Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Churchill Mining LSE:CHL London Ordinary Share GB00B1318J18 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 37.75p 0.00p 0.00p - - - 0.00 05:00:10
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Financial 0.0 -2.4 -1.7 - 55.66

Churchill Mining Share Discussion Threads

Showing 43001 to 43024 of 43025 messages
Chat Pages: 1721  1720  1719  1718  1717  1716  1715  1714  1713  1712  1711  1710  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/4/2017
14:27
Using inadmissable evidence to change the scope of the hearing is a serious breach of icsid rules.Like theorb mentioned there is possible the likes of Meg Kinnear, Kim Yong and other high ranking officials of icsid may have been involved in this decision.Why would the three world class arbiters taint their reputation?
neo26
27/4/2017
12:59
cheers wulber.
lithological heterogeneities
27/4/2017
12:42
Good find on LSE:I think this applies to us !http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1fb1926f-245b-4162-8848-f19a30101c13&utm_source=Lexology United Kingdom April 25 2017 The court has power, under s.68 of the 1996 Arbitration Act, to set aside or remit an arbitrator's award if there is "serious irregularity" which the court considers has caused, or will cause, "substantial injustice". But what does "serious irregularity" mean? The Act lists the possibilities, one of which is an award obtained by fraud or in a way contrary to public policy. A party to an arbitration deliberately withheld from the arbitrator material that was completely inconsistent with key issues in its case. In the court's view it was highly likely that the correspondence in question would have been material to the outcome of the arbitration, since it was contrary to the party's case. And where the key issue was one that would potentially be affected by the material not put before the arbitrator it followed that the other party suffered a substantial injustice – namely the wrong result. In any event, the arbitrator made a costs order against that party, which must have been affected by the outcome of the application. The court therefore remitted to the arbitrator the parts of the award that were challenged so that he could consider his award in possession of the full facts.
wulber
25/4/2017
22:22
Still trying to understand the unbelievable bias shown by the tribunal in the award decision. Maybe this is partly due to the glaring ICSID conflict of interest pointed out earlier. .. The ex- Managing Director of the World Bank appointed as the Indonesia Finance Minister. Now that is about as fishy as a Grimsby fish market after a record catch. It stinks! !
bdog51
25/4/2017
22:01
IHVA - your choice.
wulber
25/4/2017
21:46
Wulbar USS Carl Vinson and task force approaching waters off Jakarta, awaiting orders from Stephen and Donald! :-) re 27908, nice post, nice to read that, very rare on ADVFN, Stephen will appreciate that I'm sure.
andy
25/4/2017
21:20
Jack... Hence why I filtered him. Shame really as some of the steps he has taken are useful but he doesn't seem to live in the real world and reacts aggressively to anyone who comments about it. I am not here just for his comments so it is all good. Regards IHNC
ihavenoclue
25/4/2017
21:01
JackInteresting link, snippet from linkTo clean up the sector, the government has called in the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), which is leading a sweeping review of mining permits.Kpk has looked into the chl case and they are not looking into no chl figures and nor any ridlatama figures.They have an interest in Noor one can speculate..
neo26
25/4/2017
20:44
Theorb She left the world bank in June 2016 not long before the verdict.There is definitely a conflict of interest here.
neo26
25/4/2017
20:42
Just taken off LSE website, if you want to publicise matters:The Jakarta PostJakarta GlobeBisnis IndonesiaMedia IndonesiaThe Daily Jakarta Shimbun
wulber
25/4/2017
20:38
Jack1236Stephen does have a great input here, but contacting Trump is as useful as a chocolate teapot, but like his spirit.Stephen - please keep posting and no offence meant, sorry. Bit out of character for me.
wulber
25/4/2017
20:21
SRI MULYANI INDRAWATI was Managing Director of the world bank i.e ICSID's creator until 2016, she was then reappointed by Joko Widowo as Finance Minister in the Indonesian government. I can now sleep happy knowing that Indonesia isnt well connected with the world bank and ICSID.
theorb
25/4/2017
20:16
Interesting reading:- hTTp://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesia-clamp-coal-industrys-worst-excesses/
jack1236
25/4/2017
20:05
If you think Stephen has nothing of value to say, then don't read or comment on his posts.
jack1236
25/4/2017
19:50
Lets hope for a repeat.
wulber
25/4/2017
19:29
DW ... great post ... spot on. They wouldn't want to open the floodgates so best to settle with CHL but admit no liability. RoI have settled other claims at quite a high % of original claim :) Regards IHNC
ihavenoclue
25/4/2017
18:59
Daddy, yes I agree.But the political entwined system of ISCID, Washington and the World Bank (and all the counterparts) does worry me!Justice should prevail, but annul decision first.
wulber
25/4/2017
17:54
Wulber, I can't see any other way the ROI can win. The next best thing for them to do would be to settle before the annulment process is complete and get Churchill to agree to stop the process and accept the ROI do not admit liability, whilst paying compensation in the form of buying the company out.If they don't settle and the fraud allegations are annulled, they leave themselves open for further challenges by other companies and if they are found to have been lying in this case, they will be weakened in every case following.Not admitting liability in this case leaves other companies wondering if it is worth the expense of challenging the ROI in the ICSID process.
daddy warbucks
25/4/2017
17:33
If the annulment is rejected the this would be a travesty of justice!
wulber
25/4/2017
17:02
Me too, but didn't get a satisfactory reply.
wulber
25/4/2017
16:43
TheorbIn the past I have contacted Meg and told here about the errors made. She is aware of our case, that's for sure...Very likely top officials been involved in getting to this conclusion. Let's see how strong they fight the annulment..
neo26
25/4/2017
16:41
Point 84 in the Award and also a reference here hTTps://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw6358.pdf
weegeordie
25/4/2017
16:31
JonoNot hard, just go and read the award or scroll past posts..
neo26
25/4/2017
16:25
Does anyone have the snippet of info from the ICSID which states Noor's statement has been struck out, that can paste here?
j0no5
Chat Pages: 1721  1720  1719  1718  1717  1716  1715  1714  1713  1712  1711  1710  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:41 V: D:20170427 14:57:30