We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovision Res. | INN | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 34.75 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.75 | 34.75 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 28/4/2007 11:33 by garth With NFC gathering pace and a significant GSM announcement this week it seemed it might be time for a new Innovision thread. Beyond INN and SMRT I'm not aware of too many places British investors can go for NFC exposure. So this is one share that might see growing interest.INN also have a low cost ITSO specified RFID tag and ITSO are looking at NFC to deliver wave and go or tap and go ticketing via mobile phones. As the Concessionary Bus Travel Bill hits in 2008 and ITSO rail ticketing follows in 2009 there should be growing revenue flowing to loss-making Innovision. Do your own research. They are still loss-making are so carry significant risk. But the market cap is not sky-high and they can tend to move quickly.... G. |
Posted at 27/3/2007 12:47 by katylied Yes, the Jewel chip specifically targets low-cost single-use ticketing, mass-transport or otherwise. The oyster-card has been around longer than the jewel chip. It has never been an issue either/or single-use/oyster ticketing. LT's current system has always included both 'day' tickets and 'season' tickets. I doubt that model will change much, in any city frequented by large numbers of transient tourists. Similarly, arena events have always tended far more towards 'day' tickets than 'season' tickets and the whole cost structure of these ticket types, is quite different...And garth... before you start banging on again about INN not being able to compete, please reflect for a moment that at the very outset of this discussion I stated unambiguously, that sales (if any) were already far short of historical investor expectations. That doesn't need speculation... it is fact... |
Posted at 26/3/2007 13:40 by katylied Must confess, I am getting pretty fed-up with this outfit.The consultancy business seems to be doing OK, but the flagship chip Jewel/Topaz product-sales are now well behind historical expectations of investors. This is supposed to be the RFID era, but you have to wonder if INN, have in fact fallen at the first fence?... |
Posted at 07/8/2006 16:10 by bizz2bizz All investors should be made aware of the article in the Sunday Business Newspaper entitled, "stocking up on chips" Bar codes have had their day. B.T, yes B.T's radio frequency ID tagging service can trace every product back to the source and make shortages a thing of the past! Is this the same stuff as INN do? There is no mention of INN just B.T, worrying? |
Posted at 08/5/2006 10:43 by a7009090 THanks for the link to ElectronicsTalk.I'm not too bothered if they don't keep issuing RNS's - it's not the directors job to talk up the share price (although I realise some investors don't agree with that!) With this technology, which has been in development for years, there is a real danger of getting investors over excited, who then complain of the company "not delivering" when contracts or revenues don't appear quickly enough. Just a personal opinion, I'm happy to hold shares for years as long as I feel the company will get there in the end - other investors are more impatient than that! |
Posted at 27/4/2006 10:37 by woodrowman News from 21 Jan...LONDON (AFX) - Innovision Research & Technology PLC has named David Wollen as chief executive officer effective Jan 30 2006. Wollen was until recently the general manager of Mobile Business and Marketing Director of Renesas Technology Europe and a Director of Hitachi Microsystems Ltd. Marc Borrett, the current CEO, who is a founder and major shareholder of the company, becomes Business Development Director. Finance director Mike Wroe has announced his intention not to relocate to Cirencester, which will be the centre of operations in future. Wroe will be leaving the company by the end of 2006 and a replacement will be announced in due course. INN's website still shows Wroe as FD - either he changed his mind & moved, or they're taking their time filling his chair. If the latter, then it can't be helping with the flow of news to investors. Wollen, the new CEO, should have got his feet under the table by now - c'mon David, let's hear something about how the business is doing! |
Posted at 23/3/2006 11:16 by chippy3 i know of two investors who hold nearly a million each in CFDs , that is why they are down so much. I didn't say a MM bought them ( i know they didn't ) all i said was that someone bid low and got them , including the directors ! one of the points i made to the FD in my e-mail was that it would help if the directors actually held some shares. Nice to see they listen to their shareholders although i wouldn't have minded seeing the offer at 30p ! |
Posted at 23/3/2006 10:52 by a7009090 Chippy3: I suspect not. I doubt there is a "best bid" in 1m shares - is a market maker really going to want to have that many shares on his book for INN?Also, who is punting using CFD's in this kind of share? In that volume? My guess (no more than that) would be it is tax related trading since it is close to the year end. A taxable fund (ie not a pension fund) wants to create a loss, so they put 1m shares through the market at 30p, which they buy back at the same price in another fund under their management. A little bit like the bed-and-breakfasting which private investors used to engage in at the end of the tax year, and Gordon Brown tried to stop with the 30 day rule. Even if it wasn't tax related, it would have to be a "negotiated" deal where somebody wanting to sell a large block would get the company broker to call around large funds seeing if somebody wanted to buy the shares. A price is agreed and they are put through the market - but you could never expect to sell so many shares without a buyer being lined up first. |
Posted at 16/3/2006 16:55 by krakow aidypiper, there are two sides to the coin. The surprise is not that it's falling, but that it went so high in the first place, imo. At 150p it was massively overvalued on fundamentals at least. Perhaps investors were expecting an overflowing supply of lucrative contracts. It's all very well having great technology but sooner or later you've got to sell it for hard cash, then the shareprice might respond. |
Posted at 08/2/2006 17:46 by katylied No sells, because (has to be) someone is feeding a line of stock into the market. The MMs know it and are reacting accordingly. The reason for that sale is anyone's guess. Could be the dissappointing 2005 for the Jewel chip, could equally be non related-reasons. Whatever. I recall a similar share-price reaction some years ago with NCH, when some of the original VC investors decided to head for the exist. That took a long time to clear. This situation at INN has already, been going on for quite a while. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
