Blinkx Share Discussion Threads

[barkboo] 11/2/2015 13:30

Jarvis - another good example are trades 102 to 105 inclusive, all timed at 12-46:

25,000 registered sell
545 registered sell
7310 registered sell
17,145 registered buy

The 17,145 registered buy was the only one of the four were the offer dropped to 29p...same price for all transactions, but - had you noticed 103,104,105 conveniently came to 25,000. lol

[nickb] 11/2/2015 13:28

Picked a few more up earlier this AM, feels like a pressure cooker ready to blow past 30p.

[geheimnis2] 11/2/2015 13:18

"I have deleted you so that I never need to see your disrespect to everyone else again, you obvious have a serious problem and you will not take advice from anyone, the way you act here I hope someday you realize that you needed help."


sadly i think safari is spot on re:luloo.

[jarvis4] 11/2/2015 13:17

Look at trades 119 and 121 to see manipulation at its finest.

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 11/2/2015 13:15

Agree with all above posts. Unfortunately, Safari. Leulot will see that post as some kind of achievement. Good luck all.

[quilarvium] 11/2/2015 13:04

Safari he is beyond help!

[jarvis4] 11/2/2015 12:56

LCWA - just adding to what BARKERS has said, my point is that this share price has been subjected to all sorts of shenanigans over many months. "O" trades give the market makers and their clients the flexibility denied them by the SETS system. To what end is, of course, another matter entirely.

[barkboo] 11/2/2015 12:34

LCWA - These are out of hour trades on a daily basis, not standard trades with settlement dates as we know ordinary trades to be.

Imo they are between two or more Market Makers, churned as moody failed trades with no settlement date.

You give me your house for a £1 - I will sell it back to you for 95p, I'll have it again at £1 you have it this time for 105p - I would lay long odds on your house is worth more than a £1 lol

[storminnorman11] 11/2/2015 12:27

to leluot3
I like to view positive and negative posts by everyone, I think in the past some people should have said the share price they thought would go up came crashing down and others that had a negative view were proved right, but the problem for the negative views are they should equally say the new management had decided to turn the company around, even to the decision that they would rename the company when the time was right and still keep the name Blinkx in the background, that is a very bold move to take by any new management, also gathering the different separate parts of the company and joining them into one unit.
All of that takes time, we now know that they started doing that last year, and it can be see by looking at comscore numbers Blinkx is up near the top, and once the other parts are joined into one unit their contribution will be added, making the company go even higher and now squeaky clean it can offer high quality results for its customers, where the big players cannot do that even now.
I tried to be helpful to you LELUOT3 by pointing out you are not giving negative or positive views a chance to be seen by your full page repeat post, all you did was put LOL laughing out loud at a friendly helpful comment I gave you, so your disrespect to someone who tried to help you is treated by contempt in not even letting negative views be seen.
I have deleted you so that I never need to see your disrespect to everyone else again, you obvious have a serious problem and you will not take advice from anyone, the way you act here I hope someday you realize that you needed help.

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 11/2/2015 12:13

Indeed Jarvis. I agree. But you are implying o trades as being murky. In what way is a private investor buying shares murky?

[jarvis4] 11/2/2015 12:01

LCWA - an "O" trade is one which is placed through a market maker as opposed to an "AT" trade which is an automated trade. A "B" trade is broker to broker. The share price is driven by AT trades only. You read into those activities whatever you see fit.

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 11/2/2015 11:48

Jarvis, when a private investor places a trade, does it register as an o trade?

[jarvis4] 11/2/2015 11:46

So, a 100,000 trade goes through at 28.8p when the Buy price is 28.75p and ADVFN have it in the "don't know" column. Mind you, it's another "O" trade so it's placing is academic anyway. Ho hum.

[jarvis4] 11/2/2015 11:16

stocky..not just the psyche. Criminal wrongdoing on an industrial scale by the "masters of the universe" has led everyone up the creek.

[stocky] 11/2/2015 10:32

Good post, Barkboo. There is indeed something wrong in the psyche of the City in comparison to other financial hubs. Robbing your own PIs is not a long term strategy for success.However, we have already sold out our politics to the U.S. So why not everything else. I'm sure, leluot is willing to bend for some Yankee pounding?

[barkboo] 11/2/2015 10:02

Geh - I cold make the list almost endless - those are just BLNX thread authors.

Many of the ADVFN rags that jump from thread to thread with trouble - have the same ip's!

[geheimnis2] 11/2/2015 09:56

lol barky - that's a very short list!

[barkboo] 11/2/2015 09:53

Loopy - you are an idiot! you keep spamming to hide details and positive information on BLNX.

If yourself, JonC, Sikky, were truly genuine about your views, you would post on a negative thread. The balance would give readers a choice.

Instead you post on the best positive BLNX thread, and try to hide any positive view.

I am sure I speak for Digi and the rest of the family, in thanking you for acting in such a stupid manner and persuading those floating voters who to trust.

ADVFN - these guys are doing you more damage!

Here is a list of your fellow BLNX/ADVFN rags - when you here these guys talk, look out for the tattooed fork on their tongue!

dugganjoe, opodio, Smelgys Mum, mambo commando, runningxinxwaves, 1I1I1I, QTop, SmashingGuy, JonC, Zipless, x5jwa, dlku, Barnes Wallace, Chris2601, Smelgys Son. sikhthetech.

[leluot3] 11/2/2015 09:34

In all day again Berkpoooooooooooooooooooo?


The truth is the BOD says nothing and appears to do nothing. Their AGM promises appear to have been for the benefit of the few that attended the meeting - to hoodwink them and send them home!

At best the next statement will say 'in line with expectations' and at worst will talk about more losses and the hope of a turnaround in the summer! The inflection point? Well what was that?
There needs to be evidence that this too was not a smokescreen to save the BOD at the time.

The market does not trust these fools and years of ramping by idiots on this thread has failed to convince anyone that Blinkx is a solid investment.

The institutions have been quitting in large numbers - unlike the lies quilarvium tells.

The next few months should be critical - but whatever the outcome - the rampers here will still shout their blinkered fantasy forecasts to the world. Can you believe that the author of this thread once had Blinkx at £30 by 2014?!!!!!

[barkboo] 11/2/2015 09:17

LCWA - "Nothing wrong with o trades" Those out of hours trades are not exactly normal standard type trades with settlement dates, trust me!

More like Market Makers churn!

[leluot3] 11/2/2015 09:16

The truth is the BOD says nothing and appears to do nothing. Their AGM promises appear to have been for the benefit of the few that attended the meeting - to hoodwink them and send them home!

At best the next statement will say 'in line with expectations' and at worst will talk about more losses and the hope of a turnaround in the summer! The inflection point? Well what was that?
There needs to be evidence that this too was not a smokescreen to save the BOD at the time.

The market does not trust these fools and years of ramping by idiots on this thread has failed to convince anyone that Blinkx is a solid investment.

The institutions have been quitting in large numbers - unlike the lies quilarvium tells.

The next few months should be critical - but whatever the outcome - the rampers here will still shout their blinkered fantasy forecasts to the world. Can you believe that the author of this thread once had Blinkx at £30 by 2014?!!!!!

[leluot3] 11/2/2015 09:15

Barkpooooooooooooooooo

the royal flush

the lies

the scaffoldersq

the lies

FITB

lies

240p

lies


THis tread really NEEDS you

the biggest liar on the thread!


Blinkx - a cunning plan?


Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[leluot3] 11/2/2015 08:57

The truth is the BOD says nothing and appears to do nothing. Their AGM promises appear to have been for the benefit of the few that attended the meeting - to hoodwink them and send them home!

At best the next statement will say 'in line with expectations' and at worst will talk about more losses and the hope of a turnaround in the summer! The inflection point? Well what was that?
There needs to be evidence that this too was not a smokescreen to save the BOD at the time.

The market does not trust these fools and years of ramping by idiots on this thread has failed to convince anyone that Blinkx is a solid investment.

The institutions have been quitting in large numbers - unlike the lies quilarvium tells.

The next few months should be critical - but whatever the outcome - the rampers here will still shout their blinkered fantasy forecasts to the world. Can you believe that the author of this thread once had Blinkx at £30 by 2014?!!!!!

[jonc] 11/2/2015 08:46

Seems to be down.

Normal service has resumed.

How bad aer the full year results?

Very very bad imo