![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Swp Grp. | LSE:SWP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B010NX28 | ORD 0.5P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 8.75 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
RNS Number:1789Y SWP Group PLC 30 April 2004 SWP GROUP PLC Interim report for six months ended 31 December 2003 Chairman's Statement Results In our 2003 Annual Report we informed shareholders that trading at the start of the new financial year had been below expectation. Unfortunately, for reasons which we expand upon below, the situation proved to be more serious than we appreciated at the time and our results for the six months to 31 December 2003 make grim reading. Turnover for the period, at #7,843,000 was 16 per cent. lower than in the corresponding period the previous year (#9,333,000) and we recorded an operating loss before exceptional items of #871,000 (2002: #199,000 profit). After taking account of non-operating costs of #234,000 (2002: nil) and net interest costs of #290,000 (2002: #259,000) the loss before taxes amounted to #1,395,000 (2002: #60,000 loss). Fundraising We announced today a Placing and Open Offer which will recapitalise the Company's balance sheet. This fundraising has been partially underwritten and will result in minimum net proceeds of #3,038,645 being received by the Company. Further details of the Placing and Open Offer will be contained in the prospectus and application form that will be sent out to SWP shareholders today. Review of Operations Clearly losses on this scale are both unacceptable and unsustainable and we have moved decisively to address the relevant issues and implement corrective action. Fullflow Group Somewhat surprisingly the major source of the problems was Fullflow Group, for so long the mainstay of the Group. In recent years Fullflow has both expanded the geographical coverage of its rainwater drainage business into France and Spain and also set up a new state-of-the-art fabrication facility at Rotherham under the umbrella of its Plasflow operation. Such moves are not without risk and whilst Fullflow's own management team and we at Group level have endeavoured to manage the various areas of risk to best effect, the fact is that Fullflow's senior management team became overstretched and unable to deal with the demands generated by the new businesses. Coincidentally the company suffered a significant fall in sales revenue, partly due to delays to a number of large projects in the UK, partly to some downward price pressure in the market and partly to shortcomings in the UK project sales operation. By the time the full impact of this sales shortfall percolated through the underperforming management information systems the losses had already escalated to a significant level. At that point a full review of Fullflow's operations was instigated. This resulted in a number of key actions: firstly a substantial redundancy programme was implemented: secondly a new Finance Director was recruited; and thirdly a fundamental restructuring of the Company was put into effect, the aim of which is to reduce the extent to which Fullflow's UK management becomes involved in the European operations whilst at the same time increasing the degree to which the Company's site operations are undertaken by subcontractors rather than Fullflow's own employees. The last change has been implemented through a new arrangement whereby individuals previously employed by the Company now operate as 'affiliates' - independent sub-contractors who undertake work for Fullflow. We are confident that this new way of working will give rise to improved operational efficiency in what is an important facet of the business as well as minimizing Fullflow's exposure to sudden reductions in sales levels. Just as importantly the high standards required of the 'affiliates' will maintain Fullflow's reputation for high quality installation and customer service. Much discussion has taken place about the problems encountered by Fullflow and we are confident that the relevant lessons have been learned. In addition the levels of reporting between Fullflow and the Group have been strengthened and enhanced. The market also appears to be showing signs of improvement with some of the delayed projects moving towards a start date on site. In the UK there is a renewed focus on projects at the quality end of the market where Fullflow's design expertise and service levels are most highly valued. In France progress continues to be made in driving operational efficiencies towards UK levels. In Spain the large Madrid Airport project is drawing to a conclusion and order levels are now picking up which should underwrite satisfactory sales levels in the months ahead. While sales at Plasflow continue to disappoint, it is expected that the recent shortage of available business from the utilities sector should reverse in due course. All in all Fullflow Group remains a quality business with considerable potential for international expansion and shareholders can take some comfort from the fact that the Company's management team is fully committed to restoring the fortunes of the business to where they belong. Crescent of Cambridge Crescent's sales for the period under review were ahead of plan but pressure on margins meant that operating profits failed to reach budget. Generally the market for steel staircases in the UK is highly competitive, its main feature being the proliferation of small fabricators operating out of low-cost premises in parts of the country where labour is readily available and wage rates are lower than the national average. Whilst this type of company is unlikely to be successful in larger and more technically challenging projects they can and do exert a considerable influence at the bread and butter end of the market and the challenge for Crescent is to sharpen its competitive edge to increase its share of this fragmented market. The substantial investment which we have made in new manufacturing plant has had a marked effect on productivity and this ought to enhance Crescent's ability to secure extra sales in this area. Another area that has been targeted for growth is the architectural end of the market where enquiry levels have shown a marked increase in recent months which we are hopeful will be a prelude to additional sales. DRC Polymer Products The frustrations to which we have referred on many previous occasions continued to affect DRC during the period under review. Overall, turnover was lower than in the corresponding period last year with sales into the company's traditional markets, such as portable buildings and the water industry, showing a marked drop. Sales of the new acoustic sheet also fell well short of planned levels. However the UK (and European) distributor has been engaged in a marketing exercise aimed at architects, consultants, house builders and Building Control inspectors and we understand that the material has been specified on several sizeable projects. We remain confident in the long term potential of this product. More encouragingly sales of the material used for fireproofing pipelines in petrochemical installations exhibited a sharp increase and we have been advised that demand will be maintained at this level for the foreseeable future. In addition a partnership agreement is in the process of being signed with a Dutch owned distributor of a specialist waterproofing product and it is expected that this arrangement should provide DRC with a useful overall profit contribution. Current Trading Trading in the third quarter of the year has continued to be difficult. Crescent continues to be profitable but at Fullflow and DRC further losses have been incurred. Future Prospects Whilst we cannot pretend that our results for the first six months are anything other than extremely poor, we believe that the worst is well behind us. The various changes which have been implemented at Fullflow have already had a beneficial effect not only in relation to the size of the overhead but also in terms of management focus. In April alone order intake is expected to be approximately #1.8 million and we are confident that progress is being made. Sales are expected to increase sharply in the summer months and the slimmed down cost structure should mean that, at the very least, Fullflow makes a very positive contribution to Group profits. At Crescent an order book which amounts to more than five months sales should produce healthy sales levels in the months ahead and we expect DRC to post an operating profit in the fourth quarter and to make significant progress thereafter. Overall therefore we believe that the current year should be viewed as something of a watershed in the Group's development. Lessons have been learned and across the Group there is a greater determination than ever before to produce the sort of results to which we aspire and believe we are capable of achieving. Finance The losses which we have sustained during the period under review have had the inevitable impact on the Group's cash flow and there is now an urgent need for the Group to raise additional equity. Full details of the Placing and Open Offer will be contained in a prospectus and application form that will be sent out to shareholders today. R M Muddimer Chairman Enquiries Alan Walker SWP Group Plc 020 7379 7181 (Group Financial Director) Consolidated Profit and Loss Account Six months Six months Year ended ended 31.12.03 ended 31.12.02 30.06.03 #'000 #'000 #'000 Turnover 7,843 9,333 18,359 Operating (loss)/profit before (871) 199 52 exceptional items Net operating expenses - exceptional (234) - (225) items Operating loss (1,105) 199 (173) Net interest payable and similar (290) (259) (541) charges Loss on ordinary activities before (1,395) (60) (714) taxation Taxation - - - Retained loss (1,395) (60) (714) Loss per share-basic (0.41)p (0.02)p (0.21)p -diluted (0.41)p (0.02)p (0.21)p Consolidated Balance Sheet As at As at As at 31.12.03 31.12.02 30.06.03 #'000 #'000 #'000 Fixed assets Intangible assets 35 34 29 Tangible assets 4,217 4,009 4,412 4,252 4,043 4,441 Current assets Stocks 2,693 2,818 2,644 Debtors 4,315 5,209 5,677 7,008 8,027 8,321 Creditors: amounts falling due (9,307) (6,892) (9,653) within one year Net current (liabilities)/assets (2,299) 1,135 (1,332) Total assets less current 1,953 5,178 3,109 liabilities Creditors: amounts falling due 3,165 4,528 2,926 after more than one year Capital and reserves Called up share capital 6,827 6,827 6,827 Share premium account 1,295 1,295 1,295 Capital reserve 41 41 41 Revaluation reserve 691 521 691 Profit and loss account (10,066) (8,034) (8,671) (1,212) 650 183 1,953 5,178 3,109 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement Six months Six months Year ended ended 31.12.03 ended 31.12.02 30.06.03 #'000 #'000 #'000 Net cash flow from operating activities 365 494 503 Returns on investments and servicing of finance Net interest paid (234) (196) (430) Hire purchase interest (56) (24) (72) (290) (220) (502) Investing activities Payments to acquire fixed assets (99) (214) (351) Receipts from sales of tangible fixed 4 21 14 assets (95) (193) (337) Financing Bank loan repayments (250) - (500) Capital element of finance leases and (194) (122) (350) purchase payments (444) (122) (850) Net decrease in cash (464) (41) (1,186) Notes to the Interim Report 1 Financial Information The interim results are unaudited and do not constitute statutory accounts. The comparative information contained in this report for the year ended 30 June 2003 does not constitute the statutory accounts for that financial year. Those accounts have been reported on by the Group's auditor and delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The report of the Auditor was unqualified and did not contain a statement under Section 237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act. 2 Taxation There is no change in the profit and loss account for taxation due to the fact that the Group has sustained losses during the period under review. 3 Loss per share Loss per share is calculated on the basis of shares 341,319,198 (2002: 341,319,198), which is the weighted average of the number of shares in issue during the period. The Company's share options are not dilutive for loss per share calculations because the share options' exercise prices are greater than the current market price. 4 Dividends The Directors are not recommending the payment of an interim dividend. 5 Copies of interim report Copies of the interim report are being circulated to shareholders. Further copies are available from the Company's registered office at SWP Group plc, 4th Floor, Bedford House, 3 Bedford Street, London WC2E 9HD. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange END IR PUUBUCUPCPGB
1 Year SWP Group Chart |
1 Month SWP Group Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions