Share Name Share Symbol Market Type
Booking Holdings Inc NASDAQ:BKNG NASDAQ Common Stock
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.23 -0.07% 1,706.175 1,704.29 1,706.08 1,739.575 1,701.94 1,720.89 144,352 16:31:00

Supreme Court Eases Trademark Rules for Online Companies -- Update

30/06/2020 6:49pm

Dow Jones News

Historical Stock Chart

From Jun 2020 to Jul 2020

Click Here for more Booking Charts.
By Brent Kendall 

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court gave online companies broad latitude to trademark their website names, rejecting restrictions imposed by the federal government.

The court, in an 8-1 ruling Tuesday, sided with the online travel firm, which had applied to register four trademarks using its name in connection with travel-related services.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office had rejected the marks, on the grounds that "booking" was a generic word that couldn't be trademarked, and adding a .com on the end didn't change the analysis.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the court, said the government's approach was incorrect because the public understands to be a distinctive business, not a generic name for an online travel service.

"Because '' is not a generic name to consumers, it is not generic," she wrote.

The case gained widespread public attention because of the unexpected role it played in Supreme Court history, thanks to the coronavirus pandemic. It was the first case the justices considered by teleconference -- and marked the first time the court ever allowed a live public audio broadcast of its proceedings.

In its Tuesday decision, the court said its ruling didn't mean that every generic .com name would automatically qualify for trademark protections. Consumer perceptions are what matter, Justice Ginsburg said.

The court rejected Patent and Trademark Office arguments that allowing such trademarks would harm competition by deterring rivals from using the word booking as part of their domain names. Other legal doctrines would ensure that can't claim a monopoly on the word booking, the court said.

Justice Stephen Breyer dissented.

"Under the majority's reasoning, many businesses could obtain a trademark by adding '.com' to the generic name of their product (e.g.,,, and so forth)," he wrote. "As the internet grows larger, as more and more firms use it to sell their products, the risk of anticompetitive consequences grows."

Booking Holdings Inc., the parent company of, said the decision was a victory for brand owners and "demonstrates that the U.S. legal system has the capacity to evolve in order to reflect the digital world we are all living in."

A Patent Office spokesman declined to comment.

An array of businesses filed amicus briefs supporting, including,, and, warning that an adverse ruling would have threatened to destabilize billions of dollars in brand investments.

Without trademark protections it would be more difficult to battle counterfeit and fraudulent uses of their names, they said., for example, cited an unaffiliated car dealership that used its name prominently in its signage.

Write to Brent Kendall at


(END) Dow Jones Newswires

June 30, 2020 13:34 ET (17:34 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

1 Year Booking Chart

1 Year Booking Chart

1 Month Booking Chart

1 Month Booking Chart
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V:gb D:20200713 15:46:00