We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centurion Ele | CUC | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 1.24 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.24 | 1.24 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 15/1/2008 14:17 by scripophilist Incredible that people can still be bullish on CUC given there history, even more incredible that they come out and say they can't raise capital and they are thinking of delisting and there are still bulls. No wonder private investors do there nuts so easily. |
Posted at 18/11/2007 07:17 by encarter Interesting to see they started advertising a job at the end of October. It indicates that they expect to be around for a while yet.Also i note Investor relations page was updated 26th 0ctober 2007. Get any one tell me what the change was please? |
Posted at 29/8/2007 19:30 by 25cent Ok so you can not be bothered to answer the cash burn question or admit trying to get people to buy this stock right?However I notice you can be bothered to spend hours on this thread propagating hyperspace with basically CUC's official line of what is happening at the company even though only weeks after you started posting such rubbish it was unraveling . Neither it seems can you be bothered to respond to all the facts that I put forward in my Audi post. Erm,one question, how come you can be bothered to follow up my posts with meaningless childish claptrap? surely it would have been easier for you just post £XXXXXX per month would it not? The CUC that you talked about only a few months ago or as you say "Trying to help investors find the bottom" is a complete farcical nonentity and remains no better than an even odds punt red or black at the local casino to survive untill November? The very fact that you talked about CUC in such a way that attempted to demonstrate that it was much misunderstood recover play is completely devoid of any knowledge or common sense, indeed its based on the one fact, that being you think you know best. Again without being rude its turned out that you don't do you? otherwise you would have inserted before all of your CUC\ Rhodes propaganda posts the comment "this is going to run out of funds by October but..... blah blah Audi blah blah blah China blah blah blah " |
Posted at 23/5/2007 18:22 by 2clueless 25Cent,Can you actually read? (It's clear that you can't spell) I haven't ever made any comment about bank debts, investment house's withdrawals or anything. (Actually, Fidelity still hold 8.39%). If you want overnight share value increases, this isn't the stock for you (but being such a guru on the automotive sector you'd know that, wouldn't you?) All I have done (I say again) is point out what the RNS means and try to shed some light on it and interpret it for those not familiar with the sector. I have always answered your ridiculous comments directly, and your response has always been to ignore the facts I've stated and that you've been proved wrong, and try to introduce another comment from left-field - I don't think you've ever come back and answered any question or comment of mine (because you can't without admitting you're wrong). Well, this is probably my last response to you as you clearly know all there is to know about it so I can be no more help. To answer your question, it was Chris Rhodes who said that - BUT because the bank offered support, and then had an about turn and withdrew the facility. He did well to secure the financing he did. As I said before - Chris Rhodes has rescued the company he "inherited" (with the huge 3-4.5Million stock-loss that was legacy from "Dear Mr Powell" & Co) and secured finance to allow it to continue trading. Without that it would have gone bust, people would have been out of work and holders would have lost all (OK, I accept they lost a lot, but they still have some long term hope). The main question is, "Can the finance last long enough for long-lead-time OEM contracts to come on-line, and pay for all the NPD, testing etc. that is required?" If yes, the company will be profitable and show decent returns. If No,then they either try for another round of financing, or go bust. Which would you prefer (if you actually held these). Shares worth 13.5, or nothing? I'm not a "fan", I was not in total agreement when Mr Rhodes took control as I didn't see him as the best man for the job, and his agressive statements during investor roadshows were "surprising". But I'm prepared to give credit where it's due and think he's done a good job with the poor tools he was left with when he started. You can disagree, that's your prerogative, but please don't keep making stupid comments just for the sake of it. |
Posted at 21/4/2006 10:42 by sven2006 could be they granted these to fool investors, then take the money and run - very dodgy looking company. |
Posted at 15/4/2006 15:41 by smiler27 Investors will soon start buying into DMR....a snip at 0.45 pence. |
Posted at 20/2/2006 20:49 by licom Hi Dell,You seem to be making a habit of try to ruffle my feathers:-)) At the risk of repeating myself... I/we have never tipped any company...that is a fact. However, that said, we have extensive research on more than 81 companies in just three years. I am please to say, almost all have been in the money at some stage. Yes, some, including MPS, are showing a loss. We do not hide the facts, we are transparent with our statistics, (which, by the way are intended as guides to our success) and displayed at the following link. In order to save you the trip across cyber: 2005 featured companies include: Average gains of 34% ~Average loss of 5.8%. Alkane Energy, AgCert International, Aminex, Avingtrans, Gaming VC, Goals, Emerald Energy, Equator Exploration, Ideal Shopping, IP2IPO, Intermolly, Minorplanet, NXT, Retail Decisions, themutual, Systemc Healthcare,Toledo Mining, Vanco,York Pharmaceutical, and XAAR. Our dog's also bark: AeroBox -73% and Marchpole, -72% from a previously 120% gain, Gaming VC -38% and SystemC - 34% If you have a problem with these figures or anything related to Lemming Investor, may I respectfully suggest you speak to FSA enforcement officer Tim Dolan, (020 7066 1000) we have been in close contact with Tim to ensure we are within the law, even though we are not regulated. Of course, we do not need to be, as we don't tip, or offer investment advice. Our members are intelligent, seasoned investors. Investor Chronicle and Money Am are in the same boat...they are not FSA regulated. How many investors know that?:-) Kind regards |
Posted at 17/2/2006 08:00 by thinkbig? What was the point in saving the company might as well go bust a bought it off the recivers for a £1 one for the toilet as they have shafted us investors 5000,000 shares wow their will be a world war befoer this gets any were near 20p |
Posted at 29/12/2005 21:30 by alexacj Interesting debate guys......i think that both sides of any investment case should be aired...it is imho human nature for each party (be they a buyer or not a buyer) to "defend" their corner....many shares that have a similar profile to CUC have gone either way....take for example Ashtead....from the depths of ruin at 2p to the heights of nearly £2....there is a success story that many were calling a company ready for administration....bu |
Posted at 30/11/2005 20:27 by fusebox They have too much debt for a low turnover company.They could have suspended the shares to prevent a mass exit in order to raise money via a rights issue at a discount. If they didnt suspend the shares and they collapsed it would have been far more difficult to raise money. It dont look good though. Investors are getting fed up putting up more cash and what with numerous suspensions and new ipos lately its gona be difficult to raise cash. The banks are also getting fed up...they are taking hits with consumers and will be carefull to lend more. I'm sorry for investors but at the end of the day debt is a killer. I'm invested in EKT a small cap with a bright future however the fundamentals are fantastic...with no intangibles and goodwill and no net debt with excelent cash rising. The co is making that much money it dont know what to do with it...so buy backs and an enhanced dividend has been indicated. You pays your money and you takes your choice but avoid heavily debted companies!!! |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
