Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Work Service S.a. LSE:WSE London Ordinary Share PLWRKSR00019 ORD BR PLN0.10
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 55.00p 0 01:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
10.00p 100.00p 55.00p 55.00p 55.00p
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Equity Investment Instruments 0.08 0.40 137.5 9.9

Work Service (WSE) Latest News

Real-Time news about Work Service S.a. (London Stock Exchange): 0 recent articles
More Work Service News
Work Service Takeover Rumours

Work Service (WSE) Share Charts

1 Year Work Service Chart

1 Year Work Service Chart

1 Month Work Service Chart

1 Month Work Service Chart

Intraday Work Service Chart

Intraday Work Service Chart

Work Service (WSE) Discussions and Chat

Work Service Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
19/5/201908:25Western Selection (Investments). NAV 22p. Price Only 16p579
04/12/201417:09Western 2104 AGM resolutions- Vote NO !7
15/11/201418:49New Western Selection90
28/10/201419:18Resolutions for 2014 AGM - Any support ?2
05/3/201412:34Action Group to remove the BOD1

Add a New Thread

Work Service (WSE) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Work Service trades in real-time

Work Service (WSE) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
17/6/2019
09:20
Work Service Daily Update: Work Service S.a. is listed in the Equity Investment Instruments sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker WSE. The last closing price for Work Service was 55p.
Work Service S.a. has a 4 week average price of 0p and a 12 week average price of 0p.
The 1 year high share price is 205p while the 1 year low share price is currently 55p.
There are currently 17,948,022 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 0 shares. The market capitalisation of Work Service S.a. is £9,871,412.10.
17/4/2019
07:30
russman: Bilby makes me cringe. WSE share price performance has been unremarkable considering the "overheads". Just merge LFI & WSE; life would be so much easier. Consolidate their share registers. Its a no-brainer.
15/5/2016
21:13
smithie6: ...Western stake in Bilby now worth 3.8M Or 21p/ Western share. Big % of Western share price.
03/11/2015
00:28
russman: Do not understand the size of today's NBI purchase. Either DC is supporting the share price or he is betting Big. Bought 600k @ 70p Bought 25k @ 206.5 Sold 125k @ 4.55 Sold 200k @ 3.75 Totally confused, he must know the seller. I will wait and see.
02/11/2015
21:14
topvest: WSE just in for 600,000 shares at 70p. Not convinced they should be catching a falling knife to be honest. Hope they have not made another poor call. I'm not going to buy NBI until the share price flattens and we get an update on covenants. That being said WSE should have a better view than most.
24/10/2015
07:22
russman: I clarify NBI. Its share price is currently at the bottom of a steep cliff. "But is he lucky?" asks Mr Bonaparte.
08/8/2015
22:05
coolen: Wonder if Mr Marshall might get closer to his Scandanavian friend ? I'm not a fan of either guy as individuals, but it could be a case of 1+1=3 for the WSE share price. If anyone hears word of that, I might be tempted to buy.
02/3/2014
20:37
smithie6: NAV I think the accounts said 93p + around 3p due to increase of Creston ..maybe -1p due to NBI drop maybe +1p due to SWL increase perhaps around 96p now.....(I havent calculated in detail apart from +3p due to Creston) say 320k at Hartim for the year....with P/E of 10 that's 3.2M 18M shares. say 17p/share gives... 113p/share imo current Western share price is under priced imo noting - large discount to NAV - trend of increasing NAV over last few years - share price underpinned to a degree by share price of NBI (if NBI were to be worth 75p per Western share price then imo Western share price would go to at least 75p or close) even though the performance of the Gen. Portfolio in H1 was....terrible. say 1.5p/share missed...its real money....to shareholders, even if not to the City Rd. crowd.
12/6/2011
12:48
markt: Topvest I hear what you are saying and agree with some of your points..... however the 3% running cost is TOO HIGH imo....and imo can not be justified for WSE. how do the directors spend so much money ??!...they refuse to answer !!. (WSE pays over 40k for office space....but it has no staff !!...it subcontracts the running of WSE to City Group....which also charges it 90k... is WSE paying a high price in order to subisidise the private businesses being run from the same address, there appear to be at least 3 or 4 investment companies being run from the same address....belonging to different people I think incl. D.C.Marshall and Mr Latilla-Campbell (son of director that was on LFI board for 30 years) is the real money being made by these private companies ? while WSE/LFI tread water the company of Latilla Campbell made very high % profit recently...London Finance Corporation Ltd. (not LFI PLC) ==== 'better examples of corporate excess elsewhere' perhaps there are.....but if I am not a shareholder in the other companies then I am not going to devote time to investigate and try to get changes made.... ==== ...part of what I see as the problems with the management of LFI and WSE are what I see as a lack of integrity, transparency and honesty. eg. Mr David C.Marshall writing a resolution of the WSE AGM of 2006 to allow him to use the LFI votes (44% of WSE) to vote on a related party transaction....which the law does not allow....and to intentionally keep it secret from shareholders that a son would be one of the 2 main beneficiaries of the scheme. The other main beneficiary is I assume Mr E.Beale. The company refuses to answer any questions about the Benefit schemes. Performance reqts. are secret. Who has options, secret. ===== I note that the 2006 scheme was put in the AGM when the share price was rising strongly.... if the LFI or WSE share prices ever do well in the future....perhaps we will see new benefit schemes being put in place....(which the shareholders can not stop since the 2 companies are, in my opinion, controlled > 50% by concert parties....such that I have to ask....will normal long term shareholders receive anything ???....such as me who has held shares since 1999/2000 and if we do receive anything maybe our yearly % return taken over 10-15 years will be peanuts while the beneficiaries and Marshall family members may get a good return...in 1 go approx. 1M pounds of free shares may be handed out...and not having to put up hard cash to buy shares. (noting that the D.C.Marshall shareholding in LFI is the same as it was donkeys years ago, and 0 shares in WSE). === If WSE/LFI are being used for personal benefit of directors and/or related parties (especially while keeping it hidden from shareholders !!...by using subsidiaries, whose accounts the PLC shareholders do not receive) then small shareholders need to stand up and make their voices known imo. (for my concerns see past posts....36k car, use of luxury apartment, shares at no cost for a son, no performance targets made public, no justification of high running costs for WSE 250k (but on Plus, cheap).....) === BTW I don't think I have been ranting. the word 'ranting' infers empty shouting, with no facts or content. My posts include real data and real facts, dug out of accounts of subsidiaries. Facts that no one else has posted in the last 20 years of operation of LFI/WSE. I am trying to make these facts visible to all shareholders (if they want to read ADVFN message boards) and to try to obtain changes at WSE/LFI which I think would benefit all WSE/LFI shareholders (greater openess/reporting, integrity etc). Complaints have also been sent to the 'system'/regulators since I think that certain rules have been broken by WSE/LFI. And if the 4% benefit shares can have real performance targets attached then all LFI/WSE shareholders may be 4% richer if the targets are not met. If WSE/LFI outperform over 10-15 years then I would be happy to pay 4% out of the outperformance. But 4% of the shares for free, if provide bad performance (as provided since 1993-1996 for LFI/WSE ) is not correct imo...and shareholders should not tolerate it.
02/5/2011
14:29
markt: Topvest A Mining Pension Fund bt 2.7M shares at 56p in 1996. If add compounded performance at ONLY 6%/year, this gives a value of 106p at Dec 2010. (with dividends this equates to perhaps 8-9%...for shares there needs to be a return higher than inflation, otherwise it is no worth taking the risk) And the WSE share price now is ONLY 37p to sell !! And the WSE share price now is in fact LOWER than the price that that Mining Pension fund paid in 1997, 56p !. 1997 !!!, now it is 2011 !! With this performance in mind, do you think that free shares for 4% of the company is 'correct' ? (you are happy about the 4%, I am not )
02/5/2011
12:56
markt: Summary of WSE and LFI Performance, under the management of D.C.Marshall, Mr Robotham ...and the son of Mr Marshall as one of the 2 main operators of WSE from its active manager City Group PLC. A Mining Pension Fund bt 2.7M shares at 56p in 1996. If add compounded performance at ONLY 6%/year, this gives a value of 106p at Dec 2010. (with dividends this equates to perhaps 8-9%...for shares there needs to be a return higher than inflation, otherwise it is no worth taking the risk) And the WSE share price now is ONLY 37p to sell !! And the WSE share price now is in fact LOWER than the price that that Mining Pension fund paid in 1997, 56p !. 1997 !!!, now it is 2011 !! ie. bad performance. A bad investment. Conclusion. The historic performance data from 1996 to now shows that WSE/LFI are not good investment managers. And hence that should not receive 4% of the shares of the WSE/LFI at no cost. (some share options to buy would be reasonable....but at a price to reward performance and not to reward inaction and bad performance). (by inaction I refer to the fact that WSE/LFI have not acted in the past to protect the assetts of the shareholders.....they did not sell all the holding MWB at its peak or on the way down (the chance that MWB will ever return to 3 pounds/share is zero in my view, now around 40p), nor Creston, nor Finsbury Food !!....one must ask if they are only interested in operating the company and taking their pay and other benefits and not interested in the share price performance...maybe they are too busy running their own/other companies....maybe that is where they make their personal gains, while WSE/LFI pays their running costs, who knows...).
Work Service share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
WSE
Work Servi..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20190617 12:00:36