We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leo Ins | LEO | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 4.25 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 15/3/2014 22:29 by leopold555 I trade QPP been buying at 33/34 and selling at 37/38 I have had a load of profit from it but I look at the price now and think CTP could double, triple, quadruple my money in a short time as QPP did. However QPP would have to get to 75p really quick to double my money now and look at the RNS's that have been out, they are not enough even to make the price go up let alone give a good return? So I would rather have a pile of cash in CTP than QPP. I think investors need RNS's from QPP now to say they have bagged a contract worth 500 million quid but those contracts are thin on the ground. |
Posted at 17/7/2010 10:13 by yohoho Way overcooked. Investors in at 2.25. All hope value above that. Sell. |
Posted at 31/3/2010 10:15 by tara7 Knitcraft you may be right, however if one is going to to take a risk investing in shares then one must go for MAX gain .Investors have just seen the 20M Jarvis go bust, so in my view the trick is to start low. Also buying started here a few days ago and i have yet to find out why.? |
Posted at 31/3/2010 09:23 by tara7 Not gone bust and not delisted and directors have in the past done some very, smart deals for investors in the property boom. |
Posted at 23/2/2010 10:47 by wooly62 tara - it's been around 5 years to get where exactly? After 5 years it's worth diddly squat and there's no evidence that the position in 5 years time will be any different. How many times have you seen statements saying companies are looking to do deals, or they've overcome their difficulties only to find they disappear into the ether? You evaluate the risk as zero? Then why on earth don't you launch a bid for the company - after all, it's mkt cap is less than your home is worth isn't it? Much better to sell that and rent than run the risk of owning a home which can go down in value than to own a stock with zero risk. I do accept that if you can find a 10 bagger it pays for 9 that go wrong, but there is simply nothing to suggest that this is worth 10x current SP, or even current price + anything - it's a total punt. If you want to represent it as such, it would be a justifiable play, but to suggest it's a zero stock which is going to make the sort of returns you're claiming is unwarranted. Investors should do their own research, but some will be swayed by the strength of others arguments. I have no idea if this will fly or crater at some point - and neither do you. |
Posted at 10/2/2010 10:23 by tara7 Pwhite73, you again fail to ask why would the directors do that cos it would stuff themselves .!!! and why are they paying listing fees.???, and why have they not de listed , and why should they not make great profits for investors as in the past. You seem to think i and others are out to con investors, when infact its companies like this that can 10, or 50 bag with a deal. |
Posted at 10/2/2010 01:06 by pwhite73 tara7 - 3 Feb'10 - 14:05 - 305 of 351"Look also at Kenny last week 60k profit in a few days." If you believe that rubbish you'll believe anything. Bought 0.3p x 6,014,553 = £18,043 Sold 1.15 x 6,014,553 = £69,167 - £18043 = £51,124 Well there's £9K missing for a start. You then have to look at the date of MHG announcements. They notified us on 28 Jan 2010 that KR had notified them on 26 Jan 10 of 4.37% stake. So when did he get the chance to pick up 6 mil at 0.3p. The trades show 25 Jan 2010 was a day of active buying. However on that day the first 20 buys would have had to of been his to meet the 0.3p average. The following day 26 Jan 2010 the stock was too high. So all pile into LEO is it. Hopefully some of the stardust will fall onto us. How much of the $60K has he lost in this stock or more to the point how much money have private investors who play 'follow the leader' lost in this stock. tara7 you ought to be ashamed of yourself. |
Posted at 03/2/2010 07:52 by tara7 Kennyruss did make 60k [as he says trades are all up to see.] Not hard to do just buy any stock with stupid low valuation, and wait for action. Both he and i have read up about LEO, and if they make a profit or do a deal investors should do well in my view. With all these tiny stocks one is, working on the basis that out of 10 investments [like Leo] one reduces risk has fun and could make huge profits. Good luck. |
Posted at 02/2/2010 12:33 by tara7 That*S right a hot dog stall pitch is worth more in London. Any profit or any deal will in my view do the job for investors. Seller now gone. |
Posted at 28/1/2010 08:37 by boomorbust lol ramptastic tara. The company has negative assets and hasnt had a positive net asset base for years so it is still worth err negative.The Lipmans havent done very well lately have they and they have made a lot of small investors rather poor lately, havent they. The city knows that this is duff thats why they are rescuing some of the stupid money they put in. Maybe they paid so much because some young city boy thought it was a good idea to follw property and related support services. AGL, its your share of the decade, right you sold out. Thats why you were posting 20+ times a day for months prior to results and have now conspicuous by your abscence. You also obviously dont know how these placements work. The directors will put the money in at a ridiculous low share price to make sure they look after themselves. All other shareholders will be screwed |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
