Motive Television Share Discussion Threads

[shares188] 22/2/2016 12:04

Tookers lol, I missed that😉

[michaelsadvfn] 22/2/2016 12:00

3 days have gone by since pettgrew posted.

My money is on him having been away with Kay for a long weekend in The Highlands. Isn't that what folk do in the middle of February?

[tookers] 22/2/2016 11:57

shares188 22 Feb'16 - 11:04 - 10735 of 10739 0 0

What happened to the siyaya deal??
Wasn't that deal supposed to generate up to
$5 dollars over the next 3-5 years with payments
being made straight away???

[shares188] 22/2/2016 11:48

Tookers,you seem to think this is funny?

[tookers] 22/2/2016 11:42

5.00 USD = 3.54011 GBP

Only another £177,996.46 needed

[shares188] 22/2/2016 11:31

Tookers well it's enough to pay the £178,000 they needed today

[tookers] 22/2/2016 11:21

$5 dollar won't go far imo

[shares188] 22/2/2016 11:04

What happened to the siyaya deal??
Wasn't that deal supposed to generate up to
$5Million dollars over the next 3-5 years with payments
being made straight away???

[tookers] 22/2/2016 10:12

fyi Giddy up

[tookers] 22/2/2016 10:11

CI one thing you could learn from MTV is to patent & trademark where possible.

[chinese investor] 22/2/2016 09:16

That's one of my lines !
Along with :-

For The Record I've Top Sliced !
Thank Goodness I Accumulated !
Good Start !
Looking Good !
Here we have a current "Micro-Cap" tech stock, that......... !

[pwhite73] 22/2/2016 08:45

tookers

Getting a nomad is not just a question of money today. Even more important now is the corporate state of the company that will determine if they can get a nomad. All of the China fraud companies had money for nomads as did, Daniel Stewart, Quindell and Sefton Resources.

The stock exchange regulators have tightened up on what type of companies nomads can take on. Nomads cannot take on companies who's only real source of income is private investor money and where there is no reasonable chance of them ever making money from their operations. 2016 will see the biggest exodus of companies from the AIM.

must dash

[tookers] 22/2/2016 08:38

Ow can they afford pay for nomad if they can't afford pay CLN holders?
They can't issue more shares to pay for nomad, like. The hare has been well and truly fuct, and not just fuct, proper fuct.

[shares188] 22/2/2016 08:24

Could get another extension!!!

[2magpies] 22/2/2016 08:17

MTV management, as far as I can see, have always been very candid.

The Admission Doc was very clear indeed, to me.

CLN terms were plainly stated.

[shares188] 22/2/2016 08:17

PWhite,why don't you know what contracts they have then?🤓

[pwhite73] 22/2/2016 08:14

KNIGEL

I can't understand why you talk such sense on this BB and such rubbish on LSE.

[knigel] 22/2/2016 08:13

Which company?

[pwhite73] 22/2/2016 08:12

With today being the first of them.

[chinese investor] 22/2/2016 08:09

All I can foresee is a string of positive RNS's stretching well into the summer.

[shares188] 22/2/2016 08:08

I think the company still has legs ,but needs a better
management,I can't see how this would be allowed
to shaft holders and still run this company privately
with the same directors ,if this has failed shareholders
then it needs a new team period,Cln holder could strike
a deal with us on this payment,but it seems like this is
heading towards delisting...

[pwhite73] 22/2/2016 08:06

It is not uncommon for directors to take companies private. However I am reasonably confident it will not happen here. The company does not generate any positive cash flow therefore without private investor money I expect everything to fold.

Who wishes to pick the bones off the carcass would be free to do so but there is nothing here to pick.

shares188

Would you care to divulge what contracts were these?