PROXY STATEMENT
for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on Tuesday, June 5, 2018
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors of OFS Capital Corporation,
also referred to in this proxy statement as the “Company,” “OFS Capital,” “we” or “us,”
for use at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the Annual Meeting, to be held on Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 10 South Wacker Drive, 25th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606,
and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. You may obtain directions to the location of the Annual Meeting by contacting Tod K. Reichert, Corporate Secretary, OFS Capital Corporation,
10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
; telephone: (847) 734-2000.
All proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained in those proxies. If no choice is specified, the proxies will be voted for the election of the director nominees of our board of directors and for the ratification of our independent public accounting firm. Any proxy may be revoked by a stockholder at any time before it is exercised by delivery of written revocation to our corporate secretary, by submission of a new, later-dated proxy or by appearing at the Annual Meeting and voting in person, See “ — Changing Your Vote; Revocation of Proxy” below.
It is anticipated that the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will first be sent to stockholders on or about April 24, 2018. This proxy statement, including the accompanying form of proxy, collectively referred to as the Proxy Statement, and the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, or the Annual Report, will first be made available to stockholders on or about April 24, 2018.
The Annual Report and Proxy Statement can both be accessed online at
www.proxyvote.com
.
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, except for exhibits, will be furnished without charge to any stockholder upon written request to OFS Capital Corporation, 10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606, Attention: Tod K. Reichert, Corporate Secretary, telephone: (847) 734-2000.
Voting Securities
Stockholders of record at the close of business on Tuesday, April 10, 2018 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On that date, 13,348,774 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote with respect to all matters submitted to stockholders at the Annual Meeting. We have no other securities entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Quorum and Vote Required
The presence in person or representation by proxy of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to establish a quorum for the transaction of business. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will be adjourned until a quorum is obtained. Abstentions are included
in
the shares present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but are not counted for purposes of determining whether a proposal has been approved and thus, have no effect on the outcome.
If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting
instructions
, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes (when shares are represented at the Annual Meeting by a proxy specifically conferring only limited authority to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange) are included in the determination of the number of shares represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but are not counted for purposes of determining whether a proposal has been approved and thus, have no effect on the outcome.
If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority under New York Stock Exchange rules to vote your shares on the ratification of BDO USA, LLP, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on this matter. We urge you to provide instructions to your broker or nominee so that your votes may be considered on this important matter.
The table below sets forth the quorum requirements and votes required for each of the proposals to be presented at Annual Meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal
|
Description
|
Quorum Requirement
|
Vote Required
|
Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed
|
No. 1
|
Election of two Class III directors.
|
The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
|
The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting, provided a quorum is present in person or by proxy.
|
No
|
No. 2
|
Ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.
|
The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
|
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and voting on this proposal, provided a quorum is present in person or by proxy.
|
Yes
|
Election of Class III Directors.
The affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to elect each of the two nominees as Class III directors. Stockholders may not cumulate their votes. If you vote “withhold authority” with respect to one or more nominees, your shares will not be voted with respect to the person or persons indicated. Because directors are elected by a plurality of the votes, an abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the vote and, therefore, is not offered as a voting option for this proposal.
Ratification of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and voting on this proposal is required to approve this proposal. An abstention from voting on this proposal will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
Voting Your Shares
If you are the record holder of your shares, you may vote in one of four ways. You may vote by submitting your proxy by telephone, over the Internet, by mail or you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
You may vote by telephone
.
You may vote your shares by following the “Vote by Phone” instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.
You may vote over the Internet
.
If you have Internet access, you may vote your shares from any location in the world by following the “Vote by Internet” instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.
You may vote by mail
.
You may vote by completing, dating and signing the proxy card that accompanies this proxy statement and promptly mailing it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. You do not need to put a stamp on the enclosed envelope if you mail it in the United States. The shares you own will be voted according to the instructions on the proxy card you mail. If you return the proxy card, but do not give any instructions on a particular matter described in this proxy statement, the shares you own will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors. Our board of directors recommends that you vote FOR the director nominees of our board of directors and FOR the ratification of our independent public accounting firm.
You may vote in person
.
If you attend the Annual Meeting and are a registered stockholder, you may vote by delivering your completed proxy card in person or you may vote by completing a ballot. Ballots will be available at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares through a bank or broker, you must obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker in order to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Changing Your Vote; Revocation of Proxy
Voting by telephone, over the Internet or execution of a proxy will not in any way affect a stockholder’s right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. A proxy may be revoked before it is used to cast a vote. To revoke a proxy, a stockholder must:
|
|
•
|
file with our corporate secretary, at or before the taking of the vote, a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy;
|
|
|
•
|
duly execute a later dated proxy relating to the same shares and deliver it to our corporate secretary before the taking of the vote; or
|
|
|
•
|
attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.
|
Attendance at the Annual Meeting, if a stockholder does not vote at the Annual Meeting, will not be sufficient to revoke a proxy.
Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy should be sent to us at the following address: OFS Capital Corporation,
10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
, Attention: Tod K. Reichert, Corporate Secretary. The shares represented by all properly executed proxies received in time for the Annual Meeting will be voted as specified in those proxies.
If the shares you own are held in your name and you do not specify on the proxy card how your shares are to be voted, they will be voted in favor of (i) the election of the director nominees named in this proxy statement and recommended by our board of directors, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and (iii) in the discretion of the persons appointed as proxies, on any other items that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
If the shares you own are held in “street name,” the bank or brokerage firm, as the record holder of your shares, is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. To vote your shares held in “street name,” you will need to follow the directions provided to you by your bank or brokerage firm.
Information Regarding This Solicitation
The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors, and we will bear the expense of the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting, including the cost of preparing, printing and mailing
the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials,
this proxy statement, the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy card. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our directors, officers or employees in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and/or facsimile transmission.
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board Recommendation
Our board of directors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of Messrs. Abrams and Cerny as Class III directors.
We have three classes of directors, currently consisting of one Class I director, two Class II directors and two Class III directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors are elected for a full term of three years to succeed those whose terms are expiring. The terms of the three classes are staggered in a manner so that only one class is elected by stockholders annually. Elaine E. Healy is currently serving as the Class I director and her term expires in 2019. Robert J. Cresci and Bilal Rashid are currently serving as Class II directors, whose terms expire in 2020. Marc Abrams and Jeffrey A. Cerny are currently serving as Class III directors, whose terms expire in 2018. The Class III directors elected this year will serve as members of our board of directors until the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors are elected and qualified.
The persons named in the enclosed proxy card will vote to elect Messrs. Abrams and Cerny as Class III directors unless you cast a vote “withhold authority” by marking the proxy card (whether executed by you or through the Internet or telephonic voting). Messrs. Abrams and Cerny currently serve on our board of directors, have indicated their willingness to continue to serve if elected and have consented to be named as nominees. However, if the director nominees should be unable to serve, the shares of common stock represented by proxies may be voted for substitute nominees designated by our board of directors. Our board of directors has no reason to believe that the nominees will be unable to serve if elected.
Summary of Nominees and Incumbent Directors
Director Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Term Expiring
|
Primary Occupation
|
Committee Memberships(1)
|
Other Public Company Boards
|
Marc Abrams*
|
72
|
2011
|
2018
|
Founder and former leader of the public company business sector of SingerLewak LLP
|
A (chair), C, N
|
1
|
Jeffrey A. Cerny
|
55
|
2015
|
2018
|
Chief Financial Officer of the Company
|
—
|
0
|
Incumbent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Term Expiring
|
Primary Occupation
|
Committee Memberships(1)
|
Other Public Company Boards
|
Robert J. Cresci*
|
74
|
2011
|
2020
|
Managing Director Pecks Management Partners Ltd.
|
A, C, N (chair)
|
5
|
Bilal Rashid
|
47
|
2010
|
2020
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
|
—
|
1
|
Elaine E. Healy*
|
55
|
2011
|
2019
|
Co-Founder and Managing Partner of NexGen Venture Partners, LLC
|
A, C (chair), N
|
0
|
* Independent Director
(1) A = Audit Committee, C = Compensation Committee
N = Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Director Qualifications
In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for inclusion in the board’s slate of recommended director nominees, the nominating and corporate governance committee applies the criteria attached to its charter. These criteria include the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, knowledge of our business and industry, experience, diligence, conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The nominating and corporate governance committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee.
We believe that our directors and nominees have an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, attributes, skills and expertise required for our board as a whole and that we have sufficient independent directors to comply with applicable law and regulations. We believe that our directors have a broad range of personal and professional characteristics, including: leadership; management ability; financial experience; the ability to act with integrity and sound judgment; the capacity to demonstrate innovative thinking, consider strategic proposals, assist with the
development of our strategic plan and oversee its implementation; the ability to oversee our risk management efforts; and the commitment to preparation for, and attendance at, board and committee meetings.
Our board of directors does not have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, disability, cultural background and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for board membership. We believe diversity is important because a variety of viewpoints contribute to an effective decision-making process.
Set forth below for each of our directors, including the Class III director nominees, is information as of April 15, 2018 with respect to each director’s (a) name and age, (b) positions and offices with us, (c) principal occupation and business experience during at least the past five years, (d) directorships, if any, of other publicly held companies held during the past five years and (e) the year such person became a member of our board of directors.
Following each director’s biographical information, we have provided information concerning the particular experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills that led our nominating and corporate governance committee and board of directors to determine that each individual should serve as a director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Director Nominees
|
|
Independent Director
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director or Nominee for Director(4)
|
Mr. Abrams is considered independent for purposes of the 1940 Act.
|
Class III director, nominee to be elected at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (if elected, term to expire in 2021)
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships
|
Marc Abrams(1)(2)(3)
|
72
|
2011
|
Mr. Abrams is the founder and former leader of the public company business sector of SingerLewak LLP, a certified public accounting firm founded in 1995. He has over 40 years of public accounting experience. Mr. Abrams’ expertise includes audits of publicly held companies, initial public offerings, private offerings, corporate reorganizations and acquisitions, evaluating business plans and litigation support. Additionally, Mr. Abrams’ broad practice includes expertise in several industries, including technology, life sciences, real estate, retail and franchise, hotels and casinos, and manufacturing. He currently serves on the board of Hancock Park and previously served on the board of UnifiedOnline, Inc. (f/k/a IceWEB, Inc.). Mr. Abrams graduated from American University in 1967 with a Bachelor of Science in Accounting. Through 2011, he was an active member of AICPA, the California Society of CPAs and the Los Angeles Venture Association.
Mr. Abrams, the chair of our audit committee, brings to our board of directors years of accounting expertise. His knowledge of accounting principles, financial reporting rules and regulations, the evaluation of financial results and the oversight of the financial reporting process makes him an asset to our board of directors.
|
2
|
Interested Director
|
|
Mr. Cerny is an interested person, as defined in the 1940 Act, due to his position as an officer of OFS Capital.
|
Class III director, nominee to be elected at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (if elected, term to expire in 2021)
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships
|
Jeffrey A. Cerny
|
55
|
2015
|
Mr. Cerny has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of OFS Capital since 2014 and previously served as our Secretary from 2011 to 2014. Mr. Cerny also serves as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Hancock Park Corporate Income, Inc. (“Hancock Park”), a director, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of OFS Credit Company, Inc. (“OFS Credit”), a Senior Managing Director of Orchard First Source Capital, Inc. (“OFSC”) and OFS Advisor, as a Vice President of OFSAM, as a member of OFSAM’s investment and executive committees and as a member of various OFSAM, and OFSAM affiliates, investment committees. Mr. Cerny oversees the finance and accounting functions of the aforementioned entities as well as underwriting, credit monitoring and CLO portfolio compliance for OFS Advisor’s syndicated senior loan business. Prior to joining OFSC in 1999, Mr. Cerny held various positions at Sanwa Business Credit Corporation, American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago and Charter Bank Group, a multi-bank holding company. Mr. Cerny holds a B.S. in Finance from Northern Illinois University, a Masters of Management in Finance and Economics from Northwestern University’s J.L. Kellogg School of Management, and a J.D. from DePaul University’s School of Law.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Cerny brings to our board of directors extensive accounting and financial experience and expertise. He is also an experienced investor, including lending, structuring and workouts which makes him an asset to our board of directors. The breadth of his background and experience enables Mr. Cerny to provide unique insight into our strategic process and into the management of our investment portfolio.
|
|
Our Current Directors
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director or Nominee for Director(4)
|
Independent Directors
|
Mr. Cresci and Ms. Healy are considered independent for purposes of the 1940 Act.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships
|
Robert J. Cresci(1)(2)(3)
|
74
|
2011
|
Mr. Cresci has been a managing director of Pecks Management Partners Ltd., an investment management firm, since 1990. He currently serves on the boards of j2 Global, Inc., Luminex Corporation, CIM Commercial Trust Corporation, Presbia PLC and Hancock Park, another BDC managed by OFS Advisor. Mr. Cresci holds an undergraduate degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point and an M.B.A. in Finance from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business. Mr. Cresci’s term as a Class II director will expire in 2020.
Mr. Cresci, the chair of our nominating and corporate governance committee, has broad experience in investment strategies, accounting issues and public company matters. His experience on the board of directors of other public companies and his insight on financial and operational issues are particularly valuable to our board of directors.
|
2
|
Elaine E. Healy(1)(2)(3)
|
55
|
2011
|
Ms. Healy is a co-founder and Managing Partner of NexGen Venture Partners, LLC, dba Aura Wireless, a provider of carrier grade, metro-wide Wi-Fi services. Prior to co-founding NexGen, Ms. Healy was a co-founder, president and chief operating officer of Accel Networks, LLC, a fixed cellular wireless broadband service provider founded in November 2002 and acquired in June 2015. She is a senior executive with a broad investment background investing in operating companies ranging from start-ups to emerging growth to publicly traded entities and serving as a director of companies in a wide range of industries prior to becoming an entrepreneur. Throughout her career, she has participated in or been responsible for the periodic valuation of both debt and equity portfolios. Ms. Healy graduated from The Florida State University in 1984 with a Bachelor of Science in Finance. Ms. Healy’s term as a Class I director will expire in 2019.
Ms. Healy, the chair of our compensation committee, has vast experience in the financial and operational aspects of complex businesses, and her skills gained through service as a president and chief operating officer is essential to our board of directors. She brings to our board a unique perspective on a wide range of investment vehicles, including closed-end funds, SBICs, business development companies and both limited and general partnerships. Ms. Healy’s background has enabled her to cultivate an enhanced understanding of operations and strategy with an added layer of risk management experience that is an important aspect of the composition of our board of directors.
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Current Directors (Continued)
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director or Nominee for Director(4)
|
Interested Director
|
Mr. Rashid is an interested person, as defined in the 1940 Act, due to his position as an officer of OFS Capital.
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships
|
Bilal Rashid
|
47
|
2010
|
Mr. Rashid has served as our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since 2014. He is also Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hancock Park and OFS Credit, President and a Senior Managing Director of OFSC and OFS Advisor, Chief Executive Officer of OFSAM, and a member of OFSAM’s investment and executive committees. Prior to joining OFSC in 2008, Mr. Rashid was a managing director in the global markets and investment banking division at Merrill Lynch. Mr. Rashid has more than 20 years of experience in investment banking, debt capital markets and investing as it relates to structured credit and corporate credit. Over the years, he has advised and arranged financing for investment management companies and commercial finance companies including business development companies. Before joining Merrill Lynch in 2005, he was a vice president at Natixis Capital Markets, which he joined as part of a large team move from Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”). Mr. Rashid’s term as a Class II director will expire in 2020.
Prior to CIBC, he worked as an investment analyst in the project finance area at the International Finance Corporation, which is part of the World Bank. Prior to that, Mr. Rashid was a financial analyst at Lehman Brothers. Mr. Rashid has a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and an MBA from Columbia University.
Through his years of work in investment banking, capital markets and in sourcing, leading and managing investments, Mr. Rashid has developed expertise and skills that are relevant to understanding the risks and opportunities that OFS Capital faces and which are critical to implementing our strategic goals and evaluating our operational performance.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Member of the Audit Committee.
|
(2) Member of the Compensation Committee.
|
(3) Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
|
(4) The "Fund Complex" includes the Company, Hancock Park Corporate Income, Inc. and OFS Credit Company, Inc.
|
No director or executive officer is related by blood, marriage or adoption to any other director or officer. No arrangements or understandings exist between any director or person nominated for election as a director and any other person pursuant to which such person is to be selected as a director or nominee for election as a director.
For information relating to shares of our common stock owned by each of our directors, see the disclosure set forth under the headings “Fiscal 2017 Director Compensation” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”
Required Vote
Each director nominee shall be elected by a plurality of all the votes present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting of stockholders duly called and at which a quorum is present. Each share may be voted for each director nominee. Votes that are withheld will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
General
We believe that good corporate governance is important to ensure that OFS Capital is managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. During the past year, we have continued to review our corporate governance policies and practices and to compare them to those suggested by various authorities in corporate governance and the practices of other public companies.
This section describes key corporate governance practices that we have adopted. Complete copies of our committee charters, code of business conduct and code of ethics are available in the “Corporate Governance” section of our website at
www.ofscapital.com
. Alternatively, you may request a copy of any of these documents by writing to OFS Capital Corporation,
10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
, attention: Tod K. Reichert, Corporate Secretary, telephone: (847) 734-2000.
Board Determination of Independence
Under applicable Nasdaq rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of our board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Nasdaq Marketplace Rules provide that a director of a business development company, or BDC, shall be considered to be independent if he or she is not an “interested person” of the Company, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act defines an “interested person” to include, among other things, any person who has, or within the past two years had, a material business or professional relationship with us.
Our board of directors has determined that none of Marc Abrams, Robert J. Cresci and Elaine E. Healy, who currently comprise our audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
In determining the independence of the directors listed above, our board of directors also considered each of the statutory requirements, polices and relationships discussed in “Related-Party Transactions and Certain Relationships” and “Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons.”
Board Meetings and Attendance
Our board of directors met fifteen times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, or Fiscal 2017, either in person or by teleconference. During Fiscal 2017, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of board meetings and the total number of meetings held by all committees on which he or she then served.
Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
All of our directors attended the 2017 annual meeting, and all of our directors are expected to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting.
Board Leadership Structure; Independent Lead Director
Our
board of directors
monitors and performs an oversight role with respect to our business and affairs, including with respect to investment practices and performance, compliance with regulatory requirements and the services, expenses and performance of service providers to us. Among other things, our
board of directors
approves the appointment of our investment adviser and our officers, reviews and monitors the services and activities performed by our investment adviser and our officers, and approves the engagement, and reviews the performance of, our independent registered public accounting firm.
Our board of directors understands that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing board leadership and that given the dynamic and competitive environment in which we operate, the right board leadership structure may vary as circumstances warrant. Consistent with this understanding, the independent directors consider the board’s leadership structure on an annual basis. This consideration includes the pros and cons of alternative leadership structures in light of our operating and governance environment at the time, with the goal of achieving the optimal model for effective oversight of management by the board.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The
board of directors
currently combines the role of Chairman of the Board with the role of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), coupled with a Lead Independent Director position to further strengthen the governance structure. Our
board of directors
believes this provides an efficient and effective leadership model for the Company.
Combining the Chairman and CEO roles fosters clear accountability, effective decision-making and alignment on corporate strategy.
Moreover, the
board of directors
believes that its governance practices provide adequate safeguards against any potential risks that might be associated with having a combined Chairman and CEO.
Specifically:
|
|
•
|
Three
of the five current directors of the Company are independent directors;
|
|
|
•
|
All of the members of the audit committee, compensation committee, and nominating and corporate governance committee and are independent directors;
|
|
|
•
|
The
board of directors
and its committees regularly conduct scheduled meetings in executive session, out of the presence of Mr. Rashid and other members of management;
|
|
|
•
|
The
board of directors
and its committees regularly conduct meetings that specifically include Mr. Rashid; and
|
|
|
•
|
The
board of directors
and its committees remain in close contact with, and receive reports on various aspects of the Company’s management and enterprise risk directly from, the Company’s senior management and independent auditors.
|
Lead Independent Director
The
board of directors
has appointed a Lead Independent Director to provide an additional measure of balance, ensure the board’s independence, and enhance the
board’s
ability to fulfill its management oversight responsibilities. Robert J. Cresci currently serves as the Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director:
|
|
•
|
Presides over all meetings of the directors at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors;
|
|
|
•
|
Works with the Chairman of the Board in the preparation of the agenda for each board meeting and in determining the need for special meetings of the board;
|
|
|
•
|
Frequently consults with the Chairman and CEO about strategic policies;
|
|
|
•
|
Provides the Chairman and CEO with input regarding board meetings;
|
|
|
•
|
Serves as a liaison between the Chairman and CEO and the independent directors;
|
|
|
•
|
Consults with the Chairman and CEO on matters relating to corporate governance and board performance; and
|
|
|
•
|
Otherwise assumes such responsibilities as may be assigned to him by the independent directors.
|
While we currently do not have a policy mandating an independent lead director, the board believes that at this time, having an independent director fulfill the lead director role is the right approach for the Company.
Having a combined Chairman and CEO, coupled with a substantial majority of independent, experienced directors who evaluate the board and themselves at least annually, including a Lead Independent Director with specified responsibilities on behalf of the independent directors, provides the right leadership structure for the Company and is best for the Company and its stockholders at this time.
Board
Meetings and Committees
Our board of directors has established three standing committees — audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance. Our audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees each operate under a charter that has been approved by our board of directors. Current copies of the audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committee charters are posted in the Corporate Governance section of our website located at
www.ofscapital.com
.
Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of each of the board of directors’ standing committees are independent as defined under the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC including, in the case of all members of the audit committee, the independence requirements contemplated by Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.
Audit Committee
The audit committee currently consists, and during Fiscal 2017 consisted, of Marc Abrams, Robert J. Cresci and Elaine E. Healy. Mr. Abrams chaired the audit committee during Fiscal 2017 and continues to do so currently. The audit committee held seventeen meetings in Fiscal 2017. It is anticipated that Mr. Abrams, if re-elected to the board of directors by our stockholders, and Mr. Cresci and Ms. Healy, will continue to serve on the audit committee in
2018. No member of the audit committee is an “interested person” of the Company, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Our audit committee’s responsibilities include:
|
|
•
|
appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
•
|
overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, including through the receipt and consideration of certain reports from such firm;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing and discussing with management our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures;
|
|
|
•
|
monitoring our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
|
|
|
•
|
discussing our risk management processes and procedures, as discussed below under the heading “Board of Directors Role in Risk Oversight”;
|
|
|
•
|
establishing policies regarding hiring employees from the independent registered public accounting firm and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting related complaints and concerns;
|
|
|
•
|
meeting independently with our independent registered public accounting firm and management;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing and approving or ratifying any related person transactions; and
|
|
|
•
|
preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules (which is included on page 20 of this proxy statement).
|
Our board of directors has determined that each of Ms. Healy and Messrs. Abrams and Cresci is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules.
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee currently consists, and during Fiscal 2017 consisted, of Marc Abrams, Robert J. Cresci and Elaine E. Healy. Ms. Healy chaired the compensation committee during Fiscal 2017 and continues to do so currently. The compensation committee held two meetings in Fiscal 2017. It is anticipated that Mr. Abrams, if re-elected to the board of directors by our stockholders, and Mr. Cresci and Ms. Healy, will continue to serve on the compensation committee in 2018. No member of the compensation committee is an “interested person” of the Company, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Our compensation committee’s responsibilities include:
|
|
•
|
reviewing and approving the reimbursement by the Company of the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Compliance Officer; and
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing and recommending for approval by the board of directors the compensation, if any, paid to directors that are not “interested persons” of the Company as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
|
Currently none of the Company’s executive officers are directly compensated by the Company. However, the Company reimburses its administrator for the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the administrator in performing its obligations under an administration agreement, including an allocable share of the compensation of certain of the Company’s executive officers with finance and compliance responsibilities.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee currently consists, and during Fiscal 2017 consisted, of Marc Abrams, Robert J. Cresci and Elaine E. Healy. Mr. Cresci chaired the nominating and corporate governance committee during Fiscal 2017 and continues to do so currently. The nominating and corporate governance committee held two meetings in Fiscal 2017. It is anticipated that Mr. Abrams, if re-elected to the board of directors by our stockholders, and Mr. Cresci and Ms. Healy, will continue to serve on the nominating and corporate governance committee in 2018. No member of the nominating and corporate governance committee is an “interested person” of the Company, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Our nominating and corporate governance committee’s responsibilities include:
|
|
•
|
identifying individuals qualified to become board members;
|
|
|
•
|
recommending to the board of directors the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each of the board’s committees;
|
|
|
•
|
reviewing and making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to management succession planning; and
|
|
|
•
|
overseeing an annual evaluation of the board of directors.
|
The processes and procedures followed by our nominating and corporate governance committee in identifying and evaluating director candidates are described below under the heading “Director Nomination Process, Including Diversity Considerations.”
Board of Directors Role in Risk Oversight
Our management team has the primary responsibility for risk management and must develop appropriate processes and procedures to identify, manage and mitigate risks. Our board, through its oversight role, supervises our risk management activities to ensure that the risk management processes designed and implemented by our executives are adapted to, and integrated with, the board’s corporate strategy, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, functioning as directed and that necessary steps are taken to foster a culture of risk-adjusted decision-making throughout the enterprise.
A fundamental part of risk management is not only understanding the risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the company. The involvement of the full board of directors in setting our business strategy is a key part of its assessment of management’s appetite for risk and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for us. Through dedicated sessions focusing entirely on corporate strategy, the full board reviews in detail the company’s short- and long-term strategies, including consideration of significant risks facing the Company and their potential impact.
Our
board performs its risk oversight function primarily through: (i) its standing committees, which report to the entire board and are
comprised
solely of independent directors; and (ii) active monitoring of our chief compliance officer and our compliance policies and procedures. For example, management of cybersecurity risks is the responsibility of the full board. Oversight of other risks is delegated to specific committees.
Oversight
of our investment activities extends to oversight of the risk management processes employed by OFS Advisor as part of its day-to-day management of our investment activities. The board anticipates reviewing risk management processes at both regular and special board meetings throughout the year, consulting with appropriate
representatives
of OFS Advisor, as necessary, and periodically requesting the production of risk management reports or presentations. The goal of the board’s risk oversight function is to ensure that the risks associated with our investment activities are accurately identified, thoroughly investigated and responsibly addressed. Investors should note, however, that the board’s oversight function cannot eliminate all risks or ensure that particular events do not adversely affect the value of investments.
We believe that our approach to risk oversight, as described above, optimizes our ability to assess inter-relationships among the various risks, make informed cost-benefit decisions and approach emerging risks in a proactive manner for the Company. We also believe that our risk structure complements our current board leadership structure, as it allows our independent directors, through the three fully independent board committees and otherwise, to exercise oversight of the actions of management in identifying risks and implementing risk management policies and controls.
We believe that the role of our board in risk oversight is effective and appropriate given the extensive regulation to which
we
are already subject as a BDC. As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements that control the levels of risk in our business and operations. For example, we are limited in our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates, including investing in any portfolio company in which one of our affiliates currently has an investment.
Director Nomination Process, Including Diversity Considerations
The process followed by our nominating and corporate governance committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requests to board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by members of the nominating and corporate governance committee and other members of the board of directors, as applicable.
In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for inclusion in the board’s slate of recommended director nominees, the nominating and corporate governance committee applies the criteria included in its charter. These criteria include the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, knowledge of our business and industry, experience, diligence, conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The nominating and corporate governance committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee.
We believe that our directors and nominees have an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, attributes, skills and expertise required for our board as a whole and that we have sufficient independent directors to comply with applicable law and regulations. We believe that our directors have a broad range of personal and professional characteristics, including: leadership; management ability; financial experience; the ability to act with
integrity and sound judgment; the capacity to demonstrate innovative thinking, consider strategic proposals, assist with the development of our strategic plan and oversee its implementation; the ability to oversee our risk management efforts; and the commitment to preparation for, and attendance at, board and committee meetings.
Our board of directors does not have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, disability, cultural background and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for board membership. We believe diversity is important because a variety of viewpoints contribute to an effective decision-making process.
Stockholders may recommend individuals to the nominating and corporate governance committee for consideration as potential director candidates by submitting their names, together with appropriate biographical information and background materials, to the nominating and corporate governance committee, c/o Tod K. Reichert, Corporate Secretary, OFS Capital Corporation,
10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
. Assuming that appropriate biographical and background material has been provided on a timely basis, the nominating and corporate governance committee will evaluate stockholder-recommended candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as it follows for candidates submitted by others.
Stockholders also have the right under our bylaws to directly nominate director candidates, without any action or recommendation on the part of the nominating and corporate governance committee or our board of directors, by following the procedures set forth under Article I, Section 1,12,
“Advance Notice of Stockholder Nominees for Director and Other Stockholder Proposals,”
in our bylaws and that are described in this proxy statement under the heading “Submission of Stockholder Proposals.”
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to consider the election of one independent director, Marc Abrams, and one interested director, Jeffrey A. Cerny, each of whom is standing for re-election.
Executive Sessions and Communicating with the Board of Directors
The independent directors serving on our board of directors intend to meet in executive sessions at the conclusion of regularly scheduled meetings of the board of directors, and additionally as needed, without the presence of any directors or other persons who are part of the Company’s management. These executive sessions of our board of directors will be presided over by Mr. Cresci, the Company’s Lead Independent Director.
Our board of directors will give appropriate attention to written communications that are submitted by stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. The Chairman of the Board (if an independent director), or the lead director (if one is appointed), or otherwise the chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee, with advice and assistance from the general counsel and chief compliance officer and, if requested, outside legal counsel, is primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and for providing copies of summaries of such communications to the other directors as he or she considers appropriate.
Communications are forwarded to all directors if they relate to important substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that the Chairman of the Board considers to be important for the directors to know. In general, communications relating to corporate governance and corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than communications relating to ordinary business affairs, personal grievances and matters as to which we tend to receive repetitive or duplicative communications.
Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the board of directors should address such communications to the OFS Capital Corporation board of directors, c/o Tod K. Reichert, Corporate Secretary, OFS Capital Corporation,
10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
.
Related-Party Transactions and Certain Relationships
We have entered into agreements with OFS Advisor and its affiliates in which certain members of our senior
management
have ownership and financial interests.
Investment Advisory and Management Agreement
We have entered into an Investment Advisory and Management Agreement with OFS Advisor and will pay OFS Advisor a base management fee and incentive fee. The incentive fee will be computed and paid on income that we may not yet have received in cash. This fee structure may create an incentive for OFS Advisor to invest in certain types of securities. Additionally, we rely on investment professionals from OFS Advisor to assist our board of directors with the valuation of our portfolio investments. OFS Advisor’s base management fee and incentive fee are based on the value of our investments and there may be a conflict of interest when personnel of OFS Advisor are involved in the valuation process for our portfolio investments. In addition, the incentive fee payable by us to OFS Advisor may create an incentive for OFS Advisor to cause us to make more speculative investments or increase our
debt outstanding more than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The base management fee was $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
License Agreement
We have
entered
into a license agreement with OFSAM under which OFSAM grants us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “OFS.”
Administration Agreement
We have entered into an Administration Agreement, pursuant to which OFS Capital Services, LLC (“OFS Services”) furnishes us with office facilities, equipment, necessary software licenses and subscriptions and clerical, bookkeeping
and
record keeping services at such facilities. Under our Administration Agreement, OFS Services performs, or oversees the performance of, our required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records that we are required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and all other reports and materials required to be filed with the SEC or any other regulatory authority. Administration fee expense was $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Staffing Agreements
OFS Advisor is an affiliate of OFSC, with which it has entered into a Staffing and Corporate Services Agreement (the “Staffing Agreement”). Under this agreement, OFSC makes available to OFS Advisor experienced investment professionals and access to the senior investment personnel and other resources of OFSC and its affiliates. The Staffing Agreement provides OFS Advisor with access to deal flow generated by the professionals of OFSC and its affiliates and commits the members of the Advisor Investment Committees (discussed below) to serve in that capacity. OFS Advisor capitalizes on the significant deal origination and sourcing, credit underwriting, due diligence, investment structuring, execution, portfolio management and monitoring experience of OFSC’s investment professionals.
OFSC also has
entered
into a Staffing and Corporate Services Agreement with OFS Services.
Under this agreement, OFS Services makes available to OFSC the administrative resources of OFS Services.
Investment Committees, Investment Allocation and Transactions with Certain Affiliates
OFS Advisor and its affiliates manage other assets and funds, and may manage other entities in the future, including other BDCs, and these other funds and entities may have similar or overlapping investment strategies. OFS Advisor’s Pre-Allocation Investment Committee, CLO Investment Committee and Middle Market Investment Committee, (the “Middle Market Investment Committee”, and collectively, the “Advisor Investment Committees”), are responsible for the overall asset allocation decisions and the evaluation and approval of investments of OFS Advisor’s advisory clients. The Middle Market Investment Committee, which is comprised of Richard Ressler (Chairman), Jeffrey Cerny, Mark Hauser and Bilal Rashid, along with the investment committee for SBIC I LP (the “SBIC Investment Committee”), which is comprised of Mark Hauser, Jeffrey A. Cerny, Tod K. Reichert and Bilal Rashid, is responsible for the evaluation and approval of all the investments made by us directly or through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, as appropriate. The Middle Market Investment Committee and SBIC Investment Committee also determine appropriate investment sizing and implement ongoing monitoring requirements of our investments.
Our senior management, members of the Advisor Investment Committees, including members of the Middle Market Investment Committee, the SBIC Investment Committee and other investment professionals from OFSAM or its other affiliates or may serve as officers, directors or principals of (i) entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do, (ii) entities in which we invest or in which we are considering making an investment or (iii) investment funds or other investment vehicles managed by OFS Advisor or its affiliates.
Through
these and other relationships, these individuals may obtain material non-public information that might restrict our ability to buy or sell the securities of a company under the policies of the Company or applicable law.
Similarly
, OFS Advisor and/or its affiliates have other clients with similar, different or competing investment objectives. In serving in these multiple capacities, they may have obligations to other clients or investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which may not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. An investment opportunity that is suitable for multiple clients of OFS Advisor and its affiliates may not be capable of being shared among some or all of such clients and affiliates due to the limited scale of the opportunity or other factors, including regulatory restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act. There can be no assurance that OFS Advisor’s or its affiliates’ efforts to allocate any particular investment opportunity fairly and equitably among all clients for whom such opportunity is appropriate will result in an allocation of all or part of such opportunity to us. Not all conflicts of interest can be expected to be resolved in our favor. As a result, we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by investment funds, accounts or other investment vehicles managed by OFS Advisor and its affiliates or by members of our investment committees.
Because we have elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act, we are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our independent directors and, in some cases, of the SEC. Those transactions include purchases and sales, and so-called “joint” transactions, in which we and one or more of our affiliates are engaging together in certain types of profit-making activities. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, five percent or more of our outstanding voting securities will be our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act, and we are generally prohibited from engaging in purchases or sales of assets or joint transactions with such affiliates, absent the prior approval of our independent directors. Additionally, without the approval of the SEC, we are prohibited from engaging in purchases or sales of assets or joint transactions with the following affiliated persons: (a) our officers, directors, and employees; (b) OFS Advisor and its affiliates; and (c) OFSAM or its affiliates.
We may, however, invest alongside OFSAM and its affiliates or their respective other clients in certain circumstances where doing so is consistent with current law and SEC staff interpretations. For example, we may invest alongside such accounts consistent with guidance promulgated by the SEC staff permitting us and such other accounts to purchase interests in a single class of privately placed securities so long as certain conditions are met, including that OFS Advisor, acting on our behalf and on behalf of other clients, negotiates no term other than price. Co-investment with such other accounts is not permitted or appropriate under this guidance when there is an opportunity to invest in different securities of the same issuer or where the different investments could be expected to result in a conflict between our interests and those of other accounts. Moreover, except in certain circumstances, this guidance does not permit us to invest in any issuer in which OFSAM and its affiliates or a fund managed by OFSAM or its affiliates has previously invested.
On October 12, 2016, we received exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to co-invest in portfolio companies with certain other funds managed by OFS Advisor (“Affiliated Funds”) in a manner consistent with our investment objective, positions, policies, strategies and restrictions as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors, subject to compliance with certain conditions (the “Order”). Pursuant to the Order, we are generally permitted to co-invest with Affiliated Funds if a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of our independent directors make certain conclusions in connection with a co-investment transaction, including that (1) the terms of the transactions, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to us and our stockholders and do not involve overreaching by us or our stockholders on the part of any person concerned and (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of our stockholders and is consistent with our investment objective and strategies.
OFS Advisor will seek to allocate investment opportunities among eligible accounts in a manner that is fair and equitable over time and consistent with its allocation policy. Under this allocation policy, if OFS Advisor is actively seeking investments for two or more investment vehicles with similar or overlapping investment strategies, an available opportunity will be allocated based on the provisions governing allocations of such investment opportunities under law or in the relevant organizational, offering or similar documents, if any, for such investment vehicles. In the absence of any such provisions, OFS Advisor will consider the following factors and the weight that should be given with respect to each of these factors:
|
|
•
|
investment guidelines and/or restrictions, if any, set forth in the applicable organizational, offering or similar documents for the investment vehicles;
|
|
|
•
|
risk and return profile of the investment vehicles;
|
|
|
•
|
suitability/priority of a particular investment for the investment vehicles;
|
|
|
•
|
if applicable, the targeted position size of the investment for the investment vehicles;
|
|
|
•
|
level of available capital for investment with respect to the investment vehicles;
|
|
|
•
|
total amount of funds committed to the investment vehicles; and
|
|
|
•
|
the age of the investment vehicles and the remaining term of their respective investment periods, if any.
|
In situations where co-investment with other accounts is not permitted or appropriate, OFS Advisor will need to decide which account will proceed with the investment. The decision by OFS Advisor to allocate an opportunity to another entity could cause us to forego an investment opportunity that we otherwise would have made. These restrictions, and similar restrictions that limit our ability to transact business with our officers or directors or their affiliates, may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us.
Code of Business Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to, among others, our executive officers, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as well as every officer, director and employee of the Company. Requests
for
copies should be sent in writing to our Chief Compliance Officer, Mukya S. Porter, at OFS Capital Corporation, 10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct is also available on our website at
www.ofscapital.com.
In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or Nasdaq Global Select Market listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
The audit committee of our board is required to review and approve any transactions with related persons (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and the holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership of our common stock and other equity securities on a Form 3 and reports of changes in such ownership on a Form 4 or Form 5. Officers, directors and 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of copies of Section 16(a) reports furnished to us and representations made to us, we believe that during Fiscal 2017 our officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our common stock timely complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements.
Corporate Governance Documents
We maintain a corporate governance webpage at the "Corporate Governance" link under the "Investor Relations" link at
www.ofscapital.com
Our
Code of Business Conduct and board committee charters are available at our corporate governance webpage at
www.ofscapital.com
and are also available to any stockholder who requests them by writing to
OFS Capital Corporation,
10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
, attention: Tod K. Reichert, Corporate Secretary.
Annual Evaluation
Our
directors perform an evaluation, at least annually, of the effectiveness of the board and its committees. This evaluation includes an annual
questionnaire
and board committee discussion.
Compensation of Officers
None
of our officers receives direct compensation from us. Mr. Rashid, our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Cerny, our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Owen, our Chief Accounting Officer, and Ms. Porter, our Chief Compliance Officer, are paid by OFSC, subject to reimbursement by us, pursuant to the Administration Agreement, for an allocable portion of such compensation for services rendered by such persons to us. To the extent that OFS Services outsources any of its functions under the Administration Agreement to OFSC under the Staffing Agreement, we will pay the fees associated with such functions on a direct basis without profit to OFS Services.
Our Officers
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our current officers as of April 15, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Held Position Since
|
Bilal Rashid
|
47
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
2014
|
Jeffrey A. Cerny
|
55
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
(CFO and Treasurer 2014; Secretary 2011 to 2014)
|
Jeffery S. Owen(1)
|
53
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
2016
|
Mukya S. Porter(2)
|
43
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
2017
|
Tod K. Reichert(3)
|
56
|
Corporate Secretary
|
2017
|
|
|
(1)
|
Jeffery S. Owen
currently serves as the Chief Accounting Officer of OFS Capital, Hancock Park and OFS Credit. Mr. Owen also serves as the Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and Treasurer of OFSC and OFS Advisor. Mr. Owen has over 25 years of experience in public and private accounting. Prior to joining OFSC in November of 2015, Mr. Owen served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Accounting for Northern Trust Corporation. Before joining Northern Trust Corporation in 2010, he held various positions at Aon Corporation, Web Street, Inc., CNA Financial Corporation, and Ernst & Young LLP, a national public accounting firm. Mr. Owen holds a Bachelor of Accountancy from the University of Oklahoma and a Masters of Business Administration, cum laude, from The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Mr. Owen is also a Certified Public Accountant and a CFA charterholder.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Mukya S. Porter
currently serves as the Chief Compliance Officer of OFS Capital, Hancock Park, OFS Credit, OFSC and OFS Advisor, in which capacity she oversees the compliance and risk management functions. Ms. Porter has over 10 years of experience advising investment advisers, investment banks and other financial institutions. Prior to joining OFSC, Ms. Porter served as a Senior Vice President of Compliance at Oaktree Capital Management, an alternative investment adviser, from 2012 to 2016, where she was responsible for oversight of the firm’s code of ethics program and the day-to-day management of an affiliated limited-purpose broker dealer. Prior to Oaktree, Ms. Porter held the position of Vice President and Senior Compliance Officer at Pacific Investment Management Company (“PIMCO”) from 2010 to 2012 and prior to that, from 2004 to 2010, worked, first, as a Vice President in the Legal department at Morgan Stanley Global Wealth Management and, subsequently, as a Vice President of Compliance at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. Ms. Porter received a Bachelor of Science degree, magna cum laude, in Biology from Howard University in 1996 and a J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 2001.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Tod K. Reichert
currently serves as Corporate Secretary of OFS Capital, Hancock Park and OFS Credit and as Managing Director, Legal and Administration and General Counsel of OFS Advisor, in which capacity he oversees the legal and administration functions of the firm. Mr. Reichert has over 20 years of experience as a strategic business partner, providing advice on general corporate governance and transactional matters, with a focus on securities laws, compliance, corporate finance, debt and equity investments, and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining OFS Advisor, Mr. Reichert served as General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of MCG Capital Corporation (NASDAQ: MCGC), managing the legal and compliance departments, overseeing complex litigation, and providing securities law, disclosure and transactional advice to the Board of Directors and senior management team, while serving as a member of the MCG credit committee and SBIC investment committee. Prior to joining MCG, Mr. Reichert worked as an attorney in private practice in New York, Princeton and Boston. Mr. Reichert received his J.D. from the Rutgers University School of Law - Newark and his BFA from the University of North Carolina.
|