Watchstone Share Discussion Threads

[rogthepodge] 28/6/2017 23:02

no

are you Simon?

interesting that your answer wasn't a simple yes or no

don't be shy! yes or no?

[kemche] 28/6/2017 21:43

"rogthepodge" - are you Derek?

[rogthepodge] 28/6/2017 20:26

'kemche' are you Simon perchance?

[kemche] 28/6/2017 20:06

pediment, I am trying to follow the trading of my mentor who posts here. A highly successful share trader who I shan't embarrass by naming.

[pediment] 28/6/2017 14:05

Kemche, tell me you're joking about the 19th averaging down !!!

[lydnem] 28/6/2017 13:59

...You beat me to it!

[bbmsionlypostafter] 28/6/2017 10:12

khitchen
1 Jan '16 - 18:40 - 539 of 3071

so what is the true value of WTG does anyone know, I do not know, can any of you clever fellas help with a clue
...............................
Simon Cawkwell
1 Jan '16 - 19:20 - 540 of 3071

khitchen,

My guess is upwards of 500p. This litigation conceived by My Legal Friend is balloney as far as the share price is concerned.

When? End December 2016?

SC

[kemche] 28/6/2017 09:27

Simon, You called it well last time and no doubt have called it correctly this time also.

[simon cawkwell] 28/6/2017 09:14

Gentlemen,

I suspect that Tom W has made a mistake over the strength of the S and G claim. I bought WTG again yesterday. It will take time to be resolved but, in due course, the improbable result of cash coming out of WTG will emerge.

Simon Cawkwell

[lydnem] 28/6/2017 06:45

kemche. rogthepodge aka nicky numb nuts also bought SGH at A$8 because TW said to short. !! Thyre about 10 cents now

Some people never learn!

[kemche] 27/6/2017 22:39

Well I am buying more of both - and only because TW said sell. This is my 19th averaging down.

[rogthepodge] 27/6/2017 22:22

Short SGH then Funky. Good luck!

[funkmasterp12] 27/6/2017 21:40

Based on this Rog I'd say there's a very good chance both could go to 0.

[rogthepodge] 27/6/2017 19:07

TW as usual trying to have it both ways

He says WTG = 0p (market seems to have more sense)

He kept telling us that SGH didn't have a hope in Hell (when that suited him) and heading to 0p

His views seem to depend on which day of the week it is, and who he hates on that day

Rather like a toddler or Donald Trump

Hardly the makings of a 'shares guru'

[funkmasterp12] 27/6/2017 12:28

Interesting!

[lydnem] 15/6/2017 20:24

Numb nuts. The share price action suggests otherwise. Thanks for recommending me to buy purple bricks.....I'm now 50p up on my short in a couple of weeks

[rogthepodge] 14/6/2017 15:21

you know how much due diligence SGH said it did. It will be hard to show that
they were duped

I doubt that Beachpoint are stupid

whereas I have no doubts about you Lydnem/ElCapital

[lydnem] 14/6/2017 14:09

SO, numb nuts we know you bought at £6, how much did you sell at? Taking into account the consolidation and special div, how much in percentage terms did you lose?

They cant sell the components off for two reasons. One, they are all losing money and are not attractive but of more importance is the legal action which will prevent them from selling anything

[kemche] 14/6/2017 12:15

I am buying even more!

[rogthepodge] 14/6/2017 10:07

I don't hold WTG you idiot Lydnem/ElCapital. Only SGH and REDD in this sector. But quite possibly there is value in selling the components of WTG.

Don't swallow all the twaddle Mr W feeds you!

[lydnem] 14/6/2017 09:51

Surely you arent calling nicky numb nuts a clueless idiot?

[owenski] 14/6/2017 08:54

I know this share attracted hoards of clueless idiots, but even they started to wake up and see this for the con that it was.

So much for this due dilligence nonsense, if a professional company couldn't see they were buying rubbish then they are fools.

They wont be able to recoup their losses that's for sure, the cash pile here sets to lessen even if it's just through legal costs, apart from the cash pile being steadily eroded by BoD wages and S&G's claims, there isn't really a business here.

Why Beachpoint have sunk money into this dross is a mystery.