We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lilly(Eli) | LSE:LEL | London | Ordinary Share | COM STK NPV |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 34.5373 | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Lilly Jane Calloway, 317-651-5870 or ICOS Lacy Fitzpatrick, 425-415-2207 Lilly ICOS LLC (NYSE:LLY)(Nasdaq:ICOS). In a recently published study, 90 percent of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who had previously used Viagra(R) (sildenafil citrate)(1), preferred to continue treatment with Cialis(R) (tadalafil) after treatment with Viagra followed by Cialis 20mg. Another study showed 66 percent of men starting treatment for ED (most with no prior exposure to Viagra) favored Cialis 20mg over Viagra 50mg after four-week treatment intervals with each drug. These two separate studies are published in the November 2003 issue of Clinical Therapeutics(2). Both studies were designed and sponsored by Lilly ICOS LLC, which is marketing Cialis for the treatment of ED.(3) "As a choice of effective and well tolerated oral ED medications becomes available to patients, physicians will actually use patient trial and preference in their clinical practice to determine which treatments to prescribe," said Fred Govier, M.D., Professor of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, and lead investigator of one of the studies. "Patient preference has become an interesting topic of study as treatment options allow doctors to select the medication that best suits the unique needs of each patient and his partner." Switching from Viagra to Cialis in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction -- Methodology and Key Findings The first trial was an open-label study that enrolled men who were already undergoing ED treatment with Viagra at stable doses of up to 100mg for at least six weeks. Patients remained on their dose of Viagra for three weeks after enrolling in the trial and then were switched to treatment with Cialis 20mg for nine weeks after a seven-day washout period(4). They were then given the opportunity to choose their preferred treatment for a six-month extension phase during which they would receive their ED medication of choice free of charge. At this point of the study, 90.5 percent of men chose to receive Cialis, while 9.5 percent opted to receive Viagra (p less than 0.001). The results did not vary significantly between sub-groupings based on age, etiology, duration or severity of ED or presence of common co-morbid conditions. Also, results did not vary based upon Viagra dose at entry, with 90 percent of men on Viagra 50mg and 89 percent of men on Viagra 100mg preferring to switch to Cialis. All men in this multi-country study were treated with Viagra at their previously prescribed stable dose for three weeks after entry into the study and were given dosing instructions consistent with its labelling, noting that Viagra may be effective up to four hours after dosing and that a high fat meal may delay the onset of effect(5). After a one-week washout period, the men were switched to treatment with Cialis 20mg for nine weeks. Every three weeks, the men were provided dosing instructions which indicated the following: Cialis could be effective for up to 24 hours; the duration of effectiveness could allow for flexibility and spontaneity in their sex lives; Cialis could be taken with or without food. Upon conclusion of the Cialis treatment, all men completing the study (n=147) were asked to specify which product they would like to receive during a six-month extension phase, in which patients received their treatment of choice free of charge. While the methodology of the study was designed to mimic everyday clinical practice in many ways, the authors acknowledged that certain aspects of the study design may have had some influence over the outcome, and may limit the ability to generalize the results. Dosing instructions for Viagra were derived from the US and EU package inserts, but Cialis had not yet been approved at the time the study took place. Therefore, dosing instructions for Cialis were derived from previous clinical trial experience. Patients were made aware of the flexibility and spontaneity that could result from Cialis' 24-hour duration of effectiveness, and this may have introduced some bias. In addition, dosing instructions were given at three-week intervals, so men on Cialis received these instructions three times during the Cialis treatment period. Dosing instructions were repeated to overcome the mindset that an ED drug must be taken shortly before anticipated sexual intercourse. It was thought that this mindset might be particularly prevalent in men who had been taking Viagra. The sequence of treatment was such that patients were asked to choose a preferred treatment shortly after completing treatment with Cialis. Finally, Cialis 20mg was used because it was the anticipated starting dose at the time the study began(6). Cialis 20mg is the recommended starting dose in almost half of the countries where it is approved, including Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. The recommended starting dose in Europe is Cialis 10mg. During the treatment phases of the study, side effects occurring in greater than two percent of men taking both Cialis and Viagra were headache (five percent each for Cialis and Viagra), nasal congestion (four percent for Cialis and six percent for Viagra), upset stomach (three percent for Cialis and one percent for Viagra), flushing (three percent for Cialis and seven percent for Viagra) and nasopharyngitis, similar to the common cold (one percent for Cialis and three percent for Viagra). Most side effects were mild or moderate in intensity. Two serious adverse events occurred during the Cialis initiation phase; neither was considered to be related to the study drug. Three patients discontinued use due to adverse events during the Cialis initiation phase. There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events across ED therapies. Patient Preference for Cialis Versus Viagra During ED Treatment Initiation -- Methodology and Key Findings The second study was a head-to-head, randomized double-blind, cross-over study with the aim of evaluating patient preference for ED treatment after initial four-week treatment periods with Cialis 20mg and Viagra 50mg. In the study, 66 percent of men preferred Cialis compared to 34 percent who chose Viagra (p less than 0.001). Preference did not differ significantly between groups based on treatment sequence, duration of ED, or presence of common co-morbid conditions. In this randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose study, 215 men with mild to severe ED between the ages of 18 and 65, who had no experience with Viagra (approximately 85 percent of patients) or very limited experience with Viagra, were randomly divided into two groups and began ED treatment with either Cialis 20mg or Viagra 50mg for four weeks. Those patients randomized to Viagra received dosing instruction consistent with Viagra labelling, and those patients randomized to Cialis received Cialis dosing instructions (similar to those provided in the study described above). Following a one-week washout period, patients were changed to the other ED therapy, along with associated dosing instructions, for four weeks. At the end of this second treatment phase, all patients were assessed using the Treatment Preference Question (TPQ): "Which treatment did you prefer?" As with the study described above, authors recognized the study design may limit the conclusions that can be drawn from the study. Cialis was not yet approved when the study was conducted; therefore the dosing instructions associated with Cialis were derived from clinical trial experience, and references to spontaneity and flexibility that could result from Cialis' duration of effectiveness in these instructions may have introduced bias. This study compared the highest available dose of Cialis, 20mg(7), with the 50mg recommended starting dose of Viagra. The results may have been somewhat different if the highest available dose of Viagra had been used(8). In the study, side effects occurring in greater than two percent of patients were headache (11 percent for Cialis and nine percent for Viagra), upset stomach (six percent for Cialis and four percent for Viagra), nasopharyngitis, similar to the common cold (five percent for Cialis and three percent Viagra), flushing (three percent for Cialis and five percent for Viagra), muscle ache (two percent for Cialis and zero percent for Viagra); and nasal congestion (two percent for Cialis and three percent for Viagra). Most side effects were mild or moderate in intensity. Two patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (one on Cialis, and one on Viagra). One serious adverse event occurred during the Viagra treatment that was considered to be not related to the study drug. There were no significant differences in the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events across these two medications. About ED ED is defined as the consistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse. ED affects an estimated 152 million men and their partners worldwide(9). Up to 80 percent of ED cases are caused by physiological conditions, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes, with psychological factors accounting for the remaining 20 percent. In many cases, however, both psychological and physical factors contribute to the condition(10). Cialis is available in more than 45 countries worldwide, including Europe, Brazil, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand and Saudi Arabia. About Lilly ICOS LLC Lilly ICOS LLC, a joint venture between ICOS Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company, developed tadalafil for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. Eli Lilly and Company, a leading innovation-driven corporation, is developing a growing portfolio of best-in-class pharmaceutical products by applying the latest research from its own worldwide laboratories and from collaborations with eminent scientific organisations. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, Lilly provides answers - through medicines and information - for some of the world's most urgent medical needs. ICOS Corporation is a product-driven company that has expertise in both protein-based and small molecule therapeutics. ICOS combines its capabilities in molecular, cellular and structural biology, high-throughput drug screening, medicinal chemistry and gene expression profiling to develop highly innovative products expected to have significant commercial potential. ICOS applies its integrated approach to erectile dysfunction and other urologic disorders, psoriasis, sepsis and inflammatory diseases. ICOS' strategy targets multiple therapeutic areas with drugs that act through distinct molecular mechanisms, increasing ICOS' opportunities to market breakthrough products. Certain of the matters discussed herein with respect to clinical studies and ICOS and Lilly's products may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry, management beliefs and certain assumptions made by the management. Investors are cautioned that matters subject to forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors discussed in the two companies' respective filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which may affect the business and prospects of the two companies. More specifically, there can be no assurance that this product will achieve commercial success or that competing products will not pre-empt any market opportunity that might exist for the product. (1) Viagra(R) (sildenafil citrate) tablets, Pfizer Inc. (2) Govier F, Potempa A-J, Kaufman J, Denne J, Kovalenko P, Ahuja S. A double-blind, multicenter, crossover study to evaluate patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg versus sildenafil 50 mg during treatment initiation for erectile dysfunction. Clinical Therapeutics 2003; 25 (11): 2709-2723 (3) These studies were not designed to demonstrate nor to compare efficacy of either product. (4) The study was conducted at six sites in Sweden and Italy. (5) Two-thirds of the patients took 50mg Viagra, 8 percent took 25mg, 1 percent took 75mg and 25 percent took 100mg. The starting dose of Viagra is 50mg in most countries, with the option to increase or reduce based on efficacy and tolerability. (6) The number of patients on the highest approved dose of Viagra (100 mg) was capped at 35 percent, consistent with the proportion of patients using this dose in Europe during the twelve-month period prior to commencement of the study. (7) Anticipated at the time to be the starting dose in most countries. (8) These results are, however, consistent with some independent crossover studies to be presented at the European Society of Sexual Medicine meeting November 16-19, 2003. (9) Aytac Ia, McKinlay JB, Krane RJ. The Likely Worldwide Increase in Erectile Dysfunction Between 1995 and 2025 and Some Possible Policy Consequences. BJU Int 1999; 84: 50-56 (10) Impotency Information from NIH. NIH Publication No. 95-3923.1995
1 Year Lilly(Eli) Chart |
1 Month Lilly(Eli) Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions