We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hartstone | LSE:HST | London | Ordinary Share | GB0003703500 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | - | 0.00 | - |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
14/1/2004 08:05 | bid has moved up a little.There was a largish trade of 1.25 mil yesterday | currypata kai | |
12/12/2003 12:41 | thanks .well another 1.74 million looks a bit too much for me. | currypata kai | |
12/12/2003 12:17 | Currypata, I gather there are circa 158 mil shares in circulation so 3% for a notifable interest ie 4.74mil. Not sure though about the procedure for notifying but will be interested to find out as well. Will re-read the accounts over the weekend in more detail, £1.5m market cap does some a bit daft with restructuring underway. | tony14 | |
12/12/2003 09:41 | Hi Tony.Well done.Ive lost quite a bit on RDN before so the rise was welcome.I've now got 3 mil hst so aquiring quite a percentage.I like the risk /reward altho I agree that it will need news .By the way do you know how many shares I would need to get before my holding has to be disclosed by rns.I hold the shares with a nominee broker so I suppose it wouldnt be my responsibility anyway.Could you confirm?.. | currypata kai | |
12/12/2003 09:15 | Curryapata, level 2,1 bid 4 offer, so will need some news/sustained buying to get it going. BTW well done on your recent RDN trade, banked just shy of £6K myself. HST has been on monitor for a while so may take a long position soon. Regards | tony14 | |
12/12/2003 09:05 | do you have level 2 info for this share. | currypata kai | |
12/12/2003 07:59 | "Operating profit before exceptionals - 129,000 stg vs loss 1.83 mln". Looks like good news to me, though we may have to wait six months to reap any reward. They definately aint going bust now and this is as cheap as they'll get IMHO. | alexicacon | |
11/12/2003 19:14 | It looks promising. Bank agreement on 23-Sep but not announced at the time. "On 23 September 2003 the US business agreed with its lenders new banking covenants and a new two year $20 million loan, reducing to $10 million by 31 March 2004. On 23 September 2003 the US business entered into a seven year licensing agreement with the Bennett Footwear Group LLC.." It looks as though HST will survive. As a preference shareholder the loan is good news (see HSTA thread for the pref sums and conversion date). Hambro hold 42% of pref shares and 15.6% ords: "With cash transfers to the UK restricted by the US banks, the Group will not be in a position to pay the preference dividend on 2 January 2004, and the dividends will continue to be rolled up for future payment." Note: "rolled up for future payment" | nod | |
11/12/2003 09:59 | any comments ? | currypata kai | |
11/12/2003 09:58 | 11 December 2003 11 December 2003 (for immediate release) THE HARTSTONE GROUP PLC Announcement of Unaudited Preliminary Results for the six months ended 30 September 2003 * Operating profit before non-recurring and central costs, #0.1 million (2002: loss of #1.8 million) * Non- recurring costs of #2.1 million * Loss before tax of #1.8 million (2002: loss of #2.2 million * Footwear Licensing agreement with Bennett Footwear Group signed in September * Trading in shares transferred to AIM Commenting on the announcement, Hartstone's Chairman, Shaun Dowling said: "The new Footwear Licensing Agreement has reduced working capital and given us a licence income, but we have forfeited the contribution which the footwear division previously made to company overheads. Further overhead savings are being made." PRESS ENQUIRIES The Hartstone Group PLC Tel: 01494 787700 Shaun Dowling, Chairman THE HARTSTONE GROUP PLC Unaudited results for the six months ended 30 September 2003 GROUP RESULTS In the half year to 30 September 2003, The Hartstone Group PLC made an operating profit of #0.1 million, (2002: loss of #1.8 million) before non-recurring costs of #2.1million and central costs of #0.2 million. After net interest payable of #0.3 million and other finance income of #0.6 million, there was a loss before tax of #1.8 million (2002: loss of #2.2 million). The non-recurring costs principally relate to the cost incurred in entering into a new licensing agreement with Bennett Footwear Group LLC and also to the closure of full price stores. The other income of #585,000 arose from winding up a dormant subsidiary pension fund and the taxation charge of #267,000 mainly relates to this income. There was a cash inflow of #3.7 million as stocks were reduced in the USA. Debtors increased by #2.7 million, principally due to the sale of stocks to Bennett Footwear by means of stage payments. ETIENNE AIGNER Etienne Aigner, the principal trading company contributing to group results, had another dismal trading period, as the whole US retail clothing sector remained depressed, particularly in the early months, and our major customers, the department stores, continued to lose business to low price chain stores. Sales in our wholesale footwear division were 22% down on the previous year and sales in our retail stores in the outlet malls were down by 13%. However, our smaller accessory business held up well with a 46% increase in sales, but this was not enough to prevent total sales in US dollars decreasing by 12%. During the period, four of our five full price stores were closed and the last store was closed in October, incurring costs of $0.8 million in the current period. In July I reported that we had been negotiating for several months with a purchaser and his partners to divest the Aigner business and these negotiations were aborted. This was followed immediately by negotiations to license our wholesale footwear business to Bennett Footwear Group LLC which was successfully accomplished on 23 September 2003. DIVIDENDS The group will not be in a position to pay the preference dividend on 2 January 2004 due to the restriction by the US banks on remittances to the UK. AIM The company transferred trading in its ordinary and preference shares from the Official List of the UK Listing Authority to the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange ("AIM") on 10 September 2003. This is a more appropriate and, in certain circumstances, a cheaper market in which to operate for a company of our size. DIRECTORS Mr Christopher H B Mills was appointed as a non-executive group director of The Hartstone Group PLC on 14 October 2003. He is Chief Investment Officer and indirect shareholder of J O Hambro Capital Management Ltd which has a non-beneficial interest in 15.6% of the company's ordinary shares and 42% of its preference shares in issue. FUTURE PROSPECTS The new licensing agreement will obviously have an impact on the Aigner business, and also therefore on The Hartstone Group. The principal change will be a reduction in working capital and bank borrowing, which has enabled Aigner to enter into a new bank agreement. Although Aigner has gained the benefit of a monthly license fee from Bennett Footwear, it has forfeited the contribution which the footwear division previously made to company overheads. As a result, the management structure has been streamlined, staff have been reduced and overhead savings have been made. SHAUN DOWLING Chairman 11December 2003 The Hartstone Group PLC Unaudited group profit and loss account for the six months ended 30 September 2003 6 months 6 months Year 30/09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 Turnover 33,124 40,075 75,080 Cost of sales (20,625) (27,147) (51,718) Gross profit 12,499 12,928 23,362 Net operating expenses (14,614) (14,915) (29,939) Operating profit / (loss) before non-recurring and central costs 129 (1,834) (5,491) Non-recurring costs (Note 3) (2,088) - (725) Central Costs (156) (153) (361) Operating (loss) (2,115) (1,987) (6,577) Net interest (payable)/receivable (Note 4) (318) (215) (464) Other finance income 585 - - (Loss) on ordinary activities before taxation (1,848) (2,202) (7,041) Taxation (267) (50) 75 (Loss) after taxation (2,115) (2,252) (6,966) Dividend on non-equity shares (Note 5) (400) (400) (800) (Loss) for the period transferred from reserves (2,515) (2,652) (7,766) (Loss) per ordinary share (Note 6) Basic and diluted (loss) per ordinary share (1.6)p (1.7)p (4.9)p Adjusted (loss) per ordinary share (0.3)p (1.7)p (4.4)p The Hartstone Group PLC Unaudited consolidated balance sheet at 30 September 2003 Restated See note 2 30/09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 Fixed assets Intangible assets - 35 - Tangible fixed assets 3,135 4,225 3,948 3,135 4,260 3,948 Current assets Stocks 10,742 21,394 18,019 Debtors 11,240 11,238 9,000 Cash at bank and in hand 536 935 1,151 22,518 33,567 28,170 Current liabilities Creditors: Amounts falling due within 1 year (6,354) (4,023) (16,428) Net current assets 16,164 29,544 11,742 Total assets less current liabilities 19,299 33,804 15,690 Creditors: Amounts falling due after more than 1 year (7,659) (13,576) (876) Provisions for liabilities and charges (32) (160) (31) Net assets excluding pension liabilities 11,608 20,068 14,783 Pension liabilities (1,288) (1,719) (1,804) Net assets including pension liabilities 10,320 18,349 12,979 Capital and reserves: Share capital 2,584 2,584 2,584 Capital redemption reserve 329 329 329 Profit and loss account 7,407 15,436 10,066 Shareholders' funds 10,320 18,349 12,979 Shareholders' funds represent: Equity interests 322 8,351 2,981 Non equity interests 9,998 9,998 9,998 10,320 18,349 12,979 The Hartstone Group PLC Unaudited consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended 30 September 2003 6 months 6 months Year 30/09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 Net cash flow from continuing operating activities: Operating (loss) (2,115) (1,987) (6,577) Depreciation charges 451 626 1,032 Amortisation and permanent diminution in value 22 14 59 Impairment of fixed assets - - 607 Other non-cash items (7) - 122 Working capital movement - decrease in stocks 6,624 1,499 4,766 - (increase) / decrease in (2,741) 1,302 3,219 debtors - increase in creditors 1,170 371 775 Net cash inflow from operating activities 3,404 1,825 4,003 Returns on investments and servicing of finance 349 (574) (808) Taxation (189) (148) 62 Capital expenditure and financial investment 164 (611) (1,208) Cash inflow before financing 3,728 492 2,049 Financing - (decrease) in debt (4,318) (1,591) (2,813) (Decrease) in cash in the period (590) (1,099) (764) Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt: 6 months 6 months Year 30/09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 (Decrease) in cash in the period (590) (1,099) (764) Cash outflow from decrease in debt 4,318 1,591 2,813 Change in net debt resulting from cash flows 3,728 492 2,049 Other non cash items - issue costs to be amortised (6) (6) (14) Translation difference 424 1,333 1,301 Movement in net debt in the period 4,146 1,819 3,336 Opening net debt (10,418) (13,754) (13,754) Closing net debt (6,272) (11,935) (10,418) The Hartstone Group PLC Unaudited interim results for the six months ended 30 September 2003 Unaudited statement of total recognised gains and losses Restated See note 2 6 months 6 months Year 30/09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 (Loss) on ordinary activities after taxation (2,115) (2,252) (6,966) Exchange (losses) / gains (578) (2,021) (2,086) Release of deferred tax on exchange gains / (losses) - 400 362 Gain / (loss) on pension assets 434 (926) (1,079) Total recognised (losses)/ gains for the period (2,259) (4,799) (9,769) Prior period adjustment - adoption of FRS 17 (523) Total recognised (losses)/ gains since the last interim (5,322) report Unaudited reconciliation of movements in shareholders' funds Restated See note 2 6 months 6 months Year 30/09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 Total recognised (losses) for the period (2,259) (4,799) (9,769) Dividend on non-equity shares (400) (400) (800) Net (decrease) in shareholders' funds (2,659) (5,199) (10,569) Opening shareholders' funds (originally #24.1 million before deducting prior period adjustment of #0.5 million) 12,979 23,548 23,548 Closing shareholders' funds 10,320 18,349 12,979 The Hartstone Group PLC Notes Note 1: Interim Report This interim report was neither audited nor reviewed by the auditors. The figures for the year to 31 March 2003 were derived from the statutory accounts for that year. The statutory accounts for the year ended 31 March 2003 have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and received an audit report which was unqualified and did not contain statements under s237 (2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985. The interim report was approved by the Board on 9 December 2003. The interim report has been prepared using accounting policies that are consistent with those adopted in the statutory accounts for the year ended 31 March 2003, except for Retirement Benefits. The last actuarial liability valuations were carried out as at 31 March 2003 and have not been updated as at 30 September 2003. Therefore, the net pension liabilities shown in the balance sheet have only been adjusted for the movement in value of the UK and US plan assets and payments made into each plan. Going concern In the statutory accounts for the year ended 31 March 2003 we brought to your attention that the group's principal US operating subsidiary was in breach of its banking covenants which were to be renegotiated and that the board was assessing alternative options to maximise the return to shareholders in the group including the sale and/or licensing of all or part of the US business. On 23 September 2003 the US business agreed with its lenders new banking covenants and a new two year $20 million loan, reducing to $10 million by 31 March 2004. On 23 September 2003 the US business entered into a seven year licensing agreement with the Bennett Footwear Group LLC to license its branded footwear business in return for a royalty fee and also entered into additional supplementary agreements, for varying periods, for both parties to provide additional related services to each other. The directors consider that in preparing these interim accounts they have taken into account all information that could be reasonably expected to be available including forecasts incorporating the effects of the new trading arrangement and they consider that it is appropriate to prepare these accounts on a going concern basis, consistent with the basis of preparation in the statutory accounts for the year ended 31 March 2003. Note 2: Restatement of comparatives The early adoption of FRS 17, Retirement Benefits, in the year ended 31 March 2003 required a change to the accounting treatment of pensions. As a result the prior period results have been restated accordingly as follows: Consolidated balance sheet Creditors due 1 year Liabilities account #000 #000 #000 As previously reported at 30 September 2002 (4,293) - 16,885 Adoption of FRS 17 at 30 September 2002 270 (1,719) (1,449) 30 September 2002 restated (4,023) (1,719) 15,436 The Hartstone Group PLC Notes (continued) The movement of #1.4 million in the profit and loss account in the period ended to 30 September 2002, shown above, represented the movement in the pension plan asset values at that date which have been reflected in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses. Under FRS 17, the difference between the market value of the assets of the group's UK and US defined benefit pension funds and the present value of the accrued pension liabilities is shown as a liability on the balance sheet. Previously, the only balance sheet item recognised was a provision representing the deficit between the market value of the assets and the present value of the liabilities of the US pension scheme which was frozen in 1992. The movement on this deficit has been charged to the profit and loss account in prior years. Note 3: Non-recurring costs Non-recurring costs principally comprise the costs associated with entering into the agreement to license its branded wholesale footwear business amounting to #1.5 million, transaction costs associated with the aborted sale of the US business amounting to #0.1 million and costs associated with the closure of the Full Price division amounting to #0.5 million. In the year to 31 March 2003 non-recurring costs principally comprised the impairment of the Full Price division fixed assets and certain other professional fees. Note 4: Net interest (payable) / receivable 6 months 30/ 6 months Year 09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 Net interest charge - payable on loans and overdrafts (268) (278) (556) - interest receivable 12 104 142 (256) (174) (414) Foreign exchange losses (56) (35) (36) Refinancing costs (6) (6) (14) (318) (215) (464) Note 5: Dividend 6 months 30 6 months Year /09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 Non Equity Shares - preference dividend 4p per preference 400 400 800 share, 2 July 2003 With cash transfers to the UK restricted by the US banks, the Group will not be in a position to pay the preference dividend on 2 January 2004, and the dividends will continue to be rolled up for future payment. The Hartstone Group PLC Notes (continued) Note 6: (Loss) per ordinary share Basic and diluted loss per ordinary share is calculated using a loss of #2.5 million (2002: loss of #2.7 million), after deducting preference dividends, and a weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue of 158,485,711 (2002: 158,484,612). The cumulative, convertible preference shares are anti-dilutive. The adjusted loss per ordinary share is calculated using the basic loss of #2.5 million (#2002: loss of #2.7 million), stated above, and adding back non-recurring costs of #2.1 million (2002: #nil) and using the weighted average number of ordinary shares stated above. This measure shows the loss per share of the underlying business excluding one-off charges for transaction fees, the costs of entering into the footwear licensing agreement and the closure of the Full Price division. Note 7: Analysis of cash and indebtedness 6 months 30 6 months Year /09/03 30/09/02 31/03/03 #000 #000 #000 Secured US bank loans (6,808) (12,870) (11,569) Cash and bank balances 536 935 1,151 (6,272) (11,935) (10,418) Note 8: Taxation The charge principally arises on the income received from the settlement of the David Dixon Pension Fund, which is included in other finance income, and US State taxes. This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange END | currypata kai | |
11/12/2003 09:54 | CAS Hartstone Group : Sees further savings 11-Dec-2003 09:48 Hartstone Group said today that in the six months ended Sep. 30 loss before tax was #1.8m (2002: loss of #2.2m). The new licensing agreement will obviously have an impact on the Aigner business, and also therefore on The Hartstone Group. The principal change will be a reduction in working capital and bank borrowing, which has enabled Aigner to enter into a new bank agreement. Although Aigner has gained the benefit of a monthly license fee from Bennett Footwear, it has forfeited the contribution which the footwear division previously made to company overheads. As a result, the management structure has been streamlined, staff have been reduced and overhead savings have been made. The new Footwear Licensing Agreement has reduced working capital and given us a licence income, but the company has forfeited the contribution which the footwear division previously made to company overheads. Further overhead savings are being made. ICV Edited News from Dow Jones 0948 GMT Dec 11 2003 | maut too | |
09/12/2003 13:52 | just bought another 500k.Have 2,500,000.I reckon it is a good gamble. | currypata kai | |
01/12/2003 00:36 | I have no idea who HENK MARIS VAN HEYST are, but it's good that someone is prepared to invest a 88k. | nod | |
28/11/2003 16:03 | CAS Hartstone Group : Holding in company 28-Nov-2003 16:00 SHAREHOLDER HENK MARIS VAN HEYST Class of security ORDINARY SHARES Date company informed 27 NOVEMBER 2003 Total holding 10,000,000 (6.31%) ICV Edited News from Dow Jones 1600 GMT Nov 28 2003 | maut too | |
14/11/2003 14:16 | Preferential shares are up about 90% in the last 3 months what is the likelyhoood of the ordinaries following suit ????? not by 90% but surely a small rise should be on the cards. All IMHO Sam | sambuca | |
14/11/2003 08:10 | Slight tick up on Level 2 today, also noted the 2 block trades of 3,810,000 and 6,310,00 both @0.88p yesterday. Watching with interest. Regards | tony14 | |
24/10/2003 14:37 | Nod Thanks for putting me right - just read the HSTA thread again - I had previously misread and didn't realise it was redemption at £1. If you can tie cash up for two years, it looks like the prefs are indeed a good bet, even if the 8% payments don't resume (which I presume they will once banking arrangements are settled). I have gone long on ords for now (prepared to wait until next full set of results in July 04 if necessary). It's a gamble and I probably have enough exposure to HST, otherwise would consider some prefs as well. | lombiff | |
23/10/2003 09:32 | Lombiff - you've still not quite got the maths right :) It would need to be a lot more attractive than 8% for Shaun.... As washbrook calculates on HSTA thread - if pref shares are redeemed at par on 31.7.2005 then percentage increase, if you buy at 45p, is 175% (assuming payment of interest). Dowling is already a significant holder of the ords - 6.5 million. Question: would he risk this 108k if he wasn't very sure the prefs were a safe bet? There's no guarantees in this world, but you can't get a stronger pointer to the pref shares than this purchase. | nod | |
23/10/2003 09:05 | Nod - thanks for that - hadn't seen that thread. So with repayment at par in 2005, and with them now priced at par, this is basically a loan from Dowling on which he makes 8% pa. His purchase is a message that we're going to survive, though not necessarily to thrive. Alexicacon - agree that the banks will like the guaranteed income, so going under is unlikely (IMHO) - it's all about how successful they can be in cutting costs. | lombiff | |
22/10/2003 22:51 | MINIMUM Guaranteed royalty payments of $2.5m per year (plus escalation) for seven years, which would make a minimum guaranteed royalty payment of about $3.5m a year after seven years. They have also contracted the use of EA warehousing and distribution for a further $7m over the next 3 years. With this Guaranteed income and a reasonable cutting of costs i can't see HST going under. To me they look under valued with lots of upside, but then what do i know? | alexicacon | |
22/10/2003 22:06 | Lombiff - have a read of the HSTA thread (short) - pref valuation and conversion date is explained. Pref divi payments are more pre-agreed interest payments than variable ord divi payments. Failure to pay pref payments is a breach of terms. Dowlings purchase indicates pref payments will resume. Which was obvious - so long as they don't go bust. | nod | |
21/10/2003 21:51 | If you were aware of or lets say suspected that good news and some kind of recovery was on the way, which option would offer the greatest chance of making a nice bundle? | alexicacon | |
21/10/2003 19:57 | Lombiff - because the pref shares are dead cheap due to the perceived risk of default. Dowling knows that the dividend payment will soon be resumed (once bank arrangements are confirmed). Making pref gains a safer bet than ords. | nod | |
21/10/2003 09:40 | Anyone who understands this kind of stuff care to speculate why Dowling bought preference shares and not ordinaries? I should have thought that the potential upside with ordinaries would have led him to buy these, and I would have been a lot more confident if he had done so. Nevertheless, it does show some confidence, at least in the company's survival as a going concern. But, if we do get wound up, the preference holders will at least get something back - the Ord holders will get squat. This is extremely high risk - I am tempted to have a gamble - the Bennett deal seems to remove a lot of risk and cost from the US operation, but I have to wonder whether your average American, in a jobless recovery, will buy designer shoes, or if they'll stick with cross trainers from Foot Locker. To gamble or not to gamble?? | lombiff |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions