We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invinity Energy Systems Plc | IES | Aquis Stock Exchange | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.50 | -3.33% | 14.50 | 16:29:52 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.00 | 12.50 | 15.25 | 14.50 | 15.00 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 20/1/2025 10:01 by vatnabrekk I have written to Investor Relations on this subject and if I get a response I will copy it here. |
Posted at 27/12/2024 12:06 by kemche However, again, I encourage shareholders to be logical: for a raise of this size - and again, there aren't many out there anymore, so this is a significant accomplishment for that - if there were any real 'balance sheet issues' behind this raise, the discount demanded - no matter how poorly IES has done to date - would have been much, much higher. On the contrary, the evidence we have here disproportionately points to high institutional investor demand on the back of excitement for the company's prospects. |
Posted at 30/10/2024 16:07 by vatnabrekk Perhaps investors have just realised what a good company this is! |
Posted at 11/10/2024 16:29 by yump I often imagine if I had given an investors style presentation to bankers a few years on the trot, to get repeated funding for one of the (loss making in early years) private businesses I had.I think I would have been shown the door by security. We're not here to fund aspirations. |
Posted at 28/9/2024 06:44 by megaman2 There is much evidence that the company and even more so the broker have been dishonest in many areas. Some are blind sided to this and constantly presenting positives that are either very weak or just not reality. Despite zulch going there is no evidence yet that that culture Will change. There is an argument that they are damned if they do and if they dont.eg If they had been more transparent raising £56 mill at 23p was unlikely. Or maybe they have just been very incompetent in areas. Probably both.Hopefully the latter and zulch was the culprit.. eg knowing they needed the new automated system to reduce mistral costs that has only now been ordered was that dishonesty or incompetence? I think they just gave the sales team a Price for mistral that they knew wasnt going to be available on launch & thats the crux of the issue.I see some investors supporting the share they hold like their child who can do no wrong or their favourite football team. Personally i dont see the benefit in that.chanting out things like siemens are Big & spurious positives as the share price tanks they are easily identified. |
Posted at 27/9/2024 08:34 by indiestu Likely we will see a change in reporting to order intake which will be the measure of success of Mistral going forward and the standard reporting method for commercial companies. There is no further value in reporting a speculative pipeline. The product is going to market, it will sell or it will not sell. The company will be successful or go bust. It's a very exciting time for IES investors. |
Posted at 27/9/2024 07:02 by megaman2 No pipeline in iterimsWhat a disgrace... They have gone from rnsing a huge fake pipeline to just not bothering at all.. They cant tell investors what the pipeline is...its vanished... |
Posted at 13/9/2024 07:58 by owenski Some fool on the other thread lost 20k in one day alone, so what do they do, they decide to buy even more, they're now down over 25% on that purchase, good money after bad, makes you wonder how they got the money to waste in the first place. No wonder most so called 'investors' actually lose money. Clueless.The holders from the days of RedT - still holding on - used to quote nonsense like, Schroders - who bought at 160 - did their DD, so that's good enough for us. Look how many so called 'professionals' got caught out here with their so called DD - refer to the VSA podcast. The '150' brigade wont be seeing their money back. |
Posted at 17/4/2024 18:29 by megaman2 I disagree an investor is an entity that invests . Which can include a company and is the most likely inferred party here that's why the rns title has the word strategic investor in it...it's much more likely to be a company than someone with some dough...very slim chanceInstitutional and private investors are both investors for example ...the rns did not say private investor did it ..so why would you get to that conclusion when it's clearly about strategic investors and basic common sense says it will be a company that bring something to the party . It doesn't explicitly rule out an individual but it's a very long shot given the context . What do you think the binding agreements for ...???!!! |
Posted at 15/3/2024 07:44 by megaman2 It's the corrupt ceos and not the shorters that's the problem ..shorters are just a symptom of ramped share prices that many daft ramping individuals help cause ..novice investors roping in other novice investors ....it's always them to first shout shorters when their beloved stock falls often with no evidence or blame the market makers for their own ignorant investment..how often have you seen numpty investors claim.shorters and market makers to blame when actually the company is simply over valued ...often..If many of these director lifestyle companies are not shorted it will ultimately lead to investors losing more money as they will.just end up over priced and still fail... |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
