Plutus Powergen Share Discussion Threads

[marvelman] 22/2/2017 14:09

Agree with you Savvy there does seem to be more than one seller and can quite understand that given the slowness of news associated with this company. Not that many patient investors around and this definately one for the patient investor. The fundementals remain compelling and we will just have to see it out. Regards.

[1savvyinvestor] 22/2/2017 13:54

Apparently I was wrong . Evidence seems to be that it is not one seller. I am as perplexed as anyone but having tried once to engage with Marvin will give up on that experiment . He is at best a schizophrenic and his constant allegations are extremely tiresome. I have not sold and have made the occasional top up purchase as price has been unstable but I have no explanation for current relative weakness

[marvin9] 22/2/2017 13:42

With the amount of votes entered on my earlier poll; its seems no one has confidence in PPG.

The only voter; voted below 2.5 by end of month and he could be right?

[marvin9] 22/2/2017 13:38

Marvel;

If you scroll back to Savvy's posts he assured us he knows who the dumper is and was shocked!

1savvyinvestor - 13 Feb 2017 - 18:28:31 - 3548 of 3637
THE RISING POWER OF PLUTUS POWERGEN - PPG
I know Marvin will hate me for saying this but...don't wait too long! I have today heard who the seller is and it has been someone very positive on this board. I'm disappointed he has behaved in this way. Why not just shut up and sell rather than ramp and sell? Well we all know the answer to that don't we but it is disappointing none the less. Nevertheless I believe we may be nearly clear of the seller so with luck and expected good news to come this should be the low of the pull back. Overall direction of travel still very positive

He also said the selling would stop very soon!

Others have said this main dumper has stopped!

Savvy said the main director wants to speak with me? How does Savvy have so close a contact with the main director?

1savvyinvestor
21 Feb '17 - 11:58 - 1055 of 1082    0   0
Weirdly enough I'm going to comment on this thread . Marvin that last video was actually very interesting. You might be on to something. You have the wrong culprits but possibly are not entirely off the truth in this analysis . Interesting to see the accumulation phase described like that . .......... By the way Tatnal says please contact him if you would like to

aa9 has boasted he has topped up at a perfect timing on every low, and he holds millions of shares.

Look at fact and not would coulda shoulda comments.

This mega seller is still dumping and something smells like dog poo on the bottom of my shoe!

[marvelman] 22/2/2017 12:43

Savvy

As you are feel you know who the main seller is and probably his original holding,do you have any idea how much he has left?....will not expect an answer if it compromises
a confidentiality. Regards.

[1savvyinvestor] 22/2/2017 11:54

Agreed. Intensely frustrating. There were some very strong 500K buys after the cantor announcement on Monday but we need more of those to turn sentiment around. market makers happy to accumulate for the next leg up when they will make all their money. Frightening some holders out here but with genuine operational news sentiment will change.

[marvelman] 22/2/2017 10:56

FFS...when is this guy going to stop

[danyo11] 22/2/2017 09:38

Monty - didn you get anything after Charles as to the progress on construction of sites? One thing I have picked up is it seems that the plan for 200MW of power by end 2017 has been rolled back a little. Now seem to be looking at about 140MW? Cheers.

[marvin9] 22/2/2017 07:31

So where do you all see the share price by the end of the month?

Green Thumbs up for over 2.6

Red Thumbs down for sub 2.50

[nw99] 21/2/2017 16:07

Relaxed have so many shares if they rise thats fine

[1savvyinvestor] 21/2/2017 14:44

Ask up to 2.7 now nw99! Good luck

[montynj] 21/2/2017 13:51

Marvin9 apologies. if u were on these threads a long time u will have got to know that I m not the type to bulls hit about things. I'm a long term holder so I've got nothing to gain by ramping to be honest. ..granted u don't need to trust me but it is the truth...I've been in this stock since the beginning. Anyway apologies again

[marvin9] 21/2/2017 13:46

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm dare I?


I might get told off?

[1savvyinvestor] 21/2/2017 13:25

2.65 is holding firm!!

[1savvyinvestor] 21/2/2017 13:24

I misread the data ; see other thread.

[1savvyinvestor] 21/2/2017 13:22

nw99 - I'll let you know if your 2.6 is offered!!

[1savvyinvestor] 21/2/2017 13:21

Just realised I was misreading Level 2 for a small AIM stock. All I can see is what MMS are prepared to pay to buy stock and what they will sell for. They are looking to sell to traders at 2.65 or higher but will buy from 2.45 to 2.55. 5 Market makers quoting

[marvin9] 21/2/2017 13:06

Interesting Savvy:

1savvyinvestor
21 Feb '17 - 12:33 - 3618 of 3620    1   0
Just paid for level 2 for a month to see whether I can get an idea of what is going on here. Right now there are 5 buy orders between 2.45 and 2.55 all at 100000. There are 5 sell orders of 100000 from 2.65 to 2.8. So it would seem that the bigger trades going on are moment by moment.

[cossie] 21/2/2017 12:48

most likely because the order book is SEAQ run only by market makers. Higher volume stocks will have SETS (where anyone with direct market access can place an order on the book) and SEAQ orders. Your limit order will only be visible to the MMs.

[marvin9] 21/2/2017 12:46

It might surprise you, but what I post has nothing to do with the fall in any share price.

That is all down to 'MM' and scum who wheel and deal at the expense of others.

What you lot need to do is contact PPG and demand an RNS about the latest contract they have won; that should improve the share price, but you wont, you simply blame people like me lol.

[marvin9] 21/2/2017 12:41

PS,

What misleading information have I posted?

Oh yea about the whimpering dog and the mice lol.. Surely you didn't believe that did ya lol????????????

Ps again,
Your the one doing that with no evidence?