |
15 | $ | 2,834,485,673 | |||
• Other accounts |
20 | $ | 2,364,901,207 |
Share Ownership. The following table indicates the dollar range of securities of the registrant owned by the registrant’s portfolio managers as of October 31, 2023:
Dollar Range of Securities Owned | ||
William F. Scapell |
$50,001-$100,000 | |
Elaine Zaharis-Nikas |
$100,001 - $500,000 | |
Jerry Dorost |
$10,001 - $50,000 |
Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with the portfolio manager’s management of the registrant’s investments on the one hand and the investments of other accounts or vehicles for which the portfolio managers are responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time, resources and investment opportunities among the registrant and the other accounts or vehicles he advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions among the registrant and the other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the registrant.
In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may provide more revenue to the registrant’s investment advisor. While this may appear to create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities, the investment advisor strives to ensure that portfolio managers endeavor to exercise their discretion in a manner that is equitable to all interested persons. In this regard, in the absence of specific account-related impediments (such as client-imposed restrictions or lack of available cash), it is the policy of the investment advisor to allocate investment ideas pro rata to all accounts with the same primary investment objective.
In addition, certain of the portfolio managers may from time to time manage one or more accounts on behalf of the registrant’s investment advisor and its affiliated companies (the “CNS Accounts”). Certain securities held and traded in the CNS Accounts also may be held and traded in one or more client accounts. It is the policy of the investment advisor however not to put the interests of the CNS Accounts ahead of the interests of client accounts. The investment advisor may aggregate orders of client accounts with those of the CNS Accounts; however, under no circumstances will preferential treatment be given to the CNS Accounts. For all orders involving the CNS Accounts, purchases or sales will be allocated prior to trade placement, and orders that are only partially filled will be allocated across all accounts in proportion to the shares each account, including the CNS Accounts, was designated to receive prior to trading. As a result, it is expected that the CNS Accounts will receive the same average price as other accounts included in the aggregated order. Shares will not be allocated or re-allocated to the CNS Accounts after trade execution or after the average price is known. In the event so few shares of an order are executed that a pro-rata allocation is not practical, a rotational system of allocation may be used; however, the CNS Accounts will never be part of that rotation or receive shares of a partially filled order other than on a pro-rata basis.
Because certain CNS Accounts are managed with a cash management objective, it is possible that a security will be sold out of the CNS Accounts but continue to be held for one or more client accounts. In situations when this occurs, such security will remain in a client account only if the portfolio manager, acting in its reasonable judgment and consistent with its fiduciary duties, believes this is appropriate for, and consistent with the objectives and profile of, the client account.
Advisor Compensation Structure. Compensation of the investment advisor’s portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus and (3) annual stock-based compensation consisting generally of restricted stock units of the investment advisor’s parent, CNS. The investment advisor’s investment professionals, including the portfolio managers, also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to all of its employees. Compensation of the investment advisor’s investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis.
Method to Determine Compensation. The registrant’s investment advisor compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the total return performance of funds and accounts managed by the portfolio manager versus appropriate peer groups or benchmarks. C&S uses a variety of benchmarks to evaluate each portfolio managers’ performance for compensation purposes, including the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and other broad based indexes based on the asset classes managed by each portfolio manager. In evaluating the performance of a portfolio manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on one-and three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer periods of time. Performance is evaluated on a pre-tax and pre-expense basis. In addition to rankings within peer groups
of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to risk-adjusted performance. For funds and accounts with a primary investment objective of high current income, consideration will also be given to the fund’s and account’s success in achieving this objective. For portfolio managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis. The investment advisor has three funds or accounts with performance-based advisory fees. Portfolio managers are also evaluated on the basis of their success in managing their dedicated team of analysts. Base compensation for portfolio managers of the investment advisor varies in line with the portfolio manager’s seniority and position with the firm.
Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of the investment advisor and CNS. While the annual salaries of the investment advisor’s portfolio managers are fixed, cash bonuses and stock based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) | The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, based upon such officers’ evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a) | The Fund did not engage in any securities lending activity during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023. |
(b) | The Fund did not engage in any securities lending activity and did not engage a securities lending agent during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023. |
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COHEN & STEERS TAX-ADVANTAGED PREFERRED SECURITIES AND INCOME FUND
By: | /s/ James Giallanza | |||
Name: James Giallanza | ||||
Title: Principal Executive Officer | ||||
(President and Chief Executive Officer) | ||||
Date: | December 28, 2023 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/ James Giallanza | |||
Name: James Giallanza | ||||
Title: Principal Executive Officer | ||||
(President and Chief Executive Officer) | ||||
By: | /s/ Albert Laskaj | |||
Name: Albert Laskaj | ||||
Title: Principal Financial Officer | ||||
(Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer) | ||||
Date: | December 28, 2023 |
EX-99.CERT
EXHIBIT 13 (a)(2)
RULE 30a-2(a) CERTIFICATIONS
I, James Giallanza, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: December 28, 2023 |
/s/ James Giallanza |
James Giallanza Principal Executive Officer |
(President and Chief Executive Officer) |
RULE 30a-2(a) CERTIFICATIONS
I, Albert Laskaj, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: December 28, 2023 |
/s/ Albert Laskaj |
Albert Laskaj |
Principal Financial Officer |
(Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer) |
EX-99.906CERT
EXHIBIT 13 (b)
RULE 30a-2(b) CERTIFICATIONS
In connection with the Report of Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (the Company) on Form N-CSR as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Giallanza, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and |
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ James Giallanza |
James Giallanza |
Principal Executive Officer |
(President and Chief Executive Officer) |
Date: December 28, 2023 |
EXHIBIT 13 (b)
RULE 30a-2(b) CERTIFICATIONS
In connection with the Report of Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (the Company) on Form N-CSR as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Albert Laskaj, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and |
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Albert Laskaj |
Albert Laskaj |
Principal Financial Officer |
(Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer) |
Date: December 28, 2023 |
N-2 |
12 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct. 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cover [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity Central Index Key | 0001793882 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment Flag | false | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity Inv Company Type | N-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Document Type | N-CSR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity Registrant Name | Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Objectives and Practices [Text Block] | Investment Objectives The Fund’s primary investment objective is high current income. The Fund’s secondary investment objective is capital appreciation. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives. Unless otherwise indicated below, the Fund’s investment objectives and investment policies are considered non-fundamental and may be changed by the Fund’s Board of Trustees without shareholder approval. However, the Fund’s investment objectives and its policy of investing at least 80% of its Managed Assets (defined below) in preferred and other income securities may only be changed upon 60 days’ prior written notice to the Fund’s shareholders. Investment Strategies The Fund pursues its investment objectives primarily by investing in issues of preferred and other income securities the investment manager believes to be undervalued relative to credit quality and other investment characteristics. In making this determination, the investment manager evaluates the fundamental characteristics of an issuer, including, among other characteristics, an issuer’s creditworthiness, and also takes into account prevailing market factors. In analyzing credit quality, the investment manager considers not only fundamental analysis but also an issuer’s corporate and capital structure and the placement of the preferred or income securities within that structure. The investment manager may rely primarily on its own analysis of the credit quality and risks associated with individual securities considered for the Fund, rather than relying exclusively on nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) or third-party research. This aspect of the investment manager’s capabilities will be particularly important to the extent that the Fund invests in below investment grade or unrated securities and in securities of non-U.S. issuers. In evaluating relative value, the investment manager also takes into account call, conversion and other structural security features, in addition to such factors as the likely directions of credit ratings and relative value versus other income security classes. The Fund will not seek to achieve specific ESG outcomes through its portfolio of investments, nor will it pursue an overall impact or sustainable investment strategy. However, the investment manager will incorporate consideration of relevant ESG factors into its investment decision-making. For example, although the investment manager does not generally exclude investments based on ESG factors alone, when considering an investment opportunity with material exposure to carbon emissions regulation, this risk may be considered as one factor in the investment manager’s holistic review process. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its Managed Assets in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter preferred stock and debt securities; floating-rate and fixed-to-floating-rate closed-end, open-end or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that invest primarily in preferred and/or debt securities. These securities may be across a wide range of sectors, industries and countries. To the extent the Fund invests in securities of other closed-end, open-end, or ETFs, the Fund will consider the investments of these funds, to the extent known by the Fund, in determining compliance with this policy. The Fund may also invest in restricted securities, including securities that are issued in private placements, securities that are only eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) (referred to as Rule 144A Securities) and securities of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers that are issued without registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. In addition to purchasing securities in the secondary market, the Fund may seek investment opportunities in new issues and follow-on or secondary offerings of preferred and debt securities. “Managed Assets” are the Fund’s net assets, plus the principal amount of loans from financial institutions or debt securities issued by the Fund, the liquidation preference of preferred shares issued by the Fund, if any, and the proceeds of any reverse repurchase agreements entered into by the Fund (Reverse Repurchase Agreements). The Fund will invest 25% or more of its total assets in the financials sector, which is comprised of the banking, diversified financials, real estate (including real estate investment trusts (REITs)) and insurance industries. From time to time, the Fund may have 25% or more of its total assets invested in any one or more of these industries that make up the financials sector. In addition, the Fund also may focus its investments in other sectors or industries, such as (but not limited to) energy, industrials, utilities, pipelines, health care and telecommunications. The investment manager retains broad discretion to allocate the Fund’s investments across various sectors and industries. The Fund may invest without limit in securities of non-U.S. companies, which may be non-U.S. dollar denominated, including up to 15% of Managed Assets in securities issued by companies domiciled in emerging market countries. Typically, emerging markets are in countries that are in the process of industrialization, with lower gross national products per capita than more developed countries. Many foreign companies issue both foreign currency and U.S. dollar-denominated preferred and debt securities. Those securities that are traded in the United States have characteristics that are similar to traditional and hybrid preferred securities. The Fund may also invest in securities of foreign companies in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs) and European Depositary Receipts (EDRs). The investment manager may hedge some or all of the Fund’s foreign currency exposure. The Fund may invest in preferred and debt securities of any maturity or credit rating, including investment grade securities, below investment grade securities and unrated securities. Although not required to do so, the Fund will generally seek to maintain a minimum weighted average senior debt rating of companies in which it invests of BBB-, which the Fund considers to be investment grade. Although a company’s senior debt rating may be BBB-, an underlying security issued by such company in which the Fund invests may have a lower rating than BBB-. If the Fund cannot access a company’s average senior debt rating, the Fund may look to the rating of the underlying security issued by such company. The determination of whether a security is deemed investment grade or below investment grade will be determined at the time of investment. A security will be considered to be investment grade if it is rated as such by one NRSRO (for example minimum Baa3 or BBB-by Moody’s or S&P, respectively) or, if unrated, is judged to be investment grade by the investment manager. Below investment grade securities are also known as “high yield” or “junk” securities and are regarded as having more speculative characteristics with respect to the payment of interest and repayment of principal. The Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in below investment grade securities or securities that are unrated but judged, at the time of investment, to be below investment grade by the investment manager. The Fund may invest in both OTC and exchange-traded preferred securities. There are two basic types of preferred securities, traditional preferred securities and hybrid-preferred securities. Traditional preferred securities are perpetual and equity-like in nature. They may be issued by an entity taxable as a corporation and pay fixed or floating rate dividends. “Preference” means that a company must pay dividends on its preferred securities before paying any dividends on its common stock, and the claims of preferred securities holders are ahead of common stockholders’ claims on assets in a corporate liquidation or bankruptcy. However, these claims are subordinated to more senior creditors, including senior debt holders. Holders of preferred securities usually have no right to vote for corporate directors or on other matters. Preferred securities share many investment characteristics with both common stock and bonds; therefore, the risks and potential rewards of investing in the Fund may at times be similar to the risks of investing in both equity funds and bond funds. Hybrid-preferred securities are debt instruments that have characteristics similar to those of traditional preferred securities. Hybrid preferred securities may be issued by corporations, generally in the form of interest-bearing notes with preferred securities characteristics, or by an affiliated trust or partnership of the corporation, generally in the form of preferred interests in subordinated debentures or similarly structured securities. The hybrid-preferred securities market consists of both fixed and adjustable coupon rate securities that are either perpetual in nature or have stated maturity dates. Hybrid preferred holders generally have claims to assets in a corporate liquidation that are senior to those of traditional preferred securities but subordinate to those of senior debt holders. Certain subordinated debt and senior debt issues that have preferred characteristics are also considered to be part of the broader preferred securities market. Debt securities in which the Fund may invest include fixed- and floating-rate corporate debt securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. corporations, including U.S. dollar denominated debt obligations issued or guaranteed by U.S. corporations, U.S. dollar-denominated obligations of foreign issuers and debt obligations denominated in foreign currencies. Such debt obligations may include, among others, bonds, notes, debentures and variable rate demand notes, with the primary difference being their maturities and secured or unsecured status. Such corporate debt securities are fixed or floating-rate securities issued by businesses to finance their operations. The issuer pays the investor a fixed or variable rate of interest and normally must repay the amount borrowed on or before maturity. The Fund may invest up to 20% of its Managed Assets in CoCos. CoCos are debt or preferred securities with loss absorption characteristics that provide for an automatic write-down of the principal amount or value of securities or the mandatory conversion into common shares of the issuer under certain circumstances. A mandatory conversion might be automatically triggered, for instance, if a company fails to meet the capital minimum described in the security, the company’s regulator makes a determination that the security should convert, or the company receives specified levels of extraordinary public support. Since the common stock of the issuer may not pay a dividend, investors in these instruments could experience a reduced income rate, potentially to zero, and conversion would deepen the subordination of the investor (worsening the Fund’s standing in a bankruptcy). In addition, some CoCos provide for an automatic write-down of capital under such circumstances. The Fund is authorized to purchase, sell or enter into any derivative contract or option on a derivative contract, transaction or instrument, without limitation, including various interest rate transactions such as swaps, caps, floors or collars, and foreign currency transactions such as foreign currency forward contracts, futures contracts, options, swaps and other similar strategic transactions in connection with its investments in securities of non-U.S. companies. The Fund’s primary use of derivative contracts will be to enter into interest rate and currency hedging transactions in order to reduce the interest rate and foreign currency risk inherent in the Fund’s investments. To the extent any derivatives would be deemed to be illiquid, they will be included in the Fund’s maximum limitation of 25% of net assets invested in illiquid securities. The Fund may also invest up to 20% of its Managed Assets in common stocks, up to 20% of its Managed Assets in government securities (not including mortgage- or asset-backed securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or one of its sponsored entities), up to 20% of its Managed Assets in municipal securities, up to 25% of its Managed Assets in illiquid securities and up to 15% of its Managed Assets in securities denominated in the currencies of emerging market countries; however, under normal circumstances the Fund will not invest more than 10% of its Managed Assets in mortgage-backed, mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities (including mortgage- or asset-backed securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or one of its sponsored entities). The Fund may invest in Rule 144A Securities. Rule 144A Securities are considered restricted securities because they are not registered for sale to the general public and may only be resold to certain qualified institutional buyers. The Fund may invest in the securities of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers that are issued through non-U.S. offerings without registration with the SEC pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act. Offerings of Regulation S securities may be conducted outside of the United States. Because Regulation S securities are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale, certain Regulation S securities may be considered illiquid. The Fund may enter into short sales, provided the dollar amount of short sales at any time would not exceed 25% of the Managed Assets of the Fund. The Fund must designate collateral consisting of cash or liquid portfolio securities with a value equal to the current market value of the shorted securities, which is marked-to-market daily. If the Fund owns an equal amount of such securities or securities convertible into or exchangeable for, without payment of any further consideration, securities of the same issuer as, and equal in amount to, the securities sold short (which sales are commonly referred to as short sales against the box), the above requirements are not applicable. The Fund may invest in securities of other investment companies, including open-end funds, closed-end funds or ETFs, that invest primarily in preferred and/or debt securities, to the extent permitted under Section 12(d)(1) of the 1940 Act, and the rules promulgated thereunder, or any exemption granted to the Fund under the 1940 Act. The Fund also may invest in other funds either during periods when it has large amounts of uninvested cash, such as the period shortly after the Fund receives the proceeds of an offering of its common shares, or during periods when there is a shortage of attractive opportunities in the market. On an overall basis, the Fund seeks to implement an investment strategy designed to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. The Fund seeks to accomplish this primarily by (i) investing in dividend-paying securities that are eligible to pay dividends that qualify for U.S. federal income taxation at rates applicable to long-term capital gain (tax-advantaged dividends), and complying with the holding period and other requirements for such favorable tax treatment; and (ii) offsetting any ordinary income with Fund expenses and realized short-term capital gain against realized short-term capital loss and net realized long-term capital loss. The Fund may invest up to 25% of its Managed Assets in investments that may be illiquid ( i.e. day-to-day e.g. Temporary Defensive Positions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Factors [Table Text Block] | Principal Risks of the Fund The Fund is a diversified, closed-end management investment company designed primarily as a long-term investment and not as a trading vehicle. The Fund is not intended to be a complete investment program and, due to the uncertainty inherent in all investments, there can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives. Risk of Market Price Discount from Net Asset Value. closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a discount from their NAV. This characteristic is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that NAV could decrease as a result of investment activities and may be greater for investors expecting to sell their shares in a relatively short period following completion of this offering. Whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of the shares will depend not upon the Fund’s NAV but entirely upon whether the market price of the shares at the time of sale is above or below the investor’s purchase price for the shares. Because the market price of the shares will be determined by factors such as relative supply of and demand for shares in the market, general market and economic conditions, and other factors beyond the control of the Fund, Fund shares may trade at, above or below NAV, or at below or above the initial public offering price. Investment Risk Market Risk Limited Term and Tender Offer Risks with the Declaration of Trust, or unless the Fund completes an Eligible Tender Offer and converts to perpetual existence, the Fund will terminate on or about the Dissolution Date (subject to possible extension). The Fund is not a so called “target date” or “life cycle” fund whose asset allocation becomes more conservative over time as its target date, often associated with retirement, approaches. In addition, the Fund is not a “target term” fund as its investment objective is not to return its original NAV on the Dissolution Date or in an Eligible Tender Offer. The Fund’s investment objectives and policies are not designed to seek to return to investors their initial investment on the Dissolution Date or in an Eligible Tender Offer, and such investors and investors that purchase shares after the completion of this offering may receive more or less than their original investment upon dissolution or in an Eligible Tender Offer. Because the assets of the Fund will be liquidated in connection with the dissolution, the Fund will incur transaction costs in connection with dispositions of portfolio securities. The Fund does not limit its investments to securities having a maturity date prior to the Dissolution Date and may be required to sell portfolio securities when it otherwise would not, including at times when market conditions are not favorable, which may cause the Fund to lose money. In particular, the Fund’s portfolio may still have large exposures to illiquid securities as the Dissolution Date approaches, and losses due to portfolio liquidation may be significant. Beginning one year before the Dissolution Date (the Wind-Down Period), the Fund may begin liquidating all or a portion of the Fund’s portfolio, and the Fund may deviate from its investment strategy and may not achieve its investment objective. As a result, during the Wind-Down Period, the Fund’s distributions may decrease, and such distributions may include a return of capital. It is expected that common shareholders will receive cash in any liquidating distribution from the Fund regardless of their participation in the Fund’s automatic dividend reinvestment plan. However, if on the Dissolution Date the Fund owns securities for which no market exists or securities that are trading at depressed prices, such securities may be placed in a liquidating trust. The Fund cannot predict the amount, if any, of securities that will be required to be placed in a liquidating trust. The Fund may receive proceeds from the disposition of portfolio investments that are less than the valuations of such investments by the Fund and, in particular, losses from the disposition of illiquid securities may be significant. The disposition of portfolio investments by the Fund could also cause market prices of such instruments, and hence the NAV and market price of the common shares, to decline. In addition, disposition of portfolio investments will cause the Fund to incur increased brokerage and related transaction expenses. Moreover, in conducting such portfolio transactions, the Fund may need to deviate from its investment policies and may not achieve its investment objective. The Fund’s portfolio composition may change as its portfolio holdings mature or are called or sold in anticipation of an Eligible Tender Offer or the Dissolution Date. During such period(s), it is possible that the Fund will hold a greater percentage of its total assets in shorter term and lower yielding securities and cash and cash equivalents than it would otherwise, which may impede the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective and adversely impact the Fund’s performance and distributions to common shareholders, which may in turn adversely impact the market value of the common shares. In addition, the Fund may be required to reduce its leverage, which could also adversely impact its performance. The additional cash or cash equivalents held by the Fund could be obtained through reducing the Fund’s distributions to common shareholders and/or holding cash in lieu of reinvesting, which could limit the ability of the Fund to participate in new investment opportunities. The Fund does not limit its investments to securities having a maturity date prior to or around the Dissolution Date, which may exacerbate the foregoing risks and considerations. A common shareholder may be subject to the foregoing risks over an extended period of time, particularly if the Fund conducts an Eligible Tender Offer and is also subsequently terminated by or around the Dissolution Date. If the Fund conducts an Eligible Tender Offer, the Fund anticipates that funds to pay the aggregate purchase price of shares accepted for purchase pursuant to the tender offer will be first derived from any cash on hand and then from the proceeds from the sale of portfolio investments held by the Fund. In addition, the Fund may be required to dispose of portfolio investments in connection with any reduction in the Fund’s outstanding leverage necessary in order to maintain the Fund’s desired leverage ratios following a tender offer. The risks related to the disposition of securities in connection with the Fund’s dissolution also would be present in connection with the disposition of securities in connection with an Eligible Tender Offer. It is likely that during the pendency of a tender offer, and possibly for a time thereafter, the Fund will hold a greater than normal percentage of its total assets in cash and cash equivalents, which may impede the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective and decrease returns to shareholders. The tax effect of any such dispositions of portfolio investments will depend on the difference between the price at which the investments are sold and the tax basis of the Fund in the investments. Any capital gains recognized on such dispositions, as reduced by any capital losses the Fund realizes in the year of such dispositions and by any available capital loss carryforwards, will be distributed to shareholders as capital gain dividends (to the extent of net long-term capital gains over net short-term capital losses) or ordinary dividends (to the extent of net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses) during or with respect to such year, and such distributions will generally be taxable to common shareholders. If the Fund’s tax basis for the investments sold is less than the sale proceeds, the Fund will recognize capital gains, which the Fund will be required to distribute to common shareholders. In addition, the Fund’s purchase of tendered common shares pursuant to a tender offer will have tax consequences for tendering common shareholders and may have tax consequences for non-tendering common shareholders. The purchase of common shares by the Fund pursuant to a tender offer will have the effect of increasing the proportionate interest in the Fund of non-tendering common shareholders. All common shareholders remaining after a tender offer may be subject to proportionately higher expenses due to the reduction in the Fund’s total assets resulting from payment for the tendered common shares. Such reduction in the Fund’s total assets may result in less investment flexibility, reduced diversification and greater volatility for the Fund, and may have an adverse effect on the Fund’s investment performance. Such reduction in the Fund’s total assets may also cause common shares to become thinly traded or otherwise negatively impact secondary trading of common shares. A reduction in net assets, and the corresponding increase in the Fund’s expense ratio, could result in lower returns and put the Fund at a disadvantage relative to its peers and potentially cause the Fund’s common shares to trade at a wider discount to NAV than it otherwise would. Furthermore, the portfolio of the Fund following an Eligible Tender Offer could be significantly different and, therefore, common shareholders retaining an investment in the Fund could be subject to greater risk. For example, the Fund may be required to sell its more liquid, higher quality portfolio investments to purchase common shares that are tendered in an Eligible Tender Offer, which would leave a less liquid, lower quality portfolio for remaining shareholders. The prospects of an Eligible Tender Offer may attract arbitrageurs who would purchase the common shares prior to the tender offer for the sole purpose of tendering those shares which could have the effect of exacerbating the risks described herein for shareholders retaining an investment in the Fund following an Eligible Tender Offer. The Fund is not required to conduct an Eligible Tender Offer. If the Fund conducts an Eligible Tender Offer, there can be no assurance that the number of tendered common shares would not result in the Fund having aggregate net assets below the Dissolution Threshold, in which case the Eligible Tender Offer will be canceled, no common shares will be repurchased pursuant to the Eligible Tender Offer and the Fund will dissolve on the Dissolution Date (subject to possible extensions). Following the completion of an Eligible Tender Offer in which the number of tendered common shares would result in the Fund having aggregate net assets greater than or equal to the Dissolution Threshold, the Board of Trustees may, by a Board Action Vote, eliminate the Dissolution Date without shareholder approval. Thereafter, the Fund will have a perpetual term. The investment manager may have a conflict of interest in recommending to the Board that the Dissolution Date be eliminated because the investment manager would continue to receive management fees on the remaining assets of the Fund while it remains in existence. The Fund is not required to conduct additional tender offers following an Eligible Tender Offer and conversion to perpetual existence. Therefore, remaining common shareholders may not have another opportunity to participate in a tender offer. Shares of closed-end management investment companies frequently trade at a discount from their NAV, and as a result remaining common shareholders may only be able to sell their Shares at a discount to NAV. Preferred Securities Risk on-going COVID-19 outbreak has increased certain risks associated with investing in preferred securities. The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak could persist for years to come and the full impact to financial markets is not yet known. See “Geopolitical Risk” below for additional information regarding the COVID-19 outbreak.
Debt Securities Risk. Risk of Concentration in the Financials Sector Below Investment Grade and Unrated Securities Risk. NRSROs are private services that provide ratings of the credit quality of debt obligations, including convertible securities. Ratings assigned by an NRSRO are not absolute standards of credit quality and do not evaluate market risks or the liquidity of securities. NRSROs may fail to make timely changes in credit ratings and an issuer’s current financial condition may be better or worse than a rating indicates. In addition, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in unrated securities (securities which are not rated by an NRSRO) if the investment manager determines that purchase of the securities is consistent with the Fund’s investment objectives and policies. Unrated securities may be less liquid than comparable rated securities and involve the risk that the investment manager may not accurately evaluate the security’s comparative credit rating. If a security is unrated, the investment manager will assign a rating using its own analysis of issuer quality. Contingent Capital Securities Risk i.e e.g Foreign (Non-U.S.) and Emerging Market Securities Risk.The Fund may hold foreign securities of developed market issuers and emerging market issuers. Investing in securities of companies in emerging markets may entail special risks relating to potential economic, political or social instability and the risks of expropriation, nationalization, confiscation, trade sanctions or embargoes or the imposition of restrictions on foreign investment, the lack of hedging instruments, and repatriation of capital invested. Emerging securities markets are substantially smaller, less developed, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets. The limited size of emerging securities markets and limited trading value compared to the volume of trading in U.S. securities could cause prices to be erratic for reasons apart from factors that affect the quality of the securities. For example, limited market size may cause prices to be unduly influenced by traders who control large positions. Adverse publicity and investors’ perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the value and liquidity of portfolio securities, especially in these markets. Many emerging market countries have experienced substantial, and in some periods extremely high, rates of inflation for many years. Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates and corresponding currency devaluations have had and may continue to have negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain emerging market countries. Foreign Currency and Currency Hedging Risk The Fund may (but is not required to) engage in investments that are designed to hedge the Fund’s foreign currency risks, including foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency futures contracts, put and call option on foreign currencies and foreign currency swaps. Such transactions may reduce returns or increase volatility, perhaps substantially. While these practices will be entered into to seek to manage these risks, these practices may not prove to be successful or may have the effect of limiting the gains from favorable market movements. Foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency futures contracts, OTC options on foreign currencies and foreign currency swaps are subject to the risk of default by the counterparty and can be illiquid. These currency hedging transactions, as well as the futures contracts and exchange-listed options in which the Fund may invest, are subject to many of the risks of, and can be highly sensitive to changes in the value of, the related currency or other reference asset. As such, a small investment could have a potentially large impact on the Fund’s performance. Whether or not the Fund engages in currency hedging transactions, the Fund may experience a decline in the value of its portfolio securities, in U.S. dollar terms, due solely to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Use of currency hedging transactions may cause the Fund to experience losses greater than if the Fund had not engaged in such transactions. The Fund’s transactions in foreign currencies may increase or accelerate the Fund’s recognition of ordinary income and may affect the timing or character of the Fund’s distributions. Convertible Securities Risk When the market price of the underlying common stock increases, the prices of the convertible securities tend to rise as a reflection of the value of the underlying common stock. While no securities investments are without risk, investments in convertible securities generally entail less risk than investments in common stock of the same issuer. Derivatives Risk The market for many derivatives is, or suddenly can become, illiquid. Changes in liquidity may result in significant, rapid and unpredictable changes in the prices for derivatives transactions. The Fund could experience losses if it were unable to liquidate a derivative position because of an illiquid secondary market. Although both OTC and exchange-traded derivatives markets may experience lack of liquidity, OTC non-standardized derivatives transactions are generally less liquid than exchange-traded instruments. The illiquidity of the derivatives markets may be due to various factors, including congestion, disorderly markets, limitations on deliverable supplies, the participation of speculators, government regulation and intervention, and technical and operational or system failures. In addition, the liquidity of a secondary market in an exchange-traded derivative contract may be adversely affected by “daily price fluctuation limits” established by the exchanges which limit the amount of fluctuation in an exchange-traded contract price during a single trading day. Once the daily limit has been reached in the contract, no trades may be entered into at a price beyond the limit, thus preventing the liquidation of open positions. Prices have in the past moved beyond the daily limit on a number of consecutive trading days. If it is not possible to close an open derivative position entered into by the Fund, the Fund would continue to be required to make cash payments of variation (or mark-to-market) Successful use of derivatives transactions also is subject to the ability of the investment manager to predict correctly movements in the direction of the relevant market and, to the extent the transaction is entered into for hedging purposes, to ascertain the appropriate correlation between the transaction being hedged and the price movements of the derivatives. Derivatives transactions entered into to seek to manage the risks of the Fund’s portfolio of securities may have the effect of limiting gains from otherwise favorable market movements. The use of derivatives transactions may result in losses greater than if they had not been used (and a loss on a derivatives transaction position may be larger than the gain in a portfolio position being hedged), may require the Fund to sell or purchase portfolio securities at inopportune times or for prices other than current market values, may limit the amount of appreciation the Fund can realize on an investment, or may cause the Fund to hold a security that it might otherwise sell. Amounts paid by the Fund as premiums and cash or other assets held as collateral with respect to derivatives transactions may not otherwise be available to the Fund for investment purposes. The use of currency transactions can result in the Fund incurring losses as a result of the imposition of exchange controls, political developments, government intervention or failure to intervene, suspension of settlements or the inability of the Fund to deliver or receive a specified currency. The Fund may enter into swap, cap or other transactions to attempt to protect itself from increasing interest or dividend expenses resulting from increasing short-term interest rates on any leverage it incurs or increasing interest rates on securities held in its portfolio. A decline in interest rates may result in a decline in the value of the transaction, which may result in a decline in the NAV of the Fund. A sudden and dramatic decline in interest rates may result in a significant decline in the NAV of the Fund. Depending on the state of interest rates in general, the use of interest rate hedging transactions could enhance or harm the overall performance of the Fund. In the event the Fund enters into forward currency contracts for hedging purposes, the Fund will be subject to currency exchange rates risk. Currency exchange rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time and also can be affected unpredictably by intervention of U.S. or foreign governments or central banks, or the failure to intervene, or by currency controls or political developments in the United States or abroad. The Fund’s success in these transactions will depend principally on the ability of the investment manager to predict accurately future foreign currency exchange rates. Additional risks associated with derivatives trading include counterparty risk, liquidity risk and tracking/correlation risk. The Fund’s investments in forward currency contracts and interest rate swaps would subject the Fund to risks specific to derivatives transactions, including: the imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying assets of the Fund, which creates the possibility that the loss on such instruments may be greater than the gain in the value of the underlying assets in the Fund’s portfolio; the loss of principal; the possible default of the other party to the transaction; and illiquidity of the derivative investments. Furthermore, the ability to successfully use derivative instruments depends on the ability of the investment manager to predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. Thus, the use of derivative instruments for hedging, currency or interest rate management, or other purposes may result in losses greater than if they had not been used. Structured notes and other related instruments carry risks similar to those of more traditional derivatives such as futures, forward and option contracts. However, structured instruments may entail a greater degree of market risk and volatility than other types of debt obligations. The Fund will be subject to credit risk with respect to the counterparties to certain derivatives transactions entered into by the Fund. Derivatives may be purchased on established exchanges or through privately negotiated OTC transactions. Each party to an OTC derivative bears the risk that the counterparty will default. If a counterparty becomes bankrupt or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, the Fund may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative contract in bankruptcy or other reorganization proceeding. The Fund may obtain only a limited recovery or may obtain no recovery in such circumstances. The counterparty risk for cleared derivatives transactions is generally lower than for uncleared OTC derivatives transactions since generally a clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a cleared derivative contract and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade looks only to the clearing house for performance of financial obligations. However, there can be no assurance that the clearing house, or its members, will satisfy their obligations to the Fund. Rule 144A Securities Risk Regulation S Securities Risk non-U.S. offerings without registration with the SEC pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act. Regulation S securities may be relatively less liquid as a result of legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Because Regulation S securities are generally less liquid than registered securities, the Fund may take longer to liquidate these positions than publicly traded securities or may not be able to sell them at the price desired. Furthermore, companies whose securities are not publicly traded may not be subject to the disclosure and other investor protection requirements that would be applicable if their securities were publicly traded or otherwise offered in the United States. Accordingly, Regulation S securities may involve a high degree of business and financial risk and may result in losses to the Fund. Other Investment Companies Risk open-end funds, closed-end funds, ETFs and other types of pooled investment funds, those assets will be subject to the risks of the purchased investment companies’ portfolio securities, and a shareholder in the Fund will bear not only his or her proportionate share of the Fund’s expenses, but also indirectly the expenses of the purchased investment companies. Shareholders would therefore be subject to duplicative expenses to the extent the Fund invests in other investment companies. Risks associated with investments in closed-end funds also generally include the risks associated with the Fund’s structure as a closed-end investment company, including market risk, leverage risk, risk of market price discount from NAV, risk of anti-takeover provisions and non-diversification. In addition, investments in closed-end funds may be subject to dilution risk, which is the risk that strategies employed by a closed-end fund, such as rights offerings, may, under certain circumstances, have the effect of reducing its share price and the Fund’s proportionate interest. In addition, restrictions under the 1940 Act may limit the Fund’s ability to invest in other investment companies to the extent desired. The SEC has adopted Rule 12d1-4 permitting fund of fund arrangements subject to various conditions, and rescinding the present rule and certain exemptive relief previously granted. Rule 12d1-4 may adversely affect the Fund’s ability to invest in other investment companies and could also significantly affect the Fund’s ability to redeem its investments in other investment companies, making such investments less attractive. The effects of rule and other regulatory changes are not known as of the date of this report, but they could cause the Fund to incur losses, realize taxable gains distributable to shareholders, incur greater or unexpected expenses or experience other adverse consequences. Common Stock Risk in returns. Common stocks may be more susceptible to adverse changes in market value due to issuer specific events or general movements in the equities markets. A drop in the stock market may depress the price of common stocks held by the Fund. Common stock prices fluctuate for many reasons, including changes in investors’ perceptions of the financial condition of an issuer or the general condition of the relevant stock market, or the occurrence of political or economic events affecting issuers. For example, an adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of common stock in which the Fund has invested; the price of common stock of an issuer may be particularly sensitive to general movements in the stock market; or a drop in the stock market may depress the price of most or all of the common stocks held by the Fund. Also, common stock of an issuer in the Fund’s portfolio may decline in price if the issuer fails to make anticipated dividend payments because, among other reasons, the issuer of the security experiences a decline in its financial condition. The common stocks in which the Fund will invest are typically subordinated to preferred securities, bonds and other debt instruments in a company’s capital structure in terms of priority to corporate income and assets, and, therefore, will be subject to greater risk than the preferred securities or debt instruments of such issuers. In addition, common stock prices may be sensitive to rising interest rates as the costs of capital rise and borrowing costs increase. Government Securities Risk Municipal Securities Risk The cost associated with combating the outbreak of COVID-19 and its negative impact on tax revenues has adversely affected the financial condition of state and local governments. In the past, a number of municipal issuers have defaulted on obligations, were downgraded or commenced insolvency proceedings during economic or market turmoil or a recession. The effects of this outbreak could affect the ability of state and local governments to make payments on debt obligations when due and could adversely impact the value of their bonds, which could negatively impact the performance of the Fund. Restricted and Illiquid Securities Risk i.e. Leverage Risk Additional Risk Considerations Tax Risk. tax-advantaged qualified dividend income or long-term capital gain or what the tax rates on various types of income will be in future years. The maximum long-term capital gain tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income is currently 20%, 15%, or 0% for individuals depending on the amount of their taxable income for the year. An additional 3.8% Medicare tax will also apply in the case of some individuals. In addition, it may be difficult to obtain information regarding whether distributions by non-U.S. entities in which the Fund invests should be regarded as qualified dividend income. Furthermore, to receive qualified dividend income treatment, the Fund must meet holding period and other requirements with respect to the dividend-paying securities in its portfolio, and the shareholder must meet holding period and other requirements with respect to the Fund’s common shares. Holding periods may be affected by certain of the Fund’s transactions in options and other derivatives. There can be no guarantee that U.S. federal tax laws will not change in the future. Active Management Risk Portfolio Turnover Risk Anti-Takeover Provisions open-end investment company. Geopolitical Risk: COVID-19, market instability, debt crises and downgrades, embargoes, tariffs, sanctions and other trade barriers and other governmental trade or market control programs, the potential exit of a country from its respective union and related geopolitical events, may result in market volatility and may have long-lasting impacts on U.S. and global economies and financial markets. Supply chain disruptions or significant changes in the supply or prices of commodities or other economic inputs may have material and unexpected effects on both global securities markets and individual countries, regions, sectors, companies or industries. Events occurring in one region of the world may negatively impact industries and regions that are not otherwise directly impacted by the events. Additionally, those events, as well as other changes in foreign and domestic political and economic conditions, could adversely affect individual issuers or related groups of issuers, securities markets, interest rates, secondary trading, credit ratings, inflation, investor sentiment and other factors affecting the value of the Fund’s investments. Although the long-term economic fallout of COVID-19 is difficult to predict, it has contributed to, and may continue to contribute to, market volatility, inflation and systemic economic weakness. COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread may also exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, economic, market and financial risks. In addition, the U.S. government and other central banks across Europe, Asia, and elsewhere announced and/or adopted economic relief packages in response to COVID-19. The end of any such program could cause market downturns, disruptions and volatility, particularly if markets view the ending as premature. The U.S. federal government ended the COVID-19 public emergency declaration on May 11, 2023, however, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are expected to continue and the risk that new variants of COVID-19 may emerge remains. Therefore the economic outlook, particularly for certain industries and businesses, remains inherently uncertain. On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) withdrew from the European Union (EU) (referred to as Brexit), commencing a transition period that ended on December 31, 2020. The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, a bilateral trade and cooperation deal governing the future relationship between the UK and the EU (TCA), provisionally went into effect on January 1, 2021, and entered into force officially on May 1, 2021, but critical aspects of the relationship remain unresolved and subject to further negotiation and agreement. Brexit has resulted in volatility in European and global markets and could have negative long-term impacts on financial markets in the UK and throughout Europe. There is still considerable uncertainty relating to the potential consequences of the exit, how the negotiations for new trade agreements will be conducted, and whether the UK’s exit will increase the likelihood of other countries also departing the EU. During this period of uncertainty, the negative impact on the UK, European and broader global economies, could be significant, potentially resulting in increased market volatility and illiquidity, political, economic, and legal uncertainty, and lower economic growth for companies that rely significantly on Europe for their business activities and revenues. On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine significantly amplifying already existing geopolitical tensions. The United States and many other countries have instituted various economic sanctions against Russia, Russian individuals and entities and Belarus. The extent and duration of the military action, sanctions imposed and other punitive actions taken (including any Russian retaliatory responses to such sanctions and actions), and resulting disruptions in Europe and globally cannot be predicted, but could be significant and have a severe adverse effect on the global economy, securities markets and commodities markets globally, including through global supply chain disruptions, increased inflationary pressures and reduced economic activity. Ongoing conflicts in the Middle East could have similar negative impacts. To the extent the Fund has exposure to the energy sector, the Fund may be especially susceptible to these risks. Furthermore, in March 2023, the shut-down of certain financial institutions raised economic concerns over disruption in the U.S. banking system. There can be no certainty that the actions taken by the U.S. government to strengthen public confidence in the U.S. banking system will be effective in mitigating the effects of financial institution failures on the economy and restoring public confidence in the U.S. banking system. These disruptions may also make it difficult to value the Fund’s portfolio investments and cause certain of the Fund’s investments to become illiquid. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies may, among other things, adversely affect the Fund’s investments denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies. It is difficult to predict when similar events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have, and the duration of those effects. Real Estate Risk. Cyber Security Risk. denial-of-service. Each of the Fund and the investment manager may have limited ability to prevent or mitigate cyber-attacks or security or technology breakdowns affecting the Fund’s third-party service providers. While the Fund has established business continuity plans and systems designed to prevent or reduce the impact of cyber-attacks, such plans and systems are subject to inherent limitations. Regulatory Risk: Rule 18f-4, which governs the way derivatives are used by registered investment companies, the SEC, Congress, various exchanges and regulatory and self-regulatory authorities, both domestic and foreign, have undertaken reviews of the use of derivatives by registered investment companies, which could affect the nature and extent of instruments used by the Fund. The Fund and the instruments in which it invests may be subject to new or additional regulatory constraints in the future. While the full extent of all of these regulations is still unclear, these regulations and actions may adversely affect both the Fund and the instruments in which the Fund invests and its ability to execute its investment strategy. For example, climate change regulation (such as decarbonization legislation, other mandatory controls to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, or related disclosure requirements) could significantly affect the Fund or its investments by, among other things, increasing compliance costs or underlying companies’ operating costs and capital expenditures. Similarly, regulatory developments in other countries may have an unpredictable and adverse impact on the Fund. Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities Risk. Asset-backed securities involve certain risks in addition to those presented by mortgage-related securities: (1) primarily, these securities do not have the benefit of the same security interest in the underlying collateral as mortgage-related securities and are more dependent on the borrower’s ability to pay; (2) credit card receivables are generally unsecured, and the debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state and Federal consumer credit laws, many of which give debtors the right to set off certain amounts owed on the credit cards, thereby reducing the balance due; and (3) most issuers of automobile receivables permit the servicers to retain possession of the underlying obligations. If these obligations are sold to another party, there is a risk that the purchaser would acquire an interest superior to that of the holders of the related automobile receivables. In addition, because of the large number of vehicles involved in a typical issuance and technical requirements under state laws, the trustee for the holders of the automobile receivables may not have an effective security interest in all of the obligations backing such receivables. There is a possibility that recoveries on repossessed collateral may not, in some cases, be able to support payments on these securities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects of Leverage [Text Block] | Use of Leverage The Fund currently seeks to enhance the level of its distributions and total return through the use of leverage. The Fund may utilize leverage in an amount up to 33 1/3% (measured immediately after such borrowings) of its managed assets through borrowings, including loans from certain financial institutions and/or the issuance of debt securities (collectively, Borrowings). Under the 1940 Act, the Fund may utilize leverage through (i) Borrowings in an aggregate amount of up to 33 1/3% of the Fund’s total assets immediately after such Borrowings and (ii) the issuance of preferred stock (Preferred Shares) in an aggregate amount of up to 50% of the Fund’s total assets immediately after such issuance. In addition, the Fund may utilize leverage through reverse repurchase agreements (Reverse Repurchase Agreements), in an aggregate amount up to 50% of the Fund’s total assets. The Fund also may borrow money as a temporary measure for extraordinary or emergency purposes, including the payment of dividends and the settlement of securities transactions. The Fund may borrow in both U.S. and foreign (non-U.S.) currencies, and may use derivatives and other transactions to manage any interest rate risk or currency exposure associated with its use of leverage. Borrowing in non-U.S. currencies will expose the Fund to foreign currency risk. See “Foreign Currency and Currency Hedging Risk” below. The Fund may also engage in various derivatives transactions to seek to generate return, facilitate portfolio management and mitigate risks. Certain derivatives transactions effect a form of economic leverage on the Fund’s portfolio and may be subject to the risks associated with the use of leverage. There is no assurance that the Fund will utilize leverage or, if leverage is utilized, that it will be successful. The net asset value of the Fund’s common shares may be reduced by the issuance or incurrence costs of any leverage. See “Leverage Risk.” Effects of Leverage. The following table is furnished in response to requirements of the SEC. It is designed to illustrate the effect of leverage on common share total return, assuming investment portfolio total returns (comprised of income and changes in the value of investments held in the Fund’s portfolio) of -10%, -5%, 0%, 5% and 10%. These assumed investment portfolio returns are hypothetical figures and are not necessarily indicative of the investment portfolio returns expected to be experienced by the Fund. The table assumes leverage in an aggregate amount equal to 37% of the Fund’s Managed Assets. See “Leverage Risk” below.
Common share total return is comprised of two elements – the net investment income of the Fund after paying expenses, including interest expenses on the Fund’s Borrowings as described above and dividend payments on any preferred shares issued by the Fund and gain and losses on the value of the securities the Fund owns. As required by the rules of the SEC, the table assumes the Fund is more likely to suffer capital losses than to enjoy capital appreciation. For example, to assume a total return of 0%, the Fund must assume that the income it receives on its investments is entirely offset by losses in the value of those securities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Interest Rate [Percent] | 6.14% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Coverage Return Rate [Percent] | 2.28% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects of Leverage [Table Text Block] |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return at Minus Ten [Percent] | (19.50%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return at Minus Five [Percent] | (11.50%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return at Zero [Percent] | (3.60%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return at Plus Five [Percent] | 4.30% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return at Plus Ten [Percent] | 12.30% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effects of Leverage, Purpose [Text Block] | Assuming that leverage in the form of Borrowings will represent up to 37% of the Fund’s Managed Assets and charge interest or involve payment at a rate set by an interest rate transaction at an annual average rate of approximately 6.14%, the income generated by the Fund’s portfolio (net of estimated expenses) must exceed 2.28% in order to cover such interest payments or payment rates and other expenses specifically related to leverage. Of course, these numbers are merely estimates, used for illustration. Actual interest, or payment rates may vary frequently and may be significantly higher or lower than the rate estimated above. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk of Market Price Discount from Net Asset Value [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Risk of Market Price Discount from Net Asset Value. closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a discount from their NAV. This characteristic is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that NAV could decrease as a result of investment activities and may be greater for investors expecting to sell their shares in a relatively short period following completion of this offering. Whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of the shares will depend not upon the Fund’s NAV but entirely upon whether the market price of the shares at the time of sale is above or below the investor’s purchase price for the shares. Because the market price of the shares will be determined by factors such as relative supply of and demand for shares in the market, general market and economic conditions, and other factors beyond the control of the Fund, Fund shares may trade at, above or below NAV, or at below or above the initial public offering price. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Investment Risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Market Risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Limited Term and Tender Offer Risks [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Limited Term and Tender Offer Risks with the Declaration of Trust, or unless the Fund completes an Eligible Tender Offer and converts to perpetual existence, the Fund will terminate on or about the Dissolution Date (subject to possible extension). The Fund is not a so called “target date” or “life cycle” fund whose asset allocation becomes more conservative over time as its target date, often associated with retirement, approaches. In addition, the Fund is not a “target term” fund as its investment objective is not to return its original NAV on the Dissolution Date or in an Eligible Tender Offer. The Fund’s investment objectives and policies are not designed to seek to return to investors their initial investment on the Dissolution Date or in an Eligible Tender Offer, and such investors and investors that purchase shares after the completion of this offering may receive more or less than their original investment upon dissolution or in an Eligible Tender Offer. Because the assets of the Fund will be liquidated in connection with the dissolution, the Fund will incur transaction costs in connection with dispositions of portfolio securities. The Fund does not limit its investments to securities having a maturity date prior to the Dissolution Date and may be required to sell portfolio securities when it otherwise would not, including at times when market conditions are not favorable, which may cause the Fund to lose money. In particular, the Fund’s portfolio may still have large exposures to illiquid securities as the Dissolution Date approaches, and losses due to portfolio liquidation may be significant. Beginning one year before the Dissolution Date (the Wind-Down Period), the Fund may begin liquidating all or a portion of the Fund’s portfolio, and the Fund may deviate from its investment strategy and may not achieve its investment objective. As a result, during the Wind-Down Period, the Fund’s distributions may decrease, and such distributions may include a return of capital. It is expected that common shareholders will receive cash in any liquidating distribution from the Fund regardless of their participation in the Fund’s automatic dividend reinvestment plan. However, if on the Dissolution Date the Fund owns securities for which no market exists or securities that are trading at depressed prices, such securities may be placed in a liquidating trust. The Fund cannot predict the amount, if any, of securities that will be required to be placed in a liquidating trust. The Fund may receive proceeds from the disposition of portfolio investments that are less than the valuations of such investments by the Fund and, in particular, losses from the disposition of illiquid securities may be significant. The disposition of portfolio investments by the Fund could also cause market prices of such instruments, and hence the NAV and market price of the common shares, to decline. In addition, disposition of portfolio investments will cause the Fund to incur increased brokerage and related transaction expenses. Moreover, in conducting such portfolio transactions, the Fund may need to deviate from its investment policies and may not achieve its investment objective. The Fund’s portfolio composition may change as its portfolio holdings mature or are called or sold in anticipation of an Eligible Tender Offer or the Dissolution Date. During such period(s), it is possible that the Fund will hold a greater percentage of its total assets in shorter term and lower yielding securities and cash and cash equivalents than it would otherwise, which may impede the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective and adversely impact the Fund’s performance and distributions to common shareholders, which may in turn adversely impact the market value of the common shares. In addition, the Fund may be required to reduce its leverage, which could also adversely impact its performance. The additional cash or cash equivalents held by the Fund could be obtained through reducing the Fund’s distributions to common shareholders and/or holding cash in lieu of reinvesting, which could limit the ability of the Fund to participate in new investment opportunities. The Fund does not limit its investments to securities having a maturity date prior to or around the Dissolution Date, which may exacerbate the foregoing risks and considerations. A common shareholder may be subject to the foregoing risks over an extended period of time, particularly if the Fund conducts an Eligible Tender Offer and is also subsequently terminated by or around the Dissolution Date. If the Fund conducts an Eligible Tender Offer, the Fund anticipates that funds to pay the aggregate purchase price of shares accepted for purchase pursuant to the tender offer will be first derived from any cash on hand and then from the proceeds from the sale of portfolio investments held by the Fund. In addition, the Fund may be required to dispose of portfolio investments in connection with any reduction in the Fund’s outstanding leverage necessary in order to maintain the Fund’s desired leverage ratios following a tender offer. The risks related to the disposition of securities in connection with the Fund’s dissolution also would be present in connection with the disposition of securities in connection with an Eligible Tender Offer. It is likely that during the pendency of a tender offer, and possibly for a time thereafter, the Fund will hold a greater than normal percentage of its total assets in cash and cash equivalents, which may impede the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective and decrease returns to shareholders. The tax effect of any such dispositions of portfolio investments will depend on the difference between the price at which the investments are sold and the tax basis of the Fund in the investments. Any capital gains recognized on such dispositions, as reduced by any capital losses the Fund realizes in the year of such dispositions and by any available capital loss carryforwards, will be distributed to shareholders as capital gain dividends (to the extent of net long-term capital gains over net short-term capital losses) or ordinary dividends (to the extent of net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses) during or with respect to such year, and such distributions will generally be taxable to common shareholders. If the Fund’s tax basis for the investments sold is less than the sale proceeds, the Fund will recognize capital gains, which the Fund will be required to distribute to common shareholders. In addition, the Fund’s purchase of tendered common shares pursuant to a tender offer will have tax consequences for tendering common shareholders and may have tax consequences for non-tendering common shareholders. The purchase of common shares by the Fund pursuant to a tender offer will have the effect of increasing the proportionate interest in the Fund of non-tendering common shareholders. All common shareholders remaining after a tender offer may be subject to proportionately higher expenses due to the reduction in the Fund’s total assets resulting from payment for the tendered common shares. Such reduction in the Fund’s total assets may result in less investment flexibility, reduced diversification and greater volatility for the Fund, and may have an adverse effect on the Fund’s investment performance. Such reduction in the Fund’s total assets may also cause common shares to become thinly traded or otherwise negatively impact secondary trading of common shares. A reduction in net assets, and the corresponding increase in the Fund’s expense ratio, could result in lower returns and put the Fund at a disadvantage relative to its peers and potentially cause the Fund’s common shares to trade at a wider discount to NAV than it otherwise would. Furthermore, the portfolio of the Fund following an Eligible Tender Offer could be significantly different and, therefore, common shareholders retaining an investment in the Fund could be subject to greater risk. For example, the Fund may be required to sell its more liquid, higher quality portfolio investments to purchase common shares that are tendered in an Eligible Tender Offer, which would leave a less liquid, lower quality portfolio for remaining shareholders. The prospects of an Eligible Tender Offer may attract arbitrageurs who would purchase the common shares prior to the tender offer for the sole purpose of tendering those shares which could have the effect of exacerbating the risks described herein for shareholders retaining an investment in the Fund following an Eligible Tender Offer. The Fund is not required to conduct an Eligible Tender Offer. If the Fund conducts an Eligible Tender Offer, there can be no assurance that the number of tendered common shares would not result in the Fund having aggregate net assets below the Dissolution Threshold, in which case the Eligible Tender Offer will be canceled, no common shares will be repurchased pursuant to the Eligible Tender Offer and the Fund will dissolve on the Dissolution Date (subject to possible extensions). Following the completion of an Eligible Tender Offer in which the number of tendered common shares would result in the Fund having aggregate net assets greater than or equal to the Dissolution Threshold, the Board of Trustees may, by a Board Action Vote, eliminate the Dissolution Date without shareholder approval. Thereafter, the Fund will have a perpetual term. The investment manager may have a conflict of interest in recommending to the Board that the Dissolution Date be eliminated because the investment manager would continue to receive management fees on the remaining assets of the Fund while it remains in existence. The Fund is not required to conduct additional tender offers following an Eligible Tender Offer and conversion to perpetual existence. Therefore, remaining common shareholders may not have another opportunity to participate in a tender offer. Shares of closed-end management investment companies frequently trade at a discount from their NAV, and as a result remaining common shareholders may only be able to sell their Shares at a discount to NAV. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Preferred Securities Risk on-going COVID-19 outbreak has increased certain risks associated with investing in preferred securities. The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak could persist for years to come and the full impact to financial markets is not yet known. See “Geopolitical Risk” below for additional information regarding the COVID-19 outbreak.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Debt Securities Risk. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk of Concentration in the Financials Sector [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Risk of Concentration in the Financials Sector |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Below Investment Grade and Unrated Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Below Investment Grade and Unrated Securities Risk. NRSROs are private services that provide ratings of the credit quality of debt obligations, including convertible securities. Ratings assigned by an NRSRO are not absolute standards of credit quality and do not evaluate market risks or the liquidity of securities. NRSROs may fail to make timely changes in credit ratings and an issuer’s current financial condition may be better or worse than a rating indicates. In addition, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in unrated securities (securities which are not rated by an NRSRO) if the investment manager determines that purchase of the securities is consistent with the Fund’s investment objectives and policies. Unrated securities may be less liquid than comparable rated securities and involve the risk that the investment manager may not accurately evaluate the security’s comparative credit rating. If a security is unrated, the investment manager will assign a rating using its own analysis of issuer quality. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contingent Capital Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Contingent Capital Securities Risk i.e e.g |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign (NonU.S.) and Emerging Market Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Foreign (Non-U.S.) and Emerging Market Securities Risk.The Fund may hold foreign securities of developed market issuers and emerging market issuers. Investing in securities of companies in emerging markets may entail special risks relating to potential economic, political or social instability and the risks of expropriation, nationalization, confiscation, trade sanctions or embargoes or the imposition of restrictions on foreign investment, the lack of hedging instruments, and repatriation of capital invested. Emerging securities markets are substantially smaller, less developed, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets. The limited size of emerging securities markets and limited trading value compared to the volume of trading in U.S. securities could cause prices to be erratic for reasons apart from factors that affect the quality of the securities. For example, limited market size may cause prices to be unduly influenced by traders who control large positions. Adverse publicity and investors’ perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the value and liquidity of portfolio securities, especially in these markets. Many emerging market countries have experienced substantial, and in some periods extremely high, rates of inflation for many years. Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates and corresponding currency devaluations have had and may continue to have negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain emerging market countries. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency and Currency Hedging Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Foreign Currency and Currency Hedging Risk The Fund may (but is not required to) engage in investments that are designed to hedge the Fund’s foreign currency risks, including foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency futures contracts, put and call option on foreign currencies and foreign currency swaps. Such transactions may reduce returns or increase volatility, perhaps substantially. While these practices will be entered into to seek to manage these risks, these practices may not prove to be successful or may have the effect of limiting the gains from favorable market movements. Foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency futures contracts, OTC options on foreign currencies and foreign currency swaps are subject to the risk of default by the counterparty and can be illiquid. These currency hedging transactions, as well as the futures contracts and exchange-listed options in which the Fund may invest, are subject to many of the risks of, and can be highly sensitive to changes in the value of, the related currency or other reference asset. As such, a small investment could have a potentially large impact on the Fund’s performance. Whether or not the Fund engages in currency hedging transactions, the Fund may experience a decline in the value of its portfolio securities, in U.S. dollar terms, due solely to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Use of currency hedging transactions may cause the Fund to experience losses greater than if the Fund had not engaged in such transactions. The Fund’s transactions in foreign currencies may increase or accelerate the Fund’s recognition of ordinary income and may affect the timing or character of the Fund’s distributions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Convertible Securities Risk When the market price of the underlying common stock increases, the prices of the convertible securities tend to rise as a reflection of the value of the underlying common stock. While no securities investments are without risk, investments in convertible securities generally entail less risk than investments in common stock of the same issuer. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Derivatives Risk The market for many derivatives is, or suddenly can become, illiquid. Changes in liquidity may result in significant, rapid and unpredictable changes in the prices for derivatives transactions. The Fund could experience losses if it were unable to liquidate a derivative position because of an illiquid secondary market. Although both OTC and exchange-traded derivatives markets may experience lack of liquidity, OTC non-standardized derivatives transactions are generally less liquid than exchange-traded instruments. The illiquidity of the derivatives markets may be due to various factors, including congestion, disorderly markets, limitations on deliverable supplies, the participation of speculators, government regulation and intervention, and technical and operational or system failures. In addition, the liquidity of a secondary market in an exchange-traded derivative contract may be adversely affected by “daily price fluctuation limits” established by the exchanges which limit the amount of fluctuation in an exchange-traded contract price during a single trading day. Once the daily limit has been reached in the contract, no trades may be entered into at a price beyond the limit, thus preventing the liquidation of open positions. Prices have in the past moved beyond the daily limit on a number of consecutive trading days. If it is not possible to close an open derivative position entered into by the Fund, the Fund would continue to be required to make cash payments of variation (or mark-to-market) Successful use of derivatives transactions also is subject to the ability of the investment manager to predict correctly movements in the direction of the relevant market and, to the extent the transaction is entered into for hedging purposes, to ascertain the appropriate correlation between the transaction being hedged and the price movements of the derivatives. Derivatives transactions entered into to seek to manage the risks of the Fund’s portfolio of securities may have the effect of limiting gains from otherwise favorable market movements. The use of derivatives transactions may result in losses greater than if they had not been used (and a loss on a derivatives transaction position may be larger than the gain in a portfolio position being hedged), may require the Fund to sell or purchase portfolio securities at inopportune times or for prices other than current market values, may limit the amount of appreciation the Fund can realize on an investment, or may cause the Fund to hold a security that it might otherwise sell. Amounts paid by the Fund as premiums and cash or other assets held as collateral with respect to derivatives transactions may not otherwise be available to the Fund for investment purposes. The use of currency transactions can result in the Fund incurring losses as a result of the imposition of exchange controls, political developments, government intervention or failure to intervene, suspension of settlements or the inability of the Fund to deliver or receive a specified currency. The Fund may enter into swap, cap or other transactions to attempt to protect itself from increasing interest or dividend expenses resulting from increasing short-term interest rates on any leverage it incurs or increasing interest rates on securities held in its portfolio. A decline in interest rates may result in a decline in the value of the transaction, which may result in a decline in the NAV of the Fund. A sudden and dramatic decline in interest rates may result in a significant decline in the NAV of the Fund. Depending on the state of interest rates in general, the use of interest rate hedging transactions could enhance or harm the overall performance of the Fund. In the event the Fund enters into forward currency contracts for hedging purposes, the Fund will be subject to currency exchange rates risk. Currency exchange rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time and also can be affected unpredictably by intervention of U.S. or foreign governments or central banks, or the failure to intervene, or by currency controls or political developments in the United States or abroad. The Fund’s success in these transactions will depend principally on the ability of the investment manager to predict accurately future foreign currency exchange rates. Additional risks associated with derivatives trading include counterparty risk, liquidity risk and tracking/correlation risk. The Fund’s investments in forward currency contracts and interest rate swaps would subject the Fund to risks specific to derivatives transactions, including: the imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying assets of the Fund, which creates the possibility that the loss on such instruments may be greater than the gain in the value of the underlying assets in the Fund’s portfolio; the loss of principal; the possible default of the other party to the transaction; and illiquidity of the derivative investments. Furthermore, the ability to successfully use derivative instruments depends on the ability of the investment manager to predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. Thus, the use of derivative instruments for hedging, currency or interest rate management, or other purposes may result in losses greater than if they had not been used. Structured notes and other related instruments carry risks similar to those of more traditional derivatives such as futures, forward and option contracts. However, structured instruments may entail a greater degree of market risk and volatility than other types of debt obligations. The Fund will be subject to credit risk with respect to the counterparties to certain derivatives transactions entered into by the Fund. Derivatives may be purchased on established exchanges or through privately negotiated OTC transactions. Each party to an OTC derivative bears the risk that the counterparty will default. If a counterparty becomes bankrupt or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, the Fund may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative contract in bankruptcy or other reorganization proceeding. The Fund may obtain only a limited recovery or may obtain no recovery in such circumstances. The counterparty risk for cleared derivatives transactions is generally lower than for uncleared OTC derivatives transactions since generally a clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a cleared derivative contract and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade looks only to the clearing house for performance of financial obligations. However, there can be no assurance that the clearing house, or its members, will satisfy their obligations to the Fund. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rule 144A Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Rule 144A Securities Risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulation S Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Regulation S Securities Risk non-U.S. offerings without registration with the SEC pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act. Regulation S securities may be relatively less liquid as a result of legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Because Regulation S securities are generally less liquid than registered securities, the Fund may take longer to liquidate these positions than publicly traded securities or may not be able to sell them at the price desired. Furthermore, companies whose securities are not publicly traded may not be subject to the disclosure and other investor protection requirements that would be applicable if their securities were publicly traded or otherwise offered in the United States. Accordingly, Regulation S securities may involve a high degree of business and financial risk and may result in losses to the Fund. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Investment Companies Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Other Investment Companies Risk open-end funds, closed-end funds, ETFs and other types of pooled investment funds, those assets will be subject to the risks of the purchased investment companies’ portfolio securities, and a shareholder in the Fund will bear not only his or her proportionate share of the Fund’s expenses, but also indirectly the expenses of the purchased investment companies. Shareholders would therefore be subject to duplicative expenses to the extent the Fund invests in other investment companies. Risks associated with investments in closed-end funds also generally include the risks associated with the Fund’s structure as a closed-end investment company, including market risk, leverage risk, risk of market price discount from NAV, risk of anti-takeover provisions and non-diversification. In addition, investments in closed-end funds may be subject to dilution risk, which is the risk that strategies employed by a closed-end fund, such as rights offerings, may, under certain circumstances, have the effect of reducing its share price and the Fund’s proportionate interest. In addition, restrictions under the 1940 Act may limit the Fund’s ability to invest in other investment companies to the extent desired. The SEC has adopted Rule 12d1-4 permitting fund of fund arrangements subject to various conditions, and rescinding the present rule and certain exemptive relief previously granted. Rule 12d1-4 may adversely affect the Fund’s ability to invest in other investment companies and could also significantly affect the Fund’s ability to redeem its investments in other investment companies, making such investments less attractive. The effects of rule and other regulatory changes are not known as of the date of this report, but they could cause the Fund to incur losses, realize taxable gains distributable to shareholders, incur greater or unexpected expenses or experience other adverse consequences. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Common Stock Risk in returns. Common stocks may be more susceptible to adverse changes in market value due to issuer specific events or general movements in the equities markets. A drop in the stock market may depress the price of common stocks held by the Fund. Common stock prices fluctuate for many reasons, including changes in investors’ perceptions of the financial condition of an issuer or the general condition of the relevant stock market, or the occurrence of political or economic events affecting issuers. For example, an adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of common stock in which the Fund has invested; the price of common stock of an issuer may be particularly sensitive to general movements in the stock market; or a drop in the stock market may depress the price of most or all of the common stocks held by the Fund. Also, common stock of an issuer in the Fund’s portfolio may decline in price if the issuer fails to make anticipated dividend payments because, among other reasons, the issuer of the security experiences a decline in its financial condition. The common stocks in which the Fund will invest are typically subordinated to preferred securities, bonds and other debt instruments in a company’s capital structure in terms of priority to corporate income and assets, and, therefore, will be subject to greater risk than the preferred securities or debt instruments of such issuers. In addition, common stock prices may be sensitive to rising interest rates as the costs of capital rise and borrowing costs increase. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Government Securities Risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Municipal Securities Risk The cost associated with combating the outbreak of COVID-19 and its negative impact on tax revenues has adversely affected the financial condition of state and local governments. In the past, a number of municipal issuers have defaulted on obligations, were downgraded or commenced insolvency proceedings during economic or market turmoil or a recession. The effects of this outbreak could affect the ability of state and local governments to make payments on debt obligations when due and could adversely impact the value of their bonds, which could negatively impact the performance of the Fund. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted and Illiquid Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Restricted and Illiquid Securities Risk i.e. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Leverage Risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Tax Risk. tax-advantaged qualified dividend income or long-term capital gain or what the tax rates on various types of income will be in future years. The maximum long-term capital gain tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income is currently 20%, 15%, or 0% for individuals depending on the amount of their taxable income for the year. An additional 3.8% Medicare tax will also apply in the case of some individuals. In addition, it may be difficult to obtain information regarding whether distributions by non-U.S. entities in which the Fund invests should be regarded as qualified dividend income. Furthermore, to receive qualified dividend income treatment, the Fund must meet holding period and other requirements with respect to the dividend-paying securities in its portfolio, and the shareholder must meet holding period and other requirements with respect to the Fund’s common shares. Holding periods may be affected by certain of the Fund’s transactions in options and other derivatives. There can be no guarantee that U.S. federal tax laws will not change in the future. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Management Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Active Management Risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Portfolio Turnover Risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AntiTakeover Provisions [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Anti-Takeover Provisions open-end investment company. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geopolitical Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Geopolitical Risk: COVID-19, market instability, debt crises and downgrades, embargoes, tariffs, sanctions and other trade barriers and other governmental trade or market control programs, the potential exit of a country from its respective union and related geopolitical events, may result in market volatility and may have long-lasting impacts on U.S. and global economies and financial markets. Supply chain disruptions or significant changes in the supply or prices of commodities or other economic inputs may have material and unexpected effects on both global securities markets and individual countries, regions, sectors, companies or industries. Events occurring in one region of the world may negatively impact industries and regions that are not otherwise directly impacted by the events. Additionally, those events, as well as other changes in foreign and domestic political and economic conditions, could adversely affect individual issuers or related groups of issuers, securities markets, interest rates, secondary trading, credit ratings, inflation, investor sentiment and other factors affecting the value of the Fund’s investments. Although the long-term economic fallout of COVID-19 is difficult to predict, it has contributed to, and may continue to contribute to, market volatility, inflation and systemic economic weakness. COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread may also exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, economic, market and financial risks. In addition, the U.S. government and other central banks across Europe, Asia, and elsewhere announced and/or adopted economic relief packages in response to COVID-19. The end of any such program could cause market downturns, disruptions and volatility, particularly if markets view the ending as premature. The U.S. federal government ended the COVID-19 public emergency declaration on May 11, 2023, however, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are expected to continue and the risk that new variants of COVID-19 may emerge remains. Therefore the economic outlook, particularly for certain industries and businesses, remains inherently uncertain. On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom (UK) withdrew from the European Union (EU) (referred to as Brexit), commencing a transition period that ended on December 31, 2020. The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, a bilateral trade and cooperation deal governing the future relationship between the UK and the EU (TCA), provisionally went into effect on January 1, 2021, and entered into force officially on May 1, 2021, but critical aspects of the relationship remain unresolved and subject to further negotiation and agreement. Brexit has resulted in volatility in European and global markets and could have negative long-term impacts on financial markets in the UK and throughout Europe. There is still considerable uncertainty relating to the potential consequences of the exit, how the negotiations for new trade agreements will be conducted, and whether the UK’s exit will increase the likelihood of other countries also departing the EU. During this period of uncertainty, the negative impact on the UK, European and broader global economies, could be significant, potentially resulting in increased market volatility and illiquidity, political, economic, and legal uncertainty, and lower economic growth for companies that rely significantly on Europe for their business activities and revenues. On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine significantly amplifying already existing geopolitical tensions. The United States and many other countries have instituted various economic sanctions against Russia, Russian individuals and entities and Belarus. The extent and duration of the military action, sanctions imposed and other punitive actions taken (including any Russian retaliatory responses to such sanctions and actions), and resulting disruptions in Europe and globally cannot be predicted, but could be significant and have a severe adverse effect on the global economy, securities markets and commodities markets globally, including through global supply chain disruptions, increased inflationary pressures and reduced economic activity. Ongoing conflicts in the Middle East could have similar negative impacts. To the extent the Fund has exposure to the energy sector, the Fund may be especially susceptible to these risks. Furthermore, in March 2023, the shut-down of certain financial institutions raised economic concerns over disruption in the U.S. banking system. There can be no certainty that the actions taken by the U.S. government to strengthen public confidence in the U.S. banking system will be effective in mitigating the effects of financial institution failures on the economy and restoring public confidence in the U.S. banking system. These disruptions may also make it difficult to value the Fund’s portfolio investments and cause certain of the Fund’s investments to become illiquid. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies may, among other things, adversely affect the Fund’s investments denominated in non-U.S. dollar currencies. It is difficult to predict when similar events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have, and the duration of those effects. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Real Estate Risk. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cyber Security Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Cyber Security Risk. denial-of-service. Each of the Fund and the investment manager may have limited ability to prevent or mitigate cyber-attacks or security or technology breakdowns affecting the Fund’s third-party service providers. While the Fund has established business continuity plans and systems designed to prevent or reduce the impact of cyber-attacks, such plans and systems are subject to inherent limitations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Regulatory Risk: Rule 18f-4, which governs the way derivatives are used by registered investment companies, the SEC, Congress, various exchanges and regulatory and self-regulatory authorities, both domestic and foreign, have undertaken reviews of the use of derivatives by registered investment companies, which could affect the nature and extent of instruments used by the Fund. The Fund and the instruments in which it invests may be subject to new or additional regulatory constraints in the future. While the full extent of all of these regulations is still unclear, these regulations and actions may adversely affect both the Fund and the instruments in which the Fund invests and its ability to execute its investment strategy. For example, climate change regulation (such as decarbonization legislation, other mandatory controls to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, or related disclosure requirements) could significantly affect the Fund or its investments by, among other things, increasing compliance costs or underlying companies’ operating costs and capital expenditures. Similarly, regulatory developments in other countries may have an unpredictable and adverse impact on the Fund. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage and AssetBacked Securities Risk [Member] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk [Text Block] | Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities Risk. Asset-backed securities involve certain risks in addition to those presented by mortgage-related securities: (1) primarily, these securities do not have the benefit of the same security interest in the underlying collateral as mortgage-related securities and are more dependent on the borrower’s ability to pay; (2) credit card receivables are generally unsecured, and the debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state and Federal consumer credit laws, many of which give debtors the right to set off certain amounts owed on the credit cards, thereby reducing the balance due; and (3) most issuers of automobile receivables permit the servicers to retain possession of the underlying obligations. If these obligations are sold to another party, there is a risk that the purchaser would acquire an interest superior to that of the holders of the related automobile receivables. In addition, because of the large number of vehicles involved in a typical issuance and technical requirements under state laws, the trustee for the holders of the automobile receivables may not have an effective security interest in all of the obligations backing such receivables. There is a possibility that recoveries on repossessed collateral may not, in some cases, be able to support payments on these securities. |
1 Year Cohen and Steers TaxAdv ... Chart |
1 Month Cohen and Steers TaxAdv ... Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions